Slashdot Mirror


Judge Says Public Has a Right To Know About FBI's Facial Recognition Database

schwit1 writes U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said the bureau's Next Generation Identification program represents a "significant public interest" due to concerns regarding its potential impact on privacy rights and should be subject to rigorous transparency oversight. "There can be little dispute that the general public has a genuine, tangible interest in a system designed to store and manipulate significant quantities of its own biometric data, particularly given the great numbers of people from whom such data will be gathered," Chutkan wrote in an opinion.

6 of 79 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No it doesn't by lucm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's why Linux is so dangerous and is never used for mission-critical systems.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  2. Re:As a Federal Inmate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > It's unfortunate that someone with my education and my level of life experience had to experience federal incarceration...

    Because prison is something for the poor and uneducated?

  3. Re:No it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whoosh!

  4. Re:As a Federal Inmate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are an admitted liar and thief. You are the reason prisons were built. It is not unfortunate that you went to prison, it is unfortunate it was only 5 years for 4 felonies.

  5. Re:As a Federal Inmate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > It's unfortunate that someone with my education and my level of life experience had to experience federal incarceration...

    Because prison is something for the poor and uneducated?

    Generally speaking, yes. That is the demographic that makes up the majority of the prison population.

    Richer & well-educated people are less likely to commit crime, more likely to get away with it, and more likely to have good lawyers.

  6. Re:EDF: Epithet Density Factor by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    10 years ago, a Windows security flaw would merit an article, and Linux fanbois would brag how secure Linux was.

    I would point out how, if Linux were on half a billion computers and rapidly increasing, it would take over as the primary target of thousands of profiteering hackers, and you would quickly find out how secure it wasn't.

    It was a quick ticket to a downmod. I never even used words like "fanboi" or "dried rabbit pebble-chewing ignorami".

    Go figure.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.