Slashdot Mirror


Europol Predicts First Online Murder By End of This Year

An anonymous reader sends this story from The Stack: The world's first "online murder" over an internet-connected device could happen by the end of this year, Europol has warned. Research carried out by the European Union's law enforcement agency has found that governments are not equipped to fight the growing threat of "online murder," as cyber criminals start to exploit internet technologies to target victims physically. The study, which was published last week, analyzed the possible physical dangers linked to cyber criminality and found that a rise in "injury and possible deaths" could be expected as computer hackers launch attacks on critical connected equipment. The assessment particularly referred to a report by IID, a U.S. security firm, which forecast that the world's first murder via a "hacked internet-connected device" would happen by the end of 2014.

155 comments

  1. Self fulfilling prophecy by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Challenge accepted?

    1. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just cried and shat my pants. OMG The HORRROR!

    2. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know why it needs "hacked".

      many bombs have been detonated for almost two decades with network connected means.

      USA routinely kills people via network connected flying devices that shoot missiles on network commands..

      oh well I guess they're referring to only networked devices that weren't meant to kill in the first place..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up. The first "online murder" happened the day they put weapons on a drone. TFA is just the usual news-that-try-to-scare-you bullshit.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    4. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sword Art Online :P (Seriously, the Gun Game part is THIS)

      In all honestly though, there's a few potential ways to murder someone with a desktop, but they all require the target to be alone. Everything else involves collateral damage.

      For example:
      - Someone who is Seizure sensitive could be induced into one
      - "Medical" devices wirelessly could be tampered with
      - Internet controllable light bulbs, thermostats could be set to dangerous settings (eg where the "frog in a blender" effect happens)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lawnmower_Man_(film)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Machine_(film)

      Collateral damage (Anything involving hacking the power grid, telecommunication or other "safety" system)
      - Setting traffic lights all to green
      - Distracting drivers from red-light cameras/speed cameras
      - Blowouts of water, gas or sewage systems
      - Intentional Electrical overloads (again, difficult to do without the right unique circumstances)

      Like there's an endless list of "potential" out there, but one would need to be a willing victim or know "just the wrong people" to not see it coming.

    5. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is talking about the premeditated killing of a civilian by another civilian ("murder") occurring as a cause of specific data transmissions on the public TCP/IP-based internet ("online").

      If you're going to count radio-control systems and military systems then you can go back a LOT further than armed drones, but that's not what this story is about.

    6. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is exactly what happens when the coach potato who's running a drone is shooting at people in areas with no US jurisdiction -- a civilian (at most, an 'enemy combatant') is murdering other civilians.

    7. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first "online murder" was the remote/phone controlled bomb. Of course, bombs with remote wires is as old as electricity - so the internet has to be involved somehow. Not just current for the detonator. But that is still old...

    8. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is talking about the premeditated killing of a civilian by another civilian ("murder") occurring as a cause of specific data transmissions on the public TCP/IP-based internet ("online").

      If you're going to count radio-control systems and military systems then you can go back a LOT further than armed drones, but that's not what this story is about.

      Does "Swatting" count?

      If so, then yeah I believe it could or has happened already. Skype is being used to call local police forces on the other side of the planet to send the cops to peoples' houses over trivial shit like rivalries in video games.

      Given the nature of many police forces, it won't be long before (or has already occurred) someone gets shot by police over it, or police shot by home owners (if in some states. Not you Texas, your gun laws suck.)

    9. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Drone strikes already murder people every day.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    10. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      but that's not what this story is about.

      But that's what news stories should have been about when killing people using remote controlled devices was news and not normal.

      --
      bickerdyke
    11. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why it needs "hacked".

      Damn straight. I could simply be "fixed" or "improved".

      For example, by anyone's measure, beta.slashdot.org is a murder.

    12. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Translation+Error · · Score: 2

      As swatting ultimately amounts to manipulating humans to do the deed, I'd classify it as social engineering, personally.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    13. Re: Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish to shove my fetid pregnancy rod so far up your rancid mangina that it enters your small intestine so that when I pull it out it pulls your small and large intestines out with it and then I wish to strangle you with this as I continue to fuck it.

      What say you?

    14. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      it won't be long before someone gets shot by police over it, or police shot by home owners

      If police get shot by homeowners, it won't be long before someone gets shot by the police over it.

    15. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just most days, but we are really getting more efficient.

    16. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      The first "online murder" happened the day they put weapons on a drone

      Wrong, it's way older than that.

      Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were murdered online. You're worried about the network being used against us, but hundreds of years ago, SciFi authors already went meta and had the network be used to murder a part of itself!

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    17. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by RailGunner · · Score: 2

      Not you Texas, your gun laws suck.

      As someone who lives in Texas, our gun laws are pretty good with one notable exception -- we need an Open Carry law for hand guns. Otherwise, we can own / carry just about any gun.

    18. Re: Self fulfilling prophecy by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      Be good, leave the computer alone and go back play with your toys. The Internet is a dangerous place for a 10yo

    19. Re: Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish to shove my fetid pregnancy rod so far up your rancid mangina that it enters your small intestine so that when I pull it out it pulls your small and large intestines out with it and then I wish to strangle you with this as I continue to fuck it.

      What say you?

      I say you need therapy. Whatever emotional and/or psychological issues you are struggling with are better dealt with in the mental health ward of a hospital.

    20. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > implying drones don't communicate by unencrypted TCP/IP

      http://www.wired.com/2012/10/hack-proof-drone/

      pfffttt!!!

    21. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We....do have open carry handguns. Forgive me I only moved to Houston 4 months ago. You can open carry a rifle or a shotgun, why the fuck not a pistol?

    22. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I see you can pretty much only do it on your own property or in your own property if its hidden, unless you have a CCW. I come from Ohio where we can open carry pistols. :-/

    23. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by alex4u2nv · · Score: 1

      Discounting remote controlled robotic devices like drones, robots and such, I think compromised devices like google glass, iwatch and other wearable technologies can be very dangerous, if not fatal.
      Think about driving over a bridge or 2 way traffic when random zombies start loading in google glass, or your phone transmits a virus over to your bluetooth connected car, etc. All plausible scenarios that can take place

    24. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by matbury · · Score: 1

      Isn't it still murder if you kill someone outside of any judicial process or theatre of war? Is the US at war with Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, etc.? Is Israel at war with Palestine?

      "Targeted killing (also known as Selective assassination) is the premeditated killing of an individual by a state organization or institution outside a judicial procedure or a battlefield." -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

    25. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      ...and I thought Ping-of-Death was so 90's.

    26. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Tom · · Score: 1

      We're not talking radio-controlled. These drones use networking technology, and if their IP address is pingable from your location is not exactly the major point.

      Given that many drone victims are civilians, in a conflict that is not officially a war, the only difference left seems to be that the murderers are not civilians. That's one of the flimsiest excuses ever to call something by a different name.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    27. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by RailGunner · · Score: 1

      No, Texas does not have an Open Carry law permitting the open carry of hand guns in public. On your property, open carry away. You can open carry a long gun (rifle, shotgun, even the "scary" AR-15) but we can't openly carry hand guns.... yet.

  2. Are they saying... by flu1d · · Score: 5, Funny

    That monitor mounted, usb powered (web) gun wasn't the best purchase?

    1. Re:Are they saying... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That or unless there's some kind of internet connected medical equipment that has the ability to kill you, how the fuck is this supposed to happen? I think it would be equally feasible to induce a nuclear reactor into meltdown in the same vein as how Stuxnet destroyed all of that equipment while giving false readings on the indicators.

      That is to say, not fucking likely.

      If somebody had the kind of resources to pull such a thing off, I think their victim is already in a vulnerable enough state that they could hire a hitman anonymously for a few bitcoins.

    2. Re:Are they saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A specially-crafted audio file will be downloaded by the 4G-enabled stereo system of a sports car traveling 120 MPH down the freeway. To ensure no aftermarket competition, the car company will have deeply integrated the stereo with the computer that controls the fly-by-wire power steering, causing the car to careen off of a high promontory into the sea.

    3. Re: Are they saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hacking a WiFi capable pacemaker would be my first guess.

    4. Re:Are they saying... by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      The two likeliest methods, in a very general sense, are by medical device and by starting a fire. This is not including what some posters are speculating about - planting false data to trigger police SWAT raids and similar things, because that isn't really within the scope of what European Law enforcement is postulating. (and really, making a false police report by computer is not that distinct from making a false police report by other means).
              Without going into detail which might encourage someone to actually try something, you might consider the CPAP machine - a little looking at product lines and I was swiftly able to find CPAP designs that use USB networking and can at least send regular data summaries to an e-mail account, so I think it's safe to assume they are running some OS internally and at least connect through a gateway PC to the internet. A similar situation applies to some heartbeat and respiation monitors, plus some of these include Cat-5 or wireless connections, or both. Sometimes, the product descriptions for both of these devices don't mention any networking uses, and the only way to tell it has them is to look at the pictures of back panels and such to spot the various ports.
                  For some reason, people keep mentioning tampering with pacemakers, but pacemakers actually seem pretty far down the list of gadjets becoming part of the internet of things. I don't see any wireless equipped morphine pumps or similar items for sale from hospital supply sources either, but even if I haven't just missed those, some idiot will probably try to make one soon.
                I would say such a device fits your definition - "internet connected equipment that has the ability to kill". A CPAP machine isn't a terribly reliable method of killing someone, but it's certainly a possible one. I don't guarantee that any CPAP machines are running a really unsecure OS, or in particular something like Windows CE, but t's something I would watch for, and avoid using, at least unless the physician prescribing has some good reasons to want a nettable version of the machine in a particular situation.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:Are they saying... by Zorpheus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about other countries, but in Germany drive-by-wire is not allowed. This became law long ago because they were worried about an electronic failure, not hacking. Though hacking also is a type of electronic failure, so it is actually widely covered by that approach.

    6. Re:Are they saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my werk's suppliers emailed to say they'd been DoS attacked, which had caused physical damage to something or other (probably network switches, I guess). It'd be a bit of a reach, but it's easy to do in Hollywood - I'd like to see sparks flying out of my USB keyboard - all that low voltage... it's dangerous stuff ;-)

    7. Re:Are they saying... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good idea at the first thought. But it begs the question, why it is allowed for commercial airplanes...

      --
      bickerdyke
    8. Re:Are they saying... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      making a false police report by computer is not that distinct from making a false police report by other means

      Oh yes it is!!! -- Amazon Patent Team

    9. Re:Are they saying... by StikyPad · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Are they saying... by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Oh, I just meant the steering. Probably it is the same for brakes, also not sure about the rules for accelerator. But as long as you can disconnect the engine with the shift or clutch it can't get too bad anyway. Unless you forgot what you learned in your driving lessons.

  3. easy enough by roman_mir · · Score: 0

    all you have to do is call cops on an unsuspecting victim at night, especially if the person in question has guns in the house and may use them to attempt and protect himself from some sort of an attack. At this point cops in the US are militarised enough and are fucked in the head just enough to attack and shoot first and ask questions later, so that's a way to do it if you are into that kind of a thing.

    1. Re:easy enough by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      that sort of thing done in the age of swords, spears and bows

    2. Re:easy enough by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I suppose, but today you can probably do it with skype or something of that sort.

    3. Re: easy enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, phones in the age of swords were kinda unwieldy.

    4. Re:easy enough by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      I suppose, but today you can probably do it with skype or something of that sort.

      There is no essential difference between calling the cops by skype, phone or anonymous postcard.

      If you live in a society where householders react to a knock at the door by shooting blind, you are unsurprisingly going to have a higher than average murder rate.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:easy enough by electrofelix · · Score: 1

      If the cops knocked before hand and announced themselves then it's highly unlikely the householder would shot them thinking someone was trying to break in.

      The whole reason swatting is likely to go wrong is because of no-knock entry.

  4. Neuromancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the AI that can kill

  5. Remotely induced sudffocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The combination to the air shield is 1-2-3-4-5.

    1. Re:Remotely induced sudffocation by wideglide · · Score: 1

      ... before going to ludicrous speed ...

      --
      The sum of intelligence on a planet is constant. Nowadays we have more people. When classic goes away, so do I. Copy
  6. Bash.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The day is near when we can finally stab people in the face over the internet.

    1. Re:Bash.org by PPH · · Score: 1

      Slashdot moderation is finally going to be fun!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  7. Cheap Solution by JayTech · · Score: 1

    We wouldn't need to discuss this if the medical device manufacturers stopped using consumer-grade wireless radios and protocols. But of course that would cost more money to research and develop, yada yada yada. There's a cheap solution to this problem, however. Dispense with the tinfoil hats and go for a full-blown tinfoil body wrap. Problem solved!

    1. Re:Cheap Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't that it is consumer-grade. It is that wireless (or even wired into the Internet, like what the SCADA manufacturers like to do) negates the safety interest of an airgap.

  8. Note to self: by Ignacio · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do NOT Internet-enable the wheeled stabbing machine I am currently working on...

    1. Re:Note to self: by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Is that anything like this stabbing machine?

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    2. Re:Note to self: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean this kind of stabbing device?

      Yep, I think you do. Of course it would be great if one could "stab" people over the Internet.

  9. IOT by 4wdloop · · Score: 1

    oh..that's what it's for!

    --
    4wdloop
  10. Dear doc... by Kekke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please use TOR when fetching My ventilator's new firmware.
    And while yer add it, pls remove the rootkit from the darn Dialysis machine. My granddaughter charged Her iPhone from it's usb port.
    My blood salts have been through the roof ever since....

    PS:
    My wheelchair threatens to ran me off cliff, if the payment isn't complete in three days.

    1. Re:Dear doc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS:
      My wheelchair threatens to ran me off cliff, if the payment isn't complete in three days.

      Dear Patient,

      The Wheelchair is simply acting as the hospital instructed - your insurance claim was denied

    2. Re:Dear doc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wheelchair threatens to ran me off cliff, if the payment isn't complete in three days.

      Wow. Sounds just like the recent The Blacklist episode (Dr. Covington)...

  11. Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the creators of the equipment will finally spend a little time on how they will make their products secure! Is it really that hard?

    1. Re: Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is pretty hard to do it properly. Unfortunately, they're not really trying, so it would be pretty easy to drastically improve the situation.

  12. Bring back the WinNuke! by Cito · · Score: 2

    Give whole new meaning to the famous mid 90s exploit instantly blue screening all Windows and locking up Linux 2.0.30 and below kernels by popping port 139.

    Make it literal :-P

    1. Re:Bring back the WinNuke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give whole new meaning to the famous mid 90s exploit instantly blue screening all Windows and locking up Linux 2.0.30 and below kernels by popping port 139.

      Make it literal :-P

      I don't remember any linux machine locking up like the windows installations did. And why should they as there was nothing listening there by default and I don't think samba was able to lock up the system.

    2. Re:Bring back the WinNuke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are thinking of Teardrop not WinNuke

    3. Re:Bring back the WinNuke! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Linux just sets devices aflame. ;)

    4. Re:Bring back the WinNuke! by Cito · · Score: 1

      I remember my Slackware 2.0.29 kernel would freeze in a winnuke I found that back then slack opened 139 by default for shared drives via samba

      Samba was formed as it had exact bug windows did when a fragmented packet hit 139 both OS would crash.

      I think it was 2.0.31 that fixed the problem letting those packets get ignored or something its been a long time.

      Slackware was fixed fast, but widows was vulnerable for long long time.

      Used to troll irc and winnuke channels watching all the timeouts.

      Teardrop was fun, it brought the similar bug back

      Then there was modem bugs, ctcp +++atz I think it was and it forced modems to hangup. You could also send string to hang up modem and dial a 900 number to piss off some kids parents when they got bill

  13. Honestly, I doubt a cyber criminal will be first by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    My gut tells me it's going to be a 14 or 15 year old boy who does it for the yuks, and doesn't really have a grasp on what a horrible thing it is.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  14. Spoiler alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Power grid crashed, life sustaining equipment shuts down.

  15. Welcome to 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. Does SWATing count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like we've been murdering people with connected devices for about a decade already - drones.

  17. It'll be a vehicle by chrism238 · · Score: 2

    If it's sanguine to place bets, my money's on an Internet accessible, or controlled, car killing its driver or targeting a pedestrian.

  18. More fear mongering. by seoras · · Score: 3, Interesting

    F.U.D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt

    Anyone else getting a bit fed up with all this fear BS?
    I'm I alone in feeling like our governments are treating us like a herd of sheep using fear to herd us and control us?

    Only earlier today we had a post about giving up freedoms so we can be better protected.
    http://news.slashdot.org/story/14/10/07/0235241/brits-must-trade-digital-freedoms-for-safety-says-crime-agency-boss

    Now another article where we are again being told that a free internet is a physical threat to us and we can be murdered online. ...."found that governments are not equipped to fight the growing threat of "online murder", ..".
    The solution - give up our freedom online.

    How long until a post like this is blacked out as "unsafe".
    Who is it really unsafe for?

    1. Re:More fear mongering. by tehcyder · · Score: 0
      Bullshit. Your freedom to do what you like (on the internet or elsewhere) certainly does not extend to the freedom to murder people.

      It seems entirely reasonable to me to think about the potential problems caused by an "internet of things". Cheerleading progress for its own sake, with no regard to any downsides, is childish.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:More fear mongering. by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      you are not incorrect and you are not alone.

    3. Re:More fear mongering. by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Your freedom to do what you like (on the internet or elsewhere) certainly does not extend to the freedom to murder people.

      Of course not. But thinking about the potential problems and violating a person's liberty on the basis that someone else might abuse it are two entirely different things. By all means, consider the problems—and find the solutions which preserve freedom for everyone.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    4. Re:More fear mongering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're wrong, and you shouldn't be allowed to vote. Sorry. Of course you don't have the freedom to murder peopple.

      Now another article where we are again being told that a free internet is a physical threat to us and we can be murdered online. ...."found that governments are not equipped to fight the growing threat of "online murder", ..".
      The solution - give up our freedom online.

      Is not acceptable. Yet you fucking liberals always get your way and erode everyone's liberty. You like to cry that Bush started what Obama made worse (when in reality it was started way before Dubyuh) except ignore the whole "made worse" part when people like me say this, too. Governments need only be concerned about the threat of "online murder" towards their own employees. Only sheeple are going to cry to the government to protect them from rogue electrons. It's fucking ridiculous. This is not Hollywood. It's not a video game. It's sure as shit not the matrix, or Hackers, or any of dozens of other stupid fictions where you can hack a cellphone andi it will emit a massive burst of radiation that gives you a tumor then kills you with it within 5 seconds. Is it impossible?

      No.

      But, as it is, NOTHING has the ability to connect to the internet on its own, especially if you disable its internet abilities or remove them. Smartcars oh boy, because people will ever drive those. Webcams OH NOS it's going to reflect-blind me to death some how. What's going to happen? Someone is going to hack a nuclear power plant? Not possible. Hack your heat and burn you to death? Also not possible. What, hack your completely analog locks and deadbolts unless you're dumb enough to completely digitize your home security? Nothing that can kill you.

      It's a completely fucking ludicrous idea and will be for the next 50 years minimum. Thus my original comment laughing my ass off.

  19. Someone just killed my dog, why? by millette · · Score: 0

    Someone just killed my dog, why?

    1. Re:Someone just killed my dog, why? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      Because it might have been carrying ebola?

      For those who haven't read it, John Varley's "Press Enter" is what a series of internet murders could really look like. It reads like a blueprint or how-to.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  20. cyber terrorist BS by lippydude · · Score: 1

    What a load of cyber BS ..

  21. Oh my! by ZorkZero · · Score: 1

    The framers of the constitution could not possibly have anticipated a world with such a thing as this "murder".

  22. death by cd reader smashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make your victim stand in front of the PC and....

    while true; do
          eject
    done;

  23. I thought it wasn't murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When ordered by a government agency?

  24. Hackers can turn your computer into a BOMB by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

    ... & blow your family to smithereens!

    http://i.imgur.com/0BSZXxl.jpg

    --
    Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    1. Re:Hackers can turn your computer into a BOMB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of Die Hard 4. Like computer nerds THAT good at hacking wouldn't notice theres a giant block of C4 connected to their computer.

  25. Re:Honestly, I doubt a cyber criminal will be firs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, whomever it is will retroactively have been an evil pedophile all along. No one murdered their Ex in a drunken rage, a brave Ferguson officer saved thousands of babies by ending this monster's life minutes before the logs and child-porn first appeared on his hard drive.

    Are you seriously going to complain about someone saving children with the newest compliance-tool?

  26. Life imitates art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it's murder by numbers, one, two, three
    It's as easy to hack as your TCP/IP

  27. I don't care of someone murders my account by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Who cares if someone uses the internet to murder my Facebook account? On the other hand, if it's real world murder, then it's just as much murder regardless of how it was done.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:I don't care of someone murders my account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if someone uses the internet to murder my Facebook account? On the other hand, if it's real world murder, then it's just as much murder regardless of how it was done.

      Could that be classified as a mercy killing?

  28. Re:Honestly, I doubt a cyber criminal will be firs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From their stolen bent iphone, no less.

  29. Opcode for this has been around for long by pereric · · Score: 1
    CPU opcode "HCF" meaning "halt and catch fire". Could affect user.
    http://www.catb.org/jargon/htm...

    Or - of course, just including the control character "EOU" in any message sent:
    http://www.catb.org/jargon/htm...

    1. Re:Opcode for this has been around for long by bluescrn · · Score: 2

      Making a laptop/smartphone 'halt and catch fire' is potentialy a real threat. Not by overheating the CPU, but by targeting the battery charging system. Lithium-based batteries can 'explode' (burn very violently) - if mistreated - e.g. overcharged. If the battery charging system has elements of firmware control, that might be a real risk?

    2. Re:Opcode for this has been around for long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately that will literally never happen ever because overcharging isn't a problem any Lithium based battery has ever had - quite the opposite. Lithium batteries lose capacitance very, very, very quickly. They pretty much can't be overcharged. You could overload the power system while it's plugged in and hope to blow up the computer, sure.

  30. Mod parent up by Prune · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ah, a deliciously nerdy reference to the famous IRC quote, one of the top-rated ones on the quote database:

    <Zybl0re> get up
    <Zybl0re> get on up
    <Zybl0re>get up
    <Zybl0re>get on up
    <phxl|paper>and DANCE
    * nmp3bot dances :D-<
    * nmp3bot dances :D|-<
    * nmp3bot dances :D/-<
    <[SA]HatfulOfHollow>i'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    1. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the follow-up that proves that we are all sad bastards.

  31. At long last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, does this mean we can now punch people in the face over TCP/IP?

  32. No, lying headline by pjt33 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first link in the summary is to a news report with the headline "First online murder to happen by the end of 2014, warns Europol". When you read the story, what it actually claims is

    The study, which was published last week, analysed the possible physical dangers linked to cyber criminality and found that a rise in ‘injury and possible deaths’ could be expected as computer hackers launch attacks on critical connected equipment.

    The assessment particularly referred to a report by IID, a US security firm, which forecast that the world’s first murder via a ‘hacked internet-connected device’ would happen by the end of 2014.

    And the reference that it mentions is right here and says

    With more objects being connected to the Internet and the creation of new types of critical infrastructure, we can expect to see (more) targeted attacks on existing and emerging infrastructures, including new forms of blackmailing and extortion schemes (e.g. ransomware for smart cars or smart homes), data theft, physical injury and possible death [188], and new types of botnets.

    No mention of 2014. No assertion that it will happen: just that it might.

    TL;DR: Europol isn't predicting an online murder in 2014. That's just a subeditor who either didn't understand the plain English of the reporter or who chose to outright lie when writing the headline in order to sensationalise it.

    1. Re:No, lying headline by Beamboom · · Score: 2

      Please /., gimme a handful of points to share. I need to throw some at this guy. More often than not, what's found behind a fantastic headlines are usually so much more sober that it becomes almost the opposite of what the headliner claims.

    2. Re:No, lying headline by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      I think it's fairly safe to say that the majority of headlines these days are sensationalised.

    3. Re:No, lying headline by Whibla · · Score: 4, Informative

      Informative? Not so much...

      If you're going to go to all the effort to read the article, you might like to spend the extra 3 seconds to follow the linked reference (quoted in your post as [188]).

      IID ... today issued a midterm report on its cybersecurity predictions for 2014, revealing we are on our way to seeing many of these prognostications become a reality. Last year at this time, IID boldly envisioned that by the end of 2014:

        We will witness the first ever public case of murder via hacked Internet-connected device.

      The article goes on to say:

      There has yet to be a proven case of murder via Internet. However, former Vice President Dick Cheney revealed in October 2013 that he underwent surgery to turn off the wireless function on his pacemaker, to prevent it from being hacked.

      You end with:

      TL;DR: Europol isn't predicting an online murder in 2014. That's just a subeditor who either didn't understand the plain English of the reporter or who chose to outright lie when writing the headline in order to sensationalise it.

      A headline has to be short, and unfortunately in that shortening some information is lost. Sure, it would have been more accurate to say "Europol reports that a security firm predicts the first online murder by the end of this year", but removing the bolded part strikes me as an acceptable precis of (that small section of) the article. Complaining that editors sensationalise headlines in order to encourage people to read the full article is akin to complaining that advertisements are designed solely to get you to buy a product. Well, duh!

      As for lying, you're as guilty as a lie by ommission as they are of any lie by commission.

    4. Re:No, lying headline by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I think it's fairly safe to say that anyone reading slashdot is looking for sensationalism.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:No, lying headline by pjt33 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I quoted the part of the article where the reporter states that the security firm made that forecast. But as often happens, the headline makes claims which don't match either the truth or the body of the article. It's far from unknown for reporters or opinion writers to get a nasty shock when they see the headline which the subeditor chose to put on their copy.

      If the issue were the length of the headline, a 20% saving could be made and the accuracy improved by rewriting it to "Online attacks could lead to deaths, warns Europol".

    6. Re:No, lying headline by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I find it very likely that the first online murder has already occurred. Although it may have been ruled manslaughter. Someone has probably hacked a hospital or a pacemaker or something and gotten somebody killed.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:No, lying headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just here to see someone blame Obama.

  33. Hackers can turn your home computer into a BOMB by GroeFaZ · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    1. Re:Hackers can turn your home computer into a BOMB by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say, this was being done by hackers decades ago. :-)

  34. Already happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already happened if you total up all the hours people have wasted here, on FaceBook, and various other places. Not to mention all the seat time developing it. Sitting down all the time is bad for your health. OK... not "murder" in the classic sense; but taking lives for profit anyway.

  35. The obligatory drone comment by bluescrn · · Score: 1

    But online murders have been happening for a while, via military UAVs...

  36. Ooh! Let Me Play! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    My guess is it's going to be C0lMu5+rd in the IRC chat-room with the FDA-Pee-Hole-Device int-range overflow exploit! How'd I do?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  37. FUBAR by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Would smashing oneself over the head with a #@%& Comcast modem count?

    1. Re:FUBAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No because ComCast makes you hurt yourself the old fashioned way: Not giving a fuck about their customers, having a monopoly, horrible customer service, horrible pricing, horrible billing, horrible infrastructure, and they're proud of it.

      Until you break something or hurt yourself because you can't deal with it anymore. Unhappy Comcast user, future extremely unhappy Comcast customer.

    2. Re:FUBAR by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And the worst part is that their competitors, when they have any, suck almost as much.

  38. Roomba Alert by dbarron · · Score: 1

    So is that maybe what happened when the Roomba ate my parakeet ?
    Yep, that's it...the bird was hacked!

  39. You laugh, but... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Currently there are thousands of heart pacemakers which wirelessly connect to interrogator devices that sit next to the bed every night. Those devices check the device every night and check in with the company if there's any problem.

    Is it impossible to reprogram those interrogators? The manufacturers say so. I guess we should believe them?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:You laugh, but... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I saw this demonstrated on a documentary called "Homeland" a year or two ago, so it's definitely possible.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  40. Exactly! by SomeoneFromBelgium · · Score: 1

    That's what I tried to explain to my neighbour when my AirDrone 'inexplicably' went through his greenhouse, destroying his precious, award winning rose.

  41. Really? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Hundred of Bombs have been exploded via cellphones, is it really that more 'modern' if it's done via SIP or Skype?

  42. This was predicted ages ago. by Stu101 · · Score: 1

    I can't remember exactly which book, but the book pointed out how easy it could be.

    Ignore messing around with firmware etc. The book foretold the story that someone would be using a online take out service/delivery service and they had setup all their allergies so that any restaurant saw a red flag and to be careful what goes in the meal. Someone hacks into just-eat or whomever the provider is. The customers Peanut allergy suddenly goes away on the notes and the dish is prepared as normal a week later. Instant severe incident if not death.

    I'm so glad I don't have food allergies.

       

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
    1. Re:This was predicted ages ago. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      ... and the dish is prepared as normal a week later. Instant severe incident if not death.

      I'm so glad I don't have food allergies.

      Me, too, neither.

      Although if I did have a potentially deadly aversion to some foods, I would have to be without food for some time before eating a meal prepared by strangers.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:This was predicted ages ago. by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      My plan, I would data mine you to figure out what fast food outlets you like and if you have any addictions.
      Then send you free bacon cheeseburgers, cigarettes, venti coffee that's pure espresso shots. Whatever you have trouble saying no to the most.
      It would kill you, eventually, unless you started exercising, eating right, and maybe a trip to a detox clinic.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    3. Re:This was predicted ages ago. by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      My plan, I would data mine you to figure out what fast food outlets you like and if you have any addictions.
      Then send you free bacon cheeseburgers, cigarettes, venti coffee that's pure espresso shots. Whatever you have trouble saying no to the most.
      It would kill you, eventually, unless you started exercising, eating right, and maybe a trip to a detox clinic.

      Can I volunteer to be your enemy?

      My death/wish-list:

      Kobe beefburgers
      That coffee that's made from cats shitting out beans, whatever it's called
      Single malt scotch
      Cuban cigars

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:This was predicted ages ago. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I can't remember exactly which book, but the book pointed out how easy it could be.

      Ignore messing around with firmware etc. The book foretold the story that someone would be using a online take out service/delivery service and they had setup all their allergies so that any restaurant saw a red flag and to be careful what goes in the meal. Someone hacks into just-eat or whomever the provider is. The customers Peanut allergy suddenly goes away on the notes and the dish is prepared as normal a week later. Instant severe incident if not death.

      I'm so glad I don't have food allergies.

      That sounds more like some sort of "perfect crime" story than a serious threat.

      I'm pretty sure that if I had a real, fatal food allergy I wouldn't be eating anything I hadn't seen prepared with my own eyes.

      I definitely wouldn't be relying on Domino's Pizza or whoever to custom bake my pizza in a separate, sterile area.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:This was predicted ages ago. by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      Datamining...... Ok, a dump truck load of German scheisse porn is on it's way to you now.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  43. Think of the Children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need more of these stories so we can know what is going to be the future for our children.
    Then we must allow the government to tax us for the new 3 letter acronymed organization it will put in place to track and protect us.

    1. Re:Think of the Children! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yes, because I, for one, look forward to my children living in an untaxed, government-free future, where the only security comes from being an indentured slave to some mega-corporation run by a malevolent AI.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  44. Speaking of... by sootman · · Score: 2

    The book Daemon by Daniel Suarez was pretty good. Started out just the littlest bit cheesy -- someone was killed by the Internet! -- but I'm glad I stuck with it because it quickly became really good. The sequel, Freedom (TM), did nothing for me.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  45. Re:Honestly, I doubt a cyber criminal will be firs by jandersen · · Score: 1

    My gut tells me

    When my gut speaks, it's usually with low, growling voice and a terrible halitosis.

  46. oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    I'm sorry but how do you not ONLY laugh your ass off at this?

    Online murder. What is this, 90's hollywood? Current hollywood? It's like that scene in Forgetting Sarah Marshall where russell brand and jason segel are making fun of "Sarah"'s movie where a cellphone murders people. As Russel Brand says "It's ridiculous."

    This cannot and will not happen. You can't murder someone digitally. You could theoretically - VERY theoretically - hack a tangible piece of equipment with which to mruder them. Assuming any of those things had network connectivity. Guess what, they don't, because there's no reason for them to, and never will be. You'd sooner be able to hack a military assault robot to kill someone with - something also decades and decades in the future.

  47. Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's to say the challenge hasn't already been met, yet overlooked...

  48. Wow, so using Windows can get you killed now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume that the threat refers to malicious software commonly known as viruses and trojans, which notoriously plague Windows, from all OSes. So now using this system you're not only risking your data, finance, but also your life. And you have to pay for the thing. Nice.

  49. Kaboom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. Get the fuck out. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I've got more important things to worry about.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Get the fuck out. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      You hope you've got more important things to worry about. But when your router catches fire in the middle of the night before you were due to change your will...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Get the fuck out. by __1200333 · · Score: 1

      the night before you were due to change your will...

      No way! It will be the night after you changed your will. To give everything to Google. Life insurance paid out by a wholly owned subsidiary of Google.

  51. Patent worthy by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    That sounds like an innovative business method patent for assassins:

    Claim 1: Murder, using a computing device consisting of a visual display and keyboard orchestrated using the internet.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  52. Re:And I predict by Sentrion · · Score: 1

    Murder is Haraam, so no true Muslim will be doing this.

  53. Glass half full by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Technological progress continues apace.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  54. Hacker! by naris · · Score: 1

    This add a whole new meaning to the term Hacker!

  55. This has already happened ... by netsurfer912 · · Score: 1

    That is an old shoe by now. Do you remember that Journalist whose car exploded? The engine was forund several meters from his car. Although it's not offical, it's extremely likely that his car was hacked. (trying to find source)

  56. It's a simple 3 step process: by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

    Step 1. Weaponize my "Laser" printer
    Step 2. ???
    Step 3. Online murder

    --
    "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    1. Re:It's a simple 3 step process: by fhage · · Score: 1

      Step 1. Weaponize my "Laser" printer ...

      Perhaps not as far fetched as one might expect.

      Many Google Cloud Print laser printers are constantly connected to the cloud and have a software controlled heat element with the potential to start a fire. Anyone who can access the owner's Google account could send the printer malicious commands.

      Another potential fire vector is smart devices with Li batteries. Charge a Li battery too long and it may burst into fire. Charging is typically software controlled and most people leave their smart phones and other devices plugged into a charger at night while they sleep.

      An attack could be time triggered, and a million devices might set themselves on fire at 3AM on a specific date. My own experience with the IOT suggests that security is an afterthought. It's past time we start taking these issues seriously.

  57. Re:And I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Murder is Haraam, so no true Muslim will be doing this.

    Take your fucking taqiyya elsewhere

  58. Achewood's take on it by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    "FOOLS! I have invented a USB device which can collect votes from the Internet and drive a knife through your heart!"
    http://achewood.com/index.php?...

  59. Probably already has happend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't help but think that drone pilots in Nevada are not in some way linked to drones via internet. Plenty of people have been killed this way.

  60. I'll file this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the same department as making someones CPU a grenade.

  61. I'm tired. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm seriously tired of this Recycled in CyberSPACE bullshit.

  62. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curious to know why my awesome comment was deleted. Horse shit.

  63. Speaking of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other authors have imagined this death over the internet bit too. Null Pointer, by Johnny Batch.

    http://www.amazon.com/Null-Pointer-Joshua-Jones-Mystery-ebook/dp/B002L6GMMG

  64. Mystery Writer Predicted it Years Ago by valmroberts · · Score: 1

    Have you *read* Null Pointer by Johnny Batch? You should, because it's all about an online murder that only a programmer can solve. http://www.amazon.com/Null-Poi... http://www.barnesandnoble.com/...

  65. First? by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 1

    Seriously? 150+ comments and no one posts that the first "online murder" will be accompanied by a "First!!" comment when it happens?

    --
    When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
  66. Rule 34 by Charlie Stross by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    ISBN 978-0-441-02034-8

    Published 2011.

    Murder by hacking of internet-connected devices (such as an automated enema-delivering wank-bot which got loaded up with dietary additives that killed the wankee) was a major plot element.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"