Slashdot Mirror


Google Wallet API For Digital Goods Will Be Retired On March 2, 2015

An anonymous reader points out that Google plans to shut down Google Wallet API for third-party digital purchases. "Google has quietly revealed it plans to retire the Google Wallet API for digital goods on March 2, 2015. The company plans to continue supporting the sale of apps on Google Play as well as in-app payments, but users will not be able to purchase any virtual items offered on the Web through Google Wallet. We say "quietly" because there is no official announcement from Google. Furthermore, Google says it has no plans to proactively communicate the change to Google Wallet users; buyers will simply get 404 errors when trying to check out after support is pulled."

105 comments

  1. Android is winning! by rumpledoll · · Score: 1

    But it is!

    1. Re:Android is winning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Galaxy Note 3 is still randomly laggy. Can't say that I'm super happy.

    2. Re:Android is winning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because VMs still suck dick regardless of what the Java weenies would have people believe.

    3. Re: Android is winning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Page,

      Tear down this walled garden.

    4. Re:Android is winning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it is!

      OMG!!! The retiring of a not-really-widely-used product signifies the downfall of the entire company. The sky is falling!!!!!!!

      It's not like apple ever gave up on a product.

  2. So, why the continued G-love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google says it has no plans to proactively communicate the change to Google Wallet users; buyers will simply get 404 errors when trying to check out after support is pulled.

    So, any of the Google zealots want to take a moment and explain (as in, communication, not downmods, not insults) why they trust this company?

    1. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... but... Google contributes to open source software!!! zOMG!!!!!!!111111eleventyone

    2. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by bhagwad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Much as I love Google for many things, I can no longer believe in investing time into its products - except for a handful. These few are Gmail, Maps, Chrome, Android, and of course Search. After Wave, Buzz, Picasa, Google Health, Orkut, and Google Reader, I finally realized that Google is not committed to its products. It builds potentially cool stuff, and then ignores the hell out of them. I am not interested in using the products of a company that essentially tells its users to go fuck themselves.

      Even with Google+, I'm receiving signals that the company is losing interest - which is sad, because I have far better conversations with people on G+ than on Facebook. I have realized now that the future lies with companies who make dedicated products. This is the reason for example, why I use LastPass instead of the Google Chrome password manager. I never know if a day will come when Google suddenly decides to wrap up its password functionality saying "not enough users" or whatever.

      I no longer have faith in ANY of the conglomerates offering products all over the board. None of them have the interest or commitment to keep working on them. I am now a firm believer in "Do ONE thing and do it DAMN well".

    3. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, that still leaves the problem of the company that does one thing, and damn well, then being taken over by Google, Apple, or Microsoft, at which point their product languishes unupdated or is canceled altogether, or it's turned into a new Google / Apple / Microsoft product that is abandoned a year later.

      The smart money is on those who do one thing, and do it just about well enough. Not good enough to get bought and taken over, not diversified enough to stop giving a crap. They're stuck making just-good-enough products for you and me to use.

      and I'm only half-joking.

    4. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Question: Have you ever actually used Google Wallet to buy digital goods from a seller other than Google?

      I haven't, and I worked on Google Wallet. This doesn't surprise me at all; this facet of Google Wallet never saw significant uptake. I doubt there were more than a handful of merchants who offered it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL there's such a thing as a Google zealot.

    6. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by nateman1352 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I no longer have faith in ANY of the conglomerates offering products all over the board.

      Any conglomerate? What about 3M? They make a ton of stuff across the board and I buy a lot of their products (Scotch Tape, Post-It Notes, Scotch Brights, Nexcare & ACE bandages...) and honestly the only product I can think of that they dropped that I used a lot was their floppy disks... and they didn't really drop their floppy disk line they just sold it off as a separate company (Imation) and I was able to keep buying those floppy disks until floppys were pretty much dead and I no longer had any need for them.

      When a conglomerate is well managed it actually works great, the problem is a lot of tech companies have tunnel vision and don't know how to manage a conglomerate.

    7. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Pretty much everything on your list of stuff that got dropped was in the category of:
      1) Very few people used it in the first place (Wave, Buzz, Orkut, Reader)
      2) Was not really dropped but replaced with a similar service under a different name with a method of migration (Picasa got integrated into Drive for all practical purposes, and actually technically G+ replaced Buzz)

      The only thing I'm not sure about is Google Health - although remnants of that have been getting integrated into Android lately.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    8. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Google Checkout was widely used, until it was transitioned to the wallet branding and then killed. As a former google checkout user for digital goods I wasn't even aware that I could've been using wallet still.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    9. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been buying Humble Bundle games with Google Wallet.

      I'd rather not use Amazon's system for it right now...

    10. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newegg supports it. I used it there because newegg keeps asking me for a "Secured By Visa" password that I don't have and can't seem to get my bank to fix.

    11. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes I have, I know of at least 2 MMORPGs that use it as an option for microtransaction currency

    12. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by grim4593 · · Score: 2

      If you hit the back button Newegg at the "verified by Visa" page Newegg will process the order without it. I have done this a half a dozen times since neither Newegg or the card company will fix it.

    13. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even then it won't work.

      We bought our accounting system ($50k) from a specialty company, that was their only product and a couple hundred customers in our industry. Unix program that had been built over the last 20 years, Not even graphical, would still run on green screens and a IBM mini but it did what it was supposed to do. Within a year they were bought by a large regional/national software company with a couple different accounting systems already. Believe it or not, a year or two later THEY were swallowed up by a multinational software corp with a dozen accounting systems for sale. Went from one of 200 customers with specialized service to one of 2000000 customers with support as an afterthought to collecting the fees. Not exactly the experience we signed up for :/ Just looked and sure enough, no (current) references to it anymore anywhere.

    14. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by jaq1an · · Score: 1

      Completely agree, its why I don't get too exiteed about new Google products as they have no loyalty to their own products. I loved Google Pages (hated its replacement) and Buzz

    15. Re:So, why the continued G-love? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      It's sad, I really liked Picasa. The others were crap though.

  3. Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google had some competing thing of paypal, for credit cards I used quite often and they retired that too years ago. It was something I used quite frequently.

    They retired that too. Thing was my business depended on it and it took a while to find a nonpaypal solution.

    All this type of stuff does is remind me to not rely on google for merchant options. Business want stability.

    1. Re:Google's Paypal by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      so-called 'free applications' or services are bullshit since they can and will be pulled at any time google so chooses.

      they are THEY 'short attention span' company of the decade. I can't think of anyone else who abandons their own work so frequently and after its actually launched on the public, too. abandoning things in internal field-test is fine. but once its launched, it should not be killed off without a damned good reason.

      with all the brainpower (?) google has, with all their money and employee base, its amazing how much abandonware they have produced over the years.

      google makes me laugh. a bunch of children who think they can engineer products. lol. it takes a lot more than just writing code and throwing it on a website to truly be a respectable product engineer. I don't know if google has ANY such people, form what I can see on the outside.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Google's Paypal by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Ditto for my wife's business.

      Square & FreshBooks saved her bacon. Happy to pay ~$50 + $30 per month for reliable products.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:Google's Paypal by Jeremi · · Score: 0

      I can't think of anyone else who abandons their own work so frequently and after its actually launched on the public, too.

      I can think of one... Apple. Try bringing your $6,000+ quad-Xeon cheese-grater Mac Pro into an Apple Store for support -- the "geniuses" will all gather round to look at the fascinating museum piece, before they tell you that they can't help you with your "legacy Mac". :^P

      google makes me laugh. a bunch of children who think they can engineer products. lol.

      No doubt that explains why they are such a tiny company that nobody has ever heard of, with such a minuscule user base. Do I detect some sour grapes?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Google's Paypal by KlomDark · · Score: 2

      Yep, I wrote a bunch of code for Google Checkout (I think that was what it was called) and then all of a sudden it didn't work. They just up and killed it. Not trusting them again.

    5. Re:Google's Paypal by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      I can think of one... Apple. Try bringing your $6,000+ quad-Xeon cheese-grater Mac Pro into an Apple Store for support -- the "geniuses" will all gather round to look at the fascinating museum piece, before they tell you that they can't help you with your "legacy Mac". :^P

      Total bull. Just a few months ago I got my girlfriends 4 year old Air serviced at an Apple Store. I also saw other 2009-2010 era Macs being serviced as well.

    6. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of one... Apple. Try bringing your $6,000+ quad-Xeon cheese-grater Mac Pro into an Apple Store for support -- the "geniuses" will all gather round to look at the fascinating museum piece, before they tell you that they can't help you with your "legacy Mac". :^P

      As much fun as it is to bash Apple, bullshit... There's only one MacPro that isn't actively supported any more (the very first one), which is 8 years old at this point. Considering we're talking about a 2 year old product that Google is dropping just now, this really doesn't support your argument.

    7. Re:Google's Paypal by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      I can think of one... Apple. Try bringing your $6,000+ quad-Xeon cheese-grater Mac Pro into an Apple Store for support -- the "geniuses" will all gather round to look at the fascinating museum piece, before they tell you that they can't help you with your "legacy Mac". :^P

      To add to my statement above I checked out this claim. I entered in a serial number for an early 2008 Quad-core MacPro and it let me go through all the steps to be able to get it serviced. So I repeat what I said at first, you're statement is total bullshit.

    8. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the real question is why does a 4 year old need a Macbook Air?

    9. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They retired that too. Thing was my business depended on it and it took a while to find a nonpaypal solution.

      Do you realize that this was your fault, not theirs? Any business that lets themselves depend on a single 3rd party for their payments is looking for trouble. It's fine to use 3rd parties, but you always have to either use two providers, or have a plan in place to switch providers instantly.

    10. Re:Google's Paypal by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Because someone would want to buy them one? Since I never said a "4 year old's MacBook Air" and instead said "my girlfriends (yes this was a typo when I meant to say girlfriend's) 4 year old Air" you're attempt at a joke falls pretty flat.

    11. Re:Google's Paypal by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about a MacPro1 that shipped in 2006, then yes, you aren't going to receive support.

      I'd challenge you to find ANY hardware company that supports stuff that is 8+ years old without an annual maintenance agreement in place.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    12. Re:Google's Paypal by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      your reply addresses nothing that I posted about.

      they are not a tiny company and so, they have LESS excuses to kill off launched apps and services. 10 or 50 man company, sure, fine. but the mamoth that they are? inexcusable!

      do I sense fanboi'ism at YOUR end, mate? I don't have sour grapes; I stopped supporting google and their products years ago. they fooled me once but they are never getting a 2nd chance from me.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    13. Re:Google's Paypal by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      your reply addresses nothing that I posted about.

      Of course it doesn't. They were attempting to turn it into some stupid Google v Apple thing.

    14. Re:Google's Paypal by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Because someone would want to buy them one? Since I never said a "4 year old's MacBook Air" and instead said "my girlfriends (yes this was a typo when I meant to say girlfriend's) 4 year old Air" you're attempt at a joke falls pretty flat.

      You should have just stuck with the typo since it implied you have more than one girlfriend...of course they all had to share the same 4 yr old Macbook Air...but thing being /. and all...

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    15. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bolded one word. One word. You got that one word wrong. Nice proof reading; do you work on scientific papers or for slashdot?

    16. Re:Google's Paypal by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      so-called 'free applications' or services are bullshit since they can and will be pulled at any time google so chooses.

      But it's not necessarily free. If it worked like Paypal, then they take a small cut off of each transaction.
      Send someone $10 on Paypal, and they'll receive $9.75 (or if it's a "gift," then sender pays). That's not free. It's just that, like with credit card transactions, the cost is hidden from the purchaser.

    17. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that kind of the whole point? Google is saying "there are more than enough off-the-shelf options out there that you can just use those, instead of our unpopular product." You basically just proved the point -- there are easy replacements everywhere, and it's time to move on.

    18. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're attempt at a joke falls pretty flat.

       
      Up until the point you replied, yeah. Then you replied and negated the flatness.
       
      CAPTCHA: diamond

    19. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toyota, Link-Belt, Trane, Caterpillar, Mack Trucks, Boeing, Rolls Royce, GE.

      Oh, sorry, you asked for just one - you got 7 more for no extra charge.

    20. Re:Google's Paypal by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      so-called 'free applications' or services are bullshit since they can and will be pulled at any time google so chooses.

      This payment api they're retiring was far from their usual free offering. It was a payment api. It was getting a cut of every transaction.

      That being said, the article is click-baiting us, it's discontinuing a service that nobody uses. Google Wallet isn't being discontinued for other goods, just digital goods. And it isn't being discontinued for in-app payments on Android, or on Google Play, only third party web sites selling digital goods with Google Wallet are going to be affected, which means practically no one.

      If you had a third party global web site selling digital goods, it never made any sense to use Google Wallet in the first place. So it's not so much Google abandoning a product feature. It's actually a digital market that never saw the need for Google Wallet over competing options, and finally Google waking up to that fact.

    21. Re:Google's Paypal by Tom · · Score: 1

      with all the brainpower (?) google has, with all their money and employee base, its amazing how much abandonware they have produced over the years.

      Only if you don't understand the lifecycle of business.

      Look at what most of the brains within Google are doing these days. Running services and building bigger server farms. You are completely right: They're a big company, but not a grown-up company.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:Google's Paypal by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Try bringing your $6,000+ quad-Xeon cheese-grater Mac Pro into an Apple Store for support -- the "geniuses" will all gather round to look at the fascinating museum piece, before they tell you that they can't help you with your "legacy Mac". :^P

      You're wrong to feel abandoned. Apple hasnt abandoned the hardware, they just are no longer offering support in that store. To be fair. It's out of warranty by several years. The thing still works, and you can get it serviced elsewhere or flip it on CL for a decent sum. It didn't vanish into the aether.

    23. Re:Google's Paypal by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      It would still be a typo. It would need to say "my girlfriends' 4 year old air". He would likely be some sort of cheap polygamist in Utah to make so many women share one tiny computer.

    24. Re:Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 Girls 1 Mac?

    25. Re:Google's Paypal by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      He was clearly talking about computer hardware.

    26. Re:Google's Paypal by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the fact that I was relying on it, and those services weren't fully developed when they did drop them, yeah it was an easy replacement.

      Business changes are never 'easy'.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    27. Re:Google's Paypal by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      I can still request and receive money just fine from Gmail, unless you are talking about something else.

    28. Re: Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is wrong, that machine can still be serviced.

      It's a troll. Or an ignorant millinial. Hard to tell the difference.

    29. Re: Google's Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      asshole. what the fuck do you know, dickhead

    30. Re:Google's Paypal by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      In fact, it's double-clickbaiting us - it's claiming that the product is being retired "quietly", "without an official announcement" while simultaneously linking to the official announcement...

    31. Re:Google's Paypal by RandomAdam · · Score: 1

      Rockwell

      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
    32. Re:Google's Paypal by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      So, if I still had the 4-5 year old Mac which I got rid of in about 2009, then I'd be able to get it repaired?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Won't be missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is a scam. Walled garden garbage.

    1. Re:Won't be missed by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

      Walled garden as opposed to Apple Pay?

      How is Apple Pay a walled garden? Apple Pay interoperates perfectly fine with all other existing NFC systems.

    2. Re:Won't be missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why opposed instead of "in addition to"? They are both garbage, for similar reasons.

    3. Re:Won't be missed by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Which would be 'a terminal, but on a computer'.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Won't be missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wallet uses the same terminals. Drink cool-aid much?

    5. Re:Won't be missed by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Wallet uses the same terminals.

      Yes, they do. Who ever said otherwise? Leave that poor straw man alone.

      Drink cool-aid much?

      No, I don't drink kool-aid much. It taste like shit.

    6. Re:Won't be missed by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Haha bolding fail on my part.

    7. Re:Won't be missed by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Wallet uses the same terminals.

      Yes, they do. Who ever said otherwise? Leave that poor straw man alone.

      Drink cool-aid much?

      No, I don't drink kool-aid much. It taste like shit.

      You have to add water and sugar.

      Don't buy the version that says "no sugar needed!", it has terrible tasting artificial sweeteners.
      Don't buy the pre-mixed boxes/puoches. They taste terrible.
      Don't attempt to drink the powder straight.

    8. Re:Won't be missed by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Haha, your post gave me a chuckle. If I do ever want to drink Kool-Aid again for some reason I will take your advice. :-)

    9. Re:Won't be missed by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Sugar drinks taste terrible in general, unless you've been drinking them your whole life and have gotten used to the taste.

    10. Re:Won't be missed by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You heard it here first, folks. Lemonade tastes terrible! Coke tastes terrible! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!

  5. Wut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they planning to buy Paypal?

  6. Rely on a Google API? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be crazy.

    1. Re:Rely on a Google API? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But...but... open source! No walled garden!! Do no evil!! Warble garble!!!

  7. Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google do everything with Wallet quietly. I bet a good chunk of Android users don't even know Wallet exists because Google never market it, which is a shame because it actually works really well.

    1. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      from what ive read, this isnt the android app or nfc payments. it is just for payment processing part that websites can use.

    2. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the point stands. Google are terrible communicators when it comes to things related to Wallet.

    3. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You mean the portion that has any significant adoption whatsoever.

    4. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by watermark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google Wallet still has limited usefulness. NFC payments are still only supported on a tiny fraction of Android users, using a custom build of the wallet app not available in the Google play store. Only some phone distributors are given access to this custom build. My phone has android 4.4, NFC support, and Google wallet installed, but I can't do NFC payments. How do they expect to compete like that?

    5. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by swillden · · Score: 1

      My phone has android 4.4, NFC support, and Google wallet installed, but I can't do NFC payments. How do they expect to compete like that?

      Huh? Google Wallet NFC payments should work on any NFC-capable device with KitKat or higher. What phone do you have, and in what way does it not work?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      Google Wallet still has limited usefulness. NFC payments are still only supported on a tiny fraction of Android users, using a custom build of the wallet app not available in the Google play store. Only some phone distributors are given access to this custom build. My phone has android 4.4, NFC support, and Google wallet installed, but I can't do NFC payments. How do they expect to compete like that?

      What terrible phone are you using?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    7. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone has android 4.4, NFC support, and Google wallet installed, but I can't do NFC payments. How do they expect to compete like that?

      Huh? Google Wallet NFC payments should work on any NFC-capable device with KitKat or higher. What phone do you have, and in what way does it not work?

      Verizon Galaxy Note 3. No NFC Payments, and probably will never have them.

      That being said, it's not that Google doesn't want Wallet to succeed. But Carriers have screwed them over by limiting the devices to ISIS/Soft Card.

    8. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Verizon Galaxy Note 3. No NFC Payments, and probably will never have them.

      That's the phone my wife has, and NFC payments work fine. Did you enable NFC in the settings? When you go into the Google Wallet app what do you see about "tap and pay"?

      That being said, it's not that Google doesn't want Wallet to succeed. But Carriers have screwed them over by limiting the devices to ISIS/Soft Card.

      Google solved that problem by moving from SE to HCE.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Verizon Galaxy Note 3. No NFC Payments, and probably will never have them.

      That's the phone my wife has, and NFC payments work fine. Did you enable NFC in the settings? When you go into the Google Wallet app what do you see about "tap and pay"?

      Ah, correction. My wife has the Note 2. It turns out that HCE payments aren't supported on NXP NFC chipsets (per XDA). The Broadcom chipsets are far more common and work fine. I don't know if this is changing for 5.0. It does seem like a pure software limitation if what I was reading is correct.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by Fuzi719 · · Score: 1

      Google Wallet still has limited usefulness. NFC payments are still only supported on a tiny fraction of Android users, using a custom build of the wallet app not available in the Google play store. Only some phone distributors are given access to this custom build. My phone has android 4.4, NFC support, and Google wallet installed, but I can't do NFC payments. How do they expect to compete like that?

      Google Wallet (installed from the standard Play Store) on my T-Mobile US HTC One (both M7 and new M8) works great paying for purchases anywhere they accept NFC payments (including Apple Pay locations). I previously used it at CVS before they turned off their NFC terminals, I use it at Panera, McDonalds, Kroger, Best Buy, Target. You're making claims that are not based in fact.

    11. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by swillden · · Score: 1

      A little more information: Some Note 3s can do HCE and some cannot. It's definitely an unusual case. Samsung decided to source NFC chipsets from both NXP and Broadcom. All Broadcom chipsets can do NFC and all of the newer NXP chipsets can as well but older ones had some bits hardwired that makes it impossible for the handset to send certain types of NFC messages. The Note 3s with NXP chips have an early version of a later-generation NXP chipset and still has that limitation, even though the final version of the chipset doesn't have it.

      So... roughly half of Note 3 owners got screwed (on NFC Wallet). Nearly all other major devices of the last 2-3 years used Broadcom chips, though, and I'd be surprised if anything released in the last 12-18 months had an HCE-incapable NFC chipset.

      It's possible that all of the Verizon Note 3s have NXP, since Verizon doesn't like Google Wallet.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Doing Google Wallet quietly? Shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't even use Google Wallet, they banned me a few years ago when I tried to change the expiry date on my CC.

  8. User to user still alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm unclear from what I've read if user-to-user payments will still be permitted/supported as an alternative to Paypal for example....

  9. Not killing Wallet, just payment for digital goods by technomom · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is just killing a very small function in wallet that mostly no one was using anyway. It does not in any way kill Google Wallet NFC payments or Wallet itself.

  10. and nothing of value was lost by slashdice · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to sources, Google code hosting will get killed off early next year. Go (the language) is moving to git and github, which also hosts most (if not all) of Google's other open source code.

    Who could imagine that source forge would outlast them! Of course, I'm not sure why source forge is still a thing, either. Maybe the domain is set to auto-renew and nobody noticed the bill.

    --
    Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
  11. Google's Paypal by kingbyu · · Score: 2

    I spent a lot of time coding a good checkout solution that worked with Google Checkout, so I was pretty mad when all the work I did went down the drain when they discontinued it. I was fortunate to had already integrated Paypal and Amazon checkout before it was discontinued, so the business impact was pretty small.

    But it did teach me to be 10 times more careful when investing time to integrate with a third party platform.

    But this also shows an interesting trend away from APIs and "Mashups." 5 to 10 years ago, providing an API for your startup was considered an essential way to promote your platform by having it integrated all over the place. I suspect too many developers got burned in the way that I was with Google Checkout, and stopped trying to "mashup" APIs to the point where there was no longer much benefit to provide them.

  12. Obvious reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they're about to integrate bitcoin support.

    (A guy can dream...)

    1. Re:Obvious reason by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Why would that require shutting down the API?

  13. Nobody? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    Nobody commenting that this is simply for the purchase of DIGITAL goods? Your shitty eZine has to get paid for some other way.

    Real goods can continue to use Google Wallet.

    1. Re:Nobody? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Well, since Verizon won't update the drivers for the NFC chip in my phone (Note 3), the only way I ever use Wallet is for digital goods (mostly purchasing Humble Bundles). Guess I'll to switch to Amazon Payments (no way in hell is paypal getting my info).

  14. Google APIs by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Here yesterday, gone today.

  15. Prepare another tombstone... by sootman · · Score: 2
    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  16. Re:Not killing Wallet, just payment for digital go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is silly, if you think about it. I've been buying all my Humble Bundle purchases (and yes, I did pay better than average every time...) with Wallet and I guess now the Humble Bundle bunch will have to take that out and offer something else. Not everyone likes PayPal, which lean towards criminal in conduct in many ways.

  17. Re:Not killing Wallet, just payment for digital go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this not killing Google Wallet? NFC still works, but it has pretty much 0% market share. I had a phone with NFC, but it got replaced before Google got things working.

    That leaves Google Wallet as a payment solution for Google Play. Which is pretty much part of Play, and not a payment processor any more.

    So yes, this kills Google Wallet.

  18. Googled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Googled" seems to be a word that is mutating.

    Used to be it was used as "She googled for the answer, and the link was on top of the results."

    Now, it's more like "You've been googled, I'm so sorry that happened to you."

    1. Re:Googled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh no, is Microsoft still trying to make that go viral?

  19. Re:Not killing Wallet, just payment for digital go by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    0% market share -- you know, except every NFC enabled POS terminal, vending machine, or electric car charger.

    Most grocery stores, many chain convenience stores, nearly every Coke machine with a credit card reader...

  20. Re:Not killing Wallet, just payment for digital go by Tom · · Score: 2

    True, but they kill the exact small function that was the only one I'm utilizing. I understand why - nobody is using it anyways. My online game (below) is taking payments in a few different formats, plus a few more I'm planning or working on, but frankly speaking, it's PayPal and then nothing for a very long time. I think one person purchased game credits with Google Wallet this year. Two more paid with Bitcoin. Everyone else uses PayPal. Yes, people ask for other options, but generally they ask "do you have something else except PayPal?", and not for something specific else. They just don't like PayPal.

    But Google Wallet, for my case, was not even worth the time it took to integrate it. I can completely understand why they kill this function.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  21. Re:Not killing Wallet, just payment for digital go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "People that could use Google Wallet" != "Market Share".

  22. Re:Not killing Wallet, just payment for digital go by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    "That leaves Google Wallet as a payment solution for Google Play."

    No, it leaves Google Wallet is a valid payment option everywhere that there's an NFC-enabled POS terminal, and, frankly, everywhere that takes a regular old swipe card, since you can get a physical Google card too.
    https://support.google.com/wal...

  23. Google going too many directions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google to me is simply fragmenting itself in too many directions. They have no focus, although they have plenty of ideals and directions to go. They act like a kid on Mountain Dew, and speed when it comes to products. Many of which die simply because the kids on speed comes down and get's bored with the product. Google is like a automaker who builds great cars but never develops a good way to sell them. Reminds me of another great talent Tesla motors. Well produced cars but want to fight the very way the US sells cars? Maybe the problem is that Google really makes it money on ad revenue and its products are simply a accessory rather then a primary product. No one at Google see's anything as so important other then ad revenue that they need to focus harder. Chromebook's, Android, Web apps and such all help Google in gaining users. But the end game for Google is still ads. Its like a rich millionaire's kid who gets a hefty allowance and pretty much does whatever and never has to worry about anything. Google is that rich kid, who has a good flow of cash with ads and can dabble in whatever. If it sticks great, if not then move on to something else. Kind of makes me not want to use any Google products.

  24. The Service Everyone's About To Use by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    it's discontinuing a service that nobody uses

    That strikes me as an incredibly poor choice just as Apple is starting to allow users to do exactly that same thing via ApplePay... you can already see how well it works with app store purchases. My online buying will now lean heavily to using ApplePay where possible primarily because I don't have to give the merchant a CC number.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. The article is trolling; this is barely news by virtualXTC · · Score: 1

    As it's already been said, Wallet NFC and the user app are not going anywhere. It just makes no sense to have a product that takes a cut from vendors, when you can now send mony by email (via Wallet) to anyone for free. Thus a dedicated api for 3rd party purchases no longer makes sense.