Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Gearing Up To Release a Smartwatch of Its Own

SmartAboutThings writes The smartwatch market is still in its nascent form, but with Apple releasing its AppleWatch in early 2015, things are going to change. And Microsoft wants to make sure it's not late to the party, as it has been so many times in the past. That's why it plans on releasing its own smartwatch, which would be the first new category under CEO Nadella. The device could get launched with two specific features that could make it stand apart from other similar devices — much better battery life and cross-platform support for iOS and Android users. A release before this year's holiday season is in the cards, with no details on the pricing nor availability. (Also at Reuters and The Inquirer.)

38 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. I can already see it by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet it's called the X-Watch, has an x86 CPU and tries to cram the regular version of Windows into a 2" display with a tiny cursor controlled by a Kinect camera you wear on your head via the included X-BaseballCap.

    1. Re:I can already see it by drjzzz · · Score: 2

      you are joking but damn if it doesn't sound pretty interesting...even before you drop a *nix distro on it...

      --
      to err is human, to forgive is divine, to forget is... umm...
    2. Re:I can already see it by Jonifico · · Score: 2

      It sounded cool until the Kinect-BaseballCap combo.

    3. Re:I can already see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep! And then they'll make force the display on Windows 10 to have a 640-480 resolution to create a familiar experience between the watch and the desktop.

    4. Re:I can already see it by tomhath · · Score: 4, Funny

      regular version of Windows into a 2" display with a tiny cursor controlled by a Kinect camera you wear on your head

      Imaging a Beowulf cluster of those.

    5. Re:I can already see it by RazorSharp · · Score: 2

      And of course it runs Office using voice-recognition dictation.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    6. Re:I can already see it by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's great news for my dear aunt because while she's set on buying a smart watch on the double, without a killer feature to distinguish between them she's been having a hard time selecting between them all.

    7. Re:I can already see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's silly, they'll just use their new advanced scaling and vector-based rendering engine to scale up buttons and fonts to fill an entire 4k screen.
      That way they can still claim a 4k resolution, even if you can only fit two words and an "OK" button on it.

    8. Re:I can already see it by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      tries to cram the regular version of Windows into a 2" display.

      Ofcourse they're not THAT stupid.
      They will design a new interface specifically suited to 2" displays on one-button devices.
      It'll replace the start menu on Windows 10.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  2. Funny but Microsoft is the most open ecosystem. by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microsoft supports Outlook on Android and IOS. OneDrive works on IOS, Android, Windows and OS/X
    Skype works on just about all platforms.

    I guess Microsoft being number 3 in the mobile space makes them support more platforms.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Funny but Microsoft is the most open ecosystem. by jones_supa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, Windows works on all PCs with all hardware supported.

    2. Re:Funny but Microsoft is the most open ecosystem. by sideslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny but true, at least in terms of proprietary software. The observation even applies to Windows itself, since I can run it everywhere I want, including in a virtual machine on OS X, whereas Apple won't let people run OS X in a VM. Of course, I do anyway because I insist on building my own PCs. Currently I'm running Mavericks on VMware Workstation in a Win 8.1 host, but I get nervous every time I apply an update.

    3. Re:Funny but Microsoft is the most open ecosystem. by ErnoWindt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, I agree. It seems like Nadella is taking the cross-platform approach seriously and is not just blowing smoke. Refreshing, no question, and in direct contrast to Google and Apple as you point out.

    4. Re:Funny but Microsoft is the most open ecosystem. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only limitations I've ever had with Windows on Apple computers are limitations *Apple* put in place.

      Try this - replace the internal DVD drive on a 17" MBP with a hard disk:

      1. Bootcamp won't allow you to install Windows on anything other the primary hard disk
      2. The EFI firmware will specifically refuse to boot Windows on the second hard disk
      3. The EFI firmware will specifically refuse to boot OSX on the second hard disk
      4. The EFI firmware will specifically refuse to boot the Windows installation media from anything other than the internal DVD drive
      5. The EFI firmware will specifically refuse to book the OSX installation media from anything other than the internal DVD drive
      6. The EFI firmware will specifically refuse to allow the Windows installation to write to it, so Windows cannot set the boot partition

      So these days I have a 10GB OSX partition on the primary hard disk which I never boot into, and the final act of doing all the installations was a fun case of swapping the DVD drive in and out.

      I've never had anything like as many issues installing Windows on non-Apple hardware.

    5. Re:Funny but Microsoft is the most open ecosystem. by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " Refreshing, no question, and in direct contrast to Google and Apple as you point out."
      Actually no it isn't in direct contrast.
      When Apple first entered the mobile market they only had to worry about Blackberry, Wince, and Palm. In the smartphone market there was no real dominate player. It was in many ways a lot like the early days of micros with Atari, Apple, Commodore, Radioshack, Ti, and the CP/M machines fighting it out.
      Apple and Google where friends and Google got Maps, search, and youtube on the iPhone.
      When Android came out IOS was pretty much king. so Google kept putting their products on IOS to keep market share. Apple having the marketshare did not feel the need to put any services on Android. They used their services to keep market share.
      Now Microsoft to get market share supports Android and IOS. Android and IOS see no reason to help Microsoft gain marketshare. It is the exact same pattern.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  3. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by MouseR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can't be as bad as Apple's.

    I'm normally in line with what Apple produces (and potentialy biased too) but their watch is a total let down. Pebble has been doing this for long.

  4. The downside is by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its only compatible with Microsoft time, requires network access for a license check before you can set or change any functions, and won't be supported in 7 years time.

    1. Re:The downside is by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, 7 years of support!

      That would out do the original iPhone (released June 2007, last software update February 2010, less than 3 years of support), the iPhone 3G (released July 2008, last software updated November 2010, less than 2.5 years of support) and the iPad 1 (released April 2010, last software update May 2012, just over 2 years of support).

      Bring on that 7 years, it sounds positively fantastic!

    2. Re:The downside is by bazorg · · Score: 4, Informative

      On the upside, the support policy will be published on http://support2.microsoft.com/... and you'll be able to check the status of your chosen products regularly instead of just keeping your fingers crossed and hope that the "service" doesn't move from Beta to discontinued.

    3. Re:The downside is by sootman · · Score: 2

      Settings -> Display -> [_] 12-hour time [x] 24-hour time

      You will need to reboot for the changes to take effect. Reboot now? [_Yes_] [_No_] [_Cancel_] [_Abort_] [_Retry_] [_Fail_]

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  5. Behold the bluescreen watch! by miknix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait no more, with this new windows watch you will be able to make pauses during your work and stare a wonderful 8-bit blue.
    No need to wait for the 16h to drink your tea, with the windows watch you get random bluescreens every time!

    Now available with the new RandomFunctionEx32! It is random 7.9999 times in 8!

    Call now, and get a free copy of Windows 10 Fisher price edition!

    1. Re:Behold the bluescreen watch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      * The Windows 10 Fisher price edition is limited to 1 running process.

  6. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did it? Who declared that? They seemed to be selling fairly well when I was in my local EE store yesterday, buying my two Lumia 930s :) At least another 5 Windows Phones were sold while I was being dealt with, and the store had a full display and demo area set aside for Cortana, which was drawing some interest.

    I am seeing more and more Windows Phones in the wild these days - yup, anecdotal evidence etc, but its something to be noted none the less.

  7. Categorized under Android? by dnebin · · Score: 2

    Since when does MS stuff get categorized as an Android item?

    1. Re:Categorized under Android? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      It's either because of the Microsoft patents in Android or timothy is a Samsung fanboy.

      If you ask me, the icon for anything related to smart watches should be a Pebble icon.

  8. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by gmack · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know what they say: "The plural of Anecdote is not Data". Windows Phone sales decline as share shrinks to just 2.5 percent

  9. Maybe get one thing going before the NBT? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone remember Apple in the early-1990s? Coming down off a high of realizing they could charge $6000 for a computer, the company felt invincible and practically started chasing every Next Big Thing that came along. It didn't make a difference whether they had any background in it, whether anyone in their market wanted it, or whether it really was going to be the Next Big Thing - if someone said it was, they were on it!

    By the mid-90s it was clear the company was in utter disarray. Teams throughout the company were chasing products as mundane as X.400 servers while at the same time offering the ridiculously designed PowerTalk that, for all purposes, rendered the server useless. Meanwhile no one could be bothered to work on anything as dull as the OS, which became a ridiculous collection of warts on bags. Copeland was the most obvious symptom of this problem, not the end result.

    And then came Jobs. First he fires most everyone while personally interviewing new hires. Almost all ongoing projects were cancelled outright, even ones that maybe shouldn't have. Lots of utter trash, like OpenDoc and CyberDog, were thankfully killed, although people still lament HyperCard to this day. In any event, within ONE YEAR the iMac was introduced and by 2000 the Mac lineup was completely overhauled and greatly simplified. THEN they did iPod.

    I believe the lesson to be learned here is that any company, no matter how large, can only do so many *new* things well. That number appears to be somewhere around two. You can continue improving existing lines, but radical change requires the entire employee base to pull in the same direction, and maintaining cohesion at that level on too many projects is simply not going to work.

    So...

    It is really a good time for MS to be doing a watch? The phone and tablet efforts are still completely up in the air. I don't run a multi-billion dollar company (and I'm very happy to say that) but it seems pretty clear that jumping into yet another product category while *every one* of their other categories needs major work seems extreme unwise to me. Hell, Windows 8 is universally detested. That needs to be addressed first.

  10. Stand alone? by Dan+East · · Score: 2

    Unlike Samsung and Apple's watches, which are meant as an accessory / extension for their existing flagship mobile devices, I would think MS would tend to make something a little more stand-alone and not so intimately tied to a specific device or OS. That, IMO, would be a good thing.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  11. Re:As usual ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're wrong. Out of all software giants, Microsoft invests the most into research and emerging technologies. Marketing of these technologies is poor tbh, but still doesn't make Microsoft not innovative.
    http://research.microsoft.com/

    I've heard that Microsoft phones are pretty popular in europe.

  12. Re:from the submitter by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can somebody explain why the links I have included have been modified? Not fair from /. to remove links and direct the traffic to already big outlets. Slashdot is also about diversity and supporting smaller publications, from what I remember.

    Are you new to submitting? I've had a bunch make it to the front page... the mods Heavily modify your submission. To the point that, you might as well not even bother spending time typing it up nicely. I got concerned when they not only corrected things but wrote their own diatribes into the submission, made their own mistakes and such, and then attributed the post to me. So I don't submit nearly as much anymore.

    If you're going to quote me with "Charliemopps writes" then it should be cut&paste. If you're altering it, Slashdot needs a different statement like "Submitted by..." etc...

  13. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least another 5 Windows Phones were sold while I was being dealt with.

    Was this some kind of fire sale to get rid of stock?
    I've never been to a "local EE store" on a non-launch day and had that many customers waiting in line to buy the exact same product, of any product.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  14. Re: The Windows Phone failed. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Your comment on the crown makes no sense - it's somewhat off-center by a few mm, not really any harder to reach than any other crown. And because the watch is reverseable it can be on either side.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  15. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by hammer_gaidin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I run the phone program for my company. We currently have around 200 users. I have purchased over 100 devices this year for employees, and not one has selected a windows phone. I offer whatever the current flagship phone is for each brand. Now, its useful to note that this is in the US. Because our germany counter part, has many more windows phones. However, I notice that German's are very anti google.

  16. I had a microsoft smart watch for about 12 years. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It was called Timex DataLink. Released around 1995 or so. You set up the calender, contacts etc in the PC and click on "send to watch" menu item. The CRT monitor will flash horizontal bars. You just hold the watch up in front of the monitor to receive the data.

    It sort of worked. But it was too much of a pain but it worked when I tried. Eventually I stopped updating the data and carried around long obsolete phone numbers, addresses etc for a long time. It had super good battery life. Lasted 12 years or so. Then I went back to a simple Casio GShock.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  17. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by Defenestrar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems as if an always on OLED display would be the major source of battery drain - and so I don't get why watch makers haven't used e-ink. Come into the market as Timex and not a Rolex. A simplistic device which displayed time and push notifications at a $50 price point seems like it'd quickly dominate the market. Heck, you could even make it an e-ink background to a nice analog watch for that matter (although that'd probably up the total price). This sort of thing wouldn't need the processing power (i.e. more battery drain) as the current giant glossy types either. Perhaps I'm being naive, but I don't get the high-end luxury approach.

    Open API would be natural too; especially given a low price point this type of watch could quickly be a community favorite.

  18. "The time has changed" by itzly · · Score: 2

    Please reboot for the change to take effect...

  19. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

    I don't think the MS mobile products were a failure. Marketing a phone in this industry is an uphill battle especially when the retail stores push Apple as the ideal product and Android as the economy option. I'm not talking out of my ass, I've been to 3 stores while looking to replace my wife's phone and the story was the same at all stores:
    - Apple is the best if you can afford it
    - Android phone are nice and they cost less
    - Windows Phone. I wouldn't sell you that if my life depended on it. Why? Long moment of silence... They have no apps.

    So ignorance and pre-made opinion will fail any new player to the market. That's the truth. Ended up getting my wife a Nexus which I find better than any Apple product offered yet... My 2 cents.

  20. Re:The Windows Phone failed. by gtall · · Score: 2

    MS Watch: Hi there, I see you are trying to find the time.
    Human: Yes, please tell me the time.
    MS Watch: Would you like that in military time or civilian time?
    Human: Sigh...civilian please.
    MS Watch: Which time zone are you in?
    Human: Hell, I don't know, you figure it out.
    MS Watch: Hmmm....you must be in Tuvalu's time zone, are you on the east or the west side?
    Human: Egads...just give me the time and tell me what time zone you got it from.
    MS Watch: I don't think I like your attitude.
    Human: You don't know the time, do you?
    MS Watch: Why don't you tell me the time?
    Human: ** shoots self in head **
    MS Watch: Look, I'm not telling the time to a dead guy, are you really dead?
    Human: ** raises a weak hand with gun...the final shot is fired **
    MS Watch: Errr....I need a software upgrade and could you please reboot me? Yoo hoo? Yo? Sign...bloody humans!