Slashdot Mirror


More Eye Candy Coming To Windows 10

jones_supa writes Microsoft is expected to release a new build of the Windows 10 Technical Preview in the very near future, according to their own words. The only build so far to be released to the public is 9841 but the next iteration will likely be in the 9860 class of releases. With this new build, Microsoft has polished up the animations that give the OS a more comprehensive feel. When you open a new window, it flies out on to the screen from the icon and when you minimize it, it collapses back in to the icon on the taskbar. It is a slick animation and if you have used OS X, it is similar to the one used to collapse windows back in to the dock. Bah.

6 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. Re:how pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Linux back in the day looked like hell, but it worked.

    No it didn't, sound and graphics were a pain in the ass to get working!

  2. Re:form over function? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    To be fair, this is a Technical Preview, and I wouldn't be surprised if these are "checked" debug builds, which are always going to be slower than a highly optimized build.

    Captcha: OVERFLOW

  3. Re:how pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, I am a researcher, work with Mathematica, Acegen, C++11, OpenGL, Qt, some Fortran 2003, CEI Ensight and ParaView. I am slashdotting in my Mac but do all work in Linux. Basically, I use the Mac to read and write emails and to listen to music. All serious work is done in Linux.

    Actually, after OSX 10.9, most classical software like Xfig, Lyx, Gnuplot, etc became brittle, slow or simply stopped working.

    It is difficult to keep a straight face and state that OSX is stable. Xcode crashes all the time, Qt software crashes all the time, visualization software works much better on Linux. Keynote is ok though, but that's about it.

    What you are referring to is perhaps the 2006-2009 period.

  4. Re:how pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    1: Edge detection. Edge detection only works well on single monitors. It really doesn't work at all if you run a VM in a window.

    It works fine on multiple monitors as you have that couple of pixels at the top to "catch" the mouse as you move between displays. It also works in VM windows if you do manual mouse capture, obviously it isn't going to work if you do automatic mouse capture.

    2: Apps that automatically go full screen, and many of which don't even have a windowed mode. That's a huge productivity killer, and source of errors. It kills drag/drop, but even worse, you can't have source and references visible at the same time, nor copy/paste between multiple windows.

    In Windows 10 they can all be run in windowed mode.

    3; No activate without auto-raise. Which now is auto-raise-and-zoom. Why won't you let me type in or paste into a window that isn't on top? It makes no sense. Do people really like to bring an entire IM session to the foreground, and, depending on the program, obscuring everything else, just to type in "ok"?

    It's there, and it's simple to configure it. Most people don't want that as default behavior.

    4: Inconsistent menus and windows, self-organizing depending on use. It's a support nightmare when you can't tell someone how to do something, because the menus and windows are going to be different on each user's machine. You have to shoulder-surf people to support them.

    Yes we should eliminate customization so everything is the same on every system because allowing people to customize their system is too confusing for "support" to understand ... heaven forbid they use this thing we've had for years called "remote desktop".

    Standard modern geek mentality "if it doesn't work the way i like it out of the box it's crap, i shouldn't have to do scary things like change settings to make it work the way i want, that's too hard".

  5. Re:how pretty by cyn1c77 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "It is difficult to keep a straight face and state that OSX is stable. Xcode crashes all the time, Qt software crashes all the time, visualization software works much better on Linux."

    I play with the same tools - and I experience no instability like this on OS X. Xeon and Core Ix series hardware.

    Agreed. Same here.

    If you are having serious instability issues, you have something wrong locally with your machine.

    Especially if it is crashing with that "classical" software.

  6. Re:how pretty by jcupitt65 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a working scientist. I have a Mac at home for playing, but work is all Linux. OS X has a very slow filesystem, no working package manager (or rather it has at least four, none of which are much good) and only runs on relatively expensive hardware. Good luck building a compute cluster from imacs. Windows is even worse, of course.