Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Canadian Agency Drops Cases Rather Than Deal With New Requirements For ISP Info

Posted by samzenpus on from the forget-about-it dept.

An anonymous reader points out this story about what has happened since the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling on the warrantless disclosure of subscriber information to law enforcement from ISPs. "A funny thing happens when courts start requiring more information from law enforcement: law enforcers suddenly seem less interested in zealously enforcing the law. Back in June of this year, Canada's Supreme Court delivered its decision in R. v. Spencer, which brought law enforcement's warrantless access of ISP subscriber info to an end. 'In a unanimous decision written by (Harper appointee) Justice Thomas Cromwell, the court issued a strong endorsement of Internet privacy, emphasizing the privacy importance of subscriber information, the right to anonymity, and the need for police to obtain a warrant for subscriber information except in exigent circumstances or under a reasonable law.' The effects of this ruling are beginning to be felt. Michael Geist points to a Winnipeg Free Press article that details the halcyon days of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police's warrantless access. 'Prior to the court decision, the RCMP and border agency estimate, it took about five minutes to complete the less than one page of documentation needed to ask for subscriber information, and the company usually turned it over immediately or within one day.'"

2 of 29 comments (clear)

  1. From: The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Dear whoever the fuck you are (we don't give a shit),

    We have bribed your government to make sure all America citizens are lawbreakers online. Enjoy sucking our cocks while continuing to line our pockets and contribute to the decline of music. Yes, we too know Justin Beiber is a worthless faggot who can't create good music if his life depended on it, but you dumb fucks will still buy it, so why should we give a fuck. So long, cocksuckers.

    Sincerely yours,
    MPAA

  2. lets play a game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    What type of fallacy is this comment in the fine summary?

    "law enforcers suddenly seem less interested in zealously enforcing the law"

    Here's a nice list to choose from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

    winner gets to brag