Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Dubai Police To Use Google Glass For Facial Recognition

Posted by samzenpus on from the watching-you-better dept.

cold fjord sends word about what the Dubai police plan on doing with their Google Glass. Police officers in Dubai will soon be able to identify suspects wanted for crimes just by looking at them. Using Google Glass and a custom-developed facial recognition software, Dubai police will be able to capture photos of people around them and search their faces in a database of people wanted for crimes ... When a match is made in the database, the Glass device will receive a notification. .... What's particularly interesting about the project is that facial recognition technology is banned by the Google Glass developer policy. ... The section of the policy that addresses such technology seems to disqualify the Dubai police force's plan for Glass."

5 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Enforce by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always wandered if and how Google would enforce that rule.
    Now we'll find out.
    My money is on "Pay lipservice to privacy in the media, keep supplying the Dubai police anyway".

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Enforce by davecb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The German Federal security service tried this years ago in airports, and got a combinatorial explosion in false positives (AKA the "birthday paradox") that drowned out the real positives. Google knows the math, and is trying to save the inumerate from an expensive failure (;-))

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    2. Re:Enforce by davecb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      better technology doesn't help enough!

      To oversimplify, if you have 1 error in a thousand, and you have 10,000 (crooks + innocent people), you do (10,000 * 9,999) comparisons and get 99,990,000 / 1,000 = 9,990 errors. In stats, it's a selection of every two persons out of 10,000.

      It's really something like (select one of 100 crooks from 10,000 innocents), but it's still an insanely huge number of comparisons. Hoeever good your technology, adding more people will give you (N * N-1) more chances of getting an error.

      Facial recognition vendors are very careful to NOT report their error rates in ways that expose this problem: it's the "elephant in the room" for that industry. And that includes Siemens, my former employer.

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    3. Re:Enforce by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You forgot to mention the necessary sense of walking around: liberty. Even if you're a "positive", what of due process? Will you land in a jail, await a long process? How and who guarantees that you'll be then excluded if you're falsely positive? It's a slippery slope. Google has opened a Pandora's box of paranoia.

      Will people stop traveling in fear of false-positives? Where are governments permitted to gnaw on their citizenry, privacy death by a thousand cuts?

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  2. Why this is bad by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those that were unaware, Dubai is an awful place to live.
    The majority of low wage workers are shipped in from out of the country and are treated as slaves. They've no hope to leave and any question of the system will land you in prison. There are dozens of documentaries on the situation.

    Vice has a good one: http://www.vice.com/vice-news/...
    Caution, it's an auto-play video and it's got a loud intro.