Slashdot Mirror
Bounties vs. Extreme Internet Harassment
squiggleslash writes Brianna Wu, a game studio owner in Boston, found herself the target of numerous anonymous death threats last month, apparently the escalation of a campaign that started when she spoke up for women in gaming, and that intensified during the GamerGate train wreck. Rather than hide, she's offering an $11,000+ cash reward for anyone who helps put her attacker in jail, and she's reporting — albeit at a time many see GamerGate being in its death throes — that it's already having an effect. Wu is also setting up a legal fund to go after those promoting more extreme libels against her and others, with screenshots of a forged tweet purporting to be written by her still circulating around the Internet.
1. Why do we seriously need threats prison time to get people to knock off threating to rape and murder people, or threats of lawsuits to have people not forge the kind of libelous "evidence" that drives such hatred in the first place?"
2. What happens to those without the resources? I'm guessing most of those who suffer this kind of extreme harassment aren't rich enough to own game studios.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
Is that why InternetAristocrat and KingOfPol left?
Because GamerGate's doing so well right now?
The whole thing is a giant ball of stupid masquerading as a "consumerist revolt".
Taken at face value, it's ridiculous and does not understand what journalism is, or games journalism for that matter. Just because Polygon gave Bayonetta 2 a 7.5 doesn't mean it's a bad score; nor is telling Nintendo to stop supporting them because it got a bad score appropriate. For a movement based on "ethics in journalism" it seems to not understand what that means.
Taken with a grain of salt, it's a horrible witch hunt against "SJWs, feminazis and progressives" for daring to question the status quo in gaming. Heaven forbid I don't want more games based on the same tired of misogynistic tropes.
Digging deeper than that, it's pretty transparent that the whole "movement" was started because Eron Gjoni couldn't move on after he broke up with Zoe Quinn and felt like pouring gasoline on the fire started by asshole angry crybabies at wizardchan who got upset that a *woman* of all people could suffer from depression.
Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
This is about extreme harassment - death threats, attempts to fake evidence to get other mobs involved, etc. Not laughing at people. Not calling them names. Not disagreeing with them.
Does a death threat on the internet automatically become more credible because you're female? I'm willing to entertain the notion that it's the case, that more internet death threats are followed up against women than against men. But is it the case?
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I recommend you read through this woman's tweets... She is extremely abrasive, histrionic and goes out of her way to get attention. On Slashdot she would be modded troll or flamebait constantly. She would consider that targeted harassment. She uses a few instances of actual threats plus a lot of people calling her an idiot for saying moronic things to say she gets nonstop threats. I am not a twitter person; I went to it solely to research this whole hoopla and neither her nor any of her sycophants would be able to handle Slashdot discourse.
She says these threats are targeting her for this or that reason (outspoken woman blah blah) but it is because she has made a spectacle out of herself. This has been brought up time and again but is labeled as "victim blaming". She wants to make it about "being a woman on the Internet" (that gets media attention) but anyone well versed in the ways of the Internet try to tell her it's just about being an idiot on the Internet. Unfortunately anybody that makes a spectacle out of themselves will attract people sending death threats. Those people are doing it for attention too so they will latch on to whoever will make it the loudest. No amount of stroking her ego will change that fact.
YOU are completely wrong.
This all started because a female game designer made an interactive experience about going through depression, called it a "game" and got it put on steam in lieu of thousands of other male designers because "diversity". When her game met with poor reviews and got trashed she attacked them as troglodyte misogynists on her tweets and, as expected, got fired upon in return which included harassment and death threats (such is the way of the internet today). That started the whole media circus where it was revealed she had slept with reviewers ostensibly to get better ratings. This was then counter revealed as all lies because she slept with the reviewer BEFORE the game was released... so there!
Everything else is political posturing by do-gooders trying to "expand the scope" of games and claim that women make up the majority of "gamers" now because millions of grandmas play candy crush and the only thing standing in their way are "misogynist terrorists".
Yeah, it's all BS you're perpetuating.
GamerGate is not dying out. Neither is the giant backlash against the leftists and the SJWs that are desperately trying to smear gamers.
I don't know if you noticed, but on Tuesday, the nation stood up and said "we've had enough." They embraced conservative, American values. They rejected the SJWs and their candidates. They rejected Obama's America.
You may be right. GamerGate itself may be fading away. But the SJWs attacking gamers have lost as well. While they were busying themselves attacking gamers, they lost America.