Slashdot Mirror
Which Programming Language Pays the Best? Probably Python
Nerval's Lobster writes: What programming language will earn you the biggest salary over the long run? According to Quartz, which relied partially on data compiled by employment-analytics firm Burning Glass and a Brookings Institution economist, Ruby on Rails, Objective-C, and Python are all programming skills that will earn you more than $100,000 per year. But salary doesn't necessarily correlate with popularity. Earlier this year, for example, tech-industry analyst firm RedMonk produced its latest ranking of the most-used languages, and Java/JavaScript topped the list, followed by PHP, Python, C#, and C++/Ruby. Meanwhile, Python was the one programming language to appear on Dice's recent list of the fastest-growing tech skills, which is assembled from mentions in Dice job postings. Python is a staple language in college-level computer-science courses, and has repeatedly topped the lists of popular programming languages as compiled by TIOBE Software and others. Should someone learn a language just because it could come with a six-figure salary, or are there better reasons to learn a particular language and not others?
Ada is paying me ~$140k
It's the problem domain, not the language. Front-end webdev seems more concerned with language fashion, and kernel work still scoffs at anything but C, but in-between language doesn't seem to matter that much.
I've most of my career writing no-UI usermode code, and employers haven't much cared which language I knew. It's sort-of moved from C++/C#/Java being interchangeable to Java/C#/Python, though many hiring managers still seem skeptical of Python as a "real language" (I expect that will change over time).
It's not your ability to bang out code in any language that will advance your career anyhow - whether tech track or management, it's one set of leadership skills or another that come to matter most.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Not a single programming language makes the best figures in a year for you..but the ability to adapt and learn new technologies as well as completing your task does.
I read that LinkedIn is a job website that will get you more than $100,000 per year. Meanwhile, LinkedIN was the one programming language to appear on LinkedIn's recent list of the fastest-growing tech skills, which is assembled from mentions in LinkedIn job postings.
Fuuuuuck Yoooooouuuuuuuu Dice!
I was wondering what languages I should learn myself. I have some experience with C++, but that's over 10 years ago, and only as a hobby. I've been thinking about picking it back up, but wasn't sure if there were better options. Since I'm an adult and looking to be able to support my family, money certainly is one of the leading factors as to which language I want to get into.
A more relevant question than money may be what interests you? Automation, mobile apps, database, web, etc.? You may have the potential to make more money as a Python programmer, but will a few thousand on average more per year make the job itself more worthwhile? Would, say, only $95k per year to program C++ -- if the specific job was more to your liking -- be a deal breaker?
Another way to look at it: If you are happier doing the job, might that make you perform better and therefor out-perform the industry average?
Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
The salary data is taken from the subset of job ads that list compensation. I don't know the last time I saw a want ad in the software industry that said anything beyond "competitive compensation" or the like. That suggests that they are only looking at a very skewed subset of jobs, my guess would be much greater representation from government, academic, non-profit, and non-tech companies looking for developers.
.NET stack, which is a very low-expertise, low-standards type of job.
Getting into speculation here, but I would guess that the higher premium on things like python would be because non-tech firms hiring python devs probably need scripts for efficient data mining, analysis, and reporting, a skill requiring far more expertise than run-of-the-mill software development.
C#, which I don't think anyone would argue is vastly more marketable than python, Ruby, or Objective-C in the highly lucrative tech sector, is likely so low because the sort of want ads they are looking at are mostly going to be positions that build web-based business management sites on the
Beyond the stupid methodology of only looking at want ad compensation (a better - though still suspect - method would be to look at something like glassdoor for salaries and then correlate those to the skills asked for in want ads for the same position and company), they should really be including the full requirements list for this to be at all meaningful. If one ad asks for "python, plus 7 years of experience working with large scientific datasets, strong understanding of statistics, and experience with one or more data visualization libraries" and the second asks for "c#, knows what a website is", then saying the first one is better paying because of python is silly.