Slashdot Mirror


Leaked Docs Reveal List of 30 Countries Hacked On Orders of FBI Informant Sabu

blottsie writes A Federal Bureau of Investigation informant targeted more than two dozen countries in a series of high-profile cyberattacks in 2012. The names of many of those countries have remained secret, under seal by a court order—until now. A cache of leaked IRC chat logs and other documents obtained by the Daily Dot reveals the 30 countries—including U.S. partners, such as the United Kingdom and Australia—tied to cyberattacks carried out under the direction of Hector Xavier Monsegur, better known as Sabu, who served as an FBI informant at the time of the attacks.

78 comments

  1. Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeat after me, hacking someone in another country is different than hacking that country.

    1. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Likewise, invading and killing citizen(s) of another country is not attacking that country?

      What's your theory of the relationship between a citizen and their country?

    2. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What's your theory of the relationship between a citizen and their country?

      Given the perception of human-generated media, I find more evidence that the latter exists than the former.

    3. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, you would be attacking Mexico. The proper thing to do would be to report the situation to Mexico and work with them for redress by due process of law. That's why we have the notion of "jurisdiction". Doing whatever you wish to, to their citizens, at your personal discretion, is indeed attacking Mexico, both their citizens and their legal system. As well as being murder.

      Are you really trying a "think of the children" justification... on Slashdot?

    4. Re:Repeat after me by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, if I walk outside my door and slap my neighbor, am I attacking my own country?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    5. Re: Repeat after me by aod7br7932 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many of sites attacked in Brasil were goverment sites. Yes thats attacking a country and i hope ma goverment arrest any FBI agente in brazillian soil.

    6. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Technically, yes. Is your neighbor not part of your country? And, your country is likely to respond with force. By what we call "the police".

    7. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they are in Brazillian soil then the arrest is probably too late.

    8. Re:Repeat after me by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Valid. That said, the government needs to be more careful.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    9. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im about to go fuck the us. over and over again. after your country sucks me hard im going to drill it in the ass. your mom is proxy.

    10. Re:Repeat after me by tqk · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me, hacking someone in another country is different than hacking that country.

      Damned [Ll]ibertarians. Sigh.

      Hi. Me too! :-) You ****ing Murricans, you let cash == speech, and now you're suggesting individual actions == $bad_country act of war? Shouldn't you look into who $attacker's boss/paymaster is first?

      [sorry for perlisms, really]

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    11. Re: Repeat after me by tqk · · Score: 0

      Many of sites attacked in Brasil were goverment sites. Yes thats attacking a country ...

      No it's not. Bra[sz]il != Bra[sz]il's political regime, now or ever. Don't think like a nationalistic slave.

      ... and i hope ma goverment arrest any FBI agente in brazillian soil.

      Me too, but I suspect it would be CIA instead (if they're still pulling this !@#$ as they long have; hi Chiquita).

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    12. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self: must send suggestion for the fucking /. beta about all AC topics. Could be really spruce up the boring of beta.

      I was struck by the revelation here that the FBI went outside the US. I thought that was CIA territory.
      Can't wait the day when it will be revealed that the CIA is hacking away its citizens...

    13. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope my country (Brazil) does not arrest any agent (FBI or otherwise) in Brazilian soil. It's meaningless. For starters, we have no secret of any importance to be spied about... we have no plans of "defending" (in the American way) against any of our neighbours and, of course, against more distant countries. Not that we could if we wanted...

      The USA fscked Brazil farmers regarding soy or something and WTO said we should receive 800 million as compensation. The USA didn't pay and we -- yes, we, not the USA -- went to Washington and closed a "deal" to get 300 million, take it or leave it. That's lame at level 99... and yet some fool decided to spy us...

      Spying Brazil is... what should I compare it... probably as boring to the US as watching a soccer game.

      I'd jail the guy not for starting an international crisis -- but just for wasting the taxpayers money.

    14. Re: Repeat after me by tqk · · Score: 0

      I'm drunk. Caveat emptor.

      ... we have no secret of any importance to be spied about...

      Secrets? Ptheh. You have resources. Chiquita running rampant in the Amazon? Who do we bribe?

      Meanwhile, what's "your government" doing? Bulldozing future World Cup venues/poor people's slums/homes?

      [People should read more SciFi.]

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    15. Re: Repeat after me by currently_awake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The legal liability issue is interesting. Since these actions are illegal in those (attacked) countries, and since most of them have extradition treaties with the USA that means members of the FBI should be subject to extradition and trial in those other countries just as they would be if they had been caught (and prosecuted) for breaking American law. Only without the US government covering up or just plain ignoring US law. In theory we might actually see the US government held accountable.

    16. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since there has been a poster here from Brazil I will pick on it. Brazil's official policy is to never extradite a Brazilian national, no matter what the person is accused of or what evidence there is of the crime. The US will therefore apply the rule of reciprocity which mean a US citizen will not be extraditied to Brazil (unless convinient for the US government of course). So Brazil's policies give the US an easy out that they can blame on Brazil. I bet there are usable loopholes for other countries as well, such as whether the other country has laws making it a crime to hack computers in the US, again an application of reciprocity. In the end, no, no one will be extradited.

    17. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, the UK has extradited people at USA request so those FBI agents should be on a plane to England.

    18. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US government held accountable for it's illegal actions... lol...

      Can i buy some drugs from you? You seem to have some awesome ones.

    19. Re: Repeat after me by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      In theory we might actually see the US government held accountable.

      Ahahahahahahahahahah...

      Oh, sorry. For a moment I thought you were serious.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    20. Re: Repeat after me by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      apparently cotton subsidies.

      http://online.wsj.com/articles...

      short and long of it. complaint brought and won by brazil over US cotton subsidies in 2004. penalty of 800 million. Decided to go with 150 million a year.

      Washington stopped paying during sequester last year. Brazil threatened to go to the WTO again, they settled for one more payment of 300 million.

      so by my count that's 1.5 billion ish for an initial fine of 800 million.

    21. Re:Repeat after me by ProfFalcon · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's why a part of your country will file assault charges.

      --
      Simply stating [Citation Needed] does not automatically make you insightful or brilliant.
    22. Re:Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. That would constitute as combative action.

    23. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have some awesome ones.

      lol.

      That almost tops "Hey guys. You wanna smoke some drugs?"

    24. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, the UK has extradited people at USA request so those FBI agents should be on a plane to England.

      No, the logic creates exceptions to avoid performing, not requirements TO perform.

    25. Re: Repeat after me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I (OP) stand corrected, but I've got different numbers today: the USA already had paid ~535 million before they stopped. The original agreed payment was ~865 million.

      We settled things with a 300 million final payment. We lose 30 million and close a gap with a traditionally friend nation. Not lame at all, I find it totally reasonable as a way to end the issue.

      Of course, I was wrong and therefore apologies are in order.

      As a bad excuse, I can say I probably heard half of the news the first time; I don't campaign against Brazil (or the USA, BTW).

  2. FBI hidden agenda by lucm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can spin this any way they want, but the only explanation that makes sense is that they were hoping that this operation would at some point lead them to Assange (who had prior contacts with Sabu). Shame on them.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:FBI hidden agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of the info gathered from these hacks have already been provided to black ops teams who have assassinated the target.

    2. Re:FBI hidden agenda by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can spin this any way they want, but the only explanation that makes sense is that they were hoping that this operation would at some point lead them to Assange (who had prior contacts with Sabu). Shame on them.

      What's really astonishing is they needed to resort to this despite the billions they've sunk into the NSA and their obvious and complete disregard for even the fundamental principles of law and the constitution.

    3. Re:FBI hidden agenda by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      The reality is was all about FBI agents with delusions of grandeur of pursuing 'Anonymous' and breaking open of global network of tens of thousands cyber activists. One giant global 'criminal' fishing expedition, with agents so blinded by the idea of becoming special agent super heroes then ended up breaking laws all over the planet without the permission or legal authority of those countries networks they were hacking.

      This brings to mind the recent US proesecution of four individuals and the claims of hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, so how much damage has the FBI caused. Based on calculations they have submitted themselves perhaps 10 of billions of dollars damage to global computer networks and the companies using and creating them. Tens of billions of dollars damage, now that puts them squarely in the hole of being actively involved in global economic warfare, attempting to damage the economies of other countries by hacking computer networks and but the FBIs own evaluation of economic damage causing billions of dollars of damage.

      This all to entrap a bunch of minors there own inside person, lured into crime, not only drawing them in but providing the tools and the knowledge and selecting the targets, this in of itself a criminal act especially when minors are to be the victims of conniving adults.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:FBI hidden agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, not the children!

    5. Re:FBI hidden agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Suck a dick, you fucking stupid cocksucker. You don't have a FUCKING CLUE what you are talking about. Be comfortable in your beliefs that the only thing the US government is trying to do is illegally spy on Americans.

      If you'd stop sucking the governments dick you might notice that it was a call on results which they should be delivering any year now. Doesn't matter which laws they break, you only break them if in dire need and for direct result. You don't aggravate foreign countries for nothing either.

      So either they like people hating them, their country and fellow citizen or they just can't cope with all the data they got in time to be effective. It appears to be the latter as the invest heavily in data mining reseach. Maybe they should focus on working techniques (less, but focused data gathering) instead of hoping for a solution in the (far) future allowing them to analyze the data in a timely manner.

    6. Re:FBI hidden agenda by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One giant global 'criminal' fishing expedition, with agents so blinded by the idea of becoming special agent super heroes then ended up breaking laws all over the planet without the permission or legal authority of those countries networks they were hacking.

      HAHAHAHA. There's no way that this went down without the blessing of the superiors. None. They knew what they were doing, and they did it on purpose.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:FBI hidden agenda by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind wrinkly old scroat types with no idea at all what computers do, how they work, what networks are, just signing off on crap to make it look like they know what they are doing and why they are doing it. The only really actively corrupt department head looking to create his own power base of extortion and blackmail was the NSA guy and that particular delusion was fully expressed in his egoistic startrek command centre. The rest are just peter principle types who have been promoted beyond their capability. So yeah, blessing in faith not if knowledge and now the the grand coverup of incompetence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  3. Sabu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sabutage? Was the title of this Slashdot post hacked by the FBI as well? :-/

    1. Re:Sabu? by torsmo · · Score: 1
      Ha! The irc logs make it look like it was the work of some 16-year olds:

      (10:05:05 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: @danawhite ceo of ufc.com basically challenging us to hack ufc again
      (10:05:12 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: saying we are terrorists
      (10:05:15 PM) yohoho@jabber.ccc.de: lol
      (10:05:16 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: and we can't hack his shit
      (10:05:20 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?
      q=cache:wpl8k-4wsVMJ:bars.ufc.com/bar/jbs-sports-bar/fl/us/5560/ufc-rio-/%3Frelease%3D1%26profile%3DiPhone+site:ufc.com+mysql&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
      (10:05:27 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: bars.ufc.com got some sqli
      (10:05:30 PM) yohoho@jabber.ccc.de: hack it again? what's the point
      (10:05:43 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: we didn't hack it in the first place
      (10:05:50 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: t was a dns hijack by some other niggas
      (10:05:58 PM) leondavidson@jabber.org/a12dcd98a30c36c2: the point would be the lulz
      (10:06:30 PM) yohoho@jabber.ccc.de: oh right hah

  4. What about Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Considering that Israel spies on the United States more than any other ally, I'm surprised they are not on the list.

    1. Re:What about Israel? by msauve · · Score: 1

      All aid to Israel should have been stopped the first time we caught them red-handed.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:What about Israel? by plover · · Score: 1

      All governments spy on each other, and they have since the invention of espionage. And they all know they all spy on each other, too. They just need to exercise the good sense to not get publicly caught. Not getting caught is getting harder in the digital age, as everyone from airports, customs, trucking, retail, and city infrastructure is beefing up their security. They may suck at it, but it makes hiding invisibly that much harder.

      --
      John
    3. Re:What about Israel? by msauve · · Score: 1

      Your point is that if all your friends jump off a bridge into shallow water, you should too? Or is it that breaking the rules is fine as long as you don't get caught?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:What about Israel? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The sad fact is the government of the USA doesn't have any principles. They always do what's in their short term benefit regardless of long term effects. (ex. the overthrow of the democratic governments of Iran and Iraq, abandoning their ally Syria) So long as Israel can pay off the Americans they upset long enough for them to forget the whole mess the Americans will continue to support them.

    5. Re: What about Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jumping into water does not give you an advantage. Having information and knowing how to use it does. If you give up an advantage as a private citizen you're a fool. If you give up an advantage as a country leader, you are grossly negligent towards your populace.

    6. Re:What about Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only allowed to spy down the chain of command, not up.

    7. Re:What about Israel? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Considering that Israel spies on the United States more than any other ally, I'm surprised they are not on the list.

      Israel is our extra special hand puppet^W^Wfriend and we would never hack them because we own them and we don't need to hack them. They're doing precisely what we pay them for.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re: What about Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go hide yourself in your utilitarist cave.

      If you stop doing wrong things you get many advantages.

    9. Re:What about Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :>

    10. Re:What about Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your point is that if all your friends jump off a bridge into shallow water, you should too?

      Well, yes

      .

    11. Re:What about Israel? by neoritter · · Score: 1

      I don't think you have any principles...

    12. Re:What about Israel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like everyone should cut ties with US? Really? They all spy on eachothers, and apparently it's ok. Because every time someone is caught red handed nothing really happens. So spy away, just try not to get caught.

  5. Who's hidden agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFS deliberately misinterprets this as attacking the countries governments. The FBI was not directing those targets. There's a difference between an agent and an informant.

  6. FBI hidden agenda by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Follow the press and PR. The US was finding and stopping computer issues around the world in public.
    The US was finding out about computer networks around the world.
    Information was flowing back to the US using consumer grade networks and tools found in the wild using the pubic as cover.
    Recall Operation CHAOS (or Operation MHCHAOS) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and COINTELPRO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Just like now domestic groups where needed with liaison services.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  7. What, wait?! by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You mean to tell me that the US doesn't even trust the other Five Eyes nations' spy agencies to be able to do this?*

    *Yes, I know, to get round legal restrictions, it was very normal for the US to spy on the citizens of the other four and to exchange that data for information collected on US citizens by other members of Five Eyes. However, we now know all the agencies DO spy on their own citizens, routinely. So the US can ask GCHQ to wiretap British citizens in Britain, it doesn't need to spy on Britain itself. This behaviour suggests wheels within wheels.

    You mean to tell me that the US isn't all caught up in the US-UK "Special Relationship" stuff?**

    **Most Americans were unaware there even was one and get horribly confused when the British talk about it.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re: What, wait?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a lo-cal story. There's no mention of how Sabu was handled by the FBI. Were they directing Sabu in order to have Hammond et al hack specific servers purposefully, or were the FBI passive recipients of information from Sabu who was coordinating Lulzsec's attacks in accordance with some other agenda? There's a difference between gathering Intel from some guy you have on a string vs pulling the strings to orchestrate international cyber attacks chosen to facilitate the strategic national interests of the U.S. government.

    2. Re: What, wait?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably some combination. Knowing exactly what was said would be pretty damning or not.

    3. Re: What, wait?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "gathering Intel from some guy you have on a string"

      FBI simply cannot be that "innocent". Sabu uploaded to an FBI server. We know that he faced a centence. There is simply no way that he would do anything that would increase his sentence.

      Thus he must have acted in a way that reduced or did not affect his sentence. Any action he did that reduced his sentence is the direct responsibility of the FBI, that much is obvious.

      So the only remaining straw one can cling to in order to make FBI look innocent is that these actions did nto have any effect on his sentence.

      That's ludicrous.

    4. Re:What, wait?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody in the UK thinks it's a special relationship. We know it's all one way traffic and most of us would be happy to cut you guys off, then hack the sh#t out of you, worthless ally.

  8. What, wait?! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    RE 'US doesn't even trust the other Five Eyes nations' spy agencies to be able to do this?*"
    Some data is kept private for 5 Eye political leaders and policy formation over decades or longer.
    Some information needs to be laundered in public in the short term to ensure good public relations spin, good news for sock puppets on social media or new public funding for gov/mil.
    The press finds a new story.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  9. "FBI informant"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the first place, "FBI informant" != "the FBI". It's not really all that surprising that a law-enforcement agency has "informants" who, by their very nature, are likely to be involved in activities that the agency itself would not condone. In other news, "police informants" regularly deal in contraband and stolen goods, and "CIA informants" actually work for foreign governments. Hold the front page!

    In the second place, WTF is "targetting a country"? Unless he came up with a way to overload the physical cables connecting those countries' internets to their neighbours, the worst he could be accused of is maybe DOSsing a few government websites. Which might irritate a few people for a few hours, but it's hardly an act of war.

    1. Re:"FBI informant"? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      targetting a country, means hacking sites that are in another country.

      the kind of thing that is "war" when done the other way. so there.

      fbi informant is fbi, as far as rest of the planet is concerned, just like a cia informant works for cia - when viewed by the other countrys government.

      like, some guy leaks information to CIA from China for money.. do you really think he would be counted as not working for CIA? stupid.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:"FBI informant"? by neoritter · · Score: 1

      Sounds as if, like the rest of the planet, you're stupid.

  10. Your mom's a whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at least my mom doesn't love it and beg for more

  11. The Felon Did Not Do IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the MSM are in warp-drive about a CDC contract employee who is a three-time felon, and who was in a certain elevator with Obama as Obama visited the CDC in Atlanta.

    Fact 1: Yes the contract employee is a 3-time felon

    Fact 2: Nothing happened (when he was in the elevator with Obama)!

    So after the resignation of the SS Chief, DHS anoints a former employee to be Obama's, Great White Savior!

    Obama, and Michelle (formerly Michael) his "wife", will likely see this as insult on injury.

    Tough Tittie Big O.

  12. The King Demands by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    Grovel you worthless peasants. The King does what you are not allowed to do! We call that freedom. Seems like government for and by the people is total bullshit.

    1. Re:The King Demands by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      "Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal,"

      Nixon, 1977.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:The King Demands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he doesn't inhale.

    3. Re:The King Demands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or ejaculate.

      Oh, wait, he did that all over Monica's dress.

      Dear bored U.S. Air Force Reserve pilot. I bet you can't drop on Congress during the next State of the Union speech. You'll need assistance from your other crew members because large nuclear weapons require them.

  13. yes, but the usa authorites said it means WAR by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and I seriously doubt that they sought permission from congress or even the president to go into war with UK...

    so is hacking an act of war or not? obviously not.

    and now, why would any of those countries arrest anyone and ship them to USA for hacking when USA claims that they're criminals?

    (actually this whole thing is result of the fucked fucked fucked up way that is the american criminal "investigation" which basically in many cases is creating crime so that they can then catch the criminals for crimes the authorities arranged to happen)

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. a foreign govt agency attacks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a foreign govt agency attacks any citizen of my nation its technically a state of war that gets declared after all its your govt attacking ....

    and i bet you thought this would bring us real hackers down low....and yet you not only failed , you bring us more power....you keep it up we'll start running for office and people will trust us and vote for us....then we'll shut you the hell down. FOR GOOD

  15. Assange hacked Icelandic Ministry? by lippydude · · Score: 1

    @lucm: "the only explanation that makes sense is that they were hoping that this operation would at some point lead them to Assange (who had prior contacts with Sabu)"

    The only other explanation being yet another attempt to discredit Assange by linking him to alleged attempts to 'hack' the Icelandic Ministry of Finance.

    1. Re:Assange hacked Icelandic Ministry? by lucm · · Score: 1

      The only other explanation being yet another attempt to discredit Assange by linking him to alleged attempts to 'hack' the Icelandic Ministry of Finance.

      I would believe that Icelandic matters interest the FSB more than the FBI...

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  16. Not allowed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The secret is that the hackers caught the authorities covering up hidden information about an Imperial King sucking a 16 year olds dick.

  17. Funny Stuff! by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    that means members of the FBI should be subject to extradition and trial in those other countries just as they would be if they had been caught (and prosecuted) for breaking American law.

    Oh, my aching sides! Are you here all week?