Slashdot Mirror
Data Center Study Reveals Top 5 SMART Stats That Correlate To Drive Failures
Lucas123 writes Backblaze, which has taken to publishing data on hard drive failure rates in its data center, has just released data from a new study of nearly 40,000 spindles revealing what it said are the top 5 SMART (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) values that correlate most closely with impending drive failures. The study also revealed that many SMART values that one would innately consider related to drive failures, actually don't relate it it at all. Gleb Budman, CEO of Backblaze, said the problem is that the industry has created vendor specific values, so that a stat related to one drive and manufacturer may not relate to another. "SMART 1 might seem correlated to drive failure rates, but actually it's more of an indication that different drive vendors are using it themselves for different things," Budman said. "Seagate wants to track something, but only they know what that is. Western Digital uses SMART for something else — neither will tell you what it is."
Nope. When looking for warning signs you don't care about causation, it's enough to know that the presence of A indicates an increased probability of imminent B.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
Those 5 SMART stats match up exactly with what I habitually look at on the job monitoring lots of RAID arrays' drives. Those are the stats that tell you if the drive is going bad most often in my experience.
Yes. This article isn't exactly news as it pretty much confirms what the global peanut gallery has already said about this stuff.
Still, data is better than emergent collective perceptions from distributed anecdotes.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
> TL;DR: Buy whatever is cheapest, the odds are always the same.
Disclaimer: I work at Backblaze. I'm going to completely agree with you wholeheartedly, and say in addition you must have a backup. You don't have to use us, I'm just saying if a drive has a 1 percent chance or a 30 percent chance of failing, the actionable item is the same - keep a backup and buy the cheaper drive and restore from backup when it happens.
> over the past 10 years, I've never had a hard drive die in any of my computers while in use.
Professionally we lose something like 10 (?) drives every single day at Backblaze, but *PERSONALLY* I had a LOT of luck for a number of years, but about 3 years ago I finally lost one drive. I'm more backed up than most people, so it was a completely relaxed event. Not a bit of stress. Replace the drive, re-install the OS, and restore the data. Yet something like 95 percent of people never backup their data. IT professionals backup up their family computers, but once you are out there in "normal computer user" land, it's a horror show.