Slashdot Mirror


Mathematics Great Alexander Grothendieck Dies At 86

An anonymous reader writes Alexander Grothendieck, one of the great eccentric geniuses of 20th century mathematics, has died in France at the age of 86. Grothendieck was the leading mind behind algebraic geometry. He was awarded the Fields Medal in 1966. He reached the very pinnacle of his profession before abandoning the discipline, taking up anti-war activism, retreating into the life of a recluse and refusing to share his research. He died on Thursday in a hospital in Saint-Girons in southwestern France.

4 of 49 comments (clear)

  1. Genius /Insanity by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The line between genius and insanity is a thin one.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Genius /Insanity by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure getting fed up with the state of the world and withdrawing from it is insanity, exactly.

  2. It's still a fair point by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    [It's not insanity... ] Yes it is.... same as Howard Hughes

    I dunno... long-term reading of this blog might result in the impression that life is a disheartening, unjust affair. It's full of rights violations by police and government agencies, feckless and obstructive politicians, corrupt and predatory corporations, and so on.

    To read online news results, everything is lurid and emotional. For example, the nurse in Main [who was in contact with ebola] who didn't agree to a quarrantine was in a "standoff" with authorities, the Philae lander is "racing against time" (whatever *that* means), there's a tiger loose in Disneyland, and we need to be afraid of everything so that the government can justify their purchases and policies.

    Is it that much of a stretch to believe that people will view the world through this skewed perspective?

    Given what we know about human psychology - for example, that people will believe what they're told by default (viz. religion) - it makes perfectly rational sense that a small cadre would lose all hope in humanity and seek to avoid it.

    I don't think these people can be legitimately called insane. They're not hurting anyone, they're not hurting themselves, and they're living their own lives.

    What criteria would you apply to these people to designate them as "insane", and what behaviour would you change about them to fix it? (And how do measure such a change so that you can tell when they're no longer insane?)

  3. Re:Fields medal is like a Nobel prize. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most academics I know talk out their butt about subjects they have no expertise in. Until they become famous for something, no one listens.