Slashdot Mirror


Crowdfunded Linux Voice Magazine Releases First Issue CC-BY-SA

M-Saunders (706738) writes Linux Voice, the crowdfunded GNU/Linux magazine that Slashdot has covered previously, had two goals at its launch: to give 50% of its profits back to the community after one year, and release each issue's contents under the Creative Commons after nine months. Well, it's been nine months since issue 1, so the whole thing is now online and free to share. Readers and supporters have also made audio versions of articles, for listening to on the commute to work.

62 comments

  1. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have published this in ASCII.

  2. Re:PDF? PDF??? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    Well, it's the 21st century, so no. I think we'd be alright with UTF-8.

  3. 9 months? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't read this magazine yet; diidn't realize it existed until today.

    However, the computer industry moves so quickly -- is the information stale or outdated nine months after initial publication? If so, what's the point, other than a public relations exercise? This may be vulnerable to the same malady that killed the paper computer magazines of the 80's and 90's.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:9 months? by M-Saunders · · Score: 5, Informative

      Linux Voice is heavily tutorial based, and we try to make them last as long as possible. But yes, some information can get outdated -- and that's why we're releasing content CC-BY-SA! Anyone can now take it and update it, put it online elsewhere, to benefit the whole community.

    2. Re:9 months? by MacTO · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps it is a good idea to read Linux Voice before commenting upon it's value, simply based upon the merit that it is a magazine.

      While certain aspects of a magzine do go out-of-date quickly, others don't. Nine month old news, not so great. Nine month old reviews are okay. They'll introduce you to a product, even if some information is outdated. Nine old month tutorials can be useful.

      Magazines do have merits other than content. The flow of information is more paced. Reading the news daily (or even hourly) means that you are more likely to run into redundant details across multiple articles. It also means that there is less time to write comprehensive stories, verify details, and edit the material. I'm not saying that they're perfect, but you really have to wonder about the quality of a lot of the online media when they publish as much a day as a magazine publishes in a month. Actually, I don't have to wonder. I've gone to many sites where the articles range from terrible to excellent, primarily because the authors range from terrible to excellent. Yet they won't cut the terrible authors because it's more important to have a continuous stream of updates than it is to invest in quality.

    3. Re:9 months? by CachorroMaluco · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that M-Sauders sig isn't something like 'MikeOS to rule them all.'
      :-)

  4. Re:PDF? PDF??? by M-Saunders · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. There are HTML versions of many of the articles. 2. We're giving this away for free! To share and adapt. Feel free to pull the text from the PDFs and put it up on GitHub. If you're still angry about PDFs, we'll happily give you your money back... Oh wait, you got it for free! :-)

  5. Re:PDF? PDF??? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2

    They offer HTML versions of each article on their website too. Look a bit further down the page past the pdf link and you'll find them.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  6. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here we go again, /. at its worst.
    A 116 page CC licensed magazine with dozens of articles, and our comments?
    That their format sucks, that it's out of date, that there is a smell spelling error on page 87, and so on.
    Way to go guys and gals, a fine example of what /. appears to be all about.

    1. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that there is a smell spelling error on page 87

      ... Was that deliberate?

    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. :)
      I also noticed it (before reading your reply), but /. has no edit options, so... yeah.

    3. Re:Slashdot by jasno · · Score: 1

      The smart folks left /. years ago.

      I still use /. as a news aggregator, as they *sometimes* post stories that I don't find elsewhere.

      In the olden days you'd find some real insights in the comments section. Nowadays you're better off on reddit(*shudder*).

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    4. Re:Slashdot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The criticisms are a bit over the top. However, the real issue is "why?"

      Back in the days of dial-up internet, linux magazines came with cover disks. It's how I got old versions of Mandrake, Suse, etc.

      Now? High-speed internet killed the cover cds and the later cover dvds. The articles? Reviews are a dime a dozen on the internet (and new ones at that). Example: Review: FreeBSD 10.0. 10.1 has already been released and reviewed elsewhere. Tutorials on vim and grep? Build dynamic web pages? Why? Tis is available all over the place, in as little or as much depth as you can manage.

      E-zines are the online equivalent of dead tree magazines, and subject to the same problems that are killing the paper publishing industry. If I'm looking for information about something, I'll search for it, and probably come up with something very specific in the first page of results, rather than an e-Zine article that deals in generalities. Sorry, but the online version is just another linux website, except with older - and non-interactive - content.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:Slashdot by M-Saunders · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, our 3,200+ (and growing) subscribers have a different view, clearly. Not everyone has the time or inclination to search around the web, and while there's certainly lots of very good content out there, "it's like drinking from a fire hydrant" as the old quote goes. Our readers like a montly dose of Linux-related features, tutorials, interviews and reviews, neatly packaged up into one bundle, from a team they can trust. Sure, the market for computer magazines is much smaller today. But there clearly is a market, otherwise we wouldn't have raised £127,000 in a crowdfunding campaign and have a very satisfied readership (only three subscription cancellations since we started!). And of course some of the reviews on that page are a bit dated -- it's from nine months ago! But the tutorials should still be useful, and everyone is welcome to update them and share with the community.

    6. Re:Slashdot by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      ...and let's not forget sanctimonious comments from ACs.

    7. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had that concern, but the magazine provides A. better tutorials than you'll necessarily find elsewhere, and at worst shortens the search for a good one, and B. provides a way for me to get unbiased reviews of things.

      A good example was their tutorial on installing Arch Linux. I was debating whether it was something that I wanted to try, and after reading their tutorial, I realized that no, there is no way I ever want to do that. :)

    8. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geeze people, if you think it's that bad then just fork it.

    9. Re:Slashdot by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

      I like physical books - there are people like me who still buy them. I like dead-tree newspapers - I, like many, still get theirs daily. I like dead-tree magazines - easy to flick-through and just browse. So that's why.

      Oh, and yes, I am a subscriber to Linux Voice.

      (So to the magazine and its staff - thanks).

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    10. Re:Slashdot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Most people can't be arsed (using the Brit term seeing as your subscription prices are quoted in GBP) to cancel a subscription - the real "rubber hits the road" question is renewal rates, which will lead to the churn rate, cost of acquisition per new reader, etc.

      You may be right, but the odds, sadly, are against it. Add to that the extra costs of maintaining both an e-Zine format and a print format (with higher production and distribution costs, even though you charge more for the print edition, it's probably less profitable) ... and that linux today is not seen as being "new, the underdog, exciting", but just infrastructure, just another OS with some "nice to have" and some "real PITA" features, and too many distractions (systemd anyone?)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    11. Re:Slashdot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I still like dead tree books, papers, etc. But ... they're an archaism. Harder to search than a digital library. Uses more resources. A PITA to store and move. A lot harder to recycle than a bunch of bits on a usb key. Restricted to static content. Needs yet another separate print edition for people with moderate visual handicaps (which, in practical terms, mostly means "forget it" or being stuck using an audio format).

      Digital isn't "the way of the future" any more. In another generation or two "bookshelf" won't mean the same thing it does to us - if it has any meaning. Kind of like "don't touch that dial", "rabbit-ears", "video tape", "floppy disk", "record player", "cassette recorder", "telephone operator", "game cartridge", "daisy wheel printer", "typewriter", "telex", "serial mouse", "parallel port printer", "TV tube", "touch tone service" (as opposed to "rotary dial service"), "DOS" are terms that refer to things and phrases that many younger people have never seen or heard.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re:Slashdot by M-Saunders · · Score: 2

      Well, let's wait and see. When we started this, Slashdot was chock full of the same comments: print is dead, nobody will back you, you'll be gone in three months, etc. etc. etc. Here we are almost a year later, successful and growing, so we're not worried about what the naysayers think. And I don't think Linux has become a boring infrastructure OS. There's been a boost of interest in open source and open platforms since the NSA/PRISM etc. revelations, and the Raspberry Pi is getting loads of people into Linux as well. I'd say it's actually the most exciting time for Linux and FOSS, but then I would say that, wouldn't I :-)

    13. Re:Slashdot by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention "graph-plotters". Absolutely fascinating to watch in action. Around in the late '80s and early '90s for drawing A4 diagrams. Run from an old-style IBM PC.

      (But then I also remember punched cards!)

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    14. Re:Slashdot by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      There are still a few of us left ... ... although with that the shitty UI Beta I wonder how long before it drives the rest of us away for good.

      Reddit? Please. While it has some fantastic sub-reddits, Reddit is the Dig of Slashdot. The majority is full of whiny emo teens who down vote anything "Just Because". It's moderation system sucks -- it provides no context for why something was up/down voted.

    15. Re:Slashdot by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      ... and punched tape ... and acoustic modems ... and lubricated ball joints and tie-rods ... inner tubes for cars ... black-and-white tvs ... ghetto blasters ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    16. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking forward to seeing your subscriber count when the first backers' subs are up for renewal.

    17. Re:Slashdot by jasno · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, reddit sucks... it's just better than slashdot in some of the technical subreddits.

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
  7. Re:PDF? PDF??? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

    PDF isn't a locked down format:

    http://www.adobe.com/content/d...

    There are extensions and other software that can encrypted and DRM pdf but I assume Linux Voice isn't going to use those.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  8. Website's down by bentos · · Score: 1

    Well, it's a bit up and down. If you're having problems, you can get the mag and audio via bit torrent from the pirate bay. http://thepiratebay.se/search/...

  9. Re:PDF? PDF??? by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

    PDF is an open standard, has been since 2008. Didn't you get the memo?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

    PDF was a proprietary format, controlled by Adobe, until it was officially released as an open standard on July 1, 2008, and published by the International Organization for Standardization as ISO 32000-1:2008,

    The fact that they used a Mac to create the PDF is a slightly more valid complaint. Note I said slightly.

    [CronoCloud ~]$ pdfinfo Linux-Voice-Issue-001.pdf
    Creator: Adobe InDesign CC (Macintosh)
    Producer: Adobe PDF Library 11.0
    CreationDate: Mon Feb 24 09:37:35 2014
    ModDate: Mon Feb 24 09:38:21 2014
    Syntax Error: Invalid object stream
    Tagged: no
    Form: none
    Pages: 116
    Encrypted: no
    Page size: 595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4)
    Page rot: 0
    File size: 63849602 bytes
    Optimized: yes
    PDF version: 1.4

  10. Re:PDF? PDF??? by M-Saunders · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We (the editorial staff) use FOSS to make the magazine content: in my case Vim, AbiWord, Gimp etc. We're all geeks and not designers, so we hired one, and her tool of choice is InDesign. We would like to move over to Scribus at some point though -- and possibly even fund some missing features that we'd need to make the magazine!

  11. Re:PDF? PDF??? by armanox · · Score: 2

    Also, I was under the impression that PDF was an open format, just Adobe's reader is closed. PDF will make most people happy.

    I'm surprised nobody sad TeX should have been used....

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  12. Re:PDF? PDF??? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    ASCII and UTF-8 are both text encoding schemes, not document formats.

  13. Awesome magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just wanted to say that I bought a subscription to this magazine, and it was money well spent. Great great great read. More Linux than you can handle.

    Disclaimer: I'm right in their target demo: Intermediate Linux user. Computer n00bs and crusty old SysAdmins may have a different experience.

  14. Re:PDF? PDF??? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget the ASCII cover art.

  15. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are using vim to create pdf's then you are seriously hard core. Hats off to you good editor.

  16. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, PDF is an open standard and there's no DRM. It's just a real PITA to recycle content into another format. Some more comprehensible markup would be more desirable. Of course, as soon as you've imported into InDesign, the chances of getting that have gone out the window. Exporting from InDesign is a double PITA. Yeah, it's too bad that Scribus is not really ready for professional work.
     

  17. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P.s. This comment from someone who still hasn't forgiven Adobe for killing off FrameMaker for the Mac.

  18. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Forget the naysayers, I'm a subscriber, and you guys rock.

  19. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TeX should have been used ;)

  20. AC probably wants Content-type: text/plain by tepples · · Score: 1

    In my experience, when someone has specified a character encoding without specifying a document format, he has meant "something that can be comfortably read using a text editor", the sort of thing that one would serve with Content-type: text/plain.

  21. Profit by oldhack · · Score: 1

    A new magazine says it will donate half the "profit."

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Profit by geggo98 · · Score: 1

      A new magazine says it will donate half the "profit."

      What else should they donate? The costs?

  22. Slashdot is so full of hate these days by mcphail · · Score: 2

    M-Saunders, please ignore the hate and thanks for your enlightened views on publishing. I was disappointed when you guys "forked" LinuxFormat but I have enjoyed what I have consumed of the new magazine and podcast. I hope your business model is sustainable and look forward to catching up with the issues I've missed.

    --
    Testiculos habet et bene pendentes.
    1. Re:Slashdot is so full of hate these days by M-Saunders · · Score: 1

      Thanks mcphail! Great to hear that you're enjoying the magazine.

    2. Re:Slashdot is so full of hate these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Well done, and a great product!

    3. Re:Slashdot is so full of hate these days by slapout · · Score: 1

      Ditto

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  23. All this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still cannot have PINCH-to-ZOOM in the browser. Come on Linux. For F's sake, the rest of the world has had 2-finger gestures since the dawn of the touchpad.

  24. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should definitely do this!

  25. Keep Up the Goodwork by ponfgong-e · · Score: 1

    I have been a subscriber since the beginning (having come over from Linux Format). I just wanted to say to any Linux Voice folks in this form, great job and keep up the good work! I love the magazine!

    1. Re:Keep Up the Goodwork by M-Saunders · · Score: 1

      Thanks ponfgong-e, much appreciated!

    2. Re:Keep Up the Goodwork by Deb-fanboy · · Score: 1

      I also have been a subscriber since the beginning and the Magazine is great. A lot of fun and a lot of useful info/tutorials etc.

      And there is still room for a magazine, I travel on Helicopter, onto Offshore Installations with very little network connection available. There are still plenty of places without good network coverage.

      So having the paper Magazine is important for me

  26. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Hydrian · · Score: 2

    It is now. Portable Document Format (PDF) wasn't officially open until 2008. For a while it was in limbo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Document_Format

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
  27. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Also, I was under the impression that PDF was an open format, just Adobe's reader is closed. PDF will make most people happy.

    Have you ever tried to copy the text out of a PDF? It's a horrible exercise where you spend the rest of the even reinserting spaces and reordering weird phantom jumps. PDF is a delivery format, not a format for editing.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  28. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    1. There are HTML versions of many of the articles.

    Many != all.

    2. We're giving this away for free! To share and adapt. Feel free to pull the text from the PDFs and put it up on GitHub.

    How nice. You've put it up to share and adapt... in a delivery format, not an edit format. You presumably have source files (I doubt the copy was originally written directly in Acrobat) but you won't burden us with them, you'll just give us your blessing to fight with copying and pasting from PDF.

    If you're still angry about PDFs, we'll happily give you your money back... Oh wait, you got it for free! :-)

    That's no excuse. You built up a lot of goodwill (and generated crowdfunding) with your promise of adaptible content, and you've left up an irritating barrier to adaptation.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  29. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6 years ago is far older than "now".

  30. Re:PDF? PDF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "now" as opposed to a time in the past when it was not open. God some people are obtuse.

  31. How is the digital subscription delivered? by geggo98 · · Score: 1

    Can anyone having the digital subscription tell me how it is delivered? Manual download on the website? Per email? Per cloud-drive (dropbox, onedrive, owncloud, etc)? FTP (pull / push)? Torrent? Amazon whispernet? Something else?

    1. Re:How is the digital subscription delivered? by bentos · · Score: 2

      It's a manual download from the website. We e-mail everyone once it's up, then you can grab it when you want. There are full issue PDFs and ePubs, and per-article PDFs.

  32. Awesome Magazine by Main!Dino! · · Score: 1

    I like my subscription to the magazine. I appreciate their open sourcing the contents (it was a factor in subscribing) but other matters were of greater importance in making my decision.

    The main one was that I'd enjoyed the writers' articles in their prior venture (which I also still read). Secondly, I thought the pricing of the digital subscription was reasonable, unlike others whose digital subscription price approaches that of the printed. Finally, I've begun to claw myself away from having to fondle the paper; a Kindle started me down the path and then I found a 10" tablet lets me easily read PDF magazines.

  33. Re:PDF? PDF??? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    PDF was open enough from the beginning to have its specification available in print from the days of Acrobat 1.0: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/pd...

    Here: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/pd...

    http://wwwimages.adobe.com/con... --- for some reason they don't have the first edition available (not that it's all that useful these days).

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.