NASA Study: Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

submitter bigwheel sends this excerpt from a NASA news release: The cold waters of Earth's deep ocean have not warmed measurably since 2005, according to a new NASA study, leaving unsolved the mystery of why global warming appears to have slowed in recent years. Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean temperature data from 2005 to 2013 and found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably. Study coauthor Josh Willis of JPL said these findings do not throw suspicion on climate change itself. "The sea level is still rising," Willis noted. "We're just trying to understand the nitty-gritty details."

Comments

Re:Yesterday Oceans were warming more than predict

[itzly]

Yesterday it was about the top layer, today about the deeper layers. Oceans are big and varied, you know.

Re:phase change

[durrr]

It's hard to admit that you could've been wrong isn't it?
Especially after you've been gloating over your high horse position and have insulted everyone that disagreed.

we get it

[Anonymous Coward]

Climate: (noun) - anything in the sky or seas that can be twisted to support the claims that the world will end if we do not all pay higher taxes and give governments more power over individuals.

Weather: (noun) - anything in the sky or seas that might be twisted into an argument that governments do not need more money and power in order to "save the planet"

Examples of proper usage:

1. Hurricanes: when large and devastating, like Katrina, they are climate and proof of global warming, but when absent for a record-setting period of time they become weather and anybody who cites them as evidence of non-warming is an IDIOT

2. Temperatures: when high in a place like California, they are climate and proof of global warming, but when very low in a place like the midwest and explained as a "polar vortex" they are just weather and anybody claiming temperatures matter is an IDIOT who doesn not "get" the difference between "climate" and "weather"

3. Droughts: When hitting California worse than younger citizens remember in their short lives they are climate and proof of global warming, but when people are reminded that they have happened many times before and when evidence shows that the current one too is tied to El Nino/La Nina weather patterns they are....... um...... still climate and proof the world will end if we do not abandon the free market, personal liberty, etc (when something is a disaster that can be used no matter what, it remains climate)

Re:we get it

[whistlingtony]

You know.....

This story is a legitimate chance for anti-GWers to crow a little bit. (sort of). We have something here, by a reputable source (NASA) that has revealed a tough question. We thought the deep ocean was warming. It turns out it isn't. We were using that as a sink for the heat to explain the recent pause in the global warming. Shit... This makes us search for some answers.

This is science working. It's also NASA saying "hey, wait a minute", which You People always seem to say never happens. It's also STILL saying that the oceans are warming, just not the deep oceans. It also says the deep oceans are REALLY hard to measure, so perhaps it's wrong. We'll see.

So, yeah, Anti-GWers, this was your moment to shine. This was your moment to crow. Instead CppDeveloper decided to make an ignorant comment about CO2 being plant food. Yes. We knew that. Thanks. You're about 20 years behind on your Stupid Anti-GWing statements. We know CO2 is plant food. We know plants absorb it. That's kind of the point of oil. It's a nicely balanced system and we have been A. releasing millions of years of Stored In Plants CO2 inside 200 years and B. cutting down rain forest for beef farms at the same time. We've hashed out your stupid statement years ago. You need to update...

Grumble.....

Re:phase change

[PhilHibbs]

Yeah, it's not a constructive attitude to take. But, if I'm convinced that global warming is going to wipe out the human race, then anyone who is arguing on the other side is directly contributing to the extermination of humanity, and that's not going to endear me to them. And in a broader sense regarding "liberals", tolerant people can't be expected to be tolerant of intolerance. Same with religion - if I'm convinced that anyone not worshipping God is helping the devil to destroy the world, then I'm not really going to be sympathetic to atheists or other religions. Of course to someone who disagrees with me on any of these positions, I'm just some nutjob. But if I'm right, well, what otherwise outrageous actions are acceptable in order to save the world?