Slashdot Mirror


Cyanogen Inc. Turns Down Google, Seeing $1 Billion Valuation

An anonymous reader writes: According to a report at The Information (paywalled), Cyanogen Inc., the company trying to commercializa the popular CyanogenMod mobile OS based on Android, recently met with Google's Android chief to talk about an acquisition. The report says Cyanogen turned down Google's offer and instead seeks funding from investors and major tech companies at a valuation around $1 billion. "Cyanogen has told potential investors that it has a deal in place to bring its custom version of the Android OS to India through a manufacturer called Micromax. Alongside Samsung, Micromax currently holds almost as much share of the smartphone market in India, making this deal a very large step to get Cyanogen into the hands of millions of more people. Lastly, the report claims that Cyanogen should be wary of modifying Android too much. During the process, the company must continue to follow Google's compatibility requirements which ensure third-party applications will work on their devices. If those requirements are not met, devices will not be licensed to run Google's services, such as Google Play and other Google applications."

107 comments

  1. Google just pissy by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google is just in a snit that CyanogenMod is fantastically better than stock android, BECAUSE it gives power back to users.

    For instance, the power to rescind permissions on installed apps, the ability to have finer control over CPU throttles, and of course, the removal of bunches of total horse-shit that gets bundled.

    Google is more worried that CyanogenMod being a mainstream thing will affect their ability to have baked in adware out of the box, generating money for them. Not that CyanogenMod devices will fail to run 3rd party apps.

    "Oh noes! Dont allow users to use fake geolocation! That will ruin our datamining operations! Oh no! Not our playstore advert shit too!? Did you REALLY just give users the ability to say "NO" to that app maker's blanket permissions requirement AFTER they said yes initially to let it install!? How will Facebook get its hentai tentacles into users' contact lists!? That removes the "Our way or the highway" tactic from the table!! AHHH!"

    Seriously-- this is SOP for big companies that have "disruptive" competition-- Attempt to buy them out.

    Google is probably pretty steamed at getting hand slapped right about now, which is why they are brandishing their oh-so-special google services apps like a cudgel now.

    1. Re:Google just pissy by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      unfortunately, no matter what your principles are, a pile of cash is a pile of cash. it has the magic power of a pile of cash. once cyanogenmod gets its pile of cash, we'll once again be looking for alternative roms.

    2. Re:Google just pissy by CaptnZilog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      unfortunately, no matter what your principles are, a pile of cash is a pile of cash. it has the magic power of a pile of cash. once cyanogenmod gets its pile of cash, we'll once again be looking for alternative roms.

      Sad but true. It's a shame, becuase cyanogenmod has support for a lot of older phones that the phone manufacturers don't really support anymore.

    3. Re:Google just pissy by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was my first thought. Google either wants to kill it or neuter it.

    4. Re:Google just pissy by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      You're kidding right? At this point, CM is the Digg equivalent of mods. The users have been steadily moving on to third party to CM mods and this valuation is smoke and mirror crazy level nonsense.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re: Google just pissy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Iron fist in a velvet glove. If they don't the money an run, Google will do what it can to defrock them from Google Play. Don't know how exactly, but expect something of a "join us or die" attitude. That said, I applaud them for standing up to Google and blazing their own path to success.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the mention the power to have broken 4G and 1 hour battery life.

    7. Re:Google just pissy by Teresita · · Score: 0

      Oh-so-special Google services, like Google+ Hangouts, how's that working out for them?

    8. Re:Google just pissy by tomhath · · Score: 1

      You are assuming a lot based on very little information. All we know is that Google expressed some interest in buying them and CyanogenMod declined. Mostly it sounds like CyanogenMod has a much higher opinion of themselves than Google does.

    9. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, screw those guys! They may have put the source out at the start and kept iterating on it over the years so we got things like filesystem trim and even a new runtime recently, but who says they get to dictate terms for shipping their apps and pick the way everything works in the Open Source version? I know all those Samsung apps etc. we all hate are *really* Google's fault. Because reasons.

    10. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > That was my first thought. Google either wants to kill it or neuter it.

      Even if they didn't, the internal pressure to do that once acquired would have been enormous.

    11. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh-so-special Google services, like Google+ Hangouts,

      There is a gynormous API that is part of google services, better location information, better 3D rendering, gaming, etc. Lots of apps have a dependency on google services nowadays.

    12. Re: Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      10E100 will just continue to move functionality to its play service. When they have closed the permissions model, they've sacked most of CM's power.

      And I think there would have been even some positive points about a CM purchase. Google doesnt like the vendors to abandon devices and leave play store app devs with the problem of old APIs. with additional google money, a system like CM could have been used by google to enlarge recent version market shares.

    13. Re: Google just pissy by Redbehrend · · Score: 1

      Cyanogen should have taken it. Other than old device support they are lacking... Google could cut them off when they feel free to... IMO Cyanogen has been going down since the whole tmobile deal. Stable updates come slower, I've had bat problems with recent builds and they don't support internal firmware of many devices. I can go on XDA and get a awesome rom anytime that includes firmware that works with device special features and get all my extra features.

      Don't get me wrong I love the guys.... I think they are starting to get greedy and I myself since years ago have seen a decline in their product. They will get their evaluation one day and the name will die they want to sell out. They donate all the time but the fact they try to force you to pay for official apps just rubs me wrong.

    14. Re: Google just pissy by Redbehrend · · Score: 1

      "I donate all the time" instead of "They donate all the time" auto correct error.

    15. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so true, they deliver the newest Android to phones that otherwise have to run with old versions full of security holes.

    16. Re:Google just pissy by davydagger · · Score: 0

      This is why I am an anti-capitalist.

      As long as capitalist exists, a pile of cash is enough to ruin any altrustic endevour, unrelated activist cause.

      When you follow this to its logical end, the only people who really have a true say in the end, are those with large piles of cash. Not the will of laborers, engineers, thinkers, and developers. Everyone needs to bow to large piles of cash.

    17. Re: Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This user is not singing the praises of google [blessed be the light of all the internet ] and is therefore very likely a paid microsoft shill or an itard. Perhaps even a witch.

      I move to have his comments deleted from the internet, his accounts and services terminated, and his possessions dispersed. Finally, we should burn him at the stake to see if the witch accusation is true.

    18. Re:Google just pissy by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      You're kidding right? At this point, CM is the Digg equivalent of mods. The users have been steadily moving on to third party to CM mods

      Like what? Having looked most of them are not updated and none of them bother to support my device.

    19. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am anti-capitalist for many reasons, but yes, the most obvious reason from a utilitarian PoV is that it is much lower risk to buy out and destroy your competition than it is to compete. It is the easiest way to become (on the one side) or to remain (on the other) filthy rich.

      Most technical advances occur under social democracy, where entrepreneurialism is encouraged but directed. The Far East is moving in this direction and away from authoritarianism, just as Europe's moving to the dullard's favourite new religion: neoliberalism.

    20. Re:Google just pissy by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 0
      As long as a capitalist* exists, most of the world's population has a chance to eat. However, society needs to restrain capitalists in return for permitting them to continue.

      Out of interest, how would you stop a man who invests his time in making and using tools from being more productive than one who sits on his ass all day drinking beer/vodka?

      * Actually, it is monetary exchange that sustains the world's population at its present level. It is not the same as capitalisim, but nor is the American system of selling government to the highest bidder the same thing as capitalism - even if a lot of people think it is.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    21. Re:Google just pissy by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google is just in a snit that CyanogenMod is fantastically better than stock android,

      This is a little absurd. I use and love Cyanogenmod, but calling it "better than stock" is a gross oversimplification. Upon upgrading to the recent M11 release of CM, I just got back the ability to watch netflix on my Nexus which was broken due to a driver bug. This isnt a new thing either; CM tends to have one or two new fairly irritating bugs per release, and generally lacks the polish of google's stock android.

      Not to mention that CM doesnt really add that much back into android; at the moment the biggest features are
        * root (not really that important for 90% of people, and generally a nuisance as actual workplaces require you to unroot to use email). Biggest reasons I can think of for root are advanced tasker profiles (though CM Profiles generally replace tasker), TitaniumBackup, and some really really niche stuff (like CatLog, wifi tinkering stuff, etc)
        * Multi-user (which is busted right now on phones)
        * Profiles (which can mostly be replicated using tasker or similar programs on stock)
        * a lot of display customization (a lot of which you can get using alternate launchers like Nova)

      As has been pointed out root does utterly break the security model of Android by allowing for actual rootkits and persistent threats.

      All that said, 3rd party roms are great, but they really arent suitable for a lot of people unless those people have a specific thing theyre looking to fix. The real value of CM is in providing access to newer ROMs than may be officially supported on their phone.

      Google is more worried that CyanogenMod being a mainstream thing will affect their ability to have baked in adware out of the box

      Android doesnt have baked in adware, and CM doesnt remove whatever you think constitutes said adware. If you're referring to GApps, its pretty normal to add the latest GApps to CM when you flash it. If you're referring to the Apps, what do you suppose would happen to free apps in a world where everyone was running a hosts-based adblocker?

    22. Re: Google just pissy by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CM doesnt come with google play by default, and Google has been working to modularize (and therefore make available to CM) a huge number of its stock "pieces" (like the camera, play services, etc).

      I feel like everyone in this thread has no idea what theyre talking about. What threat do you suppose CM represents to Google? You're still using Play, and if you arent, why should google care whether you use a de-Play'd AOSP or a Winphone? Mindshare is mindshare.

    23. Re: Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Defrock them from google play?" The reason many people use CM is precisely because it doesn't include all the google spyware by default.

      And that is threatening to google. Their whole business model depends on you running their spyware apps.

    24. Re:Google just pissy by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      Out of interest, how would you stop a man who invests his time in making and using tools from being more productive than one who sits on his ass all day drinking beer/vodka?

      That's not a capitalist. A capitalist is he who takes the surplus profit from ownership of the means of production as unearned income.

      Self-employed people are not automatically practicing capitalism. They may or may not be working within a capitalist system, but their own business is not a capitalistic one, unless and until they employ workers and pay them less than their fair share of the profit.

    25. Re:Google just pissy by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Functionally better HOW and by WHOS definition?

      From Google's perspective, its the opposite of what they want. They don't want users to be able to have apps stop spying on them, thats how Google makes money.

      Users are never going to bother installing something YOU think is superior, or it would be year of the Linux desktop too.

      Phone manufactures aren't going to want to cut themselves out of reaping the benefits of Google's spying.

      Theres pretty much nothing of value in CyanogenMod outside of geeky techs.

      99.99% of the population doesn't give a fuck about the things you care about. If they did, they'd have dropped the extra coin to buy an iPhone and get the things you're saying they want. They want a cheap phone, the only way they're going to get that is by Google spying on them. CyanogenMod becoming a for-profit means its going to actually have to have a business plan. That business plan is either going involve a fee (which anyone who knows anything about android knows Android users don't pay for shit) or its going to involve selling user data. Selling user data makes it just like stock android. Paying extra for it, might as well by an iPhone.

      Before you rant about walled garden, again, users don't actually care despite the silly thought on slashdot that slashdot users represent 'the norm' rather than a niche market.

      Anyone who thinks CyanogenMod is worth money to anyone other than Google is very confused. Google is the only one who's going to pay for them, and thats just to hide them to avoid people knowing what they do is possible.

      Billion dollar valuation? Yea, the turds I just left in the toilet are worth a billion dollars too.

      Thats just utterly ridiculous.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    26. Re:Google just pissy by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That was my first thought. Google either wants to kill it or neuter it.

      Actually, from what I see Google takes care to ensure the CM and similar efforts can continue to grow and thrive. This is why all Nexus devices are unlocked or unlockable, and why Google encourages OEMs to keep their devices open, too (with limited success).

      I'm skeptical of the article's claim that Google was interested in acquiring CM. I just don't see the point... CM's whole value to Google is because it's independent, both of Google and of other parties in the ecosystem (OEMs, carriers, etc.).

      (Disclaimer: I'm an Android engineer at Google, but I'm speaking only for myself.)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    27. Re:Google just pissy by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      "Oh noes! Dont allow users to use fake geolocation! That will ruin our datamining operations! Oh no! Not our playstore advert shit too!? Did you REALLY just give users the ability to say "NO" to that app maker's blanket permissions requirement AFTER they said yes initially to let it install!? How will Facebook get its hentai tentacles into users' contact lists!? That removes the "Our way or the highway" tactic from the table!! AHHH!"

      Cyanogenmod is clearly better than stock, but it doesn't go nearly far enough. You can't prevent an application from getting your device ID, or from accessing the Internet in stock Cyanogenmod. For that you need something like XPrivacy.

    28. Re: Google just pissy by grcumb · · Score: 2

      Capitalism developed as a response to whydontijusttakeitandrapeyourdaughterwhileimatitalism. The seductive power of a pile of cash is not changed when you change the system. The only thing that changes is the standard means of obtaining that pile of cash.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    29. Re: Google just pissy by swillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their whole business model depends on you running their spyware apps.

      Actually, most of their Android business model depends on you buying stuff on Play. I won't quote any numbers because I'm not sure if Google releases them, but Google's cut of app, movies, music and book sales is getting to be pretty significant. Google also makes plenty from mobile advertising, of course, but that doesn't really depend on you using Google's apps, since, as I understand it, most of the advertising revenue comes from (a) mobile search and (b) advertising embedded in third-party apps (AdMob).

      Oh, and do you have any evidence that Google's apps spy on you? I know that they don't. Google search history is tracked, same as on desktop, but you can opt out of that either through Google's opt-out tools, or by switching to a different search engine. Location tracking is entirely under your control. Gmail is used for targeted advertising, if you use gmail. And... that's it. Oh, maybe Google+ is mined for keywords, but I don't think so, and in any case you can just not use Google+.

      (Disclaimer: I'm a Google engineer, but I'm speaking for myself.)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    30. Re:Google just pissy by c · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Google is just in a snit that CyanogenMod is fantastically better than stock android, BECAUSE it gives power back to users.

      So does Xposed, and far deeper than CM ever contemplated.

      More likely Google is looking at CM because CM effectively helps to solve the Android "fragmentation" problem, namely getting the latest version onto devices where the manufacturers drop support prematurely. All they'd have to do is officially brand CM as their "Android legacy support" service and just kinda step back.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    31. Re: Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off and die.

    32. Re:Google just pissy by davydagger · · Score: 0

      >As long as a capitalist* exists, most of the world's population has a chance to eat. However, society needs to restrain capitalists in return for permitting them to continue.

      the irony is biting me, as a good chunk of the world does not have a good chance to eat, and its because of capitalism. People starve in wealthy countries.

      >Out of interest, how would you stop a man who invests his time in making and using tools from being more productive than one who sits on his ass all day drinking beer/vodka?

      I'd invalidate their stock certificates, and end their ownership stakes, and kick them out of elected office.

    33. Re:Google just pissy by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Google is just in a snit that CyanogenMod is fantastically better than stock android, BECAUSE it gives power back to users.

      No, the real value of CM is the way they manage to put recent, lightweight android on devices in stead of their manufacturers.
      Power to users is just a secondary goal, and CM doesn't offer much more than just rooting. For this, the champion is Xposed framework.

    34. Re:Google just pissy by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Fair enough points and you could be correct, but I'm sorry if I do not trust your employer. I'm not really sorry per se but you know what I mean. Google makes it's money from ads. CM allows users to circumvent that. It's pretty simple math to me.

    35. Re:Google just pissy by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      This isnt a new thing either; CM tends to have one or two new fairly irritating bugs per release, and generally lacks the polish of google's stock android.

      Being new to Android I was impressed as snot what all worked and stability of the platform compared with what had been previously used to dealing with.

      So far my gripes tend to mysteriously correct themselves in the next M update without ever having filed a single bug report. Flashlight app missing from quick menu - next M release it was there.

      WiFi tethering borked - working in following release.

      Pocket dialed 911 thank you crappy emergency dialer new M release new feature to disable digitizer based on proximity sensor was included.

      Few stability problems had been experiencing appear to have stemmed from allowing battery level to drop below 10% prior to placing it on the charger.

      Only remaining OS issue is lack of synchronization between running apps and task list. If you kill an app outside of UI it still appears in task list even though it is not executing.

      root (not really that important for 90% of people, and generally a nuisance as actual workplaces require you to unroot to use email).

      I couldn't live without root. Application firewalling, full shell access, tcpdump and iptables. Full backup images take just minutes to sdcard, operating system upgrades are painless and take less than a minute to install. If you have some cheesy enterprise policy not allowing your device to email blame your work. Asking a device if it is trustworthy is the same as asking a liar if they are being truthful. So much of what constitutes "enterprise security" these days is based on fundamentally unwinnable and impractical propositions designed to check boxes rather than provide actual security.

      As has been pointed out root does utterly break the security model of Android by allowing for actual rootkits and persistent threats.

      You know how I got root to begin with? On my locked down non-root, boot locked carrier fucked consumer device with the latest available firmware? I spent 5 minutes on Google and installed an APK that gave it to me. WTF is up with that? Android security appears to be total SHIT. Too many vulnerabilities allowed to persist for too long without any mechanism to address vulns across the board.

      In CM you still have to explicitly grant applications superuser privileges... superuser manager manages grants. Having root by itself does not in and of itself increase your risk exposure. Only being a sucker and allowing malware to run as root does that.

      Shitware vendors can do plenty of damage and maintain persistent spyware without root.

      said, 3rd party roms are great, but they really arent suitable for a lot of people unless those people have a specific thing theyre looking to fix.

      The awesome thing here - even a small fraction of a lot of people still adds up to millions.

      If you're referring to GApps, its pretty normal to add the latest GApps to CM when you flash it.

      Major reason I installed CM I refuse to have anything to do with GApps.

      If you're referring to the Apps, what do you suppose would happen to free apps in a world where everyone was running a hosts-based adblocker?

      The app market is a total failure and this would be why. Everyone expects something for free and nobody is willing to pay for quality product resulting in predictable self-fulfilling prophecy.

      I also think it is disingenuous to speak of in terms of advertising when 'ads' know your phone number and have access to your physical location we are really talking about spyware supported applications not advertising supported applications.

    36. Re: Google just pissy by swillden · · Score: 1

      Fuck off and die.

      What an eloquent, informative response! I salute you, sir.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    37. Re:Google just pissy by swillden · · Score: 1

      You can also circumvent ads with AdBlock. Google doesn't try to do anything about that (and they easily could, especially on Chrome). In addition, you can make the ads much less effective even without blocking them by opting out of ad personalization and analytics tracking. Google not only doesn't try to stop you from doing that, they provide and maintain tools that specifically enable you to do it.

      Yes, Google wants to trade services for the opportunity to show you ads, and even wants to make the ads more useful to you and more lucrative to Google by making them for things you're actually interested in. But if you don't want that trade, Google wants to give you the opportunity to opt out.

      Also... that's not the only way Google makes money. Google also makes money when you buy stuff on the Play store, which is why they have no problem with CM users installing and using Play... quite the opposite, in fact.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    38. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I'm afraid of. In this binge to get money they're going to ruin it. I use Cyanogen or similar kernels specifically because it lets me actually use the underlying Linux system in a non-constrained manner similar to desktop Linux. First thing I did after installing Cyanogen on my phone was dump the retarded user system in Android and recompile a desktop user manager that had native ARMv7 support. This way when I hand my phone to someone I can switch over to the guest account that's locked down tight enough that they can't do anything that will harm other users. I wouldn't be able to do that with Google running the show, they made Android plenty easy to extend but made it difficult to replace some of their stuff without breaking everything else in the process.

    39. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree.

      I think if Google was to acquire CM, they would undermine the privacy inherent in CM by adding services / features which over time would be updated to send more and more information about the device / device owner back to Google HQ; thereby killing-off one of the best selling points of CM.

      Google must be galled at being "blinded" by Android alternatives. I love my CM handset and its lack of Google spyware. Is it heavily crippled because it lacks Google's "free" services? Yes: and that's a compromise I'm happy to make, and I do know I'm in a very small demographic.

      In a nutshell: I don't see Google as a friend who has my back. I see a global mega-corporation answerable to shareholders, that does a mighty good job of cultivating an image of being socially benevolent.

    40. Re:Google just pissy by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      You do know that so long as you're running AOSP, even the compiled images that Google releases, so long as you can enable developer settings, mock locations can be enabled. You can do it from any Nexus, Moto X/G/E, and CM device. And even CM has Developer Settings disabled by default. So you can't really start complaining about Google not allowing fake geolocation, you just have to be less of an idiot to enable it.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    41. Re:Google just pissy by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      Then why did they throw a shitfit when they found out CM actually did bundle GApps early in it's lifespan? Ever since CM7 (So far as I recall, could be as early as 6), you have to flash GApps seperately or else the system is somewhat useless initially. That didn't used to be the case, nor is it with any CM edition devices like Oppo's N1 or the OnePlus One.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    42. Re: Google just pissy by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      How? CM already doesn't have GApps by default since at least CM7, because Google put a stop to it. You can't stop people from flashing GApps to a CM running device.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    43. Re: Google just pissy by LesFerg · · Score: 2

      ... Stable updates come slower, I've had bat problems with recent builds ...

      Dude, go to Settings, select Attic Window and set it to Closed. Them bats will be shit out of luck then.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    44. Re:Google just pissy by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      Are you high? Milestone 11 doesn't exist yet. It probably hasn't even been frozen yet. The most recent Milestone release is 10, which has worked flawlessly with my N7-2012, Netflix included.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    45. Re:Google just pissy by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Adding GApps is just an additional package that you have to add while flashing CM onto your device. All it really is, is one additional download and one additional package transfer after you've put CM on there. My guess is that Google wanted to control the distribution and didn't want to have the GApps bundled directly into a "not officially sanctioned" firmware or whatever. Perhaps it's a licensing issue?

      Besides, you don't have to add the GApps, and I think maybe CM prefers it that way. You can easily add alternative appstores like F-Droid and live completely without the GApps.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    46. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a naive googler, how quaint.
      Currently Google & Apple are being sued for their non-poaching agreements (in an attempt to fix salaries and to screw developers of both companies) and what do the developers of both companies do, err nothing - because they're sheep.

      It may surprise you to know that Google makes it's revenue from ads, anything that threatens that revenue is something that Google tries to either buy and shutdown or remove altogether. Take for example Adblock plus being removed from the ad store, because it blocks google's ad's. Similarly cyanogen allows users to do all sorts of things on their phones which would cripple it's ad serving abilities, can't have that can we.

      Note I'm not saying their behaviour is wrong, hey if I was a monopoly company trying to protect my revenue stream I would do the same, after all it's just business. But it's the naivety of googlers which really shocks me, it's almost as if they live in a land of rainbows and unicorns - I mean really 'do no evil' - come on do you really believe that?

    47. Re:Google just pissy by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      You can also circumvent ads with AdBlock. Google doesn't try to do anything about that (and they easily could, especially on Chrome). In addition, you can make the ads much less effective even without blocking them by opting out of ad personalization and analytics tracking. Google not only doesn't try to stop you from doing that, they provide and maintain tools that specifically enable you to do it.

      A good example is the lack of video download extensions with support for Youtube. None exist in the Chrome app store, you have to use external sites such as KeepVid to download Youtube videos, because it's against the app store usage policy. I guess it's probably a demand from content providers or whatever, but it shows that Google can restrict apps and extensions from doing things they don't approve. And yet there's tons of adblocking extensions in the app store, so obviously they don't really mind if people block ads.

      I also think Google maybe had a hand in the "acceptable ads" option in Adblock Plus, since most of their ads are simple text and fit the ABP guidelines nicely. They want to show you ads, but to have as many people as possible accept ads, they have to be non-intrusive. And Google's ads are some of the least bad ones out there, for sure.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    48. Re: Google just pissy by tom229 · · Score: 2

      While the Android core operating system is free, the Android branding and "Google Apps" are not. In order to use either of these on your version of Android you need a license from an authorized testing facility that ensures the GApps suite functions properly. This is Google's one catch to providing the world with a free mobile operating system, and I think that's probably fair.

      Regardless, I think many people wouldn't be happy if cm automatically included GApps, since the lack of that proprietary spyware is the main reason to use it.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    49. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...yeah, but I want whatever they're smoking if it makes them think that they're worth $1B...

    50. Re:Google just pissy by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Out of curiosity, if Cyanogenmod were bought for $1 billion, who would get the money? The executives and officers who manage the open source company? Would the developers who contribute to the project for free see any of it?

    51. Re:Google just pissy by Rob+Y. · · Score: 0

      Of course, the acceptable ads option is actually a good way of getting users to face the fact that they're using ad-supported content sites that wouldn't exist if everyone blocked the ads. There's such a thing as a middle ground. Freedom doesn't mean freedom to freeload.

      Similar thing with YouTube videos. Somebody owns them (and it's not always Google). They were provided to you to view online. Downloading them was not offered. Just because you can, doesn't make it right (or your "right").

      And I say this as a (conflicted) user of Adblock Plus (with acceptable ads enabled) and Video Download Helper (in Firefox).

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    52. Re:Google just pissy by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I used to be very staunchly anti-all-advertising, but I've reversed my position lately and enabled non-intrusive advertising in ABP. Basic text-only ads such as Google's are OK, I guess, as long as they don't interfere with the content.

      Then again, I run NoScript and I'm probably not going to whitelist doubleclick.net etc.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    53. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You implied that some manufacturers don't drop support prematurely. Could you provide a list of those manufacturers? Even Google drops support for Nexus devices after 2 years.

    54. Re:Google just pissy by i.kazmi · · Score: 0

      I have a Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-i9505 with Cyanogenmod installed, can you point me in the direction of a custom ROM (besides CM) with OTA updates? Re-installing all my apps and getting my phone to act the way I want each time I flash an update is really not an option so if there are any alternatives out there, I've missed them and I'll be grateful to you if you could tell me about them, thanks :-)

    55. Re: Google just pissy by i.kazmi · · Score: 0

      Serves you right for trying to bring facts to a nerd-rage-fueled discussion :p

    56. Re:Google just pissy by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      My mistake. M10 fixed the issue. M8 and M9 broke netflix on my Nexus 5 due to a "green flicker" bug.

    57. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XDA Developers

      You're welcome.

    58. Re:Google just pissy by c · · Score: 1

      You implied that some manufacturers don't drop support prematurely.

      Hm. True. I could've phrased that better, although the definition of "premature" in this case might be debatable. I like to think that everyone will agree that "while the device is still being sold in stores" definitely counts as "premature", and I'm of the opinion that anything less than 2 years after introduction is pushing it.

      Outside of the Nexus line, I'm not sure any device would get a pass.

      Even Google drops support for Nexus devices after 2 years.

      They suggest it'll typically be 18 months, but I'm not sure they've released enough Nexus devices to establish any kind of solid track record. At the moment, the 1st gen Nexus 7 is over the 2 year mark and appears to still be seeing updates. The Nexus 4 and 10 are still being sold, so I doubt you'll see Google stop supporting them soon even though they're comfortably at the 2 year mark.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    59. Re:Google just pissy by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this -- I just assumed there's no AdBlock on Chrome because Google wouldn't allow it, and didn't even look, until now. Installed and running fine. My respect for Google just went up a notch.

    60. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed "Allows you to revoke permissions of installed apps", quite possibly the only reason for a consumer running a 3rd party ROM. I'm quite happy to allow advertising on free apps, but only insofar as ads are displayed and I view them. The moment an app requires permissions to private data not related to its purpose, e.g. a game requiring read SMS or access location, that's getting disabled. If that breaks the app, then I guess I won't use it and therefore not see any adverts via the app! :)

    61. Re:Google just pissy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billion dollar valuation? Yea, the turds I just left in the toilet are worth a billion dollars too.

      Thats just utterly ridiculous.

      Take a second to flush, you inconsiderate bastard.

    62. Re: Google just pissy by swillden · · Score: 1

      the lack of that proprietary spyware is the main reason to use it.

      Cite? Specifically, do you have any evidence that GApps spies on you?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  2. 1 B$ for open source software ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    CyanogenMod being open source, what is the value of such a company ? Once bought by Google, anybody could fork CyanogenMod...

    1. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by alen · · Score: 0

      a billion $$$ for a free fork of android for freetards is a steal
      amazon or microsoft will buy them next week for double that

    2. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      CyanogenMod is missing the boat by being blinded by the *potential* for more cash. The ture reality is that Google's offer is the best they will get, and they fucked it up. Google will offer them much less when it becomes obvious that CyanogenMod made a mis-calculation.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by davydagger · · Score: 1

      >freetards

      this man is an intellegent rational person who is here to make insightful comments.

      76% of all computers run the linux kernel. u mad bro?

    4. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by davydagger · · Score: 1

      Android is Open Source as well, your not suggesting it doesn't have value. I mean anyone has the permission to fork it, but not everyone has the skills to meaninfully develop android. Those are somewhat rare actually. Its not easy maintaining software, so the fallicy of "anyone can take your software" is bogus. This is the value in Free Software. Its not the code, its the maintainers. Free Software only has value if it requires high quality devs.

      The cyanogen team has the skills to maintain not just an Android fork, but one that has value over AOSP. How do you do a better job maintaining an FOSS project than the people who wrote it? You have rare an unique talent thats how.

      The value of CM isn't its codebase. Its the developers. Google wants CM for its dev team and proccess. Its the same reason Red Hat hired the CentOS team.

      If these people do a better job with our product than we do, why aren't they working for us?

    5. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      CyanogenMod is missing the boat by being blinded by the *potential* for more cash. The ture reality is that Google's offer is the best they will get, and they fucked it up. Google will offer them much less when it becomes obvious that CyanogenMod made a mis-calculation.

      I was waiting for someone to say this. We're clearly in a tech bubble. Making a business out of CyanogenMod would mean trying to out-google google, while at the same time relying on many of google's own services! They are fools for not taking the money and running.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    6. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The value is not in the code but rather in the developers. I challenge you to take a few of your friends take the current version of cyanogen mod and get it working on the next Samsung phone when it gets released. Don't worry about upgrades or cross compatibility or the apps that the cyanogen mod team maintain, just focus on something as basic as getting it working on one new platform before you use the anyone can fork it argument.

    7. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean "are capable of running the Linux kernel, right?

        Because, it doesn't look like that is true in any application, with the possible exception of "servers".

    8. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      The value is not in the code but rather in the developers. I challenge you to take a few of your friends take the current version of cyanogen mod and get it working on the next Samsung phone when it gets released.

      You are totally right. I could not do it, but the current CyanogenMod could easily fork it after having cashed Google's Money.

      This exactly what happened with MySQL in 2008 : Monty Widenius sold it to Sun Microsystems for $1 billion. He then left to start MariaDB, a MySQL fork.

      I don't think that Google is stupid or desperate enough to spend $1 billion on a company having only brilliant developers but no IP.

    9. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the unique talent, most importantly, brandname and userbase.

      Consumer technology by itself is nothing but a commodity. Unless you're working on some high tech, niche project, almost everything can be reproduced. Why do you think facebook spent 1 billion on instagram, 2 on oculus or 16 on whatsup? Facebook could easily make their own versions of those business if they wanted.

    10. Re:1 B$ for open source software ? by Shados · · Score: 1

      Thats done all the time. You just need to give enough incentives (ie: equity with long term conditions) for people to stay.

      I don't know how many people work on CyanogenMod, but hiring a douzen or so top notch engineers with knowledge of android's internal could take years. Thats a lot of lost opportunities, projects that have to be canned from lack of resources.

  3. I could be mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but a billion for something that is just a 'piggie back' modification?

  4. 1 billion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should just kill themselves instead.

    or someone could spend a few million to put a hit on the entire company and just steal their worthless IP.

  5. Bad move by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    You don't refuse an offer from the godfather to buy you out.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  6. History repeats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember Be Inc doing something similar when apple tried to buy them out. Worked out well for them didn't it?

    Moral of the story, don't get greedy. Billion bucks is a lot of money, more than enough to start another 10-20 large companies.

  7. Android without Google. by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When do they set up a "Cyanogen store"?

    Even without Cyanogenmod, Android phones work just fine without Google services. At first power-up, there's a "sign up/log in" screen, with a "Later" option. Click "Later" and go on.

    You can disable the "Google One-Time Startup" app to keep it from bothering you again.

    1. Re:Android without Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. I run an an S3 an don't login, nor even have an account with google. Yes, that means I don't use gmail.

    2. Re:Android without Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the moment you can... Don't expect this to last forever, though.

    3. Re:Android without Google. by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 2

      F-Droid is already there, and working just fine. Been running Cyanogenmod + F-Droid only for the last three years. Wouldn't go back to Google.

      (Not using the stock OS, also has the advantage of avoiding the "later", "later", "later" options you speak of).

    4. Re:Android without Google. by tepples · · Score: 1

      F-Droid doesn't have a lot of games or (legit) movie streaming clients. For those, you need to install Amazon Appstore.

    5. Re:Android without Google. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      And Amazon is better than Google how exactly?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    6. Re:Android without Google. by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Amazon's appstore runs with the same level of privilege as F-Droid. If you allow it to, it will check for updates to your apps (just like F-Droid), but it can't install apps without your permission. Google's core apps all run as root and have complete access to your data.

      Amazon's a sleazy dataminer, too, but their appstore on Android is nothing like Google Play in its ability to be creepy and invasive.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    7. Re:Android without Google. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Amazon Appstore is available to practically every device that runs Android, be it OHA or AOSP. Unlike the distribution agreement for Google Play Store, the Amazon Appstore installation process doesn't make certain assumptions, such as the assumption that a calculator app needs to fill a 10.1" screen (source: Google CDD).

    8. Re:Android without Google. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know your source for the information that all of the GApps run as root, because if that were true, it would be a MASSIVE security hole. Somehow I doubt Google would be that stupid ;-)

      --
      Eat the rich.
  8. Good for them. I am not surprised... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Who would want to be bought by Google, only to be "destroyed" like so many promising companies' products have?

    I now see that it's [not] always about the money.

  9. That is rubbish by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Google are trying to protect their Android brand, from the reasonable accusations that hardware vendors leave their customers high-and-dry and stop supporting the handset when they have a new one to sell.
    I don't want an iOS phone - *but* buying an Android phone for a similar chunk of cash, it never comes with any guarantee of a future update.
    Google recognized this and released the 'google edition' versions of some of the high-end popular handsets. That ticks the box for the users of these phones - you're likely to get your updates for a good few more years, whatever your vendor does - but for most of these high-end phones the vendor provides upgrades anyway.
    Surely what google want go do is provide some kind of ongoing support to their users of phones from the lower tier suppliers. Cyanogen is pretty good at bridging the gap between the huge numbers of phones out there, and google's latest and greatest OS.
    The bit that niggles me is that I'm not quite sure what Cyanogen brings apart from providing a focus for the unpaid people actually doing the work.
    If I were in Google's position I'd just pick up the community myself, and put bounties against phone/android version combos, and pay the devs directly.

  10. Google lacks 'noblesse' by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    It's trying to get its godawful greedy hands on anything that it sees as undercutting its hegemony.
    I salute Cyanogen for their thumbing nose. I hope they can keep it up.
    On a related matter -- Fed up with Google? Use http://startpage.com./

    1. Re:Google lacks 'noblesse' by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      Erratum : should have made that https://startpage.com./ My apologies!

    2. Re:Google lacks 'noblesse' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link comes up with a "bad request" page using Opera phone browser.

    3. Re:Google lacks 'noblesse' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ssl_error_bad_cert_domain

  11. $1B for a niche operating system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Linux has made operating systems commodity?

    Well, good luck. Maybe they'll get it. Seems rather far fetched to me.

  12. does it matter? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Isn't Cyanomod open source? I might be missing something, but if Google buys it, can't it just be forked and have development on an OS more secure than Android continue?

    I'm not an expert in these things, so I'm not sure, but that's how I thought it worked.

    When you buy an open source OS, what are you really buying?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you buy an open source OS, what are you really buying?

      I don't think Google cares much about Cyanogenmod itself. Remember, the bid was to buy the company (Cyanogen, Inc.). Companies like Google, Apple, etc. usually buy other companies for the people/talent that work there more than anything else. In this case, there are presumably talented Android and Linux kernel software developers and others (perhaps UI/UX people or impressive business people) that a company like Google would be interested in gobbling up.

    2. Re:does it matter? by citizenr · · Score: 2

      Isn't Cyanomod open source?

      CM is working hard to remedy this. They started with photo app just after incorporating - they demanded full rights to the code so they could close it to gain 'competitive advantage' or some bullshit

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  13. Wouldn't that defeat the whole point of CM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole point of CM is that it is NOT infested with Google, right?

    1. Re: Wouldn't that defeat the whole point of CM? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      the primary point of CM is current OS support for "old" hardware - 18 month old gear abandoned by it's manufacturer. But even CM rarely extends beyond 3 yrs - I'd love to see a nonprofit that could keep up CM ports and see non-smartphone users get some of the social benefits without a huge monthly installment payment.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re: Wouldn't that defeat the whole point of CM? by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see a nonprofit that could keep up CM ports and see non-smartphone users get some of the social benefits without a huge monthly installment payment.

      That depends on how many U.S. carriers are willing to activate low-minute voice-only service on Android phones. AT&T, for instance, is known to cram a data plan onto your bill if it sees a smartphone IMEI.

  14. Offer by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't state what Google's offer was. It could have been $1 million for all we know. Cyanogen Inc. *wishes* it were worth $1 billion, and hopes investors actually believe that and thus will pump money into their company, but its actual value is probably far, far short of that, and more in the realm of whatever Google offered. The question is how will Cyanogen monetize the version of Android it produces. Is Micromax going to pay Cyanogen for its version of Android? And if so why pay for what is already free (custom features, quality assurance, etc?)

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Offer by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Just curious, did you read the paywall version as well? (I didn't.) If so, I'm interested in what details it has over the droid-life summary.

  15. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And verifying all of this would probably not be impossible. There are a few important things to take away from this. First, if you think you might be surveilled, try to collect some evidence of the fact. Second, only the government is interested in you in a personal sense — to Google you're just user number 1,409,0344,744. They are interested in whether their collective userbase finds their services to be useful, not whether you've been trash-talking Sergei Brin and the Obama Administration. Finally, if you are really concerned about your own privacy — despite being really uninteresting (I promise! I work for the NSA) — then you're pretty much going to need to roll your own infrastructure.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Second, only the government is interested in you in a personal sense — to Google you're just user number 1,409,0344,744.

      Exactly, that's why I don't think Google is nearly as threatening as a lot of people make them out to be. They don't care about your porn brownsing habits, but they're very interested in knowing the broad statistics of which terms people search for most, and which types of ads or links they click when they're buying books or whatever. Not the individual links, but the type of links.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  16. Buying Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't let google buy me out for a billion either.

  17. You can found any think about android and news her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can found any think about android and news here Http://droid-point.blogspot.com