MasterCard Rails Against Bitcoin's (Semi-)Anonymity

angry tapir writes: MasterCard has used a submission (PDF) to an Australian Senate inquiry to argue for financial regulators to move against the pseudonymity of digital currencies such as Bitcoin. "Any regulation adopted in Australia should address the anonymity that digital currency provides to each party in a transaction," the company's told the inquiry into digital currencies. MasterCard believes that "all participants in the payments system that provide similar services to consumers should be regulated in the same way to achieve a level playing field for all."

Comments

Re:they must hate cash, too

[mjwx]

They require merchants to suck up the cost of accepting Credit cards and not allowing a company to charge more to cover the credit card merchant fees. Of course 'cash discounts' can be done but that's uncommon. Most places just suck up the %3 as part of the cost of business so anyone paying cash does essentially pay more.

First I'll say that this little gem in the T&C is illegal in Australia (and anywhere else with semi-sane consumer protection). Hell, even in the United States I've negotiated better prices with cash because of merchant fees.

But this rule does not discriminate against cash accepting businesses. Everyone who accepts credit cards has to pay, even if they have no cash facilities what so ever.

In fact, it helps businesses that do accept cash because they have a percentage of transactions that are not subject to merchant service fees so they make more profit by giving a slight discount meaning a business has no incentive to refuse cash.