Slashdot Mirror


AT&T To Repay $80 Million In Shady Phone Bill Charges

First time accepted submitter dibdublin writes The Federal Trade Commission announced today that AT&T will pay $105 million for hiding extra charges in cellphone bills. The best part of the news? $80 million of it will go back into the pockets of people bilked by AT&T. The FTC announcement reads in part: "As part of a $105 million settlement with federal and state law enforcement officials, AT&T Mobility LLC will pay $80 million to the Federal Trade Commission to provide refunds to consumers the company unlawfully billed for unauthorized third-party charges, a practice known as mobile cramming. The refunds are part of a multi-agency settlement that also includes $20 million in penalties and fees paid to 50 states and the District of Columbia, as well as a $5 million penalty to the Federal Communications Commission."

61 comments

  1. Hah!!! by koan · · Score: 1

    This will go nicely with the check I got from the Apple suit.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Hah!!! by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

      calling the entire U2 back catalogue a "check" is a bit far fetched don't you think?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Hah!!! by koan · · Score: 2

      i got a $250 check from a settlement against Apples scam, yes it cashed.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    3. Re:Hah!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confused, that 250 was for sucking cock.

      lmao!!!

  2. Nice 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't happen to a better company.

  3. AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a more sleazy, incompetent corporate entity on the face of this planet?

    Rhetorical question of course. Anyone who's done business with them knows the answer.

    1. Re:AT&T by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is there a more sleazy, incompetent corporate entity on the face of this planet?

      Comcast.

    2. Re:AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast comes to mind because of this link. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/comcast-got-me-fired-after-billing-dispute-says-california-man/

    3. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Disney

    4. Re:AT&T by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I was thinking GM myself....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:AT&T by TWX · · Score: 1

      Comcast didn't fail to disclose a known bug with a product of theirs that has killed numerous people and continues to kill as it remains unpatched though.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:AT&T by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Ford (Pinto), Chrysler (minivan latches), or GM? Comcast and AT&T didn't actually kill anyone. The car companies did.

    7. Re:AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You spelled Verizon wrong.

    8. Re:AT&T by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Is there a more sleazy, incompetent corporate entity on the face of this planet?

      Comcast.

      Oracle beats them all, hands down.

    9. Re: AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the bug?

    10. Re:AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which used to be part of AT&T. They in fact follow AT&T's corporate playbook.

      As someone later in the thread said, these companies are designed around making profit, and as long as it's legal, they will do it.

      A comcast/time-warner merger will certainly be bad for customers, just look at the ATT Wireless + Cingular merger. The larger more evil/crappier company is always the one who acquires the slightly-less evil/less-crappy company, but the end result is that anyone who knows what's coming will willingly quit/take severance rather than deal with that cluster-f*** of a corporate entity.

      This means the larger a company gets, the more brain drain happens to it. Eventually you're left with a company that is run by lawyers and business managers, and no staff that can think of good innovative ideas.

      But the charge cramming problem I can speak from experience from working at AT&T wireless pre-merger that the policy was that the charges were not refundable, because they paid the third party. Just like international roaming, it's not refundable.

      I was one of the few people who said "**** that policy" and would intentionally credit small charges and tell them how to text STOP and I would be disabling their text-messaging support as a condition of receiving credit.

    11. Re:AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast and AT&T didn't actually kill anyone

      I don't know about those, but I wager Microsoft has caused a certain number of suicides...

    12. Re:AT&T by sjames · · Score: 1

      The banks laundering money for terrorists comes to mind.

    13. Re:AT&T by ruir · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, do you even need to ask it?

  4. Sounds like a win for AT&T by Joel+Cahoon · · Score: 1

    AT&T to Pay $105 Million Over Unlawful Billing

    ...customers who were billed “hundreds of millions of dollars" in unauthorized charges...

    I guess AT&T gets to keep the extra couple hundred million.

    1. Re: Sounds like a win for AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T kept "at least 35%" of those hundreds, the rest went to the third parties

      I'd assume that they lost money on this

    2. Re: Sounds like a win for AT&T by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      Yes, they get to keep a big portion of ill gotten gains. What they pay will likely be a tax write off. Also, nobody goes to jail for outright fraud. There's nothing to see here, citizen. Move along.

    3. Re: Sounds like a win for AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't fuckin bet on it. Criminals aren't stupid. And I don't see the government refunding any taxes they skimmed off this deal. We used to shoot redcoats for this kind of stuff. But that was when the right to keep and bear arms was seen as unecessarry rhetoric. Elon, PLEASE get those rockets ready. There are 10's of thousands of people willing to die on mars as free men rather than 'endevouring to persevere'.

    4. Re: Sounds like a win for AT&T by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'd guess AT&T kept less than 50% of those 35%, as they were paid on to the actual crammers. This will be a spur for AT&T to start claiming against the actual crammers.

    5. Re: Sounds like a win for AT&T by thieh · · Score: 1

      C'mon, the penal damage is like 25 million which is puny. The net profit of AT&T is like 18 Billion so it's like 8 hours of profit for them which is practically nothing. Unless you are telling me that's one million per customer, the penal part is BS.

  5. All well and good by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But at some point, an attorney general is going to have to have to call a spade and spade and actually file criminal charges against actual officials for the pattern that keeps emerging at the telecoms and cable companies. Notoriety for agreeing to pay $X for Y and then finding $X steadily increasing or Y getting padded is not an oversight. It's a pattern of fraud. People need to go to prison for that. The shareholders will thank the states after a few years if the states clean house in these companies and thus hopefully put an end to that rotten culture. It's a liability.

    1. Re:All well and good by TWX · · Score: 0

      It'll never happen. There's too much slop in the gears of a corporate structure to make much stick to the people at the top.

      If they couldn't put-away bankers for the pump-n-dump they did that blew apart in late 2007 that spawned global recession, they're certainly not going to do it over what in the grand scheme of things is a relatively minor overbilling.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:All well and good by tekrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must be new here.

      Company officials *never* will see the inside of a cell. They won't even be charged. Instead, they will get a nice fat bonus, and the company will pay for that by charging higher rates and cutting 5000 workers who were never responsible, and making sub-standard wages.

      Some more palms will get greased in government, and things will continue Business As Usual. And we the public get the shaft.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    3. Re:All well and good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your supposition that greased palms in government were true, then this suit wouldn't have been successfully brought to the courts. But, it's too bad the FTC and FCC as well as the state commission(er)s that oversee tariffs and business practices don't seem to have a clue how to assess the behavior of such corporate behemoths (or don't care to). And that's not say I don't lament the consumers' general ignorance or willingness to gobble up whatever the executive swine deem fit to offer us and that our

      (Can you imagine what might have happened if Elizabeth Warren had been allowed to actually run the US Financial Consumer Protection Bureau as Obama intended when he nominated here and if the President's cabinet level appointee responsible for running Dept of Commerce ever actually balanced the citizens' interests against the revenue generated by corporate taxes and protected by lobbyists? Who are those guys, anyway?)

      Also, don't forget, AT&T is actually Cingular dba AT&T, which was formed as a consortium of former Regional Bell Operating Companies that originally resulted from the break-up of the former AT&T. How and why the new executives at the helm of a group of reginal monopolies were able to leverage wealth and market advantages out of the ashes of a former anti-trust break-up would make for a dynamic forensic busines novel, if one could piece the malfeasance together from public records, imagination and the society pages.

      (Meh... royalty in the US isn't hereditary, it's encoded in tax law.)

    4. Re:All well and good by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But at some point, an attorney general is going to have to have to call a spade and spade and actually file criminal charges against actual officials for the pattern that keeps emerging at the telecoms and cable companies. Notoriety for agreeing to pay $X for Y and then finding $X steadily increasing or Y getting padded is not an oversight. It's a pattern of fraud. People need to go to prison for that. The shareholders will thank the states after a few years if the states clean house in these companies and thus hopefully put an end to that rotten culture. It's a liability.

      No... you don't understand how corporate cultures work. I have worked for several, including AT&T. They are designed for profit... and nothing else. So groups are created. Departments. Processes. You need to think of a company like AT&T like an ant-hill. There may be a queen and she may give a command like "Get me food!" but how that happens is completely outside her sphere of knowledge or even understanding. I'd even go so far as to say that in most corporate cultures Executives have very little to do with the direction of the company other than the people they hire.

      It's not like someone says "Hey! I bet we could do this illegal thing and make lots of money! They'll never catch us!" What happens is the collective actions of dozens of departments have a culture that is profitable. If it's not profitable, they get laid off, or broken up... eventually such systems develop in such a way that they make lots of money. Their upper management sees lots of green so all is well. The problem with this situation is that none of those people can see the forest from the trees. Collectively those departments are doing something illegal. But none of them, individually, think what they are doing illegal because they can't see the entire picture.

      The department that checks that the payments were authorized gets bonuses based on how much work they get done. So they authorize more. The billing department gets a cool trip because they got 98% on time payments. The printing department was congratulated for simplifying the bill resulting in fewer questions about bills. All, individually are totally legit. Together you have 1 department authorizing questionable content, another printing bills with missing information and a 3rd getting customers off the phone so fast they're practically hanging up on them. Combined, you have collusion to defraud, yet I guarantee you that if you asked any one of those people they'd tell you they had no idea what was going on.

      And trust me, even if you did suspect something, going into a meeting and suggesting that your companies hugely successful, hugely profitable lead project is a terrible idea. Even if you're correct and save the company from legal action, you'll be looked at like that guy at the party that said "Maybe we shouldn't drink so much..." good idea, yes... popularity winner? NO

    5. Re:All well and good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you're correct and save the company from legal action, you'll be looked at like that guy at the party that said "Maybe we shouldn't drink so much..." good idea, yes... popularity winner? NO

      Which is why said person should be on the hook, legally, if shit does go down. It's a job, not a popularity contest. It's a company, not the mob.

    6. Re:All well and good by sjames · · Score: 1

      They COULD put them away. They actively chose not to.

    7. Re:All well and good by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a good argument that nobody can be required to take responsibility.

      By law, C-level execs are required to 'sign off' on a lot of important things, which puts them on the hook for X (regardless of claims of ignorance) because it is a statement that they have checked, with due diligence, the legality of X.

      It would be relatively straightforward to add to that list a little.

      For best effect, there should be a rider that wrongdoing past a certain scale automatically gets all compensation paid to the exec, to date, doubly seized - seized from the exec (spent or not), and seized from the business.

  6. $80M funnelled through the government = $0.79 net by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

    By the time the bureaucrats finish, less than $1 will be available to split amongst all us wronged consumers.

  7. Set aside for those that have kept paperwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To submit your claim, but they'll require you to have a copy of the bills and proof of payment (e.g. copies of cleared checks, bank statements). Only 1 out of 10 victims will have the necessary paperwork. All remaining money will sit pretty in ATT's bank account.

  8. From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In its complaint against AT&T, the FTC alleges that AT&T billed its customers for hundreds of millions of dollars in charges originated by other companies, usually in amounts of $9.99 per month, for subscriptions for ringtones and text messages containing love tips, horoscopes, and âoefun facts.â In its complaint, the FTC alleges that AT&T kept at least 35 percent of the charges it imposed on its customers"

    at least they were paying for a valuable service!

  9. This should not be news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have to give back what they stole. In a just world, this would simply be the normal course of events. Besides, 25 million in penalties for getting caught stealing 80 million? That's at least an order of magnitude short of a just penalty for an entity that cannot go to jail.

  10. This just happened to me by apraetor · · Score: 4, Informative

    My bill showed my data and voice plans each as $20 more than the agreed-upon (in writing) rates selected back in January of this year. I had to argue on the phone for about half an hour, but they finally agreed to refund the money. I had to stay on the line while the CS rep filed a separate refund form for not only each month this happened, but for each of the charges. Since it was 9 months of wrongful billing it took an hour for her to refund me the 18 charges -- $360. In less than a year. I've been telling everyone I know who uses AT&T to double-check their bills because of this. Something similar happened to me with an insurance company which over-billed me by $600; by the time I got the money back it was $850 including the interest.

    1. Re:This just happened to me by Tokolosh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was about to jump ship to Uverse, but insisted on a bottom-line price before signing. They claimed it was impossible to provide, because of local taxes, yada yada. Well then, how are you able to bill me once I sign? No thanks, scumbags.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    2. Re:This just happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I never have any auto-pay bills (except for student loans, the lowered interest rate adds up and if they over bill me, then I'm simply paying off the loan faster).

      Most of the corrupt companies constantly over charge and hope you don't notice: Comcast, Verizon, AT&T (basically the large ISPs and phone providers)

    3. Re:This just happened to me by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

      Why do you continue to give them your business?

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    4. Re:This just happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your example and then multiply it by 100 million (which is roughly the number of at&t subscribers) and you'll find that the fine they paid was peanuts compared to the cash they raked in with this scheme. They probably made more than 105,000,000 per month for every month this scam was on the books, and yet they only had to pay back that amount.

      This is like if i robbed a bank and stole a million dollars, only to turn around and have to pay $10 back and be a free man in bora bora with plenty of money to spend.

    5. Re:This just happened to me by apraetor · · Score: 1

      I've got to finish paying off my phone, I had switched to AT&T Next so once that contract is up I'm probably going pre-paid. I use Google Voice for my main number anyway, so I can bounce between carriers once I get my phone *crossed fingers* unlocked.

  11. Jail time for corporate officers by oldhack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Send them to fed for couple months at least. The fine is not even a slap on the wrist. What's the point?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Jail time for corporate officers by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      +1, The fact that the officers practically get away scot-free is galling.

  12. And no one is going to prison? by cjonslashdot · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's why these companies just keep on doing this.

  13. Maybe this will encourage you by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    to renew your flagging zeal to cooperate with the NSA.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  14. Feeling Buttered Up... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    I feel like the FCC is trying to butter us up (or perhaps lube our rear ends) for something unpleasant they plan to do.

  15. Ind-US-trial Waste List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Define incompetent for me, please. If you mean that the board and executive staff are more concerned their own financial wealth than anything else, then the following list should scratch the tip of the iceberg:

    Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Barclays Capital, General Dynamics, General Electric, Carlisle Group, Microsoft, Berkshire Hathaway, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, any 'Private Capital' company you'd care to mention, all the Sovereign Capital investment funds from the Mideast, every Insurance company, Disney, Time Warner, Big Coal, Big Pharma, the American Beef Council, ALEC, Koch Industries, all of the Canadian Mining concerns, Big OIL, the Republican National Committee, the Democratic National Committee, the Federal Reserve Cartel... and the beat goes on, and on and on...

    Now that the Chinese have mastered the western rules of engagement, it's high time we learn Mandarin so as to be able to round out the list with the corporations that succeeded in creating the world's largest real estate bubble in history as well as the those that are filling the cesspools of Shanghai, Beijing, etc.. And don't forget the Russian Oligarchs who rule permafrost.

    (It's no wonder the Captcha code to let me post this was "paranoia".)

  16. And how will they repay it by grilled-cheese · · Score: 2

    I bet everyone gets a 2 month subscription to some junk AT&T service like being able to track your family's phones through their proprietary app.

  17. Doesn't change a thing. by fhage · · Score: 1
    Anyone can add a $9.99/mo charge to your bill. All they need is your cell # and access to a ring tone web site. You'll get a long spam SMS that ends; "reply STOP to cancel the special offer". If you fail to respond properly to the mystery SMS you didn't request, the phone company will bill you, claim you authorized the charges and refuse to cancel the service or issue any refunds. One has to put a block on all 3rd party services to in order to avoid being subject to this.

    When it happened to me and I complained, the ATT CSR told me that it was Congress's fault; they specifically wrote this feature into Telecom law to encourage business.

    1. Re:Doesn't change a thing. by seebs · · Score: 1

      I got refunds from AT&T for these, and they let me set a thing on my account to prevent them.

      Never had it happen with any provider but AT&T.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    2. Re:Doesn't change a thing. by ruir · · Score: 1

      Are you not mixing up things? Back in here, they sent me a code if someone does that, *and* if I reply with the code, it is like signing a contract. Actually the most dangerous part it, is your teens doing it with their mobiles. Those services I have seen charge you between 2 to 4 euros per week, and they do not bilk you more, because they hope you are illiterate enough not to notice. I have even seen spammy sites like "open your mobile with a code from this site" which were exactly the same thing.

  18. "Insurance" charges = Scam #2 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    AT&T keeps adding "insurance" charges to our bill, and make up silly excuses for adding it, usually involving some twisted "misunderstanding" of our requests. Do their sales people go to Bogus Alibi School?

    Me: "Achoo!"

    AT&T Service Dweeb: "Achoo is Swahili for 'I want insurance'. Done, Bye [phone click]"

  19. When I worked for AT&T... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I worked for AT&T, I totally saw this coming because the policy was not to credit SMS stuff, because the users willfully subscribed to to these things.

    And it is true, the customers who subscribe to these things are idiots, often falling for the "enter your phone number, win an iPad*" scams.
    *The rules would actually say subscribing to a premium service that would rebill, actual chances of winning were infinitely small. I was one of the few reps who discovered you could text STOP to these, and that was my personal policy to tell them to do that and then contact who they were being billed by.

    This stuff all started when customers started getting "3G" phones when the GSM network came online. Prior to the 3G network, customers on the 2G network would also fall for these scams, but generally there was confusion about why these charges weren't included in "unlimited text" packages.

    And that's basically where AT&T ****ed up.

    I did credit some people back for the charges as long as their excuse wasn't "my kid did it", because that's the worst excuse in the book. As long as there was less than 10$ in charges I'd credit it back and tell them to text STOP, and then note the account this advice was given, no further credit should be given.

    Company policy then, and even when I left was "no credit for premium SMS, whatsoever", and most reps didn't even know how to credit it back, it involved an obscure JAVA applet, and sometimes it just didn't work for all mobile numbers.

  20. Don't Sneeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big payout cums to 4 cents per person in the U.S.

  21. Why they do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a simple formula that AT&T (and I'm sure every other corporation) uses some variant of...

    IF Estimated Profit - Penalty for getting Caught * Chance of getting Caught > 0 THEN Do it.
    IE 80M - 105M * X% > 0?

  22. Didn't they make billions doing this? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember the profits being a _lot_ more that a measly $105 billion.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/