Slashdot Mirror


Startup's Open Source Device Promises Gamers "Surround Sound For Your Eyes"

alphadogg (971356) writes A startup called Antumbra run by 5 college students is looking to throw a little soothing light on this situation: People who hunker down in front of their computers until the wee hours, until it feels like their eyes might fall out. Antumbra's open-source-based Glow, which launches in a limited beta of 100 $35 units on Thursday, is a small (1.5" x 1.5"x 0.5") doohickey that attaches to the back of your computer monitor via USB port and is designed to enhance your work or gaming experience — and lessen eye strain — by spreading the colors from your screen onto the wall behind it in real time. The idea is to reduce the contrast in colors between the computer screen and the background area. The the idea might not be new, and people have been home-brewing their own content-driven lighting like this for a while, but this is the first I've seen that looks like a simple add-on.

43 comments

  1. No need, I have an Ambilight TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you insensitive clod :)
    On a different note, I work for the company making Philips Television....
    ... ?
    Profit ! :)

    1. Re:No need, I have an Ambilight TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ambilight and this are shit compared to Microsoft IllumiRoom.

  2. Somewhat limited by Ksevio · · Score: 1

    It seems like something that would be useful, but the article says it needs to be "1 to 3 feet from a wall" which would leave a lot of wasted space in most rooms.

    Also, only 1 LED? Should have a whole ring of them!

    1. Re:Somewhat limited by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It seems like something that would be useful, but the article says it needs to be "1 to 3 feet from a wall" which would leave a lot of wasted space in most rooms.

      It's probably more common than not to have a PC backed up onto a wall. And my living room television is in such a location, but there's no reasonable way to add such functionality to it anyhow.

      Also, only 1 LED? Should have a whole ring of them!

      It does seem like you'd need at minimum 8 or 9 LEDs to get a decent effect.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Somewhat limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lightpack, up to 10 LEDs or join 5 together for 45 LEDs. Fully open source hardware and software.

  3. Or you could just... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    You could just purchase a torche lamp with a dimmer control.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    1. Re:Or you could just... by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      You could just purchase a torche lamp with a dimmer control.

      But .. but .. but .. Startup!!!!!!!!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Or you could just... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That automatically changes with the screen colors?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Or you could just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of Ambilight clone projects on Hackaday.

      Build your own, ignore un-original startups, fuck Timmy, take back Slashdot.

    4. Re:Or you could just... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Do you really need to have the light change colors?

      Having a slightly lit room is enough to lower the contrast between the screen and its surroundings.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    5. Re:Or you could just... by gstoddart · · Score: 0

      Think of it as nerd mood lighting.

      So all of those geeks fapping in their mom's basement can have a more, er, intimate experience.

      And, just think how lovely it will be next April(*) when Slashdot does the "OMG Ponies" theme.

      (*) Note to editors, though, we may have to take out contracts on you if you do.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Or you could just... by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Yes but - seems that the color would be more immersive.

      My Dad simply put a small lamp with a "10W" nightlight bulb behind his TV that turns on/off through the aux power port on the TV box. The room is pretty dark - even during the day. So this light actually makes it more comfortable to watch TV. I did something similar in my house too.

      A simple light - that changes color. That goes to 10. That cool DIY in the link - goes to 11.

  4. Let's invent Ambilight again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    steal schematics from opensource and next morning we're young famous innovators.

  5. you'll go blind by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Only if it comes in the form of a bitchin' panther

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  6. But does it work? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    It's a nice idea and look cool. But have they actually compared eye strain with and without this? And with a placebo

    1. Re:But does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Placebo wha?

    2. Re:But does it work? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Why? Well, to see if it works. Sorry. I don't understand the question. If I make claims about the effect of a device then I want to be able to prove those claims, ideally scientifically.

      Measure reported eye strain with this device.

      Measure reported eye strain without this device.

      Measure reported eye strain without a device that purports to do this, but just projects random colours behind the screen.

      The third test is the placebo. I imagine eye strain is affected by psychological factors since pretty much every other ailment is so we need to control for that.

  7. Wrong approach by joke_dst · · Score: 1

    Eye strain isn't from the colors - it's from the brightness of the screen switching and if the screen is the only light source in the room your eyes has to constantly adjust to new brightness levels.

    To avoid eye strain - turn on a small lamp in the room. Make sure the ambient light in the room is not zero. That's way better. If anything I'd think this make it worse - the brightness of the whole room changes constantly making your eyes having to adjust more, not less.

    1. Re:Wrong approach by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      I guess you missed the parts where projected colors also constitute "light". A light behind your screen is good. Color matching doesn't take that away.

      Sincerely, Owner of a custom PC-based $300 Ambilight system for 7 years. It makes a huge difference.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    2. Re:Wrong approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I guess you missed the parts where projected colors also constitute "light".

      You seem brain-damaged, or at the very least autistic.

  8. Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, wouldn't that be akin to harassing women according to Game Journalists?

  9. Looks interesting by Rhaban · · Score: 1

    But the guy in front of me in the open space might not really like having colored light shoved in his face.

  10. Somewhat limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats a typo. They mean LSD, obviously

  11. Software overhead by halfdan+the+black · · Score: 1

    Seems like a cool idea, just concerned about how much overhead the software will cause.

    So, basically, it needs to continuously poll the frame buffer, copy over a fairly huge block of data, rip through the pixel data to determine the mean colors, and then set the device color though the USB port.

    I really would have preferred an all hardware solution where its a pass through of your DVI / HDMI, and there would be a DSP that analyzed the HDMI stream and set the color accordingly.

    1. Re:Software overhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be surprised - DVI/HDMI versions of these things do exist.
      As for overhead, it's low for normal apps (1/10 a second screenshot is taken) and around 1-2 fps in DX games (since its easier to write a dshow filter)

  12. Colors really matter? by Himmy32 · · Score: 2

    After putting a standard halogen light behind my monitor, I eliminated the headaches was having. [/anecdote]

    I fail to see how having the light colored does anything additional besides be distracting.

    1. Re:Colors really matter? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Philips' version is designed to make the screen look bigger, not save your eyes. If you want to reduce fatigue just turn the brightness down a bit, and select a warming (less blue) colour temperature.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Colors really matter? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      From my experience (I Am Not An Eye Doctor) Eye fatigue can be seriously affected by the light in the room around your monitor. The fact that most people now have flat panel displays, mitigates some of the problem. People used to have CRT monitors and often they were at 60hz. The other problem is that we often have florescent lights and those are at 60hz as well. We perceive consistent light, while in fact the light in the room is flickering on and off all the time. And your eyes can in fact respond to these constant changes faster than you can perceive them and that causes a lot of the strain.

      The other factor in strain is staring at the same position in space all the time; our eyes are designed to be constantly looking at objects that are both near and far and not doing so makes them weak. If you just remember to focus your eyes at an object about 15 feet away for a few seconds a few time an hour - this can do a lot to prevent "eye strain" -- in fact it's probably eye focusing weakness while the pupil is getting strained.

      Dark room + bright monitor = not good. Have a bit of fill light around your monitor (not florescent) is better.

      Having full spectrum light or something to look at behind the monitor -- YES that can help. But knowing how your eyes are getting weak is also part of the issue.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Colors really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actual color vision angle is very, very narrow. Basically, anything you can't read without turning your eyes from this very spot could be just any color and you wouldn't know. Your brain is painting the rest of the scene from the memory. If you would never get your sight out of the middle of the screen, you wouldn't notice that ambient light isn't colored.

  13. Philips will sue it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very innovative... Philips did it ~10 years ago.

  14. 1-2-3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1-2-3 i smell a lawsuit from Ambilight who owns all these patents...
    They'll sue, shit happens...

  15. old tec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    philips ambx setup has been around for a long time now.

  16. A mirror? by gstoddart · · Score: 0

    So, put a mirror on the wall behind you.

    I'm afraid I don't really see the point. This is "preventing eye strain for people who don't want to prevent eye strain by not sitting in the dark".

    But, hey, think of it as a geek disco ball I guess.

    I'm sure some gamers will say it makes their gaming more enjoyable, and audiophiles with monster cable will say that it gives the sound a more smooth, mellow taste.

    Me, I'll stick with my collection of lava lamps. I'm really going to miss lava lamps once all the old fashioned bulbs go away. Did I mention I like lava lamps?

    A moose bit my sister once ... it was very painful.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:A mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Me, I'll stick with my collection of lava lamps. I'm really going to miss lava lamps once all the old fashioned bulbs go away.

      That's only happening in the minds of ignorant conservatives, because the whole world is just a blur to their limited minds. Lava lamp bulbs aren't going anywhere, and you can still use your ez-bake oven.

    2. Re:A mirror? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      and you can still use your ez-bake oven

      I don't have an ez-bake oven you insensitive clod!

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  17. True Gamers by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    True gamers use big enough and near enough screens as to cover their entire FoV.

  18. Already done, already available. by cve · · Score: 2

    As far as I can tell, this is the same thing:
    http://store.lightpack.tv/products/lightpack

    1. Re:Already done, already available. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lightpack is better (and at 3x the cost it better be). This antumbra thing is just a single super-bright RGB led while lightpack is 10 RBG leds that you place around the edges of the back your monitor/tv so you can have different color zones that match the different colors on your display. Both of them get their data on the USB port, seems that philips has patented getting it directly from the HDMI signal going to the monitor. Either that or the extra DRM on HDMI makes it prohibitively expensive.

  19. Let's invent Ambilight again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly what they did.

  20. Redshift by codepigeon · · Score: 1

    I found this tool a while back. In a matter of minutes I could feel my eyes sigh in relief:

    http://jonls.dk/redshift/

  21. Poor name choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn shame it conflicts with Philips' Antumbra lighting.

  22. ummm there was a company marketing this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember it was a big thing, There was a company marketing exactly this same thing a while back. I think it was originally a new company, then some big peripheral manufacturer bought it and then it disappeared, This was maybe back in the early 2000's that this happened. So not a new idea, been on the market for quite a while and it was taken off the market because no one was buying it.

  23. Beyond not new... by BillX · · Score: 1

    "...people have been home-brewing their own content-driven lighting like this for a while, but this is the first I've seen that looks like a simple add-on."

    There's a reason for this. What they are trying to sell is Ambilight, and Ambilight is patented.

    Google "ambilight clone" and you'll find hundreds of open designs you can easily build yourself - patent holders generally don't (or can't) touch distribution of paper designs - but they're not legal to sell commercially.

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.