Slashdot Mirror


Secret Policy Allows GCHQ Bulk Access To NSA Data

hazeii writes Though legal proceedings following the Snowden revelations, Liberty UK have succeeded in forcing GCHQ to reveal secret internal policies allowing Britain's intelligence services to receive unlimited bulk intelligence from the NSA and other foreign agencies and to keep this data on a massive searchable databases, all without a warrant. Apparently, British intelligence agencies can "trawl through foreign intelligence material without meaningful restrictions", and can keep copies of both content and metadata for up to two years. There is also mention of data obtained "through US corporate partnerships". According to Liberty, this raises serious doubts about oversight of the UK Intelligence and Security Committee and their reassurances that in every case where GCHQ sought information from the US, a warrant for interception signed by a minister was in place.

Eric King, Deputy Director of Privacy international, said: "We now know that data from any call, internet search, or website you visited over the past two years could be stored in GCHQ's database and analyzed at will, all without a warrant to collect it in the first place. It is outrageous that the Government thinks mass surveillance, justified by secret 'arrangements' that allow for vast and unrestrained receipt and analysis of foreign intelligence material is lawful. This is completely unacceptable, and makes clear how little transparency and accountability exists within the British intelligence community."

6 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Oh! So it's unacceptable is it? by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Waddya gonna do about it, eh? Tell us again next week?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. Re: Oh! So unacceptable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All Governments Lie
    http://www.ifstone.org/macpherson.php

    Educate your children. Teach them that ideals should inform their morality and ethical systems. But their governmental leaders should be required to prove their loyalty. Faith should be reserved for deities.

    Teach them to encrypt their email, their hard drives and consider Google to be another iteration of, " the slime oozing out of your TV set."

  3. Why? by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can someone remind me why it is that we, the people who elect and pay the wages of the politicians and public servants who seek to destroy our right to privacy in this way, continue to allow such outrageous behavior to continue?

    Has the concept of a democracy been replaced by one of serial fascism where voters are lulled into a false sense of empowerment by governments which collude with the *real* power-brokers to simply look after their own best interests and for who "voters" are synonymous with taxpayers -- a necessary evil required to keep the oily wheels of government turning?

    They say we get the governments we deserve -- if that's true, we must be truly evil bastards!

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in the US, the government just ignores the constitution. Having a written constitution is nice and all, but if it's not properly enforced, they'll just do as they like.

  4. The laws protecting citizens are a sham by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The laws protecting citizen's rights in the Five Eyes nations are a sham. They just use the data collected by their partners to spy on their own citizens. They all do it, including Canada.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  5. Re: Yes, what are YOU going to do? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The first thing you should do is to look into how you can pay nothing or as little as you can in taxes.

    The trouble is that the world isn't black and white. I don't like having massive government spy programs. However, I do like the existence of infrastructure. You know, good roads, schools, a health service, mass transportation and so on. You can't opt out of one without opting out of others unfortunately.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.