Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Aims To Offer Windows 10 Upgrades For All Windows Phone 8 Lumias

An anonymous reader writes News suggesting that Microsoft plans to offer Windows 10 upgrades for all its Windows Phone 8 devices broke today. "It's our intention to enable a Windows 10 upgrade for Lumia Windows Phone 8 smartphones," a Microsoft spokesperson told VentureBeat. "At this early stage in the development process, and given the vast portfolio of Windows devices worldwide, we can't predict that all devices will be upgradeable, but it is our intention that the Lumia smartphone line be upgradeable to Windows 10."

77 comments

  1. for free? by Selur · · Score: 0

    Unless they offer the upgrade for free that will not really help their market share that much,....

    1. Re:for free? by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

      What they are going to over is a discount on a new windows 10 phone! So even if you have a broken windows 8 phone, you can trade it in for a windows 10 phone at a price of course. It's all marketing spin and hyperbole! That's what I read between the lines.

    2. Re:for free? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Windows is currently free of charge on phones, small tablets, and low-cost laptops. Unless Microsoft reverses course on that, the Windows Phone upgrades will be free.

      This isn't all that big a commitment. The number of Windows Phone 8 models is modest: perhaps a dozen Lumia models plus a couple of phones from other companies. So it's not much worse than Apple's commitment to iOS updates for older phones and tablets. It's not like, say, committing to updating every Android Jelly Bean and KitKat phone to Lollipop; that would require a lot more development effort.

      Windows 10 on laptops uses no more resources than Windows 8.1. (Microsoft actually intends to decrease the resource usage below Windows 8 levels by the final release, but it is impossible to judge whether they will succeed by looking at the preview releases.) That will probably also be true on phones. So any phone that currently runs Windows Phone 8 should run Windows 10 as well as it runs 8. Low end phones will still be low end phones, but they won't be any worse than they are now.

  2. terrible summary + not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first line has garden path construction that first parses as " ... Windows Phone 8 devices broke today."

    Next, the summary doesn't include the word "free." If the offer isn't free, then it's just "Microsoft plans to offer try to sell a new product to its existing customers."
    Actually after clicking through to the original article, I think this is the case. Basically I think Microsoft is saying "we hope to make it possible to sell Windows 10 to Windows 8 users, but the old hardware might prevent us from doing that."

    This isn't news. At best, this is just press spin. At worst, it's just part of the Windows 10 advertising campaign.

    1. Re:terrible summary + not news by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Yea, when I read the part about "all its Windows Phone 8 devices broke today" I wondered how they managed to do that.

    2. Re:terrible summary + not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just part of the Windows 10 advertising campaign.

      What do you expect from Slashdot?

    3. Re:terrible summary + not news by bondsbw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless the summary changed, the words

      News suggesting that Microsoft plans to offer Windows 10 upgrades for all its Windows Phone 8 devices broke today.

      does not parse the way you say it does. There is no situation, other than not reading, that parses the way you suggest.

      And just as much as you are harping on it potentially not being free, I'll harp on the wonderful possibility that it could be free! And you know what? Neither of us know anything about their plans because they just now kinda-sorta gave us a hint as to the future roadmap of these devices.

      Lay off the FUD.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    4. Re:terrible summary + not news by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      And further, this is actually an exciting development, it shows more of a commitment to keeping its older devices modern.

      Apple supports mobile OS upgrades for its devices for at least 3 or 4 major versions. Android manufacturers tend to do the opposite, you'll be lucky if you get even minor version upgrades through your 2-year contract period. (My Android got point release updates for a few months, then surprisingly one large update about 1 1/2 years later. I seriously doubt my phone sees anything newer and I still have months left on my contract.)

      WP looked like it was firmly trending toward the Android upgrade model, what with even new WP7 barely being supported the second WP8 was announced. Perhaps, at least for first-party devices, we are starting to see support timelines that look more like Apple... and that should make any user of WP8 devices happier.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    5. Re:terrible summary + not news by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. Bad summaries with garden path constructions are part of old slashdot tradition.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
  3. Who cares by vikingpower · · Score: 1, Insightful

    about Windows phones, anyway? The huge capital destruction operation that the Nokia takeover amounted to wasn't enough, obviously: MS needs to sink even more cash into a non-existing market: Windows phones. Ain't gonna change anytime soon. Reason : there is no fucking **innovation** going on at MS. Just marketing. Meh.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Who cares by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      about Windows phones, anyway?

      I'd say "who cares about Windows Phones" because that's kinda not the problem here. It's not Windows Phone 8 that the 10 upgrade is sorely needed on. Windows 8 (the desktop OS) is the failure that needs to be fixed here. Precisely because a computer isn't a phone.

    2. Re:Who cares by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Didn't they fixed most of the nuisances with 8.1 and 8.1 Update?

    3. Re:Who cares by jbolden · · Score: 0

      No precisely because they didn't require people to use the right hardware so they had a bad experience. Windows 8 is really good on hardware designed for Windows 8. Had they not allowed Windows 7 hardware to run Windows 8, not treating it like an upgrade for existing systems there wouldn't have been this backlash.

      Same mistake they made with Vista.

    4. Re:Who cares by jbolden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MS needs to sink even more cash into a non-existing market: Windows phones.

      Of course the market is small. They aren't denying that. They are trying to grow it, which is why they are "sinking cash" into it.

      Ain't gonna change anytime soon.

      I don't know that. You don't know that. Android is 5 years old. The focus of Android is down market. The focus of Apple is very up market. I can see an obvious gap developing of the next 5 years at the mid price points. Other possibilities are more corporate oriented devices moving away from BYOD.

    5. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Didn't they fixed most of the nuisances with 8.1 and 8.1 Update?

      Hmmm, is there a start menu, and not just a start button which takes you to a start screen? Is the interface discoverable or still just "magic"?

      Windows 8.x is lethal for businesses. At my company, all laptops are issued with Windows 7 - including current purchases. We've even paid for extended support for Windows XP, simply because there are a lot of applications which work fine on Windows XP, but simply don't work right on Windows 7 (and no upgrades available from suppliers, either).

      At home, we're all Linux (3 servers - all with external back-up - and several phones/laptops/desktops), of course.

    6. Re:Who cares by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The focus of Android is down market.

      Well, no, and also no. The only market Google is actually focusing on is up market. That's why the Nexus line is flagship devices. The down market will take care of itself. Google does tinker around with mid-level STBs occasionally, but they aren't the cheapest ones and they aren't very serious.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Who cares by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What the fuck are you talking about? Windows 8 runs just as good as Windows 7 on hardware released pre-Windows 8. Haven't noticed any issues at all on any of my systems that ran Windows 7 prior to Windows 8.

      Stop spouting bullshit.

    8. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good thing for software developers at least, as it reduces fragmentation. Nobody will have the resources or will to support multiple codebases even for Windows phones.

    9. Re:Who cares by SourceFrog · · Score: 2

      Unlike what, all the "innovation" going on with Android and iOS? Really? "Innovative" business models maybe, like forcing ISVs to basically zero margins to subsidize the OS's R&D by taking 30% and offering a cut of that to the OEMs.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    10. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny I think the same about iphones. There are parts of the world where it is simply not affordable to spend multiples of your monthly income on a single phone, where iphones and apple is simply unheard of. You either get android or windows phone, and windows phones are pretty simple to use for older people who are upgrading from dump phones.

    11. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 should only be allowed on pad like devices, that is his point: it is a touch based interface, don't run it on traditional equipment

    12. Re:Who cares by camg188 · · Score: 3, Informative

      My daughter got a Lumia. It's pretty nice hardware for the price. I've seen it for $89 recently. I can't comment about the OS though, but my daughter likes it.

    13. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 8 has a desktop. All it needed was an installation check to see if the system has a touchscreen or not, then default to the proper start menu/screen.

    14. Re:Who cares by deviated_prevert · · Score: 2

      I'd say "who cares about Windows Phones" because that's kinda not the problem here. It's not Windows Phone 8 that the 10 upgrade is sorely needed on. Windows 8 (the desktop OS) is the failure that needs to be fixed here. Precisely because a computer isn't a phone.

      I have a wonderful cell for sale if anyone is interested. The radio is absolutely excellent and rarely drops calls even in remote locations. The hardware has not given me any issues at all over 5 years of use and the battery is interchangeable by the user! Really it is called a Samsung Omnia 910. Trouble with the phone though is the OS which is essentially useless for web surfing with html 5 multimedia content.

      The offending OS is unfortunately a Windows mobile mashup of xp and double unfortunately even though it will easily run an early Android release the carrier has the thing locked down to the point where there is no way to change the OS.

      "Someone buy my phone PLEASE!"

      To quote a famous comedian.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    15. Re:Who cares by tepples · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, is there a start menu

      Once you install the third-party Classic Shell add-on, there is. It makes 8 look and feel like flat 7, modulo some differences in the Control Panel (things moved to the Metro-crap PC settings app).

    16. Re:Who cares by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      This may give an impression of slightly broken which is otherwise unusual in Windows (if you can gloss over some specific stuff or the non standard UI in antivirus and other software).

      Even with a start menu you may have the charms bar or more annoyingly Metro windows media player starts when you double click on a file so there's some more work to do which us old users take for granted but user competence with little settings and customisation isn't on the rise. They don't even know what a file manager is these days.

    17. Re:Who cares by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      It requires a DirectX 9 GPU with a driver that works on Windows 8, and a CPU with NX bit. Really antique hardware is already left out, so you know.

    18. Re:Who cares by tepples · · Score: 1

      There are parts of the world where it is simply not affordable to spend multiples of your monthly income on a single phone [...] windows phones are pretty simple to use for older people who are upgrading from dump phones.

      I'm assuming you're referring to the "Balassa-Samuelson" model, which predicts that a country's currency will be undervalued before it develops a vibrant export sector. For someone in a low-currency-value country upgrading from a dumbphone with $80 per year service, I imagine that the $500 per year service for a smartphone will be at least as painful as buying the handset.

    19. Re:Who cares by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      And then they make Windows 10 phone home with even more personal info than ever before whenever your PC is switched on. If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd say Microsoft made an OS so bad that everyone had to flock to the next one, even if it did sell all your personal data to the highest bidder and the NSA. At this point, I'll use Windows 7 till it hits end of life and just use Linux after that. I'll probably have an extra PC for games or recording but never use it.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    20. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with a start menu you may have the charms bar or more annoyingly Metro windows media player starts when you double click on a file

      Classic Shell can disable all Windows 8 UI elements, including charms and shortcuts to Modern UI apps.

    21. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Every single computer made in the past 12 years has a GPU that supports DX9. Windows 8 drivers are the same as Windows Vista/7 drivers. NX bit is in all CPUs since the Athlon 64 and Pentium 4.

      Windows 8 has lower system requirements than Windows Vista/7 and Android. This means any PC that won't run Windows 8 is already junk.

    22. Re:Who cares by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Since late Pentium 4, not even the first version of Prescott.

      Windows 8 driver on radeon 9600, X300 and geforce FX etc. : not sure that really works. Windows 8.x use WDDM 1.2 and 1.3, while Windows 7 uses WDDM 1.1 or XP driver mode. Anyway the computers aren't junk, when they do fucking work. I ought to put together some win 7 junk box so that a) I piss you off and b) run old games, if I come across an old KVM.

    23. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Athlon 64 supported NX bit from the very beginning in 2003. Windows Vista, 7 and 8 all use the same driver model. That was what caused the big uproar when Vista came out, that hardware makers didn't have updated drivers. And yes, a P4 is complete and utter junk now due to its low performance and high power requirements.

      Also thought you should know that Windows 8 has better performance and backward compatibility than Windows 7 while only requiring half of the RAM.

    24. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your daughter hot? Do you think she'd fuck on a first date?

    25. Re:Who cares by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      You're both wrong. They're wrong, Windows Phone isn't targeting mid market it's setting its sights firmly on the low-end. And you're wrong, Google is doing a ton to make Android work on the low-end. Low end is doing things like adding dual sims and other features for people in the developing world. Low end means heavily optimizing the OS so that it runs smoothly on weaker hardware. Google could be adding features but all of their press is on optimizing the rendering to achieve better framerates with existing hardware. Facebook is doing the same thing, read their blog on bandwidth optimization. Google is even spending tens of millions on R&D for giving web access to the developing world. Those won't be up market devices. They want to bring wireless internet to the developing world to sell billions of phones--all accessing Google Adwords.

    26. Re:Who cares by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Didn't they fixed most of the nuisances with 8.1 and 8.1 Update?

      No, because the Charms bar is still there, and unremovable, and when you click on the start button on the keyboard, you get a start screen, rather than a start button. One thing that MS could have done, but didn't, could have been to introduce multiple virtual desktops, like you have in X11 based DEs. Windows 10, OTOH, supposedly allows you to make Windows a Windows 7 when a keyboard is attached to the tablet making it a de facto laptop (and indeed may be the default on laptops as well) and Windows 8 when the keyboard is detached, or for a pure tablet. It gets rid of the gorilla arm issue

    27. Re:Who cares by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No precisely because they didn't require people to use the right hardware so they had a bad experience. Windows 8 is really good on hardware designed for Windows 8. Had they not allowed Windows 7 hardware to run Windows 8, not treating it like an upgrade for existing systems there wouldn't have been this backlash.

      Same mistake they made with Vista.

      You mean not allowing Windows 8 on non-touch laptops?

      Aside from that, not the case. I bought a Dell Inspiron (albeit non-touch) a few months ago from Costco, preloaded w/ Windows 8. The configuration? A Core i7, 8GB of RAM, 1TB HDD. Issue was not the performance, which was fine. Issue was that the whole experience of working w/ Windows was totally overhauled. I installed Classic Shell, which initially seemed to fix it somewhat, but I found out that when I'd type a document and the cursor got anywhere near the right end of the screen, the charms bar would pop up. Oh, and also, the trackpad was too sensitive, and there wasn't a good way of disabling it.

      After a week of trying all this, I bit the bullet and installed PC-BSD on the laptop, wiping out Windows 8. It had some rough edges @ first, and it took me a few tries to get it right (such as automatically booting to the OS, getting the BIOS settings right), but soon enough, I had it working the way I wanted. Recent updates to the OS, such as Lumina, have improved the experience somewhat, and now, I'm generally happy. In the meantime, all the work laptops that I've had have been Windows 7 only

      Once Windows 10 is out, I might just try that, not on this laptop though. I might try Windows 10 on a Surface Pro, if I think the budget justifies it. But the current configuration I got was for $800, whereas a similarly configured Surface Pro 3, if it existed, would be something like >$2k. The smoother form factor is certainly worth a bit more, but not >$1k more.

      Only Windows 8 platform I've liked has been Windows Phone 8, now the 8.1 version. Only thing I'm missing on that is Vonage.

    28. Re:Who cares by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      They fixed some but not all of the problems in the updates. Some more can be fixed with third party add-ons: there are multiple Start Menu apps for Windows 8, and Modern Mix lets you run Metro apps in a normal window rather than having them take over the entire screen. Even with that some awkward things remain, notably the odd split of capabilities between the PC Settings app for Metro and the Control Panel app for the desktop. (On Windows 8 and 8.1 there are things you can do in PC Settings that you can't do in Control Panel, and vice versa, so you have to know how to use both to do the full range of administrative tasks.)

      Windows 10, if things stay as they are in the Technical Preview, does everything right and should make users of older versions of Windows happy. The default user interface of the Technical Preview is nearly identical to the Windows 7 UI if you run it on a system with a keyboard and mouse; the Start menu is back and Metro apps run in windows. It only switches to the Metro interface if you run it on a device with no keyboard or mouse, like a tablet. Hybrid devices like the Microsoft Surface will automatically switch to the other interface when you attach or remove the keyboard.

      There will be a few bits of the new. The Start menu on Windows 10 has some Live Tiles along with the usual menus. Microsoft is working on expanding the capability of the PC Settings app to be more fully capable and include all the important things you can do in Control Panel, so that bit of UI schizophrenia will go away.

    29. Re:Who cares by jbolden · · Score: 1

      What I'm talking about is an interface designed around touch that is somewhat counter intuitive on non-touch based systems.

    30. Re:Who cares by jbolden · · Score: 1

      You mean not allowing Windows 8 on non-touch laptops?

      Yes. Or requiring an external digitizer (i.e. typical artist setup).

      . Issue was that the whole experience of working w/ Windows was totally overhauled.

      Exactly. The experience is both different and worse on non-touch equipment.

      Oh, and also, the trackpad was too sensitive, and there wasn't a good way of disabling it.

      I've seen that before with Macs. You may want to see if your battery overheated, expanded and pushed the trackpad slightly. That might be a hardware issue and not Windows at all.

      I might try Windows 10 on a Surface Pro

      That's the right way to test it.

      The smoother form factor is certainly worth a bit more, but not >$1k more.

      You might want to look at some other options with touch screen. I really like the Surface pro as a secondary device as a primary there is no way to get enough computer in that small a form factor at a reasonable cost. OTOH I'm running an almost $3k rMBP as my primary.

    31. Re:Who cares by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Google's Android strategy is down market. Google's hardware strategy is a show device that they don't push for large sales number but demonstrates the operating system.

    32. Re:Who cares by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Nokia has always been a low end vendor. This is where Nokia's culture and Microsoft's culture diverge. There is no value for Microsoft in the low end at all. I just don't see Windows Phone going there.

  4. As long as it has a real start MENU that's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because I hate a phone without a real start MENU. And let's not call it a phone anymore is right. Who does voice calls anymore anyway?

  5. I want to form an opinion again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not a long time ago, I was just a normal internet user that surfed various news sites like Sladshdot, reddit, or wsj.com. I read a story, perhaps clicked onto some links it contained, and I was mostly happy with my life.

    Then, one day, I surfed Slashdot. It was one of those days you will remember for the rest of your life. So, as I surfed Sladshdot, the title of a story got my attention. I read the summary. The topic seemed interesting, so I decided to read further. I read:

    Read on below for the rest what Bennett has to say.

    Usually I don't read first line of a story which contains the user who has submitted it. On that day, I didn't neither. As I've only read that bottom line, I asked myself: who is this misterious Bennett? I decided to click onto the "Read the comments" link to read more of the story that was, as it seems, written by some Bennett. During reading, I was already impressed by the clear and detailed but still concise structure of the text. As I finished reading, I was convinced it was the best story I've ever read on Sladshdot, or any comparable news site. I asked myself: perhaps this misterious Bennett has contributed more frequently than just once?

    To find that out, I went to Sladshdot's search bar and searched for "Bennett". I clicked the second entry, and it began with:

    Frequent contributor Bennett Haselton writes

    I searched for the "Read on" line, and I was happy when I found it. As it seemed, he was a frequent contributor. However the story was on a topic completely unrelated to the topic of my article. Would the other article still be as insightful as the first? And the other stories in the search result? Would they be also by Bennett? Or someone else? I decided first to be happy to have found such an insightful article, and decided to make a photograph of me, before I read the second story.

    I still have that photograph of me and I can see the hope and the satisfaction in my eyes, the hope that the other stories are also written by this brilliant author called Bennett, and the satisfaction of having read such an insightful article. As I've read the first couple of stories by Bennett, I couldn't believe what my eyes saw: all the stories were as insightful or even more insightful than the original story I read. I asked myself whether the spectators in the Globe theatre would have felt the same way when they watched a piece by shakespeare: Witnessing history of writing. I realized Bennett is one of histories great writers.

    As I've finished reading all contributions by Bennett Haselton on Sladshdot, I went back to the first Bennett story, and read them a second time. I sat three days straight, missing all social events during that span, only reading Bennett's stories, and reading them again and again. During that time my eyes opened to the fact that my whole life, I've known nothing. Bennett's stories explained every aspect of very complicated things in such detail, that I formed something in my mind. First, I couldn't describe it what it was, but years later I know that, for the first time of my life, I formed something called "opinion" on a topic. Previously, I've only adopted opinions from others, but Bennett's stories enable people to make their opinions for themselfes, to form them. With his stories, Bennett gives you the material to form your own opinion on your own. I know you will say that you can form your opinion on your own, and that you don't need Bennett for that. I
    disagree with you. What you call opinion, is in reality just ideology you imitate from others. You don't form your opinions, you don't have them.

    Every time Bennett writes a new story on Sladshdot, I take a free day and spend it reading the story

  6. Insert free advert for MICROS~1 by lippydude · · Score: 0

    snoooor ....

  7. Microsoft 2nd most valuable company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither a fan of the most valuable company (Apple) nor the 2nd, but had to be said before Microsoft bashing commences: http://www.betawired.com/microsoft-becomes-second-most-valuable-company-leapfrogging-exxon/1414855/

    So they must be doing something right!

    1. Re:Microsoft 2nd most valuable company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither a fan of the most valuable company (Apple) nor the 2nd, but had to be said before Microsoft bashing commences: http://www.betawired.com/micro...

      So they must be doing something right!

      That's a great point. Most everyone I know looks at market capitalization when trying to choose a desktop or mobile operating system. Damn straight I do! How else can I know if the quality of the user interfaces, ISV models, required hardware footprints or device support are what I need?

      I used to research the products, test them out to see if I liked the look and feel, confirm that the hardware I wished to use was supported and that I had good choices of software. What a waste of time. Now I just look at the stock prices and market cap and I'm done.

      What a dork I was! Usability. pfft! Access to applications of my choice. Who needs it? Support for my hardware? Throw that crap out!

      Focusing on Market Cap makes me feel almost as good as after I used MYCleanPC and it made my PC 4000 times faster!

  8. Frankly speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Windows doesn't really need to be fixed, but be left behind for good.

    It would be fair to finally people understand that it's like SCO UNIX and Xenix that should be buried and never look back. The only people that should ever look back are few historians and computer scientists writing books of a well known and cautious example how things can go horribly wrong when you let marketing department lead development changing their mind again and again after few years until its time to repeat same mistakes and ignore or forget fixing fundamental things that have been broken decades. That leads to a kind rubicon Windows is today and it's fair to say nobody can fix it without completer clean room rewrite, but that would be too awful for MS to admit and therefore it's still trying to pull new stunts year after year.

    Please do you selves a favor, leave Windows behind already and choose whatever else other system, you will be a much happier camper after a while. The learning curve for a switcher is not that steep any more it was 10 years ago.

    1. Re:Frankly speaking by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Switch to what?
      The competition on its terms, default target for hardware support of almost every hardware and installation of arbitrary software, is Android.
      I guess PCs could switch to Android 5 as the default OS, then you'd be stepping from Windows to another new kind of Windows with most of the same issues.

    2. Re:Frankly speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switch to what?

      It all depends what you are up to with the computer of course. But unless you have painted yourselves in corner with 'business needs' requiring using some specific Microsoft product for Windows only. That case I would run those things virtualized somewhere and remain most of day without pain of using Windows desktop. Works well, can be either cheaper because sharing licenses of bit more expensive if no sharing is possible.

      Then the idea is to isolate those Microsoft Windows only apps somewhere (a server or in simple case a desktop os) where you don't have to mess with them a) often hopefully and b) because of isolation where not much other stuff is done it (the windows system) remains bit more sane state. Most problems with windows arise when you have lot of programs both from Microsoft and third parties and system gets overly complicated to situation that it wasn't designed to handle -- remember it's roots are in single user single tasking system, which was then mocked single user multitasking system and then yet again mocked multiuser multitasking system and it shows all over the system today.

      Registry was a bright idea* to fix things, but implementation is and continues to be horribly broken even today.

      *) without centralized settings somewhere in the system it's hard to implement centralized administration domain (company/organization) wise.

      There hasn't been proper package manager (supposedly windows 10 will have, but meh -- it's 15+ years late, software vendors have learned bad habits already and unless Microsoft would force using it with iron fist and not let anything installed without it's not going to improve things much as vendors will continue old traits learned coming years to no end. If Microsoft would force using it then it would cause breaking ties to compatibility in a way that they hardly would be able to solve without so much collateral damage that they simply doesn't even dare to consider about it.

      I've talked with Microsoft representatives about these issues over decade and asked when they will be solved. First it was like talking to a politician they always replied what they wanted not answered to question(s), but later years some of they guys seem to have bit more clue what customers are asking. However it's too little and too late already.

      I'm not to give an advise what to choose instead of windows, because it all depends what is being done. However complaining that there isn't options is false. Sure there is. Some people are giving up windows and use just tablets, some people switch to OS X, some to any of many Linux distributions which have gained popularity. Falling back to windows because it's being marketed more and pushed by vendors isn't still only option if you use even half the brain and really want something better.

  9. Not interested by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Wake me when they offer a Win10 upgrade for those who had to suffer from Win8 on a Desktop. It's kinda a slap in the face when they only offer an upgrade for an OS for the only platform where that OS at least remotely made any sense.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Not interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who suffer while using Windows 8 should be slapped in the face, kicked in the balls, and rightly told to go fuck themselves. From a TI 99/4a, to an Amiga 500, then onto a PC in 1997. I've used every version of Windows since 95. I've found every new version to be an improvement over the previous version. Had no problems with Windows ME (ran on 2 machines, proved to be more stable then Windows 98) or Windows Vista, and currently enjoy Windows 8.1, though I also had no problems with Windows 8. I personally adapted to the new Start Screen in less than 10 minutes. Sick and tired of the god damn crybabies that bitch over every single change.

      Windows 8 actually makes a lot of sense. Microsoft noticed how all these dumb motherfuckers litter their desktop with 50 fucking icons, 3/4 of which they never even click on once. The same idiots that fill up their primary hard drive by dumping shit to a folder on the desktop because they are too ignorant to simply copy the data to another partition and make a desktop shortcut to said folder. I just wish they would have removed the "refresh" option on the right click menu. You wouldn't believe how many idiots I see refreshing the desktop at least twice before opening any file or program.

    2. Re:Not interested by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      It's kinda a slap in the face when they only offer an upgrade for [Windows Phone]

      But this isn't the case at all. Perhaps you need a slap in the face just to knock some sense into you.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    3. Re:Not interested by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      pfft, wake me up when they extend the Vista to Windows 7 upgrade program to all users. Vista is a festering pile of shit utterly unusable since it was last service packed and they made it even slower than it already was, it's unsuitable for the declared purpose.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. It's not like they have another choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would they ask money through windows update?

  11. And the Lumia 900? by operator_error · · Score: 1, Troll

    What about the once-flagship Nokia Lumia 900? Oh sure, nevermind; that phone will always be stuck at Windows Phone 7.5. As TFA says, only Windows Phone 8 will be upgraded. Pity those fools that trusted Microsoft and their %$#@! Windows Phone when they bought their new, first ever released (non-linux, non-symbian) Nokia Lumia, complete with new and shiny Windows Phone 7.5.

    It would be very interesting to learn the stats on those buyers' subsequent smartphone purchases, assuming that was possible.

    1. Re:And the Lumia 900? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about the once-flagship Nokia Lumia 900? Oh sure, nevermind; that phone will always be stuck at Windows Phone 7.5. As TFA says, only Windows Phone 8 will be upgraded. Pity those fools that trusted Microsoft and their %$#@! Windows Phone when they bought their new, first ever released (non-linux, non-symbian) Nokia Lumia, complete with new and shiny Windows Phone 7.5. It would be very interesting to learn the stats on those buyers' subsequent smartphone purchases, assuming that was possible.

      And that's what this announcement is all about, keep on buying WP8 phones because they won't be obsoleted by Win10 like WP7.5 was. With enough weasel words that they don't actually promise anything.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:And the Lumia 900? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft should support 3-4 year old phones... why exactly?

    3. Re:And the Lumia 900? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't suppprt 3-year old phone models, either. There's no business justification for it.

  12. Slashdot - Daily Microsoft blog by Bar666Bar · · Score: 1

    No other site covers Microsoft so much.
    So much love or rather donations are coming Slashdot way?

    1. Re:Slashdot - Daily Microsoft blog by nukenerd · · Score: 4, Funny

      No other site covers Microsoft so much.

      If you think Slashdot is bad, you should see this one :- www.microsoft.com

    2. Re: Slashdot - Daily Microsoft blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot loves to hate anything not Linux.

    3. Re: Slashdot - Daily Microsoft blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not hating Microsoft, you're not paying attention.

  13. More Information by jamesl · · Score: 2

    From TheVerge ...

    Microsoft doesn't plan on making the same mistake twice: the company has made a public pledge that all of Nokia's Lumia Windows Phone 8 devices will be upgraded to the mobile version of Windows 10 when it's released. Responding to a customer's question on the topic, Microsoft tweeted, "We plan to upgrade all Windows Phone 8 devices to Windows 10 in the future." Microsoft's next big operating system remains in early development, so the company obviously isn't revealing details as to when that update will arrive.
    http://www.theverge.com/2014/1...

  14. too little, many years too late by jsepeta · · Score: 0

    i had a windows 6 mobile phone with a start menu. it was a great phone to type on, as it had a real keyboard. i also liked having EXCEL on my phone as i could keep a list of supplies and prices to help me make purchase decisions. but it was slow so i moved to android, then the iphone. none of my phones took upgrades until i moved to the iOS platform. so while i acknowledge it's a good idea for microsoft to offer windows 10 to existing windows 8 phone users, they didn't make an upgrade path from 6>6.5, from 6.5>7, or from 7>8. And the carriers don't make it easy to upgrade Android, either. So nuts to them, I'm happy in my walled garden.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  15. FTFY by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

    ... all eight of Nokia's Lumia Windows Phone 8 devices ...

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  16. Funny way of phrasing that... by Kaldaien · · Score: 1

    I'm so used to reading broken English on sites like Stack Overflow, I thought the article said free Windows 10 upgrade for people whose Windows 8 phones suddenly broke today.

  17. I'd rather be hit over the head ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... with a wet squirrel than

    Read the rest of this comment...

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  18. Not everyone subscribes to unlimited SMS by tepples · · Score: 2

    Who does voice calls anymore anyway?

    People who don't pay several hundred dollars per year to a cellular carrier. This includes land line users and (by extension) people who call land line users. It also includes users of $7/mo pay-as-you-go flip phones, for whom multitap composition of SMS is a serious chore and T9 isn't much better.

  19. Through Windows Phone Store by tepples · · Score: 1

    How would they ask money through windows update?

    Microsoft has already offered the first service pack for Windows 8.1 as a free app in the Windows Store instead of Windows Update. So Microsoft could ask for money through Windows Phone Store.

  20. Well... by riis138 · · Score: 1

    At it looks like M$ is taking steps in the right direction, which is more than we could have said during the Ballmer years.

    --
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
  21. Bypassing the carriers? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Will they bypass the likes of Verizon while doing this, so that we can get our updates directly from Microsoft instead of waiting for Verizon to roll them out? And I'm talking about automatically, just like Apple, as opposed to signing up for the MS Developers edition.

    Incidentally, I got an update to WP8.1 yesterday on that, and now they've tossed in folders - the same way one does in iOS by merging 2 icons. Managed to reorganize a lot on that phone following that.

  22. Inferior devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when they are planning for 4G , ARM64 , 20nm device ? may be with windows 15 ?

  23. chirechi@i.softbank.jp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chirechi@i.softbank.jp

  24. Closing a Modern UI app in Windows 8.1 by tepples · · Score: 1

    This may give an impression of slightly broken which is otherwise unusual in Windows [...] annoyingly Metro windows media player starts when you double click on a file

    To test your hypothesis, I just started the Modern UI-based Music app in Windows 8.1 with Classic Shell. When I moved the mouse to the top of the screen, its title bar faded in with an X button at the far right, the same place where one expects to find it in a maximized desktop application. I was able to close it by clicking the X button. This title bar appears to be a new feature of 8.1 compared to 8 though. And in any case, right-clicking a file and choosing "Open with > Choose default program..." will fix this going forward.