Slashdot Mirror


US Navy Authorizes Use of Laser In Combat

mi writes The U.S. Navy has declared an experimental laser weapon on its Afloat Forward Staging Base (AFSB) in the Persian Gulf an operational asset and U.S. Central Command has given permission for the commander of the ship to defend itself with the weapon. The 30 kilowatt Laser Weapon System (LaWS) was installed aboard USS Ponce this summer as part of a $40 million research and development effort from ONR and Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) to test the viability of directed energy weapons in an operational environment. No word yet on a smaller, shark-mounted version.

4 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Shark-mounted laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why make the laser smaller when you can make the shark bigger?

  2. Re:in other news... by Tailhook · · Score: 5, Informative

    One tiny spec of dust on the lens would be disastrous.

    No. That's a myth. A tiny speck absorbs a tiny amount of energy before ionizing. These lasers are made of a large mass of tough material and they don't explode or whatnot when a tiny piece of matter ionizes on a ruby or YAG crystal surface.

    Powerful cutting and welding lasers are used all day long in manufacturing environments around the world. They don't go haywire when a tiny speck of foreign material vaporizes in the beam. The laser degrades over time as damage accumulates.

    Cracked lenses or lenses with significant contaminants on the surface can be damaged or even explode when the laser is activated. A speck of dust won't get you there.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  3. Re:USS Ponce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ponce is the only ship of the United States Navy that is named for Ponce in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

    And a good thing too, nobody would know what the fuck is going on if there were 15 ships and a submarine all named Ponce.

  4. Re:This might alienate anti-ISI* Muslims. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Protocol IV of the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons is unlikely to be a problem.

    Per Article 1, weapons specifically designed as their sole combat function, or one of their functions, to cause permanent blindness are Not OK.

    However, Per Article 3, "Blinding as an incidental or collateral effect of the legitimate military employment of laser systems, including laser systems used against optical equipment, is not covered by the prohibition of this Protocol." Just aim for a legitimate target and stock up on braille sympathy cards.

    Problem solved.

    As for making war with fire, light isn't fire, and conventional explosives(never mind thermobarics and incendiaries) are markedly more strongly associated with fire. Lasers have that novelty thing going against them; but anybody who actually cares about the letter of the law probably has hangups about tracers, attacks on fuel dumps, and other routine stuff. As soon as the novelty wears off lasers will recede into the background.