Slashdot Mirror


How the NSA Is Spying On Everyone: More Revelations

The Intercept has published today a story detailing documents that "reveal how the NSA plans to secretly introduce new flaws into communication systems so that they can be tapped into—a controversial tactic that security experts say could be exposing the general population to criminal hackers." The documents also describe a years-long effort, aimed at hostile and friendly regimes, from the point of view of the U.S. government, to break the security of various countries' communications networks. "Codenamed AURORAGOLD, the covert operation has monitored the content of messages sent and received by more than 1,200 email accounts associated with major cellphone network operators, intercepting confidential company planning papers that help the NSA hack into phone networks."

13 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... security experts say could be exposing the general population to criminal hackers.

    I don't get it. The NSA is an organization of criminal hackers, and it's not a question of "could be", the NSA is already doing it. What am I missing?

    1. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Killers are killers unless they are waving a flag, then they are heroes, and praised, such as the US military

  2. Call a spade a spade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't muddy the waters by implying that only a specific, "bad-apple" division of government is doing the stalking. It is government that is doing the stalking. The specific division of government (NSA) is utterly irrelevant to the victims. That only matters to the aggressor.

    If it was a private company doing the stalking, you wouldn't say that "Human Resources" is the aggressor and ignore the fact that Human Resources is owned by, funded by, and works for Google. You would state the obvious and say that Google is the aggressor.

    In other words, this is a failure of government, not "the NSA". Government is attacking your basic human right to free association, not "the NSA".

    1. Re:Call a spade a spade by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While this is a good point, one of the questions we should be asking ourselves is to what degree the agency is under effective political control. For many years the FBI wasn't because it had the goods on everyone.

      It makes a difference whether the actions of the agency are due to the vulnerability of political leaders, the lack of will of political leaders, or the direction of political leaders. Specifically it makes a difference to how to fix the problem.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Call a spade a spade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it is not government because the government isn't a monolithic hive mind.

      Sheriff Bob out on the rural I80 isn't attacking my security/privacy. The firefighters aren't attacking my security/privacy. The FDA and BPA aren't. It's a specific branch - the NSA - that is.

      And at that, though I'll be damned if I can find the presentation on youtube, it's not even "the NSA" - there are 3 branches of it. One is tasked with protecting American information/security (which I believe most of us would agree is laudable), one with tracking known enemies, and the third are the sigint "break the security of everything" guys that everyone but them, apparently even outside their branch of the NSA, think are fucking insane.

      In fact, that presentation led me to believe that the actions of this branch which (You might want to sit down and have your smelling salts ready) went insane following 9/11 are more than anything else like HAL: They were handed absurd instructions and have no choice but to carry them out. In this case the instruction was "never again." Well..... never is an awfully long time and an awfully high bar. The only way you can know if anyone, anywhere is planning the next 9/11 is if you're watching everyone, everywhere. Multiple officials inside the NSA brought their concerns over this insane order (and its insane results) forward but were, as we now know, ignored.

      The left hand of the fedgov routinely doesn't know what the right hand is doing, and that's without the right hand actively trying to prevent anyone from knowing what it's doing. But do go on about how the government is a monolithic evil. I'm sure that Senator Wyden, who's been one of the leaders in the charge to stop this bullshit, appreciates your thoughtful and nuanced views of this complex matter.

  3. Re:Standard M.O. by spacepimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Surprised? No... Concerned that US Citizens are being illegally monitored in their communications by the NSA? Yes... This is illegal monitoring of people who pose no threat to the US or their citizens. Monitoring them without a valid warrant with a description of what the threat they pose is is illegal.

  4. Re:3GPP by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yea, but at this point I think we should just give up on this. It's just not possible to protect yourself from a group with the size, clout and finances of the NSA. I think you and I both know, the easiest way for them to solve most of their problems is just have high level people in just about all of these companies on their payroll. If I were a DBA at a company like Google I'd be sitting in the lunchroom wondering which of my colleagues were the NSA guys and which were not.

    The only fix for all of this is to shut down the agency completely. Such a thing cannot exist in a free world. Yes, we'll be less safe from it. But I'll take a 1 in 250,000,000 chance of dieing in a terrorist attack over a 1 in 1 chance of having my mail read any day.

  5. Re:Honest question ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone has been spying on everyone for at least a couple of centuries. ... Nothing's changed, other than public awareness of espionage.

    And the scale on which the technology allows this to happen.

    See, before the interwebs and computers, there was no mechanism to tap into an entire country's phone systems.

    So it's pretty much bullshit to say nothing has changed. Technology has allowed the scope of this to be done on an absolutely mind-boggling scale.

    And this sense of self entitlement which says the rest of the world should be giving up our rights in service to the security of Americans ... well, we don't see it that way.

    If your security comes at my expense, I'm afraid I couldn't care less about your damned security.

    Because in doing this crap, America has become the enemy of the liberty of everyone else on the planet.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Re:Standard M.O. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Technically the people of the United States have the authority. It's such a shame that the government has been able to sucker the less intelligent masses into giving up liberty under the "threat" of terrorism.

    My solution was simply to move out of the USA. I've been an ex-pat going on a decade now and couldn't be happier. I plan to renounce my US citizenship this coming year.

  7. Re:3GPP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But I'll take a 1 in 250,000,000 chance of dieing in a terrorist attack over a 1 in 1 chance of having my mail read any day.

    I wonder where that number came from: As an American civillian, my odds of dying specifically in the 9/11 attacks were something like 1/60,000

    And your odds of dying in a car crash are even higher.

    So did you quit driving yet, asshole ?

  8. Re:Standard M.O. by spacepimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are plenty of people who can take authority. They can defund the NSA. They can disband the NSA. They can add new layers of oversight to the NSA> Just because they haven't doesn't mean there is no one who can./ Remember they did defund the TIA in early 2000's... Then they allowed it to side step and rename itself and begin operating anew. I think legally at this point, if defunded to resume operation under a new name would be seen as the complete refusal to operate within the charters it was held to.

  9. Re:This will only stop by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    not that i disagree per se, but thats pretty much a no true scotsman fallacy no? No party in american politics is 100% to its core. Democrats claim to be for the poor people, yet they keep pushing bills that directly hurt the poor. republicans say they are for limited government, except for military/police, or if you are a woman.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  10. It's not just the NSA (No Sales for Americans). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The U.S. government is EXTREMELY corrupt.