Slashdot Mirror


About 40% of World Population Online, 90% of Offliners In Developing Countries

New submitter lx76 writes: The International Telecommunications Union does research on telecommunications in society worldwide, from cellphones to internet use. Since 2009, on a yearly basis, they've released their research findings in a report called the Measuring Information Society Report. This year's report is over 200 pages long, illustrated with abundant graphs and tables (PDF). It's not a light read. But one of the interesting numbers is an index showing the divide in global connectivity. From the report: "Over the past year, the world witnessed continued growth in the uptake of ICT [Information and Communication Technology] and, by end 2014, almost 3 billion people will be using the Internet, up from 2.7 billion at end 2013..... Despite this encouraging progress, there are important digital divides that need to be addressed: 4.3 billion people are still not online, and 90 per cent of them live in the developing world."

The report continues, "As this report finds, ICT performance is better in countries with higher shares of the population living in urban areas, where access to ICT infrastructure, usage and skills is more favorable. Yet it is precisely in poor and rural areas where ICTs can make a particularly significant impact." Projects like Google's Project Loon have their work cut out for them."

45 comments

  1. Developing by qbast · · Score: 1

    Do they actually mean developing like "less developed than west Europe, but catching up" or is it just polite euphemism for third-world shitholes that are actually worse than in colonial times?

    1. Re:Developing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Look kids, racism!

      No seriously, that's some racist-ass shit. Fuck you, and your imagined colonial past. Things are substantially better now in the vast majority of developing nations than they ever were under colonial control.

      Birth rates are down, death rates are down, education rates are up, diseases are getting eradicated, and assholes like you just want to imagine you know what's best for everyone.

    2. Re: Developing by qbast · · Score: 0

      Look kids, SJW bot that runs his potty mouth as soon as he encounters a trigger word.
      Of course developing countries are better off, that's the whole damn point of developing. The question is if the report, in the name of appeasing PC morons like you, also included self-destructing countries like Central Africa Republic and Somalia in the same group, which would likely skew the numbers badly.

    3. Re:Developing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe qbast is being sarcastic, since there are some "developing nations" that are not really developing so.... but for the few ones that are really developing and are included in that non-sense developing nations label that's really some racist-ass shit

    4. Re:Developing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but kan they reed?

    5. Re: Developing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Potty mouth? SJW? Are you sure you're not a terrible racist that pretends that using profanity is somehow wrong in an attempt to mask your own inferiority? I see a lot of this from the ignorant conservative dead-enders, and suspect you of being one of them.

    6. Re: Developing by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I'm real stung that a racist asshole called me a "SJW".

      Fuck off and take your backwards beliefs with you.

    7. Re:Developing by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      It's not a few that are really developing and a lot that aren't, but the contrary. For example, if you look at how well Nigeria has dealt with the current Ebola crisis, you pretty much have to acknowledge that they have improved a lot since the 1960's. In the same way, Uganda today is not sliding downhill from some Idi Amin glory days, quite the contrary. We could fairly describe a few states as failed - that's not a racist term per say, it's a rational assessment if used correctly, but when people talk about developing nations like 9 of 10 are never going to develop instead of the contrary, that's an abuse of terms like 'developing' and 'failed state'. There's also this meme that foreign aid is just pumping money into corrupt regimes that will never actually improve the lot of their populaces, and again, that's more the exception than the rule.
            There's also a difference in comparing a failed state with a successfully developing one in 21st century terms and comparing it to its colonial past or some general colonial era. You can take the real numbers for famine deaths caused by the British raj in India and Irish potato famine deaths of about the same time, and with fair statistics, nobody should ever complain about anything Stalin did to the USSR again,unless they are prepared to compare Queen Victoria with Hitler and Stalin, to her disfavor. That's your colonial era, without even knowing the figures for Africa and how much they would make the totals worse. Somalia today probably has it about as bad as they did in the colonial era, but not worse. That's bad, a drastically failed state - there's no need to claim that somehow it's even worse than what Belgum did to its colonies or other cases which were unimaginable hells - by the time things get any worse than that, everyone is dead.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re: Developing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      SJW bot

      Uh-oh, somebody's upset about ethics in game journalism.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re: Developing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I hope that at some point in my life I'm lucky enough to have done something that would qualify me as a social justice warrior.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Developing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I believe qbast is being sarcastic

      What is your evidence that qbast is smart enough to know the meaning of "sarcasm"?

      No one who uses the acronym "SJW" has yet demonstrated that level of intelligence.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re: Developing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving the minimal population of those two countries their inclusion should have minimal impact.
      You really come across as grossly misinformed. Third world countries basically no longer exist.
      By the measures that were used to define them historically they have completely caught up with 'First World'.
      The notable exception is sub-saharan Africa. Which from a global population view is not a major element of the world population.
      You really seem to be holding an inaccurate view of the current world situation.

      See the Ted talk by Hans Rosling for a good update.

    12. Re: Developing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer these simple questions: where are the african Newton, Galileo, Einstein? Oh, yes, nowhere. Whether you like it or not, the only culture and civilization worth of this name are European. Get over it.

    13. Re: Developing by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      China would like to speak to you about paper, gunpowder, the printing press, the magnetic compass, and the fork. Amongst other things.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  2. Other priorites by melting_clock · · Score: 2

    There are a lot of people in developing countries without safe drinking water, access to medical care, adequate nutrition and many other serious problems. While it is sometimes difficult for the lucky few in better off countries to understand, they might just be a few things that are more important then having Internet access.

    1. Re:Other priorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to Google.
      As soon as they become worth advertising to, Google wants them.

    2. Re:Other priorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they can't read about it on Slashdot...how will they know?

    3. Re:Other priorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no "developing" countries. They are stagnating. Caught in an endless cycle of corrupt governments, armed rebels and outside antagonists.

      You show me a starving kid and I'll show you a government that is somehow preventing the parents from raising food or otherwise providing for it. Show me a ship full of grain heading for these countries and I'll show you a corrupt government official waiting to intercept it and sell the grain on the black market.

      The best thing that could happen to a "developing" country is some good old Imperialism. Back when Zimbabwe was a colony, it produced enough food to feed almost the entire continent. All the other former colonies were safe, well ordered and prospering. Now, with few exceptions, they are hell holes infested with Islamic rebels and other groups killing with impunity and inept and corrupt government officials.

      I hope all of you politically correct morons who fought for colonies to become independent are happy what you've done.

    4. Re:Other priorites by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of people in developing countries without safe drinking water, access to medical care, adequate nutrition and many other serious problems.

      I can drive you through some towns in Texas that are just like that.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Other priorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please define 'a lot'. It is true that basic necessities are significantly more important than Internet access but I suspect the number in your head is probably a lot larger than the actual numbers of people in dire circumstance.

      Except for Sub-saharan Africa, most developing countries have made tremendous strides in basic infrastructure and the difference between developed world and developing world is largely mental remnant in the minds of Westerners. 'Developing countries' look a lot like 'Developed' countries today.

    6. Re:Other priorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Detroit is a whole fucking city like that.

    7. Re:Other priorites by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      AC, please. Anybody with five minutes--and the sense that God granted a goose--can see you're attempting to rewrite history in a pretty major fashion.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    8. Re:Other priorites by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That describes swathes of Los Angeles, too...

  3. Sign me up for the Basic Plus plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Food, clean water, sanitation, plumbing, medicine, education, reliable electricity, and then internet connectivity.

    1. Re:Sign me up for the Basic Plus plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But broadband is a fundamental human right. I know. because I've read it right here on /.

    2. Re:Sign me up for the Basic Plus plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, it's difficult to appreciate lolcats when you are dying of dysentery...

    3. Re:Sign me up for the Basic Plus plan by knightghost · · Score: 1

      Add birth control to the top of that list. Most issues stem from overcrowding.

  4. Other priorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly, the problem is infrastructure. If have that [the basics of survival that you mention] then the internet porn and facebook feeds will follow.

  5. All our eggs in one basket? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is a good thing? Even though I thoroughly enjoy participating in a widely connected world, I do question the wisdom of making being connected a requirement for survival.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  6. developing countries, like the USofA by dltaylor · · Score: 2

    where the AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, ... warlords are protecting their turf and blocking access by rural Americans?

    1. Re:developing countries, like the USofA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, they need all those heaps of money to bid on spectrum and sell you the same services at a higher profit margin

  7. 90% of "people" online are spammers by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    The numbers are actually adjusted for spammers because 90% of the email addresses and blog commenters are spammers, are spammers, are spammers, are spammers...*whack*...

  8. 40% are subsistence farmers by johncandale · · Score: 1

    Considering that 30%~ of the world are subsistence farmers, and 40~%+ are involved in farming I am not surprised. I highly doubt that Sub-Saharan Africa should be worrying about the myth of the digital divide for most of the people there. Or the people that don't use money in central America. I mean 50% of the world eats with their hands. 1st world People have weird priorities sometimes. I hope this group isn't getting any donated money.

    1. Re:40% are subsistence farmers by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Considering that 30%~ of the world are subsistence farmers, and 40~%+ are involved in farming I am not surprised. I highly doubt that Sub-Saharan Africa should be worrying about the myth of the digital divide for most of the people there. Or the people that don't use money in central America. I mean 50% of the world eats with their hands. 1st world People have weird priorities sometimes. I hope this group isn't getting any donated money.

      So were my grandparents, education precedes change. If you formulate it like "What good is Internet going to do for a subsistence farmer?" the answer is not much. Heck, you can say the same about literacy. If you formulate it like "How can we teach you more valuable skills than being a subsistence farmer?" then Internet is a great tool. Industrialized agriculture can easily grow a few extra tons of rice and beans, put them on a container ship and ship to Africa but they can't afford it. Internationally they operate with two limits at $1.25/day and $2/day at purchasing power parity, which generally means even less nominally in poorer countries. So the question is, if they work all day can they do something worth $2 to me? If so can they can stop working as subsistence farmers, work for us and buy their food.

      Of course you can't expect much, they'll probably make Indian workers seem skilled by comparison. The language they know is probably not English. But at least they got a chance of tapping into a huge market where there's a lot of people who from their perspective have a lot of money. And very often there's this one guy who speaks English who can translate and sublet to others, that's how outsourcing to India works. I know that's how many migrant workers do it too, one team/work leader that speaks English most of the rest need translators. It gets the job done, they key is just getting on the lowest level of the ladder where learning more means earning more. The rest will work itself out.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:40% are subsistence farmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Sub-Saharan Africa should be worrying ...

      Subsistence farming in Africa is a combination of poor soil and poor infrastructure. While not IT-based, it is something that modern technology can remedy.

      ... People have weird priorities sometimes.

      I was told that in the 1950s, subsistence farmers in some country were given tractors as agricultural aid. They were never used because the farmers couldn't buy the fuel.

      The IMF started handing out improvement loans in the 1980s so poorer countries could build roads and bridges, often at inflated prices since the engineers had to be imported. A few misguided countries built new schools and hospitals. But the townsfolk still didn't have jobs so nothing changed. In fact, it got worse because those countries couldn't repay the loan. It was an institutionalized form of economic assassination, where governments did the dirty work for construction, petrochemical and agribusiness multinationals; usually American-owned.

      Now we have farmers who sell their goods on the international market, at or below cost. Coffee was sold by the farmers below cost meaning farmers couldn't hire labourers to harvest the beans. Which meant the family did it, children included. Because their children didn't get an education, an infrastructure component for tertiary industries never developed. This year, chocolate beans are sold at cost, which explains the chocolate shortage when demand is growing.

    3. Re:40% are subsistence farmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What good is the internet going to do for a subsistence farmer?"

      A lot. Many people in western culture see others through the lens of their own experience. The internet isn't just cat photos and slashdot trolls. People farming their own food to live can use a local and global network to better understand the prices they should pay, the prices they should charge, when to plant, how to increase their yields, how they could work together more effectively, how to manage soil depletion... the list goes on, but I'll stop by highlighting that the internet can provide nutritional advice. Poor cultures are often out of touch on this, shipping highly nutritional fruits and veggies out of the country while eating junk food that tastes good.

      This question reminds me of that scene from the movie "the kingdom of heaven" when asked "what is Jerusalem?" So what is the internet to a subsistence farmer? Nothing.

      Everything.

  9. What counts as online? by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    Mobile phones are booming in the developing world, and most are capable of SMS, e-mail, mobile cash, and downloading electronic books, if not also web browsing. More people now have access to cell phones than toilets.

    http://time.com/74584/unesco-s...

    .

  10. My mom will be please to know by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    that she's in "the 10%"

  11. Racism and the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should come as no surprise that the vast majority of so-called "offliners" are underrepresented, disadvantaged, underprivileged minorities.

  12. How online? by AndyCanfield · · Score: 1

    I read this and immediatly thought of my family. We're in rural Thailand. I gave my son an Android tablet and I provide a wifi Internet connection: he watches cartoons all the time. My wife plays with the tablet sometimes. But neither of them have an e-mail address or any social networking presence. And, frankly, I see no reason why they should. When my wife wants to socially network, she steps outside and talks to the neighbors. When my son wants to network, he goes to school. No Facebook, no Google+, who cares?

    Most of the world lives happily without the Internet.

    1. Re:How online? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It's not even limited to the "developing world". My mom is totally offline; no computer, no internet, no cellphone. She does occasionally ask me to order something online that she heard about on the radio, but that's it. My GF isn't much better; she has an email, but doesn't use it much, and no facebook.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  13. Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    60% of word population is happy and free from surveillance.

  14. Too much of a good thing by tepples · · Score: 1

    ass shit. Fuck

    runs his potty mouth

    Potty mouth?

    Three slang words in a row referring to sexual contact, excretion of body waste, or body parts primarily associated therewith sounds "potty mouth" to me.

    pretends that using profanity is somehow wrong

    An occasional swear is a valuable rhetorical tool. But overuse of "potty mouth" words distracts from the point of the post and makes the speaker sound so uneducated that he can't express a point without bringing up sex or excretion.

  15. Middle East too by tepples · · Score: 1

    China would like to speak to you about paper [etc.]

    Granted. And the Middle East has given us phonemic writing (rebus hieroglyphs), alphabetic writing (starting with the Phoenicians), place value numerals, and algebra. Thus we recognize Europe, the Middle East, and the Far East as sources of science and technology. But what comparable contribution has come out of Africa south of the Sahara?