Slashdot Mirror
James Watson's Nobel Prize Goes On Auction This Week
HughPickens.com writes: Nicholas St. Fleur reports at The Atlantic that James Watson, the famed molecular biologist and co-discoverer of DNA, is putting his Nobel Prize up for auction on Thursday. He's the first Nobel laureate in history to do so. In 2007, Watson, best known for his work deciphering the DNA double helix alongside Francis Crick in 1953, made an incendiary remark regarding the intelligence of black people that lost him the admiration of the scientific community. It made him, in his own words, an "unperson." That year, The Sunday Times quoted Watson as saying that he felt "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really." Watson has a history of making racist and sexist declarations, according to Time. At a science conference in 2012, Watson said of women in science, "I think having all these women around makes it more fun for the men but they're probably less effective." To many scientists his gravest offense was not crediting Rosalind Franklin with helping him deduce the structure of DNA.
Watson is selling his prized medallion because he has no income outside of academia, even though for years he had served on many corporate boards. The gold medal is expected to bring in between $2.5 million and $3.5 million when it goes to auction. Watson says that he will use the money to purchase art and make donations to institutions that have supported him, such as the University of Chicago. He adds that the auction will also offer him the chance to "re-enter public life." "I've had a unique life that's allowed me to do things. I was set back. It was stupid on my part," says Watson. "All you can do is nothing, except hope that people actually know what you are."
Watson is selling his prized medallion because he has no income outside of academia, even though for years he had served on many corporate boards. The gold medal is expected to bring in between $2.5 million and $3.5 million when it goes to auction. Watson says that he will use the money to purchase art and make donations to institutions that have supported him, such as the University of Chicago. He adds that the auction will also offer him the chance to "re-enter public life." "I've had a unique life that's allowed me to do things. I was set back. It was stupid on my part," says Watson. "All you can do is nothing, except hope that people actually know what you are."
E. O. Wilson called Watson that when Watson took over the Biology department at Harvard. Wilson called him the most unpleasant man he ever met.
But Wilson admits that Watson did motivate him to move beyond the stamp-collecting stage into more disruptive work in evolution.
This.
Generally the reason for this is Africans never went through the same pressures that those that left Africa suffered.
People that went North and out towards Europe and Asia had to suffer cruel ice ages, they almost became extinct, they were literally endangered.
This led to HUGE changes in our DNA, partly due to these pressures, and partly due to smaller breeding partners, but regardless, it happened.
Africa, generally, never had to suffer this problem.
Africa only just in the past few thousand years has had really bad problems with desertification basically screaming its way through the continent, having destroyed massive chunks of land due to overfarming in hot areas.
If we were to just take everywhere else out of the equation and Africa was left for a few more thousand years, things will change massively there as well. Massive numbers of people will die. Of course, this is the real world, and such death "in the modern age" is a bad thing, so it would be stopped and in turn will lead to evolution forking its way in so many areas that won't be as useful.
Another point a lot of people make is the whole "blacks are violent" crap. This isn't true at all, that is one sub-group of Negroids, mainly those that were taken from Africa during the slave days and it ended up becoming an unintended selective breeding issue where brutish, physically tough blacks were passing on their genes to future generations.
Testosterone being the way it is totally screws the brain over in regards to intelligence. Those that have more of it are usually nowhere near as intelligent as their peers. This has been a well known fact.
Those with large bulbous muscles generally do not have the same average intelligence as their peers, whereas those that have a more uniform frame have evolved a good compromise between testosterone and intelligence.
Evolution is about balance. There is a max energy quota that the genome doesn't go over, that has been hard-coded over millions of years based on the history of our surroundings. One thing changes and it snowballs all the way through the genome. It is a very delicate balancing act.
So, to say all blacks are equal is pretty insulting itself, since the Negroid race itself is the 2nd largest diverse group there is next to Mongoloid.
But overall, Africa never suffered the pressures the rest of the human race went through, which led to them developing more socially, within the respective tribal structures humans evolved in over the past million odd years. (just in the same way that Dolphins did, or Squids, or Whales, they were in the restrictive ocean environment and so could only really evolve internally, which led to huge social and emotional skills, tribalism and such)
And that is not a bad thing at all.
A common mistake is a lot of people think Intelligence is an end-goal, a holy grail, the best. It isn't. Not even slightly.
Intelligence is only a good thing with respect to US, but that won't stop a crocodile ripping your arm off. That won't stop a bear ripping your face to shreds.
Intelligence is just one facet of evolution. Strength is another, social skills, and so on.
Africans more than most are generally more sociable.
But naw, can't say any of this, racism!
Even the term Negroid and Mongoloid are falling out of use because stupid political correctness nonsense.
Fuck the science community. Fuck all of them.
Is the entire subject taboo, then? What if there are genetic differences in intelligence between the homo sapiens who stayed in Africa and those who left? I heard one speculation that the most curious and resourceful leave where they're at and go explore. Those who are less curious, and thereby perhaps less intelligent, stay where they are. The genes for curiosity and intelligence are therefore more likely to be passed on the farther they are from the place of origin.
I don't know if this is true or not, but are you not allowed to ask this question and investigate?
We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
Dr, James Watson is an arrogant (reasonably intelligent) prick who managed to be at the right place at the right time. Both of the other co discoverers of the helix (Francis Crick and Rosealind Franklin) both went on to storied careers in research, in Franklin's case despite dying of cancer at age 37). Watson went on to be a gadfly and generic asshole.
I've met both Watson and Crick. Francis Crick, aside from his drive and intelligence was incredibly polite, well mannered and fun to be with. Watson was an arrogant ass.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
To buy the medal and give it to Rosalind's heirs
I think it is perfectly okay to ask those questions and investigate. But that isn't what Watson did. He went into the public eye and made some very racist and inflammatory statements from his 'scientific' opinion without ANY science or conclusive data to back it up.
Pulling 'I'm a Nobel prize winner and I think Africans are genetically and mentally inferior to everyone else' out of your ass will certainly not win you any friends. To follow that up with 'oh, and women are inferior too' can certainly make you an enemy.
while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
Sorry, how do you come to the conclusion that IQ tests do not measure intelligence?
Simple: IQ test scores are hard data. Any reasonable interpretation of those data raises inconvenient political issues. So therefore, they are invalid. Problem solved. So despite the fact that IQ is strongly correlated with school performance, job performance, lifetime income, criminality, etc., and despite the fact that we can actually address it in measurable ways with abatement of environmental pollutants (lead, mercury, PCBs, etc.) and better nutrition (folic acid enrichment, DHA supplements, etc.), it is much better if everyone sticks their fingers in their ears, denies the issue exists, and demonizes anyone who attempts to quantify it.