Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Seeking To Block Nvidia Chips From US Market

An anonymous reader writes: Bloomberg reports that Samsung has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission asking them to block the import of Nvidia's graphics chips . This is part of Samsung's retaliation for a similar claim filed by Nvidia against Samsung and Qualcomm back in September. Both companies are wielding patents pertaining to the improved operation of graphics chips in cell phones and other mobile devices.

41 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. I mean this respectfully by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Paten trolls into hardware trolls - How about you folks go fuck yourselves.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:I mean this respectfully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps companies with idiots for lawyers shouldn't start attacking Samsung..

      Apple attacked Samsung for using the same elements that Apple stole from others, Samsung attacked back with *real* patents to back themselves up.

      nVidia attacks Samsung with questionable patents and Samsung attacks back with *real* patents.

      Your "go fuck yourselves" should be directed @ Apple and nVidia you beligerent fuck.

    2. Re:I mean this respectfully by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Reguardless of how "patentable" things like round buttons and beveled edges should be you obviously don't understand how patents work. If Apple tried to sue the people they derived from for patent infringement they would loose and also run the risk of having their patent nullifed. If the people they copied from wanted to nullify the Apple patent or come to Samsungs aide in the case Apple put against them they could have. None of these things happened.

      And while we're on the subject, Samsung has a long history of non-trivial patent infringement. For instantance they blatantly stole Sharp LCD TV technology when it was the hot thing at the time and basically destroyed the market for Sharp after sharp had put immense effort and research into the technology. Even today Sharp has not recovered from this.
      http://online.wsj.com/articles...

      There are many many many other cases too. Samsung is unforgivable. They just copy everything and they think this is a valid business strategy. Seriously, why do more people not boycott them?

    3. Re:I mean this respectfully by umdesch4 · · Score: 1

      Wait...you're asking for a boycott on Samsung, but not Apple? ...and you think that Apple hasn't tried (and succeeded) in lawsuits defending their frivolous patents by outspending their competition on fancy lawyers? While I agree that Samsung has pulled a lot of crap that is boycott-worthy, the way you've stated the case is, to put it nicely, disingenuous.

    4. Re:I mean this respectfully by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      is theft from a thief still theft?

      Sharp stole LCD technology from a chemistry professor at Hull University and beat them to the patent office claiming it as their own - AFTER he published papers describing the technology. http://www2.hull.ac.uk/science...

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    5. Re:I mean this respectfully by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      Frivolous? Their designs were a blatant ripoff of Apple's.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    6. Re:I mean this respectfully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tried to find any evidence on your claims that sharp stole the professors technology Your link only talks about the professor but nothing at all about sharp stealing it. Could not find anything other some of the basic LCD discoveries were licences out to various companies.

    7. Re: I mean this respectfully by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I'm no fanboi, but I keep finding myself buying Samsung devices for the same reasons as the AC. Although, so far, I've not tried rooting any of them.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    8. Re:I mean this respectfully by Threni · · Score: 1

      Why don't we change the law so that when you have a patent you just get to put a little sticker on the box the devices comes in that says "I did this!" so your shareholders and your mums and dads can be really proud! Well done! And if you can win a law suit against someone else, they have to put a stick on their boxes which say "this box contains stuff some other company worked on" and people can decide whether they give a shit or not, and if they don't (clue: nobody cares), they can buy the product, but if they do care, they can go and get the first companies product instead. Let the market decide that way.

    9. Re:I mean this respectfully by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Once again patent law helps innovative small companies and the customer!

    10. Re:I mean this respectfully by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Good thing there are more than two phone manufacturers, eh?

      Why does this have to be Samsung OR Apple?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    11. Re: I mean this respectfully by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      P.S. - Samsung, in no way, is a good company. They are bribery committing, price fixing, colluding, thieves - all convictions in a court of law.

      Name one company which isn't.

      All companies do it.

      If found, pay fines, downplay it in media, and then proceed with the business as usual.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    12. Re:I mean this respectfully by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Apple attacked Samsung for using the same elements that Apple stole from others, Samsung attacked back with *real* patents to back themselves up.

      Except both were real patents. Apple's patents were Design Patents which cover ornamental designs unique to the covered item. Samsung's patents were FRAND licensed Utility Patents.

      And yes, if you want people to learn about computers, you gotta learn all about IP law because it's complex and tricky.

      Samsung made a phone that did violate Apple's design patents - which are purely for decorative purposes (rounded slab with grid of icons). In fact, you can't have any utility in a design patent - because the features are ornamental, slight non-functional changes can be made to not violate the patent. (And face it, when all the reviews of the Galaxy S (the original one) all said "It's an iPhone clone", you know you're in trouble. Especially since no other Android device gets that mention).

      Samsung fought back using FRAND patents that earned it considerable consternation and censure by the EU and the DoJ who promised to look into the issue should Samsung actually proceed. And South Korea, too, Samsung's home turf.

      It should be noted Google tried to do the same and also got shot down using Motorola's patents - FRAND patents simply have lesser protection due to their special status.

    13. Re:I mean this respectfully by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      >And yes, if you want people to learn about computers, you gotta learn all about IP law because it's complex and tricky.

      So the girls should be becoming lawyers instead?

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  2. But hey by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    the consumer comes out ahead in all this, amirite?

    1. Re:But hey by davydagger · · Score: 1

      We do? Whatever happens, its going to create needlessly high barriers to entry to potential companies looking to make chips.(the threat of being sued), and the cost of the law suit, as well as funds saved in anticipation on the next law suit adding to the total price of doing business. The only people who come out ahead are the lawyers, and mabey politicians. Thats the problem in America. Its that government and regulation is done for the careers of the lawyers doing the regulating, not for the people its supposed to protect. Thats why people hate the government. Thats why people chose to be libertarians. Its not a hard sell the American public on the idea that any government program exists, does so to fuck you.

    2. Re:But hey by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      That whooshing sound is my sarcasm flying right over your head. Of course the major loser in these things is the consumers.

    3. Re:But hey by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I assume that maybe I would get a cheaper graphics card (Sweden.)

  3. Re:Lawyers are the only winners by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    Once one has fired a Salvo the other is really obliged to do the same otherwise everyone else will see them as an easy mark. Blame the twat that decided to fire the first salvo and the idiotic patent laws. Samsung appear to be proceeding down the only avenue that the current ridiculous laws allow.

  4. If you complain about no nvidia source take note by dbIII · · Score: 2

    If you complain about no nvidia source code for linux drivers take note - it's because of this stupid patent troll shit that they get subjected to and had to deal with ever since some of the graphics team were at SGI.

  5. Re:Lawyers are the only winners by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    The only winning move is not to play.

  6. Re:If you complain about no nvidia source take not by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    that argument only works if Nvidia were the victim here.

  7. Re:If you complain about no nvidia source take not by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The argument works because the software patent system exists instead of it being a copyright system. There should not be any victims or any way it can escalate into the current attempt at a denial of trade.

  8. Konami v. Roxor by tepples · · Score: 1

    You mean like Konami v. Roxor, the lawsuit over the Dance Dance Revolution patent that led to a claim construction in Konami's favor?

  9. Deserved by nateman1352 · · Score: 1

    Honestly nVidia's business practices have been so shady recently, they make what Intel was doing in 2006 look tame. They do everything they can to make as many games as possible run poorly on anything other than nVidia GPUs, including sending employees to game studios to help "optimize" their games. They bribe review sites and "suggest" certain benchmarks to use. Also, thier legal department is more aggressive than Apple's. They deserve to be taken down a notch.

    1. Re:Deserved by Calibax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How, exactly, can Nvidia make games run poorly on other hardware? They don't write the games. Both AMD and Nvidia have extensive outreach programs to developers and make engineers available to game studios, and obviously those engineers will make suggestions on how to improve game performance on their hardware. But I doubt that game studio staff would be willing to cripple their games on either platform at the behest of Nvidia or AMD engineers.

      Would you like to provide citations that they bribe sites? And how would that hurt game performance? How can using certain benchmarks (as you suggest) make games run slower on other hardware? And even if they did, are you saying that sites would accept Nvidia's suggestions and ignore AMD suggestions?

      AMD fanboy much?

    2. Re:Deserved by nateman1352 · · Score: 2

      How, exactly, can Nvidia make games run poorly on other hardware? They don't write the games. Both AMD and Nvidia have extensive outreach programs to developers and make engineers available to game studios

      That is true, but nVidia's outreach engineers have a history of checking code that regresses performance on competitor hardware. See what this Value developer has to say about "Vendor A": Vendor A is also jokingly known as the "Graphics Mafia". Be very careful if a dev from Vendor A gets embedded into your team. These guys are serious business.

      How can using certain benchmarks (as you suggest) make games run slower on other hardware?

      Thats not what I'm suggesting. I am suggesting that nVidia has a history of being dishonest which thier performance benchmarks. The worst case by far is during the GeForce FX era when they were caught a driver that detected it 3DMark 2001 and then only rendered content that was visible to the camera instead of the whole frame to boost thier benchmark scores. That was a while ago and I've been unable to find the original story on it.

      AMD fanboy much?

      Not at all, my desktop currently has a GeForce 570 installed. When I bought it nVidia clearly held the performance crown. That said, I really don't like the unethical business practices and I think I might not buy them again.

    3. Re:Deserved by Calibax · · Score: 1

      That is true, but nVidia's outreach engineers have a history of checking code that regresses performance on competitor hardware. See what this Value developer has to say about "Vendor A":
      Vendor A is also jokingly known as the "Graphics Mafia". Be very careful if a dev from Vendor A gets embedded into your team. These guys are serious business.

      So, you are suggesting that game studios let vendors check in code totally unreviewed? I worked at a company that had two engineers from Nvidia and 3 from AMD - none of them had the ability to check in code, although they did have access to our sources.

      The Nvidia engineers were top notch, knew their products, knew how to get performance from their products, and would be unhappy if we didn't take notice of what they said. The AMD people were OK, but just not in the same league as the Nvidia people. Which was best for us? The Nvidia guys improved our product for both their customers and AMD customers. The AMD people would only look at AMD specific code and provided way less assistance. I'd go with the Nvidia guys any day - they were indeed serious, hard working engineers, one with a ph.d., the other with a masters.

      And the best you can suggest for fiddling is a benchmark from 13 years ago? That several lifetimes in graphics technology - go look at any 2001 game. As I recall, both Nvidia and ATI (as it was then) tweaked benchmarks to favor their product around that time and were found out. However, modern graphics benchmarks make it difficult for any manufacturer to corrupt the results.

    4. Re:Deserved by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      While we're talking about Samsung, cheaters still find ways to cheat benchmarks.. I wonder if Nvidia could sue over stealing their benchmark cheating methods too...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:Deserved by sadboyzz · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, can Nvidia make games run poorly on other hardware?

      http://hardware-beta.slashdot....

  10. Is there any... by MasseKid · · Score: 1

    Is there any evidence (or even suspicion) that either side here used either the patent filing or actual stolen technology to create their product? If not then the laws are clearly broken when we are allowing non-revolutionary ideas to be patented.

    1. Re:Is there any... by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Is there any evidence (or even suspicion) that either side here used either the patent filing or actual stolen technology to create their product? If not then the laws are clearly broken when we are allowing non-revolutionary ideas to be patented.

      NVIDIA holds a very large graphics patent pool. In a lot of ways they're the successor to SGI, and in the interim have picked up companies such as 3dfx, which has further enlarged their patent pool. Which makes it very, very hard to efficiently implement a GPU without violating some of those patents. Proving malice may be difficult, but it's hard to imagine building a competitive GPU and not infringing on those patents.

      As for whether the patents are revolutionary, that's a trickier point. If you researched into the same problems as NVIDIA a lot of your solutions would be similar/identical even without seeing how NVIDIA does it. But for a number of these patents the solutions are non-obvious; it's only after doing research and a lot of simulation do you come up with the same answer.

  11. Yes, that is exactly my point - patent abuse by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Try reading my above post again instead of assuming I'm on the side of either Nvidia or Samsung. We lose more from this situation than either of them. Consequences are inflated prices to cover costs of this idiocy and information needlessly kept secret as a result of such idiocy.

  12. New meaning for competition? by lolococo · · Score: 1

    It sounds like these guys are taking the concept of competition to ever higher extremes. Is this ever going to end? I, for one, am not eager to see corporate armies taking it to the battlefield. But then, maybe I already missed that train ...

  13. Just in case we needed any more proof... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    ...that the patent system is fubar.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. I know it is privacy invasive,how far can they go? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    Okay, police are tracking people on their cell phone. So they should know if you're in a car traveling with someone else. So they should be able to make like "facebook friends" of all the people who travel with you. If someone reports your car's license plate, they probably could just feasibly link that to your phone on a simple 1:1 database search and stop you down the road if you're driving erratically.

    This makes me wonder how the public could contribute... Has anyone thought of, just for getting a full panopticon feel and a reverse likes of making a website that links bad driving with your license plate number? All you would do is take a video of a car driving bad in front of you, then upload it to a video sharing site, link it with the license plate on a searchable website. Suddenly all the bad driving someone does is now logged permanently on the Internet.

    Now cops could "randomly" be browsing the worst offenders, and just "happen to be the the area" (by linking drivers licence to cell phone records against bad drivers within 1 mile of a patrol car), and hand out reckless tickets.

  15. Re:I know it is privacy invasive,how far can they by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    I'm not endorsing anyone doing this for real. It is just a thought on the ramifications. If they can catch you more often when you do bad driving, would we stop hanging them high, and put lower fines on driving infractions?

  16. Thieves by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Hey, let's be frank

    In technology almost everyone is a thief

    Not only in the corporate settings, even in the academia setting thievery thrives --- you do not even need to look far to read stories of professors stealing and patenting students' ideas from himself / herself

    And I am speaking from experience ... I had (at least) one idea stolen by my professor(s) and I couldn't do shit about it --- basically I had the choice of litigation (which would linger for ages) against my professor(s) and the university (which means I would never graduate) ...
     
    ... or I moved on ...
     
    ... by not disclosing any more ideas to anyone until I got my chance to try them out myself and patent them if they turn out to be useful

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  17. Re:Lawyers are the only winners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Never mind that Samsung usually instigates the suing by stealing other people's shit...

  18. Nvidias destruction. by hackus · · Score: 1

    Nothing would make me happier.

    From an open source perspective Nvidia is far worse than Samsung with regards to hardware openness.

    I mean, I have been very careful over the years to not buy phones, tablets, video cards that are associated with Nvidia in my private computing and professional computing experience.

    I urge everyone here to do the same and put your dollars privately in those situations professional consulting can sway your customers opinion towards companies that have open hardware. Even companies who are not open fully, like AMD, but much more so than Nvidia.

    Building a great operating system with source code requires open hardware.

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  19. If this prevents me by sabbede · · Score: 1

    from getting a GF 960 for Christmas, Samsung is gonna get it.