Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Quietly Starts Accepting Bitcoin As Payment Method

An anonymous reader writes A new page in the help guide in the payment information of Microsoft's website reveals that the Redmond giant is now accepting Bitcoin as a payment method for products and services on Windows, Windows Phone and Xbox. Currently the payments must go through to credit a Microsoft Wallet account, and the service is initially only available to U.S. users. But the wording of the new page combines with an expansive year for Microsoft and a number of positive statements about Bitcoin from Bill Gates to indicate that this first step is more than just an experiment. Microsoft is now the largest commercial entity accepting the Bitcoin currency, which it processes via the BitPay system, thus protecting the company from fluctuations in the value of Bitcoin. Also at CNN Money.

107 comments

  1. No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm seriously starting to think that regular currency will be no more in the future. I should have started mining early though, you pretty much can't get bitcoins anymore without paying for them.

    1. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Troll

      I am just waiting for more legitimate businesses to start dealing with bit coins.
      I mean most of the sites that you go to get bit coins are kinda questionable.
      And it seems you can only buy cheap poor quality stuff with bit coins.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regular currency isn't going to be replaced by bitcoins. It *IS* being replaced by credit.

    3. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      NewEgg and half.com both accept BTC. Pretty much everything in my data closet at home is from NewEgg.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    4. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty dumb thing to write.

    5. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of legitimate... I have read that if you use bitcoin you are viewed as a potential terrorist by the US government. So does that mean that M$ is enabling terrorist activity?

    6. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

      As a person from the US and well familiar with Cryptocurrency laws, I can tell you this is not true at all.

    7. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound like you should be able to get bitcoins without paying for them... which is a ridiculous concept, why should you get money for nothing?

    8. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the whole point of crypto currencies. There is no central bank so it's all based on people mining their own coins.

    9. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's all based on people

      It's all based on a pyramid scheme where the people who start and market a currency profit from the fools who buy their non-existent product.

    10. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by tehlinux · · Score: 1

      Yep, they won't put you on a watchlist without a good reason...

      --
      Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    11. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Falos · · Score: 1

      > is enabling terrorist activity
      This is a meaningless phrase they'll throw at anything.

      See also: Think Of The Children

    12. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I go to the store and see those homeless guys selling copies of the "Real Change" newspaper, I feel like explaining to them that I haven't had an actual dollar in my pocket for, like, a month.

    13. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you don't know what a pyramid scheme is, or you're lying about what it is. Which is it?

    14. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by lgw · · Score: 1

      Every time I see those guys I point to the "Help Wanted" sign hanging in the store window.

      But I like cash, for the casual anonymity.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only morons buy from Newegg. They have far worse prices, selection and customer service than Amazon.

    16. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early joiners payed less computing power for a bitcoin that is now worth as much as the newer ones. The inflation in the computing power cost comes from more miners joining in and a regulation of the rate bitcoins are created at. So if you want your early 2$ of electricity bitcoin to be worth more, you have to get gullible people to mine. That's getting money from enrolling new people, aka a pyramid scheme.

    17. Re: No more bitcoins for regular Joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people who invest early, before a stock starts to increase in price, make more money than those who invest late, after the stock has already stated to rise.

      Don't mean it's a pyramid scam.

  2. As a Market Lover by artlu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find the emergence of bitcoin and other virtual currencies alarming. We have "free markets," that are governed by some type of ruling bodies be it the IMF or the Fed (not a government entity, for those that didn't know). However, the acceptance of an unregulated currency is strife with the ability for fraud and manipulation. However, as a stock trader (see my blog The Market is not Random), the emergence of these currencies that trade on pure technical patterns is something that must be embraced if it becomes publicly accepted.

    I just hope it does not become publicly accepted. Can someone help convince me that bitcoin is the way to go?

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:As a Market Lover by Forgefather · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm like you in that I don't like the idea of a self regulated currency, but I don't find Bitcoin to be a problem because I have always looked at it as an investment similar to a stock or a bond. When you buy a Bitcoin you are buying the chance that they will become more valuable in the future. Funny enough the people who have made the most money from Bitcoin are the exchange traders and early adopters.

      I think as long as you look at Bitcoin as a commodity and transactions like a barter or trade system then there isn't much of a problem when both parties understand that they are trading in goods not currency. As far as an actual currency it is far too volatile. You can't have a currency that changes value significantly in the time it takes to get to the grocery store.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    2. Re:As a Market Lover by artlu · · Score: 1

      I don't see a digitally created currency the same way as I would view a commodity such as gold or oil. The creation itself seems troubled with the possibility of fraud. The unregulated trading of the currency is also open to fraud. As someone who was charged with fraud and conspiracy, it alarms me.

      --
      -------
      artlu.net
    3. Re:As a Market Lover by genghisjahn · · Score: 4, Funny

      We should stay with current systems that keep us safe from all fraud and irregularities.

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
    4. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The IMF, the Fed, the BoE (etc) may all be officially independent but this independence is a farce for at least two reasons:
      i) the buy government 'assets'
      ii) they create money (not currency) out of thin air at the behest of the government

      We constantly have this debate. Read: digital records over paper records for finance; digital records over paper records for medicine, digital (publicly auditable!) records for money over the records kept by an old boy's club.

      I don't see how digital currency is mechanically worse than the playground joke that is modern money.

      I get that social impacts of the inaccessible digital currency in essentially analogue worlds for the majority of the population of the world are completely misunderstood, but that is a separate question.

    5. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that - for big portions of the modern economy - money is a traded 'commodity'.

    6. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naive. What about our friends who actively manipulated the currency markets? Their fraud is way harder to prove (even!) than the theft of a BitCoin.

    7. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fraud - they've just added a new app called "OpenBazaar" that adds consumer protection. The funds are held in escrow until either (A) both seller and buyer agree the deal is done, or (B) the escrow investigates the dispute and makes a ruling (like PayPal or VISA). More advanced forms of consumer protection are forthcoming, all opt-in and competing with one another.

      Manipulation - this will have to go down naturally as market depth increases. There is unfortunately no way to prevent manipulation entirely, because any entity in charge of the market would itself be subjected to regulatory capture (a form of manipulation). So it can't be perfect, but only has to be better than Fed(President(Electoral College(Plurality vote(Public opinion)))). There is a lot of room for manipulation in each step of that function.

      For further convincing, please ask r/Bitcoin or BitcoinTalk.

    8. Re:As a Market Lover by itzly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your sarcasm meter needs adjusting.

    9. Re:As a Market Lover by genghisjahn · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know that BTC will ultimately prove to be the way to go, but I do think something like that will catch on in a big way. If you haven't seen it, Andreas M. Antonopoulos's video about BitCoin is pretty informative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
    10. Re:As a Market Lover by grnbrg · · Score: 0

      The creation itself seems troubled with the possibility of fraud.

      Do some reading. Bitcoin is absolutely uncounterfeitable.

      Unfortunately, there have been more than a few fraudulent exchanges, which has more to do with the involvement of amateurs than anything else. The marketplace is improving fast.

    11. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (same anonymous coward)
      Sorry, accepted. Apologies to GenghisJahn who makes a good point, and thanks to itzly.

    12. Re:As a Market Lover by artlu · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't believe that it is absolutely uncountefeitable. I did read the Wiki on it, but I don't think that any item digitally-based is safe. We are on /. after all ;)

      --
      -------
      artlu.net
    13. Re:As a Market Lover by itzly · · Score: 1

      Your money in the bank is also digitally based. And the very popular credit cards are based on secret numbers that are plainly printed on a piece of plastic that we carelessly hand to strangers.

    14. Re:As a Market Lover by artlu · · Score: 2

      yet, the money in the bank is subject to federal depository insurance, and the credit cards have measures in place for fraud.

      --
      -------
      artlu.net
    15. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is designed so that there is really no middle ground between becoming completely worthless and becoming The World Currency. Seeing as it hasn't been broken yet, I tend to think it won't be any time soon and in time will become The World Currency, eating out all others. Oh and if that happens it will be an economic catastrophe. It would turn the world upside down and in Satoshi-s vision improve world economy in the long run. Both of these things are by design, if you read some of the Satoshi-s original papers its pretty clear that bitcoin was designed to essentially be an economic doomsday device. It will decimate infationary economic model if bitcoin ever becomes truly widespread. And unless bitcoin is broken on technology side before that happens(doesn't seem likely so far) then world cannot help but embrace bitcoin.
      It's hard to imagine a future where bitcoin is the only currency, so im not saying if it's Good or Bad, but unless someone manages to break bitcoin, it will happen, just a matter of time.

    16. Re:As a Market Lover by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      You can't have a currency that changes value significantly in the time it takes to get to the grocery store.

      Agreed, but the hope/expectation is that as the user base grows, the valuation will become less volatile, making it more useful as a currency.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    17. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think as long as you look at Bitcoin as a commodity and transactions like a barter or trade system then there isn't much of a problem when both parties understand that they are trading in goods not currency.

      Currency needs to deflate (gradually, of course) or people will horde it instead of invest it. Basic macroeconomics.

    18. Re:As a Market Lover by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      You have it backwards. Inflation keeps people from hoarding, not deflation.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    19. Re:As a Market Lover by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The thing that scares me about Bitcoin is that a significant portion of the total bitcoins that can exist are out of circulation in a few private, anonymous, hands. One of these early adopters could easily crash the whole market, now, or just as easily in a possible future where bitcoin is a major currency.

      Governments can crash their currencies but they have a pretty big incentive not to. Bitcoin, no matter how big it gets, could crash just because anonymous18283@hotmail.com decides he wants to cash out and buy New Zealand.

    20. Re:As a Market Lover by genghisjahn · · Score: 1

      np

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
    21. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the acceptance of an unregulated currency is strife with the ability for fraud and manipulation.

      It's "unregulated" just like cash is "unregulated". Lots of regulations apply to cash and bitcoins. They are hard to enforce and so there is more illegal activity with people using them, but bitcoins are not more unregulated than cash.

    22. Re:As a Market Lover by Holi · · Score: 0

      Exactly, the first million or so bitcoins have never been in circulation, why are the creators just sitting on them?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    23. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OOps. Yeah.

    24. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got the basic statement wrong... and then even the corrected statement is wrong.

      "Currency needs to inflate (gradually, of course) or people will horde it instead of invest it. Basic macroeconomics."
      That is a garbage statement.
      If an INVESTMENT is returning 10% per year (e.g. shares of a good company), people will freely choose to invest in that company, even assuming currency's value is not dropping over time.

      Manipulation of the currency by the US FED is only for one purpose, enriching the wealthy.

    25. Re:As a Market Lover by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Governments can crash their currencies but they have a pretty big incentive not to. Bitcoin, no matter how big it gets, could crash just because anonymous18283@hotmail.com decides he wants to cash out and buy New Zealand.

      Wall Street had every incentive to keep status quo intact, yet they crashed worldwide economy anyway. As long as you'll have markets, you'll have people who "win" and get into position to cause havoc. It's the very carrot/stick combo that drives capitalism and gives it efficiency: if you work hard, you might get to wield the whip rather than yield to it.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:As a Market Lover by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Investments are risky. There are no "sure" bets.

      Therefore, some people will always horde (or save) rather than invest because they are that risk averse. So inflation might encourage them to either invest or spend, because their money loses value if they put it in the attic.

    27. Re:As a Market Lover by exomondo · · Score: 1

      But we have seen GHash hit the 51% mark a few times already...oh but we trust them not to do anything malicious.

    28. Re:As a Market Lover by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      How did you figure my bitcoin handle? And no, I prefer to buy Icelands!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    29. Re:As a Market Lover by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      People horde in both cases.
      Inflation: they horde for the big interest.
      Deflation: they horde to buy "worthy" goods cheaper.

      However I agree that common agreed hypothesis is that they horde more in case of deflation and that that hording hurts the economy more. However: my impression is that this "fear" is overrated.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    30. Re:As a Market Lover by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Inflation: they horde for the big interest.

      Interest rates are typically less than or equal to the rate of inflation when the lender can demand that the principle be redeemed at will. This is the case for savings accounts and the like. This means that hoarding money in a savings account reduces its value over time.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    31. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one thing stopping me from believing Bitcoin will become the new standard is that I cannot see how the U.S. government would ever allow it to take over the dollar. We'd see legislation banning it before then.

    32. Re:As a Market Lover by Forgefather · · Score: 1

      It is very difficult to forge a Bitcoin, and the only only known way (controlling a 50%+ share of the entire pool) can easily be discovered. If it is discovered that Bitcoins are being forged then the value tanks and the people who were forging them lose big money so I think its fairly safe on that front. Certainly less likely that the banking industry crashing the economy again.

      As for treating it like a commodity there is a very good reason for that as well because just like gold Bitcoin has no inherent value other than what we give it. Just like gold has uses in industry Bitcoin has fringe uses in driving anonymous transactions but the majority of all use is hoarding. I'm not saying that you use it like gold to shore up your investment portfolio with safe bets, but to look at it like an investment option which derives its value from belief that it has value (similar to currency which I feel is where the confusion on how to classify it comes from).

      Invest in BTC like you would in any other volatile stock.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    33. Re:As a Market Lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Study some economic theory. Deflationary currencies always result in hording due to supply and demand. you know your > will by more tomorrow than today, so better to keep and buy tomorrow. Inflationary currencies are the reverse. And, since modern economies are mainly consumer spending, if everyone went into mass saving mode, the economy would tank.

    34. Re:As a Market Lover by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No, saving accounts are usually above inflation and interest for credits is even higher.
      However regular accounts, giro accounts for money transfer, have very low interests and often very high ones if you overdraw them. So bottom line, this is true This means that hoarding money in a savings account reduces its value over time. if you do not pay attention to your money.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    35. Re:As a Market Lover by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      See my other answer: on the other hand the "published" official inflation is often "wrong" and not the perceived inflation the population has, so hording money for interest is quite often pointless.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    36. Re: As a Market Lover by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I don't believe you. Please provide a link to a savings account that you can immediately withdraw from without penalty that also higher interest than inflation.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    37. Re: As a Market Lover by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess we have a "mismatch in terminology" and probably in what you wrote.

      You never said: "saving account" where you can "withdraw immediately without penalty".

      On the other hand: all my accounts have a higher interest than inflation.

      http://vb-ka.de/ my bank ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    38. Re: As a Market Lover by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Where I live, savings accounts are generally in the category of "withdraw immediately without penalty". And, as a result, the interest rate is at or lower than inflation.

      Anyway, the point is that inflation does not cause people to hoard. Even in your case, where you have an account that has a higher interest rate than inflation, inflation isn't causing you to hoard. You are hoarding in spite of inflation.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    39. Re: As a Market Lover by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I did not say that inflation is a cause to hoard.
      I said: regardless of inflation or deflation in both cases there is reason to hoard. While our parent claimed it is only true during deflation phases.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  3. No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    L2Read people.

    They've signed on with bitpay.

    That's not the same thing as "accepting bitcoin as payment". They're accepting good ol' Yankee Greenbacks as payment, and simply allowing a third party to convert binary monopoly money into US Dollars. The fact that they're doing it this way, and don't want to have even a single bitcoin themselves, shows exactly how averse they are to the whole scam.

    This is just more libertarian fluff crap from people who don't understand currency or economics, just vomiting up stuff from the latest "end the fed" newsletter. Until there is a microsoft corporate bitcoin wallet that you can perform transactions on, they're not "accepting bitcoin as payment". Quit the hype.

    1. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they are not accepting greenbacks, nor do most vendors. They accept 1s and 0s, which we all pretend are the same as actual physical greenbacks.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by itzly · · Score: 1

      And with "physical" you are referring to little pieces of paper with green ink stamped on them ?

    3. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you are being silly, most dollars in existence are data in federal reserve bank computers, physical currency a small fraction

    4. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I accept Euros as payment for my services, and I convert them directly to UKP because I don't have a Euro account. This occurs at my bank in between the client paying and me receiving the money. That doesn't mean I don't "accept Euros as payment", and only an idiot would suggest it does, since I manifestly do accept Euros as payment. L2Think.

    5. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you quote a price in Euros and stand by it if the value of the Euro fluctuates then you can say you accept Euros... but it seems this is not the case here. It'd seem MS quotes the price of whatever you're buying according to BitPay's conversion rate at the instant the payment is done. ... So MS is accepting bitcoin as a form of payment but not as a form of currency.

    6. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft doesn't quote the price or accept payment in bitcoin, they quote in dollars and let you decide if you want to convert some other currency to dollars in order to make the purchase.

    7. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by Holi · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I have yet to walk into a store and have them refuse my actual dollars.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    8. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four quarters isn't the same as a dollar? A personal check drawn on a US bank doesn't count as paying in dollars?

    9. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

      Essentially *all* Dollars, in a computer or in paper, are just representations of debt. When the Federal Reserve issues paper money, it's backed by Treasury bonds and mortgages. When banks make loans, the loan check is backed by the loan they just made.

    10. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by Empiric · · Score: 1

      Or more insidiously, backed by the loan they just made to some other guy.

      So, essentially the proposition is that one can pay back principal plus interest with the assets of existing principal, considered on the level of the financial system as a whole.

      While it is a remarkably convenient system by which the banks can steal the added value of all human productivity gains, it remains the case that P + I != P, and inability to repay loans is inevitable. But by then, of course, the banks have the actual gains from imaginary value loaned, and it's time to blame the victim.

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    11. Re:No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Of course they subcontract the actual BTC processing to someone else. That's not the point. The point is that they deemed the demand sufficient to warrant doing something like that in the first place, and to make a public announcement about it.

  4. with bitpay, everyone can accept bitcoins by schlachter · · Score: 2

    With 3rd party services like BitPay, everyone can update their services/site to accept BitCoin with no additional risk, right? No real risk, yet, big political statement.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  5. This explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Steve Ballmer IS Satoshi Nakamoto!

    1. Re:This explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean: Satya Nadella is Satoshi Nakamoto

  6. No "Political Statement" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The only statement here is that fools and their money are easily parted, and not quickly enough.
    Microsoft has simply found another way to extract money from people who don't have ACTUAL money.

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:No "Political Statement" here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh c'mon man. You're really spinning it. I'm sure you wouldn't say that ("another way to extract money from people") if we were talking about Linux Foundation here.

  7. The Worry Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the whole sodden sytem to be "cracked". Sooner or later, someone is going to figure out a way to ruin BItcoin trading. Because of this, cryptocurrencies are not to be trusted. Bitcoin and Dogecoin and the rest of these cryptocurrencies are popular with people who dislike regulation. Without regulation you have chaos, theft, cracking attempts, a system that can never be fully trusted.

    1. Re:The Worry Exists by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like crypto currencies like Dogecoin because it allows websites and games to trade in fractions of cents, which would be impossible with standard payment methods that charge cents in trading fees.

      As an example, here's a game that will allow plays to trade Dogecoin for in-game services and goods:
      https://www.universeprojects.c...

    2. Re:The Worry Exists by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      A way to ruin it besides the exchanges breaking themselves?

      The concept of "cryptocurrency" is still fairly new. Maybe there lurks some kind of deficiency which we are not aware of right now, but which some smart guy will discover one day. Of course, we can't use any kind of system if we constantly worry about some flaw which isn't even known to exist. But it's good to think about this stuff every now and then.

    3. Re:The Worry Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead you're going to fully trust the guys who bailed out banks and left the average person in a mountain of debt.

    4. Re:The Worry Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a function of Dogecoin's popularity, not an underlying technology difference from Bitcoin. If/when it catches on, that benefit vanishes like it did for Bitcoin. If you're just using it as a payment system but storing your labor elsewhere, you might as well use a third-party payment processor like ChangeTip or ApplePay.

      In-game servers could use Open Transactions for auditability while still keeping fees low.

    5. Re:The Worry Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really just sounds like you want to abstract away microtransactions to such a small amount people don't even think twice about spending the money. Then you bury them in fractional cent transactions.

    6. Re:The Worry Exists by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with that? Even if you bury them in Dogecoin transactions, they're only worth 0.00021$USD as of this writing. So you'd need to be charged 48 whole Dogecoins before hitting one cent. If a website I like reading every day charged me 1 Dogecoin per day in subscription fees I wouldn't mind if it helped them.

      I know you'll say it isn't much, but web hosting really doesn't cost much unless you have millions of visitors every day.

      Let's say your Web hosting costs 10$USD per month. Let's also assume you charge 1 Dogecoin per day per user, at an average of 30 days per month.
      10.00$ / 30 = 0.34$ per day
      0.34$ / 0.00021$ = 1620 users

      That's the break-even cost for what I consider expensive Web hosting (I pay under 10$ per month). Any users above 1620 means (tiny) profits which you can then re-invest in other Dogecoin-accepting Websites, games and services.

      There's transaction fees for trading Dogecoins of course, let's assume 1 Dogecoin to be on the safe side. So you make your users pay every month instead of every day. That means 31 Dogecoins per month per user, or 0.00651$ per user. That's not even one cent per month, with the transaction fees.

      And as a user, even if you pay for a one-month subscription and decide it wasn't worth it after a few days and there's a "no refunds" policy in place, it won't matter to you since you haven't even lost one whole cent in the process.

  8. the future of websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be the wave of the future sites like www.stldiesel.com are the future of business online.

  9. blood by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

    I read this as "microsoft quietly starts accepting blood as payment". Need morning blood coffee!

  10. Until 60 percent of the market... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is under the control of a Cartel, and then the possibility exists to 'fork' the bitchain and take over that other 40 percent of coins.

    Go look at the pie charts of bitcoin mining. The potential is already there.

    1. Re:Until 60 percent of the market... by itzly · · Score: 2

      When that happens, bitcoins become worthless, and that 40% becomes nothing. So, while in theory that's possible, who would be stupid enough to actually do it, if instead they could just be mining 25 btc every 15 minutes ?

    2. Re:Until 60 percent of the market... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if their goal isn't to get rich (perhaps because they already are), but because they have a vested interest in ruining the Bitcoin system?

  11. The Worry Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A way to ruin it besides the exchanges breaking themselves? Because the systems are borderline unusable as they are.

    If you are late to the party, there really is no point in participating on the bitcoin speculatory game. It makes for great comedy though.

  12. Wrong again, bob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you never have any Euros, you're not accepting them for payment.
    You're allowing a third party, the bank, to do a conversion for you.

    1. Re:Wrong again, bob. by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Pedantry at its finest.

      It's like saying "nobody accepts credit cards" because your credit card processor deposits USD in your bank.

    2. Re:Wrong again, bob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft accepts hay for payment. I need to take my hay to a hay "processor" that gives me dollars and then Microsoft takes the dollars. Cool, I can buy Windows with hay now.

    3. Re:Wrong again, bob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the hay processor sends the money to Microsoft, then yes, Microsoft would accept hay as payment.

  13. Re: No. They are NOT accepting bitcoin for payment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft almost certainly subcontracts the processing of credit cards to a third party merchant account or nexus. So they're subcontracting to a third party who specializes in converting bitcoins to dollars, and already has the infrastructure in place to do it. What's the difference?

  14. Bitcoin 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin 2.0 will be completely decentralized and you should be able to do direct exchanges with people without having to connect online.

    1. Re:Bitcoin 2.0 by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I believe you can already do this by using physical Bitcoins.

  15. Kim Dotcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US dollar already bought New Zealand, THAT should scare you.

  16. Centrally regulated vs self-regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fiat money is centrally regulated by groups of people, and are therefore easily manipulable (History is full of example, and recent quantative easing, etc are proof enough also).

    Bitcoin is like gold: the total amount available is regulated by no one.

    Note that "gold-standard" money (i.e. money convertible for a given amount of gold) is regulated by a group of people (the one that says the amount of gold), and is therefore easily manipulable as well. History showed us that too.

    So, the way I understand it, bitcoin is as good as gold with the actual convenience factor of being digital.

  17. Re: Bitcoin by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

    > I just hope it does not become publicly accepted. Can someone help convince me that bitcoin is the way to go?

    Modern money, like the US Dollar, is just how we keep track of who owes something to others, or is owed something. Mostly the tracking is via bank ledgers, but occasionally it is on paper (as in paper money). Almost every dollar in existence represents a debt, either treasury bonds, mortgages, or other bank loans. Dollars make the debt easily traded in convenient units.

    Bitcoin also uses a ledger to keep track. It's a public distributed one, but rather than being based on debt, it's based on work. All the balances are positive. This discourages a government from spending money it doesn't have, and banks from leeching off the rest of us, earning money simply because they create debt, instead of actual work.

    Central banks have shown time and time again that they are bad at managing their money supply. Venezuela and Russia are two current examples, but there are literally hundreds of examples through history. Bitcoin's supply is managed by a software algorithm that releases new units at a known rate. It is on automatic pilot rather than the whim of fallible humans. I trust that more.

  18. Re: Bitcoin creation by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

    > I don't believe that it is absolutely uncountefeitable. I did read the Wiki on it, but I don't think that any item digitally-based is safe. We are on /. after all ;)

    Then you don't understand the central invention in bitcoin, an accounting ledger that is public and cannot be altered. In order to counterfeit some bitcoins, you would have insert a transaction into everyone's copy of the ledger, and also have a valid checksum (hash). Without it, every copy of the software will reject the data as invalid. The huge amount of specialized hardware thrown at generating valid hashes prevents anyone else from inserting a spurious one.

  19. Anybody smart is using BitPay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, Microsoft is smart enough to accept bitcoins, not stupid enough to keep them.

  20. Re: Bitcoin creation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, do you remember that time someone exploited a bug to make themselves 9 billion bitcoins, and they had to roll their entire worthless economy back a day to fix it?
    Of course you don't, you blithering moron. No one in the bitcoin world knows anything about bitcoin.

  21. Re: Bitcoin creation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citation?

  22. Re: Bitcoin creation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straw man.

    That's when the network was tiny and the software was new and unproven; it was fixed and undone without any real detriment.

    Nothing like that has occurred since, even though the Bitcoin ecosystem is now worth billions of dollars and is thus a juicy target for attack. I mean, it's since been nearly half a decade of continuous operation in managing billions of dollars of assets!

    It boggles the mind that you are not impressed.

    The next worst case happened in March of 2013, when an update essentially made an inadvertent change to the protocol, causing an unplanned "hard fork" of the blockhain. Here's an article about it. It's a fascinating read; it certainly provides some insight into what a hard fork looks like: As is supposed to be the case, the network is defined by those who wield the most computation.

    Bitcoin is solid. It is founded on the mathematics that define this universe, decades-old proven cryptography, and software that has been under more scrutiny than anything else in the history of computing.

  23. As Usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual in every 'X Accepts Bitcoins!' post, Microsoft isn't touching BTC at all. They're taking real world money from BitPay, who are acting as a payment processor and currency exchange.

    No company in their right mind will actually accept bitcoin, given the volatility, legal issues, and absolutely vast fraud that makes up the 'market'.