Slashdot Mirror


US Gov't Seeks To Keep Megaupload Assets Because Kim Dotcom Is a Fugitive

mrspoonsi writes with this excerpt from Billboard: 'On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Justice told a Virginia federal judge that Kim Dotcom and cohorts have no business challenging the seizure of an estimated $67 million in assets because the Megaupload founder is evading prosecution. The government brought criminal charges against Dotcom in early 2012, but he's been holed up in New Zealand awaiting word on whether he'll be extradited. The government got antsy and this past July, brought a civil complaint for forfeiture in rem, a maneuver to firmly establish a hold over money from bank accounts around the world, luxury cars, big televisions, watches, artwork and other property allegedly gained by Megaupload in the course of crimes. Dotcom is fighting the seizures by questioning the government's basis for asserting a crime, saying "there is no such crime as secondary criminal copyright infringement," as well as challenging how the seized assets are tied to the charges against Dotcom. But according to the U.S. government, Dotcom doesn't get the pleasure of even making the arguments. In a motion to strike, the government cites the doctrine of fugitive disentitlement, which bars a person from using the resources of the court if that person is aware of prosecution and is evading it.

5 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Wait what? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Informative

    The US Government routinely seizes the assets of its adversaries, even US Citizens in order to force them to appear in court. Just like this... They take your money, knowing full well they have no right to... but, to dispute it, you have to show up in court or testify about yourself in such a way that could lead to further prosecution.

    Remember how they busted Al Capone? Tax evasion? They knew for a fact how he got his money, but they also knew that to prove he was innocent he'd have to admit to how he got his money. So, despite violating his rights, the spirit of the law, and perverting the justice system. they got him anyway. Win at all costs...

  2. Re:Business as usual for US justice by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google "asset forfeiture" and weep.

    Reading Stop and seize makes for a scary experience.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  3. Re:Business as usual for US justice by DutchUncle · · Score: 5, Informative

    An introduction, for the lazy:

    http://www.newyorker.com/magaz...
    Under civil forfeiture, Americans who haven't been charged with wrongdoing can be stripped of their cash, cars, and even homes.

    http://gothamist.com/2014/01/1...
    How The NYPD's Use Of Civil Forfeiture Robs Innocent New Yorkers
    Any arrest in New York City can trigger a civil forfeiture case if money or property is found on or near a defendant, regardless of the reasons surrounding the arrest or its final disposition.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10...
    “Who takes your money before they prove that you’ve done anything wrong with it?”
    The federal government does.
    Using a law designed to catch drug traffickers, racketeers and terrorists by tracking their cash, the government has gone after run-of-the-mill business owners and wage earners without so much as an allegation that they have committed serious crimes.

  4. Re:Wait what? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about voting for people who understand that rights are something governments were formed to protect, not steal? When you have (R) and (D) fighting over which rights to steal, and most people ignorant that they both are stealing our rights, at the same time. And then you have people who say they vote (D) or (R) because the other steals more rights, while ignoring the rights that their side is stealing ...

    Take for example the whole Amnesty thing Obama is going to do tonight. What I have not heard from either (D) or (R) is the fact that we have people who don't want to be Americans, coming to America, being given rights of Americans, to the detriment of all Americans.

    Who I really feel sorry for are the Black Americans who will end up worse off because of this. They are Americans and deserve better from the people they keep electing to office. But rich white Americans who can hire cheap labor love this Amnesty crap. This is why you have an odd mix of Rich Republicans and Rich Democrats supporting this, while most Americans, including Black Americans, both (D) and (R) are opposed.

    But Obama and those supporting him will continue to lie ("American People are Stupid" - Gruber) to get things passed that no informed American would vote for. But please, make this about (D) vs (R)

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  5. Re:Business as usual for US justice by Zantetsuken · · Score: 4, Informative

    No - BP was under fire because when the part (or multiple components) failed, alarms went off. The oil rig team in charge of responding to those alarms went "God those things are annoying and nothing is ever wrong when they go off, just disable the alarms."

    The next time the alarms were supposed to go off, they could not because they were disabled, so nobody responded to an alarm that did not sound.

    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jul/23/deepwater-horizon-oil-rig-alarms

    Also, congrats on getting me to log-in for something worth of commenting on for the first time in ages.