Slashdot Mirror


Displaced IT Workers Being Silenced

dcblogs writes A major problem with the H-1B debate is the absence of displaced IT workers in news media accounts. Much of the reporting is one-sided — and there's a reason for this. An IT worker who is fired because he or she has been replaced by a foreign, visa-holding employee of an offshore outsourcing firm will sign a severance agreement. This severance agreement will likely include a non-disparagement clause that will make the fired worker extremely cautious about what they say on Facebook, let alone to the media. On-the-record interviews with displaced workers are difficult to get. While a restrictive severance package may be one handcuff, some are simply fearful of jeopardizing future job prospects by talking to reporters. Now silenced, displaced IT workers become invisible and easy to ignore. This situation has a major impact on how the news media covers the H-1B issue and offshore outsourcing issues generally.

7 of 398 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Wow... by scottbomb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "I knew slashdot was right wing these days"

    LOL really?! The leftist propaganda keeps me away from this site most of the time.

  2. Re:Leave the employers alone by Luthair · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From some of the stories we've had in Canada, its probably less tech companies and more banks etc. replacing their IT groups with a third-party contractor that only hires imported workers.

  3. Re:H1-B debate? by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yep. The obvious "fix" that nobody seems to be taking very seriously yet is making it much more difficult to get permission to hire an H1-B worker.

    Corporations are ALWAYS going to push for a plentiful supply of these as a cost savings measure, but it's ultimately the government who issues them. It's about time they start putting pressure on companies to PROVE they're unable to hire from the talent pool of American citizens before qualifying to go the H1-B route.

  4. "IT workers" vs. programmers not finding work? by unimacs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just curious. Are experienced IT workers with up to date skills really not able to find jobs? What about programmers specifically ("IT Worker" can mean a lot of things)?

    I'm assuming that age discrimination is impacting some of these people, but what about relatively young software developers? How many of you are young and talented software developers with at least of few years of experience and are having trouble finding work?

  5. Catholic Health by Pontiac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I left before it happened but my former company outsourced all of IT to Wipro.
    This was on a system with 60,000 users.
    Everyone but management was replaced with H1B- workers from India.
    Outgoing staff was asked to stay and train their replacements with no severance packages.
    Very few stayed and turnover documents were not made (hmm I wonder why) so the incoming Wipro workers had to discover and document the systems themselves.
    I hear it was a real nightmare with lots of $$ spent on contractors to help figure things out.

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  6. Re:Is it legally binding by JeffOwl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is typical. They will offer you a choice, something like: 2 weeks of severance pay and you don't have to sign anything, or 4 weeks + 2 weeks per year of employment and you sign the agreement. The agreements often say you will stay quiet about the company and you give up your right to sue over the termination.

  7. Re:LOL by OhPlz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can see this occurring in the past, but not the present. Everyone complains about everything online. If you really dig into someone's background, eventually you're going to find something objectionable. There would be hordes of people displaced if this was truly going on in significant numbers. A company can go after a worker, but it's going to be Streisand Effect. When they need to hire new talent, their candidates are also going to do a search. Who is going to want to work for a company that's notorious for silencing its workers?

    At best, the employer might be able to reverse-direct-deposit the severance if the complainer wasn't smart enough to move the money. The courts aren't going to take a person's house or retirement savings, and that's probably as much "wealth" that the average American worker has at this point. Want to rat a company out? Grab a disposable phone and tweet away.