The only problem is that the Supremes won't understand any of the arguments. Scalia believes demons cause pigs to jump off cliffs. Only two of them have e-mail skills. This is argued before monkeys.
On free speech and Canadian politics
William Watson,writing in the Ottawa Citizen, [external] argues that Tom Flanagan’s ordeal has been “Orwellian,” except inasmuch as “it wasn’t organized by the state” which rather takes some of the sting out of the term, doesn’t it? We certainly agree that Flanagan didn’t say anything that should instantly torch the career of an academic or a CBC commentator, and that it’s healthier to explain forcefully why he’s wrong than to demand “firing” or “shunning” —but then, if he wasn’t also Tom Flanagan, hard-bitten political strategist, his remarks wouldn’t have caused such a furor in the first place. As for the notion that Flanagan was “surreptitiously videoed” or somehow entrapped, we’re just a bit baffled. The problem is what he said, surely, not why or how we came to learn that he said it.
Slashdot Mirror
Â"If we want to fly it over wildfires to see where it's spreading" we can use some garlic and extra virgin olive oil. Sent via my TCM0280
More creationist claptrap. Scientists know Galileo died in 1642. How could these pictures be only 20 years old?
The only problem is that the Supremes won't understand any of the arguments. Scalia believes demons cause pigs to jump off cliffs. Only two of them have e-mail skills. This is argued before monkeys.
I'd keep it. Imagine the ads you would get after browsing black twisted dildos on Amazon.
Even worse, they'll track our fitness and hit us when we're mosst vulnerable- tired after a workout.
They come with a blue dial of death.
I only have two friends. Sob.
I live in Venice 1/4 mile from Google and can't get anything faster than 20 Mbps. My phone gets 20 Mbps. Sent from my TMC0280.
Better off having monkeys decide the issue.
Who needs robots when you can buy a blow up satan doll?
On free speech and Canadian politics William Watson,writing in the Ottawa Citizen, [external] argues that Tom Flanagan’s ordeal has been “Orwellian,” except inasmuch as “it wasn’t organized by the state” which rather takes some of the sting out of the term, doesn’t it? We certainly agree that Flanagan didn’t say anything that should instantly torch the career of an academic or a CBC commentator, and that it’s healthier to explain forcefully why he’s wrong than to demand “firing” or “shunning” —but then, if he wasn’t also Tom Flanagan, hard-bitten political strategist, his remarks wouldn’t have caused such a furor in the first place. As for the notion that Flanagan was “surreptitiously videoed” or somehow entrapped, we’re just a bit baffled. The problem is what he said, surely, not why or how we came to learn that he said it.