Slashdot Mirror


Every Weapon, Armored Truck, and Plane the Pentagon Gave To Local Police

v3rgEz writes You may have heard that the image-conscious Los Angeles Unified School District chose to return the grenade launchers it received from the Defense Department's surplus equipment program. You probably have not heard about some of the more obscure beneficiaries of the Pentagon giveaway, but now you can after MuckRock got the Department of Defense to release the full database, letting anyone browse what gear their local department has received.

29 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Why only to police? by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Per the Second Amendment, we all have the right to keep and bear arms. So, why are they only giving these to police? I'd like at least a token weapon (like a single pistol or rifle) for my share of taxes, that went to research, develop, and produce them...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Why only to police? by vettemph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> defense of the Nation.

          Our militaty has no experience in defense (which would be done on US soil.) The olny know offense. (which is done over seas)

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    2. Re:Why only to police? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      So, why are they only giving these to police?

      It's probably worth pointing out that these are not "given" to police. They are "loaned".

      Therefore police depts that accept this gear are required to pay for maintenance (which on some of the vehicles can be more than the value of the vehicle) and are forbidden from selling them if they become surplus to requirements.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    3. Re:Why only to police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The second best defense is making other people defend themselves first. It has always been that way.

      The first best defense is making so that no one wants to attack you to begin with. Counter-intuitively, simply declaring yourself neutral and not picking sides doesn't do that. You still have what other people want, and if you don't keep the others on the back foot, they will be coming to take it from you.

      The Swiss have defended themselves by first, being in a place no one really wants, and second, by arming every citizen. That's why their neutrality has worked.

      Belgium and the Netherlands were only successful until someone with more guns decided that those two countries were useful and ran them over.

      The US is currently maintaining a strategically defensive posture, just like it has been doing since the end of WWII.

      There are those who believe that "defense" is pulling your troops behind your borders and waiting for people to come for you. That's understandable, but simplistic. The US could do that while the oceans were barriers and not roads. We could also do that before we were interdependent on the rest of the world for resources and trade. That ship has sailed.

    4. Re:Why only to police? by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Our militaty has no experience in defense (which would be done on US soil.) The olny know offense. (which is done over seas)

      A bragging Athenian once told a Spartan:

      • There are many of your soldiers lying dead around Athens!
      • But none of yours around Sparta...
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    5. Re:Why only to police? by matbury · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Swiss have defended themselves by first, being in a place no one really wants, and second, by arming every citizen. That's why their neutrality has worked.

      I think the Swiss stayed neutral by keeping everyone's money for them and allowing them to make secretive transactions for arms, oil, and to hide fortunes amassed by individuals in times of war (the spoils of war). Without banks like these, you can't wage wars effectively so the banking states/havens are always safe and secure.

    6. Re:Why only to police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Per the Second Amendment, we all have the right to keep and bear arms. So, why are they only giving these to police? I'd like at least a token weapon (like a single pistol or rifle) for my share of taxes, that went to research, develop, and produce them...

      Well, actually, you can.

      Civilian Marksmanship Program. After fulfilling a set of requirements, you can purchase certain surplus military firearms. Most notably, semi-auto M1 Garands in a variety of conditions for very good prices. Modern military rifles today are select fire or full auto, so there's no way they could transfer to civilians.

      Unfortunately, Secretary of Defense Robert Macnamara, under President Johnson, had all the M14s melted down after the switch to M16s. Oh how I wish he hadn't done that and the CMP could offer semi-auto converted M14s for sale. I would LOVE to have one.

      In defense of the variety of state and local government agencies accepting these military surplus weapons and vehicles, think about it. If you were a cop, and you had the chance to get ahold of a tank, would you? Hell yeah! Not for any purpose, but just to have a freakin' tank!

  2. $1000 Flashlights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And why did they give our local PD 145 flashlights worth $130K? What does a thousand-dollar flashlight even /look/ like?

    1. Re:$1000 Flashlights? by sabri · · Score: 2

      And why did they give our local PD 145 flashlights worth $130K? What does a thousand-dollar flashlight even /look/ like?

      I was going to post exactly the same thing, so you must be from Santa Clara County as well.

      $896 for a flashlight... But what about the 6 camouflage sets for $26k? Do they fly?

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    2. Re:$1000 Flashlights? by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      They must look pretty darn good - otherwise, the folks who would pay $1000 for a flashlight must not be too bright...

    3. Re:$1000 Flashlights? by amxcoder · · Score: 2

      Not sure what kind they are, but they might look something like this: (price $900) http://www.foxfury.com/product...

      I've seen many tactical and weapon light systems in the big sporting good stores going for anywhere between $200-$500. I'm sure the military could find a way to pay twice that on dang flashlight somehow.

      They may also be using non-standard UV or IR flashlights too, those seem to cost a lot for some reason as well.

    4. Re:$1000 Flashlights? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Camouflage netting seems to be a biggy. The Anchorage, Alaska DEA got a $26,000 radar evading camo net system for some bizarre reason. Perhaps they're fighting an onslaught of radar equipped meth labs hidden in Polar Bear dens above the Arctic Circle. Who knows.

      Night vision systems are also popular. That makes sense, but boy am I jealous.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  3. Anything sold to the police should be sold... by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to the people.

    This limits what you'll sell to the police because a lot of this hardware you don't want in "civilian" hands... the police ARE civilians. They are not military.

    Anything the police are able to buy, should be something the average citizen can buy.

    Pistols?
    Rifles?
    Shotguns?
    Body armor?
    Tear gas?
    Gas masks?
    Flash bangs?
    Tasers?

    All of that can be sold to civilians already. No issue there.

    Tanks?
    Machine guns?

    THAT crosses a line.

    If I can't buy a tank then I don't want to see the police using them either. Both the police and the general public must operate under the same rules.

    If police are getting out gunned by people that have automatic weapons, then we can look at that situation and see how that happened. From what I've seen, that mostly happens with the cartels if it happens at all. And in those cases, you're dealing with a failure of the border patrol etc. Regardless, you can bring in the FBI if you really want to bring some firepower down on their heads.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Anything sold to the police should be sold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tanks for sale. Some even nearly affordable.

      Machine guns made before 1986 can easily be bought. Those made after require a class 3 FFL, which isn't impossible to get, but you have to follow the rules and it takes a while.

      As far as I know there is only 1 case of a legal machiene gun being used in a crime, and it was owned by a police officer.

    2. Re:Anything sold to the police should be sold... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Informative

      The police are under civil law, therefore they are "civilians" by the definition of the word.

    3. Re:Anything sold to the police should be sold... by hink · · Score: 2

      Because people have converted tracked vehicles to fight forest fires.
      See this for an example: M548/M1015 Full Tracked Vehicle

      --
      - speaking only for myself, as always
  4. $900 Flashlight? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to know what kind of Flashlights Santa Clara, CA received at $900 each. ($130K for 145 of them).

    They received a utility truck worth $47K - if they put just 53 of their flashlights in the back of the truck, they'd be worth more than the truck itself.

    What makes these flashlights worth $900?

    1. Re:$900 Flashlight? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The 850$ kickback.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    2. Re:$900 Flashlight? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.amazon.com/Surefire...

      Not quite there but close, some of the weapon mount flashlights are pretty expensive. I'm sure some of it is government procurement kickbacks, some of it is probably the 24 hour on call assistance military contracts demand, but the lights themselves have to be built insanely tough as well. I once bought a cheap knock off flashlight/laser combo just to try out on my shotgun. It shook itself apart before I fired the fifth round.

  5. Arming the enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, but why would they want to arm their enemy.

    Captcha: treaty

  6. The First Cop Tank by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    As far as i know it was 1961 when the city of Ft. Lauderdale got the first police tank. It was in fear of the dreaded college students on Ft. Lauderdale beach on spring break. It was stored underneath the local public swimming pool. It featured such things as tear gas sprays and rubber bullets. But the heavy, tracked vehicle was a threat as our beach road was normally covered with students. We had as many as 500,000 at one time. About 1962 colleges started to stagger their spring breaks to avoid crowding at resort areas and the FT. Lauderdale police and officials were ugly enough to cause less kids to come to Ft. Lauderdale anyway. And yes, kids really were assaulted for no reason by over worked cops. I was there and saw it first hand. Oh Lord save us from the hordes of scholars descending upon us.

  7. Re:Phew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    APCs are useless for cops 100% of the time. By the time you get the APC out of storage etc the shooter has chewed through whoever was in range and expended as much ammo as he had or wanted. The fact that the APC can survive a shot from a Barrett isn't really helpful to the 1-10 officers and God knows how many civilians that arrived before the APC.
    The APCs are way past diminishing returns if they cost as much as is reported. $1M plus mammoth upkeep costs for a PD that services 1000 people is an incredible waste. The town is never going to face a shooter where this is meaningful... but $1,000/pp in taxes is definitely meaningful.

  8. Score for Florence! by fhage · · Score: 2
    Gotta love our Florence Colorado (pop 3881) and their ability to do federal paperwork. Their police dept received $3.7M including;
    • 1 MINE RESISTANT VEHICLE
    • 2 COMBAT/ASSAULT/TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES
    • 1 Ordinance disposal robot
    • Lost count at 22 Trucks, including 3 fork lifts, a Bus and a Self propelled Vacuum.
    • 7 Trailers, including a recreational camper
    • Welding equipment, woodworking machines, bending machine
    • Earth Moving equipment, tractors, spreaders
    • 26 spotlights, 12 IR aiming systems
    • 10 night vision systems
    • 6 Shop Vacs, 2 lawn mowers, 5 TV's
    • and... 4 Mules

    Who can beat their 120+ line items of largess in a town with less than 5000 people? The Florence Facebook photos page is to die for. It took me 5 minutes to recover. Looks like a total LE staff around 12. (including the dog). I want pictures of Florence Cops on Mules!

  9. Re:Phew by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Still, who orders a grenade launcher for a school?

    I believe grenade launchers can be used to fire canisters of tear gas.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  10. Re:welcome to the post-9/11 world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Republicans (many of them) are Statists, not Libertarians.

    Now, the Romans and Greeks of the ancient world understood that in the immediate aftermath of a big event, poor law was made. They left us cautionary examples and quotes. Then again, nobody in politics today reads the classics and neither does the public generally.

    And thus, we generate new cautionary tales.

  11. Re:Phew by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    Why would you? Those 1st graders are already crying....

  12. Re:Why does my tiny town in Iowa ... by geniice · · Score: 2

    Probably they wanted a larger vehicle able to hold a fair number of offices with some cross country ability. Getting something from the military is significantly cheaper than buying something built for that purpose. It may not be perfect but it is good value.

  13. Re:Please tell me why by geniice · · Score: 2

    Because the police are the ones out and about in the small hours of the morning. If you are outside for sustained periods it doesn't need to be below freezing to be unpleasent enough to reduce your effectiveness.

  14. Re:welcome to the post-9/11 world by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    Those who ignore history are bound to... LOOK, A TERRORIST!!!!

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.