Slashdot Mirror


CERN Releases LHC Data

An anonymous reader writes: Ever wished you had access to CERN's LHC data to help with your backyard high-energy physics research? Today you're in luck. CERN has launched its Open Data Portal, which makes experimental data produced by the Large Hadron Collider open to the public. "The first high-level and analyzable collision data openly released come from the CMS experiment and were originally collected in 2010 during the first LHC run. This data set is now publicly available on the CERN Open Data Portal. Open source software to read and analyze the data is also available, together with the corresponding documentation. The CMS collaboration is committed to releasing its data three years after collection, after they have been thoroughly studied by the collaboration." You can read more about CERN's commitment to "Open Science" here.

10 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. hmmmm by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    I wonder what people will do with this data or what can be learned from it?

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:hmmmm by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless they're particle physicists with a bunch of computer power at their disposal... not much beyond bumping fists and shouting *information wants to be frrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeee!*.

      Seriously, even though it's only useful to a limited number of people, it's still cool.

  2. Looking closely by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can see the exact moment the earth was destroyed by a black hole.

  3. Re:Nuclear weapons? by jandrese · · Score: 2

    This would be more for if they wanted to jump right to Antimatter bombs. This would tell them exactly how to do it. In fact it's so simple that even ISIS can do it once they get this data. You can expect to be annihilated sometime next week.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  4. LHC@home by Maow · · Score: 2

    I wonder how this relates to the LHC@home project?

    I've got that plus a couple more running and it seems the LHC project has had some down-time lately.

    Are they switching to releasing the data in this form now?

  5. Huge Change by mbone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was told, at a NSF meeting not many months ago, that CERN never makes its data openly available and never would and that US scientists should just plan on getting European collaborators if they want to work on it.

    Now, if we just get ESA to start releasing the Rosetta data...

    1. Re:Huge Change by buchner.johannes · · Score: 2

      I was told, at a NSF meeting not many months ago, that CERN never makes its data openly available and never would and that US scientists should just plan on getting European collaborators if they want to work on it.

      Now, if we just get ESA to start releasing the Rosetta data...

      Most of the instruments (e.g. electronics) have a large US contribution. CERN operates the ring, but the instruments are "clients", which are international research teams. That was the vision of CERN after the second world war -- bring leading science to Europe, and make research in Europe attractive. Particle physics was chosen back then.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
  6. Huge Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's the CMS collaboration web front. It has a map showing where the collaborators are - lots in the US

    http://cms.web.cern.ch/content/cms-collaboration

  7. Re:Nuclear weapons? by Jamu · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. Even though it's called CERN. The research is very much sub-nuclear. And although the energies are higher, this also means the particles involved decay quickly. Similarly in nature, they're created with high energies, but don't last long. The A-bomb relies on the natural abundance of uranium or plutonium. These are unstable elements that can be triggered into decaying in a chain reaction. The particles at the LHC need a lot of energy to create, and they decay quickly. It's been suggested they could make an anti-matter bomb. You'd need to use a lot more energy making the anti-matter than would be released in the bomb. Anti-matter is hard to store: it will interact with any matter destructively. No one can make anti-matter in enough quantity. Even if they could, and despite the great energy efficiencies, plutonium and uranium is so much more practical, along with some fusion fuel, that the relatively low energy efficiencies of a nuclear bomb, isn't a problem.

    --
    Who ordered that?
  8. Probably Not a Lot by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you are getting is the reconstructed data. To be able to do anything scientifically valuable with it you have to understand the intricate details of the reconstruction software, the trigger, the calibration etc. etc. To be honest I would be amazed if anyone outside CMS will be able to do much with it at all. I'd also expect that there will be bandwidth restrictions on accessing the data since the dataset is multi-PB (if it is the full set of run I data).

    We did a similar exercise with the D0 experiment at Fermilab several years ago and it was of interest to practically nobody. I expect there may be somewhat more interest with this being the LHC data but I'd be surprised if anything useful comes of it given the massive amount of work required to be able to do a useful analysis. The best I can think of is that this might make a really nice undergraduate course project or, with some pre-written, high level analysis code, perhaps even as outreach for high school students.