Slashdot Mirror


Material Possiblities: A Flying Drone Built From Fungus

Nerval's Lobster writes What if you could construct an unmanned aerial vehicle out of biological material, specifically a lightweight-but-strong one known as mycelium? The vegetative part of a fungus, mycelium is already under consideration as a building material; other materials would include cellulose sheets, layered together into "leather," as well as starches worked into a "bioplastic." While a mushroom-made drone is probably years away from takeoff, a proposal for the device caught some attention at this year's International Genetically Engineered Machine competition. Designed by a team of students from Brown, Spelman, and Stanford Universities in conjunction with researchers from NASA, such a drone would (theoretically) offer a cheap and lightweight way to get a camera and other tools airborne. 'If we want to fly it over wildfires to see where it's spreading, or if there's a nuclear meltdown and we want to fly in to see what's going on with the radioactivity, we can send in the drone and it can send back data without returning,' Ian Hull, a Stanford sophomore involved in the project, told Fast Company.

52 comments

  1. Cheap? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

    So, the expensive parts of a drone are not the motors, electronics, battery, camera... but the chunk of plastics holding it all together?

    1. Re:Cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea that doesn't make much sense. The body of the drone is the cheapest part. And if your concern is about disposal of drones exposed to hazardous materials, why not land the drone somewhere it can be cleaned up safely later instead of letting the body decompose and dropping radioactive motors, camera, etc somewhere in the woods?

      This kind of seems like a terrible application of this technology.

    2. Re:Cheap? by brian.stinar · · Score: 1

      I agree - the plastic holding it together isn't going to be the expensive part...I think for this drone the expensive parts are probably going to be the research and development, rather than any manufacturing. This sounds super cool, and possibly have tons of interesting ramifications in materials science, manufacturing, and other fields, but I haven't ever really heard of any long term vision, government funded, R&D project described as "cheap."

    3. Re:Cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the "3D printed" drones are just a crappy body shell that goes over the frame, motors, electronics, battery, and props.

      But hey, they just 3D printed a buckle on the ISS, so FUTURE!!!

    4. Re:Cheap? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Some of their first goals make sense.... light weight material that is potentially easy to manufacture without using all the energy inherent in using metals, but maybe stronger than a lot of plastics? If they can achieve that, then great. However.... as usual, the implications needs work.... since even without this drones are already disposable enough to be worth losing them in operations like, surveying fires etc.

      "Oh noes in surveying the millions in property damage and saving lives, we lost a $1000 drone".... um.... bfd, totally worth it....NOW, with todays materials.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I both agree and disagree. Most drone frames made today are not made out of plastic. They are made out of carbon fiber, which is rather expensive in its own right. The ones made out of plastic are mostly hobbits drones, as they are not meant for long flights in sometimes harsh conditions. Another issue is cleanup, if the majority if your drone is made from bio degradable substances then environmentalists don't get as upset when you loose one. Part of any professional project is life-cycle analysis, When you loose a drone made of expensive materials that do not degrade then you have to go fetch it. Which requires an expensive search team of people you trust. The next issue is IP, you do not want a competitor or enemy to get a hold of your drone and copy it, if it degrades and is worth practically nothing then who cares if they get it. Another potential advantage is if they get it but cant replicate the materials you used to make it, then they might as well throw it away as they cant match your specs.The only thing they might get is the software on board and maybe the electrical diagrams. They software has other protections depending on how you built it, the electrical diagrams will take a lot of expense to reverse engineer. (especially if you use a board wit more than 2 layers) even then most everything they will find is pretty much available to everyone now anyway.

      So, what it all boils down to is not the expense of the drone itself, but how much trouble you get in if it's lost.

    6. Re:Cheap? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just the heaviest part. The expensive thing is lightweight propulsion - made easier the lighter the unit is.

    7. Re:Cheap? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      The ones made out of plastic are mostly hobbits drones

      Damn it! I knew I should have waited for the extended edition. They edited the hobbit drones out of the theatrical version.

    8. Re:Cheap? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      radioactive motors

      Where the hell are you buying your motors from?

    9. Re:Cheap? by timeOday · · Score: 2

      We would need to see comparisons against paper and wood. You can make a paper airplane for 2 cents or a balsawood plane with a rubber-band propeller for $2 at the dime store, as far as structural materials goes, they are proven.

    10. Re: Cheap? by mimeflu · · Score: 0

      Â"If we want to fly it over wildfires to see where it's spreading" we can use some garlic and extra virgin olive oil. Sent via my TCM0280

    11. Re:Cheap? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      ^ this.

      Surely there are more obvious uses for (presumably) biodegradable materials, even for mundane uses like packaging. Using it for drones is waaaaaaaaaay down the list on things it could use useful for.

    12. Re:Cheap? by smaddox · · Score: 1

      Already done. I forget who the original company to do it was, but that's likely where they got the idea.

    13. Re:Cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chernobyl.

      Why do you ask?

    14. Re:Cheap? by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      That's so yesterday, Tokyo engines are way more radioactive now.

  2. Careful what you ask for by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    'Flying high' could be interpreted in various ways.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  3. Laudable by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    It's a laudable research goal, more likely as a way to design surveillance devices that are somewhat less detectable than drones made of plastic and bits of metal.

    In either of the examples offered, however, the ubiquity and cheapness of drones already suggests that they'll simply be treated as a disposable, no matter WHAT they're made of, unless - as is the constant hurdle for bioplastics in pretty nearly every field of potential use - they become somehow cheaper than normal plastics. In a wildfire or nuclear meltdown, nobody's going to give a flying (get it?) hoot about a dozen ounces of slagged plastic crashing to earth in the area.

    --
    -Styopa
  4. sounds familiar by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    An unmanned vehicle made of light yet strong biological material? So, a bird?

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:sounds familiar by Immerman · · Score: 1

      A remote-controlled cybernetic bird with a camera and laser beams strapped to it's head. Don't forget the important parts.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:sounds familiar by Bartles · · Score: 1

      People have been making small, unmanned vehicles out of light yet strong biological materials for a hundred years. This is the stupidest article I have ever seen on Slashdot.

  5. I for one welcome our... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    new high flying fungal overloards

  6. Attention SciFi fans! by B5_geek · · Score: 2

    This is a start!
    It's this kind of thinking that will bring us closer to Vorlon tech, LEXX, or even Moya! =)
    (did I miss any?)

    Seriously, as others have pointed out, the most expensive valuable parts are not the airframe, but the motors/camera/radio/battery so stop the hippy-dippy crap and don't worry about making it out of biodegradable material.

    But seriously, keep working/thinking in this direction.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:Attention SciFi fans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the underrated eXistenZ :-)

    2. Re:Attention SciFi fans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the most expensive valuable parts are not the airframe, but the motors/camera/radio/battery..."

      Those are somewhat expensive. However, the pain of losing those doesn't come anywhere close to the anguish you feel as you watch your flying wing with brand new OSD/sensor/stabilizer package go flying off into the sunset because of a freak RC transmitter malfunction ... before you've finished tuning the Return to Home program settings. Rock steady flight + 2 fresh batteries + fairly efficient airframe + cruising at 40% throttle = plane keeps going for a very long time, perhaps even to a point over Lake Ontario well beyond your ability to recover. :(

  7. As long as it's OK with ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    PETA

    There is currently no reason to believe that plants experience pain, devoid as they are of central nervous systems, nerve endings, and brains.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:As long as it's OK with ... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to PETA enthusiasts. You sure you didn't copy somebody's bio?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:As long as it's OK with ... by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 1

      So imagine if some researcher somewhere manages to prove that plants actually feel pain...
      What's PETA's next move? Sustain themselves on a diet of willpower and positive energy from the universe?

    3. Re:As long as it's OK with ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1
      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  8. Zerg Rush! by redshirt · · Score: 1

    When we see carpet made from fungus, then we'll really be in trouble.

  9. Fungi as instruments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should take it a step further and not just construct the aeroframe from biological material, but also the sensor package. Engineer a radiation sensitive substance which changes color based on nuclear, biological or chemical exposure of various sorts and rather than "beaming data back" with onboard electronics instead use satellite imagery to collect the result. Some sort of biological reaction to support propulsion, or releasing this at altitude as a glider, and you could be almost completely free from inorganic material.

    1. Re:Fungi as instruments by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting that instead of giving it some simple sensors and a radio, we task a satellite capable of real-time spectrographic imaging with sub-decimeter resolution in order to spot the changes in color of some oversized flying test strip?

  10. how does it smell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..

  11. super mario bros 2 movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    super mario bros 2 movie?

  12. Most intersting part by sls1j · · Score: 2
    Personally the most interesting part is the design of the air frame not the materials. The three motors embedded in the airframe is interesting.

    The idea that you could send one of these drones in a sensitive environment and leave it there seems off. Yeah, the air frame biodegrades, but not the motors, electronics, and the most toxic part the battery.

  13. PolyLacticAcid? by Anon-Admin · · Score: 2

    So they are trying to make a drone from a biological material?

    Just 3d print it from PolyLactic acid, The stuff is made from corn and is biodegradable. On top of that it is only $18 a 2kg spool on ebay. :P

    1. Re:PolyLacticAcid? by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Or make it from balsa or spruce. Duh.

  14. Manta! by chthon · · Score: 1

    If it is a flying fungus, then it is not a drone, but a manta!

  15. Elon Musk: artificial intelligence is our biggest by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    existential threat if we grant it to fungi.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  16. Paging H.P. Lovecraft... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2
  17. Message from the Overmind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spawn more Overlords.

  18. Also known as wood by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    Also known as wood

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  19. Flying Mushrooms by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    I saw a flying mushroom once. I'm pretty sure it was due to consuming a mushroom I found in a field though.

  20. This story makes me imagine by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    John Cleese instructing someone on what to do if they're attacked with a mushroom.

  21. Another example of inhumanity. by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    They're gonna kill the exocomps all over again.

  22. A perfect application for this by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    Silk road III can sell shrooms that deliver themselves! No more self-identifying trips to the post office.

  23. Vorlon spaceships by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    So it should take another 10 to 15 years until we can start growing Vorlon like spaceships, right? ;-)

  24. Nerval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and your damn lobster

  25. No SCOBY Leather. No! by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Don't be fooled into thinking that "kombucha leather" (aka SCOBY leather) is suitable for this application.

    Kombucha/SCOBY is interesting stuff, and yes, the SCOBY mat can be dried out to make a "leather-like" substance.

    That is -- SCOBY leather is "somewhat leather-like" when perfect dry.

    It's also hygrophilic, meaning it has an affinity for moisture.

    In other words, it's always kind of damp and sticky, even in a relatively dry environment.

    Expose it to rain, and you've got a sloppy, slippery, un-leather-like mess on your hands. I say this from personal experience.

    Also, it smells like cat urine.

    --
    -kgj
  26. High Class! by genessy · · Score: 1

    "What if you could construct an unmanned aerial vehicle out of biological material..."

    That has to be the classiest way I've ever heard anyone describe a loogie before!

  27. Their projects are awesome, dunno why the UAV spin by Zeorge · · Score: 2

    Really, look at their website and see the entire scope of their work. The blurb makes it sound like just UAV but it's much more and farther reaching. Very cool indeed. This UAV part, is on their, but it's just an extension of their core work. Totally sci-fi in a way, maybe of things to come.

  28. Nothing new by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    Drow and Dwarves have been doing it for millennia.

  29. Drones? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Spirit and Allegiant Airlines already have this technology running commercial flights.