Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Discover Diamond Nanothreads

First time accepted submitter sokol815 writes Penn State University scientists discovered diamond nanothreads can be created from benzene when compressed. The compression brings the benzene molecules into a highly reactive state. It was expected that the molecules would create a non-ordered glass-like material, but due to the slow speed of decompression used, the benzene molecules ordered themselves into a naturally repeating crystal. The experiment took place at room-temperature. Early results indicate that these nanothreads are stronger than previously produced carbon nanotubes, and may have applications throughout the engineering industry.

12 of 79 comments (clear)

  1. Yes, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Should it be called Diamondium or Diamondillium?

    1. Re:Yes, but.. by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Informative

      it's not diamond nor did the original paper claim it was: http://www.nature.com/nmat/jou...

  2. How about "not diamond"? by justthinkit · · Score: 3, Informative

    How about "not diamond"?

    Diamond is characterized by each carbon bonding with 4 other carbons. You can't get a thread out of it. You might claim that you have, but all along that thread there will be carbons not bonded to four others. Those are called defects.

    From a diamond point-of-view, this stuff would be considered defect-laden pseudo-'diamond', or just simply not diamond.

    Still, sexy headline.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:How about "not diamond"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The researchers themselves didn't use the D word but called the material "close- packed bundles of subnanometre-diameter sp3-bonded carbon threads capped with hydrogen, crystalline in two dimensions and short-range ordered in the third"

    2. Re:How about "not diamond"? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 5, Insightful

      According to the preview on the Nature site each carbon atom is linked to 3 other carbon atoms and one hydrogen. Plastic is a better description than diamond. "Normal" carbon nanotubes are closer to diamond than this.
      The preview didn't call it a diamond by the way. It does equate it's properties to diamondoids and nanotubes.

      Having said that, if the result is a non-toxic high tensile strength material that can be used to make a space elevator then I don't really care what they call it. It's cool anyway.
      They could call it "Superdung" and I'd still love the stuff.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    3. Re:How about "not diamond"? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

      You can sell anything on Shopping Network.

    4. Re:How about "not diamond"? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2

      close- packed bundles of subnanometre-diameter sp3-bonded carbon threads capped with hydrogen, crystalline in two dimensions and short-range ordered in the third

      I'll stick with Diamond

    5. Re:How about "not diamond"? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      You can't sell the Shopping Network on the Shopping Network, otherwise a black hole will ensue.

  3. Elevator in the sky with diamonds by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 2

    You wouldn't guess from the summary that the article title is "Going up! Cosmic elevator could reach space on a cable made of diamonds".

    1. Re:Elevator in the sky with diamonds by Guy+Harris · · Score: 3, Funny

      You wouldn't guess from the summary that the article title is "Going up! Cosmic elevator could reach space on a cable made of diamonds".

      Breaking news: Slashdot submission headline less hyperbolic than TFA's headline.

      In other news, Satan cuts ribbon to celebrate the opening of a new ski resort. Film at 11.

  4. Need a Synthesis Process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The public and the press underestimate and understate the difficulty in mass-producing new materials. Just because we can make a little, enough to study, doesn't mean we can efficiently make more or that developing those methods will be trivial or guaranteed to succeed.

    Carbon nanotube production is still a tangled mixed mess 25+ years after their discovery and study. Graphene production is improving but still not good enough for commercial use 10 years after its discovery and study. These diamond nanothreads look to require 25 GPa of pressure to create. That's not a trivial amount of pressure - it's several times that required to make synthetic diamond gems. Using this materials is going to depend on someone inventing a much easier method of production, probably some form of chemical vapor deposition, which is already used for diamond films, graphene and nanotubes.

    The long work of developing those methods is less sexy than the initial discovery of a material or effect, and usually a gradual improvement rather than a single "eureka" moment. It's just now starting to be recognized as a scientific achievement (e.g. the invention of reliable, efficient blue LEDs just won the Nobel prize although the physical principles were clearly understood by others decades earlier).

  5. Better link by sproketboy · · Score: 2

    Not sure why we'd want to post to a CNN article. Here's the scientific american link:

    http://www.scientificamerican....