Slashdot Mirror


GCHQ Does Not Breach Human Rights, Judges Rule

An anonymous reader writes The current system of UK intelligence collection does not currently breach the European Convention of Human Rights, a panel of judges has ruled. A case claiming various systems of interception by GCHQ constituted a breach had been brought by Amnesty, Privacy International and others. It followed revelations by the former US intelligence analyst Edward Snowden about UK and US surveillance practices. But the judges said questions remained about GCHQ's previous activities. Some of the organisations who brought the case, including Amnesty UK and Privacy International, say they intend to appeal the decision to the European Court of Human Rights.

9 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. Re:One hand washes the other by x0ra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given that those who make the definition of crimes are the same who are legislating to strip you from your privacy... it's not surprising.

  2. Re:Of course by x0ra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course, governments just give themselves the exclusivity of crimes. Kidnapping, assault, theft, murder, torture... Though, they rename the action in the process, imprisonment, "public safety", taxes, war...

  3. SHUT THE FRACK UP, SLASHDOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Quit blaring Verizon commericals as soon as the page is half loaded. Video (and audio) that starts without asking is fucking the dawg, you bitch! I will never spend a penny for either Verizon or Slashdot until this quits. I say again;

    SHUT THE FRACK UP, SLASHDOT!

    1. Re:SHUT THE FRACK UP, SLASHDOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why does Slashdot never fix this problem? It's not the first time when I hear people being riled up by intrusive ads over here, especially ones which play audio.

      Sometimes this website feels like a ghost ship without anyone in control. :-O

  4. Re:One hand washes the other by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, the ones doing the spying are the ones who make the laws. There's no problem at all. Move along, comrade.

  5. Re:One hand washes the other by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except that in the UK, Judges have the ability to nullify a law if they consider it onerous or wrong, without being specifically asked to look at the law itself.

    One of the many reasons I trust the UK judicial system - its very independent of the current Government.

  6. Re:One hand washes the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And whom is appointing the judges?

  7. Re:One hand washes the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A non-political body called the Judicial Appointments Commission, the 15 members of which include barristers, judges, normal everyday people and legal professionals. The government have no say in appointments, and have no power over the commission - its completely independent.

    Look at the list of the current commissioners sometime...
    normal everyday people eh?, let me see who the lay members are..

    former senior civil servant, couple of professors, a top businesswoman, a Lieutenant General Sir... the sort of people I meet every day (well, I *used* to when I worked in Camford..).

    oh, for sure, independent..for a given value of independent.

  8. Re:One hand washes the other by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fortunately the NSA can have no dirt on any of the judges, so nothing could go wrong at all.

    Oh...

    Wait...

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"