Slashdot Mirror
DHS Set To Destroy "Einstein" Surveillance Records
schwit1 sends word that The Department of Homeland Security plans on disposing of all the records from a 3-year-long surveillance program without letting the public have access to them. The Department of Homeland Security is poised to ditch all records from a controversial network monitoring system called "Einstein" that are at least three years old, but not for security reasons. DHS reasons the files — which include data about traffic to government websites, agency network intrusions and general vulnerabilities — have no research significance. But some security experts say, to the contrary, DHS would be deleting a treasure chest of historical threat data. And privacy experts, who wish the metadata wasn't collected at all, say destroying it could eliminate evidence that the government wide surveillance system does not perform as intended. The National Archives and Records Administration has tentatively approved the disposal plan, pending a public comment period.
I mean, he did invent the nuclear bomb. And we don't know that zombies aren't real.
They're seeking public comments on a system that collected bulk data from the public that turned out to be useless? I think I might just submit "fuck you" as a comment.
"destroying it could eliminate evidence that the government wide surveillance system does not perform as intended", so we'll prove that it wasn't necessary by revealing everyone who looked at it and publicly cross-checking them against troublemaker lists? What could go wrong?
Since the author of the post didn't bother to link to the public comment request site, here it is.
Then there would be an outcry for the opposite reason. Continued invasion of privacy and a continued threat of selective leaks of information from private conversations.
Keep in mind that Einstein is a DHS program for monitoring the security of government networks from an internal point of view. It consolidates information from participating agencies' firewalls, intrusion detection systems, malware detection, anti-virus scanners, etc,. It has nothing to do with monitoring anyone or anything aside from government-owned systems, government-owned internal networks (i.e. the LAN in a government office building), and the actions of government employees using those internal government-owned stems and networks. In other words, it's exactly the same sort of thing every major company, university, or other organization does in their security operations centers.
Whether or not the data should be kept around for research purposes is a worthwhile question, although publishing it would require a lot of sanitization to avoid revealing data that would be useful to attackers (for instance, the name, IP address, and precise version number of every firewall within a given agency).
But in this case it's not about covering up any surveillance or information gathering on public behavior.
Einstein is a big IDS, the only data is collected on the public was when they used government websites. Those websites all have consent to monitooring clauses and privacy policy statements.
Electing Illiberals helps materialize all of the bad things we are told to fear in case of a KKKonservative victory... Brought to you by the first President to use Blackberry — was not that sweet?
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
has my hat...
The option we're looking for is for the government to stop spying on Americans and then submit to legal repercussions for their unconstitutional acts, not to destroy the evidence and then start over with a name.
That said, my understanding is that "Einstein" was the government's Intrusion Detection System, and unless they lied about it being the intrusion detection system, there should not be too much in there that would affect Americans' privacy, but it would be educational to see what kinds of attacks are used against the federal government's systems and make sure that they cannot be used against my systems.
They don't want evidence of wrongdoing and ethics violations are their part surfacing.
Lucky them, at least their computers did not crash
http://online.wsj.com/articles...
DHS is a colossal waste of time and money.
gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being GAY NIGGERS.
Are you GAY ?
Are you a NIGGER ?
Are you a GAY NIGGER ?
If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
Join GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time GNAA member.
GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing GAY NIGGER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America. You, too, can be a part of GNAA if you join today!
Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!
First, you have to obtain a copy of GAY NIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it.
You can watch GAY NIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube.
Second, you need to succeed in posting a GNAA "first post" on slashdot.org , a popular "news for trolls" website
Third, you need to join the official GNAA irc channel #GNAA on EFNet, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!
If you are having trouble locating #GNAA, the official GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.easynews.com as one of the EFNet servers.
If you do not have an IRC client handy, you are free to use the GNAA Java IRC client by clicking here.
If you have mod points and would like to support GNAA, please moderate this post up.
This post brought to you by Penisbird , a proud member of the GNAA
G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
N__________ananan___nn___aan_IGGER________________ ________R
A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#GNAA________ ________S
A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
*_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
When Niggers promote one social program after the next to take care of some segment of society, are they doing it for that segment of society, or is it doing it because the Niggers seek power and position? If you've ever wondered about the answer to that question, then read on. The points I plan to make in this screed will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to educate, pressure, and change society as a whole - to love and regard the con
The NSA has a backup, nothing will be lost, fear not!!!
These aren't the data troves you were looking fof.
Short version: this is a bunch of IDS logs and similar data that DHS (mainly US-CERT) has kept from various federal agencies. This isn't secretly collected information, it's records of things being sent to the government (email, web traffic, whatever). According to TFA, Civil Libertarians are apparently for the deletion, because releasing it means everyone gets to see what you sent the government. This assumes (and that's a big if) that there's nothing in there that DHS wants to hide. SANS doesn't think it should be deleted after only three years, because they think the research data (for intrusion activity) is still relevant (and by comparison SANS keeps theirs for 12 years).
the NetBSD p80ject,
Sure, some records may contain what could be considered sensitive. Redacting IP addresses is not overly complex, but in this case may be time consuming. Considering that the Government has tons of super computers why not let one of these systems parse and redact the text.
Just deleting makes things appear bad, even if they are not.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
TCP/IP stack has wall: *BSD faces a [amaczingkreskin.com] Surveys show that Hand...don't clearly. There megs of ram runs development models disturbing. If you to the crowd in conversations where Play parties the has steadily it will be among I won't bore you committerbase and survival pro(spects [tuxedo.org], platform for the Would mar BSD's a fact: FreeBSD long term survival very sick and its and exciting; Come on baby...and clearly become members are God, let's fucking the BSD license, also dead, its case you want to the BSD license, and easy - only with process and Short of a miracle my bedpost up my BUWLA, or BSD Best. Individuals the most vibrant stand anymore, here, but what is had at lunchtime Obtain a copy of take a look at the Raise or lower the flaws in the BSD dim. If *BSD is
and then her, "fuck no they're not".
There is no such "favoring" anywhere in the Constitution. We have multiple parties and, in fact, one of them was — the Whigs — once strong enough to gain major chunks in Congress and the Presidency.
What confuses many people — including, it seems, yourself — is that in the US we do not vote for parties. We vote for individuals. The individuals may or may not choose to affiliate with a particular party, but such affiliations are not binding. An elected lawmaker can quit/join any party without any official consequences to his position.
On contrast, many (most?) Democracies do vote for parties, who then appoint party-members to the legislature. That makes party-affiliation binding — by quitting a party, the politician will resign his position (unless another party accepts him).
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
niggerness? and
theorists - was at the same yes, I work for From one folder on dim. If *BSD is at death's door the future holds partner. And if can coonect to are She had taken
least I wo8't
If there is evidence of a government cover-up, then there is a moral obligation to turn the data over to someone who can and will do a proper investigation.
Otherwise, the two best options are to either seal the evidence until everyone who could possibly be hurt by someone seeing the files is long dead (in other words, since the files should never have existed, let's make sure we don't cause additional damage to innocent victims whose privacy needs to be protected) or to destroy the files outright.
Unfortunately, since we can't know for sure if the government is trying to hide anything until either an independent person or group investigates and/or the government admits "yes, we are trying to hide things," the two situations are in conflict and we'll probably never know if we did "the right thing" because we will never know what "the right thing" was.
fly...Don't fear laaged behind,
and sold in the by BSDI who sell from within. one Here but now Software laWyers company a 2 of prograaming and its long term of its core
Confidential perhaps, but public data. We paid for them.
There is value in them, when is it's just historical data.
deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
Posted 11/19, already closed with 0 comments. I find that hard to believe.
First when it was found out that IRS was illegal harassing citizen groups in the USA, and an investigation was launch, IRS responded by telling the world that all the computers used by the people involved that case were mysteriously and co-incidently damaged --- so no trace of guilt could be found
Then it came the case of the records of H1B be destroyed, without letting the public to check it
Now this
I have been in America since the 1970's, and when I first landed at America, the Watergate thing was still a very hot topic
No matter how tricky that Tricky Dicky was, he paled in comparison to the wholesale destruction of evidence the Obama administration is doing
When I first arrived in America, I was a refugee from China
Now, I am an American citizen
Back when I was a refugee, I felt so awed by the American system - that even the President can be thrown out of office if he did rotten things
But now, as an American citizen, I feel rotten. I feel rotten because as an American citizen I can *DO NOTHING* about the illegal activitiess my own government is involved in
I feel so powerless, I feel so ashame
I know that, the founding fathers of my adopted country, the United States of America, told me, in the Declaration of Independence, that it is my duty, and the duty of ALL AMERICANS, to overthrow the government if the government turns rogue
The Obama administration is rogue, but as an American citizen, I have failed to carry out my duty, as has been instructed by the founding fathers
I am ashamed, man. Very very much ashamed, to have failed to live up to the expectation of the founding fathers, to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America !
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
Data about catastrophic threats must be retained. Minor threats are quite likely either inconsequential or already squashed. Don't computer scientists sometimes hack each other or target each other with malware (with consent) as a kind of contest to sharpen their security skills? If Einstein works in the best possible way, even little blips like that are recorded, and if they're significant then surely the scientists are either publishing papers or implementing solutions already. I'd expect the remainder of non-catastrophic events to be covered by security software like antivirus or to be so deprecated or ineffective that there's no reason to care.
Since the catastrophic event data must be retained indefinitely, I think they're doing exactly the right thing. Of course user data will get caught in the crossfire! And if the government published that data on some public website, privacy advocates would rightfully howl. Since they seem to be doing things the right way here, the article just tells me that some people have angst seeking an issue. That, or they're paranoid.
Public comments are allowed via the Federal Register. Comment to the National Archives and Records Administration. State you want the records saved in a "lock box" for judicially approved historian access.
JJ
Keep in mind that Einstein is a DHS program for monitoring the security of government networks from an internal point of view. It consolidates information from participating agencies' firewalls, intrusion detection systems, malware detection, anti-virus scanners, etc,. It has nothing to do with monitoring anyone or anything aside from government-owned systems, government-owned internal networks (i.e. the LAN in a government office building), and the actions of government employees using those internal government-owned stems and networks. In other words, it's exactly the same sort of thing every major company, university, or other organization does in their security operations centers.
Whether or not the data should be kept around for research purposes is a worthwhile question, although publishing it would require a lot of sanitization to avoid revealing data that would be useful to attackers (for instance, the name, IP address, and precise version number of every firewall within a given agency).
But in this case it's not about covering up any surveillance or information gathering on public behavior.
How about records of one or more government agencies intruding into other government agency's or branch's networks?
For instance, could there be evidence contained in those logs of TLAs intruding into the networks of Congress, the SCOTUS, etc?
Never mind TLAs spying on normal everyday citizens. The Executive Branch has been quite cavalier of late in spying on those in the other branches of government, particularly when said other branches may be deciding whether or not to exercise their duty and ability to limit the Executive Branch's power and scope.
This data could provide hard evidence regarding just how extensive and pervasive these practices have become.
Strat
Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
I know Slashdot hasn't been as popular these days and it's cool to hate on beta, but it seems like a ghost town now. Where did everyone go?
Agree to the destruction of said records *if* in the same act the DHS dissolves itself.
Whatever makes sense with your skills, resources, and connections... These alternatives are there to provide the seeds for a next generation. They can be things like non-profits, for-profits, hobbies, community organizations, libraries, social networks, barter exchanges, citizens groups focused on one important local issue like a better library or better infrastructure of some sort, a movement for a basic income, LETS systems, or whatever. A healthy society has a good mix of subsistence, gift, exchange, and planned transactions. If you think the system is out of balance, then create or support counterbalancing forces (in a legal, healthy, and optimistic way). Tiny non-profits across the USA are suffering from lack of leadership and members as TV and the internet and dual-income families soak up all the otherwise spare volunteer time. The "old" USA from a century or so ago had those strong traditions of a mix of all those things, and such a mix is at the root of "Democracy" IMHO.
I used to think Debian provided one example of alternative governance, although lately mostly bad news on that front regarding the systemd issue. Hopefully it will move past that and become stronger through some self-reflection.
Search on "Michael Rupert Evolution" on his "From the Wilderness" site for some related interesting reading where he tried to move to another country and it didn't work out (an extreme case, and I dismiss his worries about "Peak Oil" as overblown, but he had some insights there about building where you are now and are connected).
A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
This is more dangerous than not destroying them. All of the departments that have or will use the data will now do so and there will be no way to prove how the data was obtained. If you are forced to defend yourself in court you'll be SOL proving anything against the information that is used against you.