Slashdot Mirror


The Airplane of the Future May Not Have Windows

merbs writes: Hope you're not too attached to looking out the windows when you fly — the designers of tomorrow's airplanes seem intent on getting rid of them. A Paris design firm recently made waves when it released its concept for a sleek, solar paneled, windowless passenger jet. Before that, Airbus proposed eschewing windows and building its cabins out of transparent polymers. Now, the Center for Process Innovation has floated its own windowless plane concept, and it's attracting plenty of headlines, too.

63 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Fine, if by mbone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fine, if it comes with a really good imaging system passengers can access. A VR set "would be nice."

    In reality, of course, it would likely mean that only the 1% will be able to see what's going on outside, as that sounds like a First Class option.

    1. Re:Fine, if by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 5, Informative

      most of the linked designs do have some form of external viewing that would be a lot better than just the tiny windows that you find on a standard plane.

      --
      XDInd
    2. Re:Fine, if by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fine, if it comes with a really good imaging system passengers can access. A VR set "would be nice."

      Meh. I mean, sure that'd be nice. You know what would be MORE nice? Take some of that savings in construction and fuel costs which you'd get from the windowless plane, and give me a slightly more roomy seat with more legroom.

      I'd gladly fly on a windowless plane if it gave me even slightly more legroom. Looking out the window was fun when I was 10 years old, but it's pretty low on my priorities for flying these days.

    3. Re:Fine, if by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

      Windowless planes makes for a much stronger fuselage, in case of a crash. Rear facing seats while you're at it, much safer.

    4. Re:Fine, if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would be an interesting experiment to have rear facing seats, but have the displays inside make it seem like you're going forward.

    5. Re:Fine, if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having your brain reconcile the forward motion on the screen with the backward-indicating thrust and inertia should be fun :)

    6. Re:Fine, if by Cyberax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That'll trigger an instant vomiting reflex in a lot of people. Turns out that our brains think that conflicting visual and vestibular cues mean that we'd ingested something very psychoactive and it's time to try and get rid of it.

    7. Re:Fine, if by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      and give me a slightly more roomy seat with more legroom.

      You can get that......if you're willing to pay for it. Most people aren't; they shop based on the cheapest flight at priceline.com. That's why everything keeps getting cheaper, with less space, less etc.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Fine, if by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      I've ridden in rear facing seats. USAF C-141. It wasn't fun. For the general population, it is a non-starter.

    9. Re:Fine, if by Winter+Lightning · · Score: 2

      Not Thunderbirds, but one of the Anderson's other creations - Captain Scarlet - had this:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

    10. Re:Fine, if by RDW · · Score: 2

      I bet you're thinking of the Spectrum Pursuit Vehicle from Captain Scarlet:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
      http://www.little-wheels.co.uk...

    11. Re:Fine, if by mbone · · Score: 2

      Don't look out of the window much I see.

    12. Re:Fine, if by ls671 · · Score: 2

      In case of a crash or when the plane lose control, for example if the plane dives or fly upside down, I wonder if the display will follow up.

      Bonus, hacking into the display system or a bug in it could freak people out even if the plane flies normally.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    13. Re:Fine, if by Richy_T · · Score: 2

      The plane comes down in a nose-up configuration also. Though it is a little less noticeable due to the deceleration.

    14. Re:Fine, if by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      And I've ridden sideways seats on a C-130. That... wasn't so bad.

      But to hell with seats... I'd much rather have a sleeper pod, like in 5th Element or the Tokyo pod hotels. Then everyone can effectively have a window AND aisle access, and flip whichever way is most comfortable for them. Or maybe even have some sort of suspension hammock that just adjusts to whichever way feels like "down" to them during whichever flight condition.

      The airlines could probably pack more people on board arranged into sleeper pods as well. Sedation is optional.

      But yeah, windows... buses and trains might as well not have windows anymore, everyone just has their noses pressed into their smartphones for the entire trip. I could certainly see everyone in a sleeper pod wanting their own window, though, which would turn the sides of an airplane into a honeycomb without some sort of virtual window option.

    15. Re:Fine, if by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've seen so many incredible things looking out of aircraft windows. One vaguely recent example - a crescent moon during a sunrise causing rapidly changing light on the clouds below. And then there's a wintry Iceland with geothermal power stations venting steam, and ice on Lake Michigan reflecting sunlight in abstract ways...

      Not sitting next to a window is awful.
       

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    16. Re:Fine, if by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bonus, hacking into the display system ...y.

      Yes. The inside of airplane walls. Finally, an appropriate display for colonoscopy videos. Especially in coach.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    17. Re:Fine, if by Calydor · · Score: 5, Funny

      70 Virgins?

      Holy crap, even the afterlife is cutting corners now. Used to be 72 just a few years ago. Maybe too many muslims died and they're rationing the remaining virgins?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    18. Re:Fine, if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Errr...are you aware that Southwest Airlines had rows of rear facing seats on their commercial flights for many years?

    19. Re:Fine, if by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Have you ever travelled with a recent plane? They usually have individual monitors you can turn of. And much more recent movies than they used to have to 20 years ago.

      --
      bickerdyke
    20. Re:Fine, if by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      I have commuted with the train for years before switching to bicycle. Always took a rear-facing seat because they tend to be free, never had any problems. But in a car I get a mild nausea very easily. Go figure...

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    21. Re:Fine, if by kbg · · Score: 2

      Yes, I always have to sit in a front facing seat in a train otherwise I get motion sickness.

    22. Re:Fine, if by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, I always have to sit in a front facing seat in a train otherwise I get motion sickness.

      Mostly, however, the train doesn't tilt so that people looking backwards find themselves looking downwards at the top of a steep-looking incline. Which can be a little disturbing.

      You don't notice the forward tilt on an airplane. They lose altitude while keeping the nose more or less upwards-pointing. Gaining altitude, on the other hand, especially the initial liftoff does dip the back quite a bit.

    23. Re:Fine, if by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

      Allahu ackbar! Peak global virgins is upon us!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    24. Re:Fine, if by Wootery · · Score: 2

      You'd probably just feel ill. Comfort is the reason they have forward-facing seats in the first place.

    25. Re:Fine, if by kuhnto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WHAT! Actually give the passenger some comfort? The airlines would never let that happen.

      --
      "A 'person' is smart. 'People' are dumb, panicky animals and you know that."
    26. Re:Fine, if by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      Probably the whole goal of getting rid of the windows is to shrink the walls an inch so they can cram one more row of seats into the plane.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    27. Re:Fine, if by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Quick, release a new edition of D&D! Get that Babylon 5 reboot into production ASAP! There is still time to increase the supply of virgins!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:Fine, if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      70 Virgins?

      Holy crap, even the afterlife is cutting corners now. Used to be 72 just a few years ago. Maybe too many muslims died and they're rationing the remaining virgins?

      What Muslims? That's just a random flip through 71 Slashdot user profiles.

    29. Re:Fine, if by mattr · · Score: 2

      I recently was given a business class trip on Cathay which was great except last legon a narrow jet the seats were arranged diagonally. That was horrible. Even when you can tilt all the way down. Look you want to be aligned with the axjs of flight.

    30. Re:Fine, if by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      Plane crashes don't happen (if you apply sane rounding). They just happen to be really well reported in those extremely few cases that fall in the rounding error.

      Worry about car crashes instead.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    31. Re:Fine, if by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      Looking out the window was fun when I was 10 years old, but it's pretty low on my priorities for flying these days.

      Really? You prefer to work, read, sleep, or tap a screen? Granted I'm a fan of sleeping but you can do all of those things anywhere (and probably spend enough time doing them as is). The ONLY place you get a view from 5 miles up is on a plane. I'm 6'3" and I prefer window seats so I can look out at all manner of cities and landscapes in a way you don't often see. I find it an excellent change of pace for my brain. Its weird how so many people are more interested in a world confined to a screen 18" from their face than the world that extends out 200 miles (minus whats obscured by the wing).

    32. Re:Fine, if by S.O.B. · · Score: 2

      70 Virgins?

      Holy crap, even the afterlife is cutting corners now. Used to be 72 just a few years ago. Maybe too many muslims died and they're rationing the remaining virgins?

      The government collects two virgins for death taxes.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  2. motion sickness by misosoup7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We're going to need more vomit bags. People who were prune to motion sickness will be worse off without the windows since they are cut off from the last piece of sensory information that tells them that they are moving.

    1. Re:motion sickness by anarcobra · · Score: 2

      I thought the problem with motion sickness was the discrepancy between your eyes telling you you're moving, and your body telling you you're not?
      So wouldn't this be better for them?

    2. Re:motion sickness by blippo · · Score: 2

      I think there is little difference on the vomit-factor.

      However, I won't fly in a windowless or driverless airplane. I like the windows because I think I am entitled to some minimal situational awareness.

      Besides, I don't think it will happen, since it will make quite a few people too uncomfortable.

    3. Re:motion sickness by microcars · · Score: 5, Funny

      People who were prune to motion sickness will be worse off without the windows since they are cut off from the last piece of sensory information that tells them that they are moving.

      And that is why I refuse to use those new-fangled elevators without windows.

      --
      I like microcars
    4. Re:motion sickness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And that is why I refuse to use those new-fangled elevators without windows.

      Yeah I hate those danged 12 hour elevator rides...

    5. Re:motion sickness by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2

      Other way around. It's when you sense an acceleration (inner ear) but don't see it that you get motion sickness. That's why looking out a window helps.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    6. Re:motion sickness by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Nope. Vertigo is your body telling you you are moving, but your eyes disagree. I had vertigo and it was freaky. My brain was telling me I was standing on the ceiling, so I vomited for 3 days straight, until the viral infection passed. Both agreed I was moving, but they disagreed as to how and where.

      Motion sickness is what you get with vertigo, as well as other issues where your senses disagree. Sensory disagreement is perceived to be a poison incident, and your body goes into "purge" mode.

  3. But ... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 5, Funny

    How are we supposed to see the gremlins?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  4. Re:After the first five minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe if you fly every week, it does. I fly rarely (almost a decade since my last flight), and I find it nice to look at the clouds, other planes, patterns on the ground, lights at night, the mountains. And now that I have a few kids, I can't wait for them to get to see it. Windowless plane sounds terrible to me.

  5. fine with me.. by zr · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..i think they will have to keep windows in the hatches. they'll now call the emergency exit rows "observation deck" and charge x2 for them.

    thats what i call win-win :)

  6. It has Windows? by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Airplanes are the only thing with Windows that don't crash (often).

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  7. added benefits by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    and as an added benefit at the push of a button you won't be able to see what is actually going on on the outside, probably the airplane company is selling this to the government as we speak, pushing it as a 'security' feature (by obscurity) as if people who really want to couldn't use timing to figure out where they are.

    1. Re:added benefits by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Yes, unfortunately they do want to control what you see. Plus there's an added "benefit", the new "windows" will break the monotony of that boring sky with advertizing and instructions for the oxygen masks.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  8. Solar panels? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see no mention of anything of the sort in the article. With engine power outputs on the order of megawatts, of what possible use is adding fragile solar panels to an airframe?

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  9. Safety Issue by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    Virtual reality is not good enough. If there is an accident we need to see actual reality to be able to see if it is safe to open the emergency exits and, for those not sitting in exit row seats, to be able to see which side of the plane they need to find an exit on. So perhaps they can make windows smaller but I doubt they can completely do away with them.

  10. Re:After the first five minutes by MachDelta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm the same way - I love staring out the window of an airplane. I'll bring hours of entertainment on a flight, and then spend half the trip just wistfully gazing out the window.

    One of my favorite moments (and quite probably a formative moment of my love for window seats on planes) was a landing at Victoria (or maybe it was Vancouver, been a while) airport. I was a young teenager, and was seated just aft of the left wing. I didn't know much about aircraft then, so when we touched down and all of a sudden the rear engine cowling splits in half and rejoins behind the exhaust to form a redirection chute (thrust reversal), and then the pilot throttles up (I've always loved the whistle of turbines and the power of a jet engine) while the plane shudders and rumbles to a stop... I was in heaven. I'm sure my eyes were the size of saucer plates. It was the most amazing thing I'd ever seen, like discovering you were actually riding a transformer the whole time. And that moment of surprise and joy is frozen in time in my memory, along with my love of window seats on airplanes. I'd be sad if they ever took that away.

  11. No Windows? by the_rajah · · Score: 2

    I guess that means they'll be using Unix, BSD or Linux. ((Ducks))

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  12. Airbus wants to make the whole plane a window by binarstu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From TFA:

    Before that, Airbus proposed eschewing windows and building its cabins out of transparent polymers.

    What that really means is that Airbus wants to turn the entire cabin into a window.

    Also from TFA:

    Hope you're not too attached to looking out the windows when you fly — the designers of tomorrow's airplanes seem intent on getting rid of them.

    Well, I guess that technically, Airbus would be "getting rid of the windows", but if the end result is that everyone on the plane has a better view, I don't think it supports TFA's argument at all.

  13. Terrible, terrible, terrible idea by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

    If the walls are opaque, people with claustrophobia will be puking.

    If the walls are transparent, people with agoraphobia or acrophobia will be puking.

    If it's actually possible to make a strong enough transparent body, then paint everything except a horizontal stripe just a little taller than existing airliner windows. Liquid crystal panels for dimming might be nice.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  14. ask the military by lucm · · Score: 2

    The US army has tried for years to come up with a full-face helmet with embedded HUD, built-in night vision, etc. On paper this is fantastic, but during field tests, soldiers consistently rip those off when they get into combat situations.

    Put hundreds of people on a windowless plane, with 20% or more already scared at the idea of flying, and see what happens if the onboard computer crashes and they find themselves surrounded by blue (or black) screens. Cabin fever on steroids.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  15. Re:After the first five minutes by witherstaff · · Score: 2

    That video link in the article of a panoramic view of just clouds instead of a wall would freak me out. Making it look like the seats were flying through the air like Wonder Woman started doing Commercial Flights is not my idea of comfort. Or if you're sitting sunside and trying to nap - could you please turn off the wall please it's too bright for me

  16. Linux by stooo · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Year of the linux airplane !! YYYEEEAAAAHH

    --
    aaaaaaa
  17. So what by paiute · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sardines don't need windows.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  18. Look at the Image by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    Why in the world would you think the emergency exits wouldn't have windows?

    If you look at the image in the article there are over 20 rows there with no hint of a window for an exit row. Most of the planes I've flown on with single aisles have an exit row within that many rows and yet there is no sign of a window anywhere.

    I mean seriously, do you think everyone else in the world is a total idiot?

    Clearly not but I presume that you'll agree that there are idiots out there so when someone proposes a new idea it is reasonable to point out some potential flaws in the scheme to see whether they have thought it through and have solutions. If they have solutions that's a good sign that they know what they are doing. However if they have no answers and start getting upset and making wild suggestions that you've called everyone in the world a total idiot simply because you dared to question them, well that's not such a good sign is it?

  19. They won't have seats either by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry folks, you'll just have to stand in that flying cattle car. And don't forget to wear your adult diapers, they won't have restrooms either.

  20. Re:bright light and vomit by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sorry that you believe that the entire airplane is your own private, dark, quiet sleeping quarters. I like the feeling of openness by having that window up next to me, and helps me forget about the overweight smelly guy next to me who's snoring and leaning my way...

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
  21. Re:Displays are free, right? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I bet all those high-resolution display panels will be lighter than windows,

    Well, for a start, they don't have to resist 10 tons per square metre.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  22. Re:bright light and vomit by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't get people to shut the dinky windows when I try to sleep on flights now.

    Ah you're one of those annoying people who insists on closing all the blinds and trying to sleep at 3 in the afternoon, no matter how awake everyone else is.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  23. Re:Penny-wise, pound foolish by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    They'd be far better investing in and researching electric planes like what Elon Musk has spoken about.

    I went to Farnborough this year and I can assure you they are researching electric planes. They had one flying shortly before the A380, and a little after the WWI dogfight demonstration team.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  24. artiste, not engineer by argStyopa · · Score: 3

    Artsy Paris design firm != actual aircraft designers.

    Unless today's engineers take their aesthetic choices from someone else's random napkin doodles, I think we are safe with windows for a while.

    (Btw what's up with the recent frequency of "new products" from design firms who pretty much just conceptualize a design by drawing a picture, with absolutely no engineering background, nor actual intent to build a working product? Aren't the aesthetics kind of the last concern, for most things?)

    --
    -Styopa