Slashdot Mirror
Ferguson No-Fly Zone Revealed As Anti-Media Tactic
The AP (here, carried by the San Francisco Chronicle) reports that recorded conversations reveal flight restrictions requested in August by the police force of Ferguson, MO, and agreed to by Federal aviation safety officials, were specifically intended to limit the access of journalists to the area, rather than purely in response to safety concerns. One FAA manager in Kansas City was recorded saying police "did not care if you ran commercial traffic through this TFR (temporary flight restriction) all day long. They didn't want media in there."
"There is really ... no option for a [Temporary Flight Restriction] that says, you know, 'OK, everybody but the media is OK,'" he said. The managers then worked out wording they felt would keep news helicopters out of the controlled zone but not impede other air traffic.
The conversations contradict claims by the St. Louis County Police Department, which responded to demonstrations following the shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown, that the restriction was solely for safety and had nothing to do with preventing media from witnessing the violence or the police response.
Police said at the time, and again as recently as late Friday to the AP, that they requested the flight restriction in response to shots fired at a police helicopter.
But police officials confirmed there was no damage to their helicopter and were unable to provide an incident report on the shooting. On the tapes, an FAA manager described the helicopter shooting as unconfirmed "rumors."
It's news for nerds, it's not exclusive to tech. This is exactly the type of story that should be on slashdot. It's a form of censorship pure and simple.
Back on point, they have already said that the cop that shot Michael Brown would probably not face any charges, even what should be obviously excessive use of force.
The problem is that many things that are "obvious" to you are wrong. Did you inspect officer Wilson's injuries? The coroner's reports? The physical evidence of struggle inside the police car?
Do you deny officer's the right to self defense? Or is it open season for police officers for you?
So the trend of Police brutality and corruption will continue, until of course people just start killing dirty cops. I don't advocate vigilantism, but at a certain point people will see there is no choice.
I guess we know now.
Will no one rid me of the troublesome priest?
much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
illegal
What statute has been violated?
Slow down sparky. The First Amendment doesn't have the "In order to maintain a well regulated militia"-type clause.
Moreover, even thought the First Amendment clearly forbids Congressional abridgment of the Press, the Supreme Court has allowed multiple exceptions.
So. Take your pocket copy of the Bill of Rights and put it back in your pocket. Grownups are talking.
-