Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Is There an Ethical Way Facebook Can Experiment With Their Users?

An anonymous reader writes: This summer, news broke that Facebook had conducted an experiment on some of their users, tweaking which posts showed up in their timeline to see if it affected the tone of their later posts. The fallout was extensive — Facebook took a lot of flack from users and the media for overreaching and violating trust. (Of course, few stopped to think about how Facebook decided what to show people in the first place, but that's beside the point.) Now, Wired is running a somewhat paranoid article saying Facebook can't help but experiment on its users. The writer says this summer's blowback will only show Facebook they need to be sneakier about it.

At the same time, a study came out from Ohio State University saying some users rely on social media to alter their moods. For example, when a user has a bad day, he's likely to look up acquaintances who have it worse off, and feel a bit better that way. Now, going on social media is going to affect your mood in one way or another — shouldn't we try to understand that dynamic? Is there a way Facebook can run experiments like these ethically? (Or Twitter, or Google, or any similarly massive company, of course.)

3 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. Informed consent? by DeadDecoy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Scientists request it all the time through their internal review board, This isn't really a complex issue, which is why the approach facebook took is considered underhanded and skeevy.

  2. Facebook hurts the Internet by koan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stop using it.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  3. "They trust me — dumb fucks" by koan · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."