Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

BlackBerry Clears Hurdle For Voice Crypto Acquisition

Posted by samzenpus on from the still-going dept.

angry tapir writes BlackBerry is now free to integrate German security vendor Secusmart's voice encryption technology in its smartphones and software, after the German government approved its acquisition of the company. BlackBerry CEO John Chen still wants his company to be the first choice of CIOs that want nothing but the best security as he works to turn around the company's fortunes.

4 of 27 comments (clear)

  1. Unless end to end, it's a farce by sideslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since multiple governments mandate that Blackberry share back doors with them, it's not clear to me what benefit more encryption will really add. Won't they be sharing keys with governments (and thus potentially hackers can get the same data)?

    The only secure encryption is end to end encryption where you understand and actively control/limit how the key transmission works.

    1. Re:Unless end to end, it's a farce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the users don't generate and completely control their keys even end-to-end is a farce.

  2. Any encryption is better than none by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since multiple governments mandate that Blackberry share back doors with them, it's not clear to me what benefit more encryption will really add.

    Having fewer people able to eavesdrop on you is enough to prefer one technology over the other. For example, even if governments A and B can still listen on your conversation with a particular party, being protected from all other governments — as well as NGOs — can be quite helpful and thus desirable.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  3. Re:No trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're being silly, and I suspect it's on purpose.

    BlackBerry, like any other publicly traded (and most private ones..) company in the world, can't just opt out of government or legal obligations. If a judge signs an order requirining access to information, there is not much you can do. Sure, you can appeal or protest it, but at the end of the day you have to comply. If you have a problem with this, you should really take it up with your elected leaders who enable the very same laws that are the root of the problem you clearly have an issue with.