Slashdot Mirror


Snowden Leaks Prompt Internet Users Worldwide To Protect Their Data

Lucas123 writes: A new international survey of internet users from 24 countries has found that more than 39% of them have taken steps to protect their data since Edward Snowden leaked the NSA's spying practices. The survey, conducted by the Center for International Governance Innovation, found that 43% of Internet users now avoid certain websites and applications and 39% change their passwords regularly. Security expert Bruce Schneier chastised the media for trying to downplay the numbers by saying "only" 39%" have taken action and "only 60%" have heard of Snowden. The news articles, "are completely misunderstanding the data," Schneier said, pointing out that by combining data on Internet penetration with data from the international survey, it works out to 706 million people who are now taking steps to protect their online data. Additionally, two-thirds (64%) of users indicated they are more concerned today about online privacy than they were a year ago. Another notable finding: 83% of users believe that affordable access to the Internet should be a basic human right.

53 comments

  1. So all those must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...terrorists. They have something to hide! Quick, stop closing down Gitmo! It needs to be expanded! How are so many going to fit in there??? And also, we need more of those "waterboards" for the prisoners. I've heard that's what they eat.

    1. Re:So all those must be... by MobSwatter · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other news the NSA has declared that 43% of Anonymous Coward's are terrorist's and have now been added to no fly lists. You have now reasonable expectation to privacy because da gubbermint has been breading stupidity for so long, the people do not know what is best for them, big thanks to Hitler for your salvation.

      The CIA has added waterboarding as a sport like wakeboarding, snowboarding, surfing etc.

    2. Re:So all those must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know me and you never will. My life is not found online nor is any of my history. Fuck your shitty world.

    3. Re:So all those must be... by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      It's just 'Karma', you know ;). I do not agree with what is going on with these clowns, in fact, no reasonable expectation to privacy en mass is unhealthy, they are effectively lining people up to buy Prozac from big pharma. Just another case of the government feeding a line of paranoid bullshit to the people with hidden objectives, and it always turns out to be about money.

    4. Re:So all those must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... In other news the NSA has declared that 43% of Anonymous Coward's are terrorists ...

      Actually it's 42.99999999956812%

      I ain't a teruhlist !

  2. If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!



    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!



    HAA HAA HAA HAA HAA HAA HAA!!!!!!

    Oh God, that was funny! *SNORT*.

    I'll let you in on a secret (*snicker*):

    If you're on the web, you're walking down the street shouting your secrets to the world.

    The way to keep your privacy is to keep your mouth shut.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      there's a lot more to 'the internet' than port 80 and 443, my friend.

      most of us don't care so much about port 80.

      we DO care about email and voip, though. there used to be the concept of privacy and security there (more or less) but now, the cat is out of the bag and all data is now sniffable and loggable.

      (I wonder if you are done with your childish laughing attack?)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking a little silly now :)

    3. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet you seriously thought that the port or network protocol ever made a shred of difference?

    4. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      No, it's because you say things like "YESSH!!!!", "I got modded Troll!", "Boooyahh!", "*Really*?", "Did you Facebook fanbois actually read what I posted,", "did your lips get tired after the first sentence?", "No troll here folks." and "Just the truth.".

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      most of us don't care so much about port 80.

      Who is "us"? Most internet users care very much about port 80, not that they even know it. Most of them do pretty much everything through their browser.

      (I wonder if you are done with your childish laughing attack?)

      I started having one when you suggested that most of us don't care about port 80. Welcome to slashdot, you must never have been here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!

      HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!

      HAA HAA HAA HAA HAA HAA HAA!!!!!!

      Oh God, that was funny! *SNORT*.

      I'll let you in on a secret (*snicker*):

      See that happens when they legalize grass?

      Doooood - don't worry man! It's all okay. Here, have some Doritos..

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      YESSH!!!! I got modded Troll! Boooyahh! *Really*? Did you Facebook fanbois actually read what I posted, or did your lips get tired after the first sentence? No troll here folks. Just the truth.

      I originally thought you were baked. Now I see it's waaay too many espresso's. You ain't supposed to drink a whole potfull of them like youur halfcaf regular coffee!.

      Yes, there is no anonymity on the intertoobZ. You don't need to get your dander up over it. I really don't give a flying fuck if dah guvmintz know I'm buying some dried chipotle peppers online, or even looking at some fine milfs on occasion.

      And if someone doesn't want to have the world know about their Mexican vacation and their "Donkey Encounter", well, then maybe they shouldn't put that online.

      You just don't have to crash into the room yelling and screaming like somone with a big dark secret among the visigoths.

      Dr Olsoc prescribes a good night's sleep, and less legal stimulants.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      No troll here folks. Just the truth.

      Surprisingly, it can actually be both.

      Congratulations, you succeeded at Troll Truthiness.

      You must be proud.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      most of us don't care so much about port 80.

      But ... but ... port 80 is where they keep most of the porn.

      We certainly do care. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:If "Steps" are Facebook Privacy Controls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're on the web, you're walking down the street shouting your secrets to the world.
      The way to keep your privacy is to keep your mouth shut.

      That's nice, how about land line phone calls and postal service is that shouting too. Deep packet inspection for the win, "Bend over citizen and do your duty."

  3. A New Year's Resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine is to implement, test, and deploy my own distributed storage for me and my friends. I'm looking at tahoe-lafs and ceph right now. Ceph seems "enterprisey" and heavy but I haven't finished my evaluation yet. I'm looking specifically for something that will run on cheapie NAS devices. Any other storage schemes worthy of consideration?

    1. Re:A New Year's Resolution by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Smoke signals using Morse code.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    2. Re:A New Year's Resolution by MobSwatter · · Score: 2

      As far as I know, they might not be able to decode that on the fly without digging up some older (and probably more sane) staff.

  4. Changing passwords regularly by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0

    From the most common hacked password (password) to the second most common password (death)

    Or using their cat's name, found in all their FB pics, instead of their dog's name (same thing).

    Yeah, that will do it.

    Not.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Changing passwords regularly by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      We're going to spend more effort on security now.

      The new password: S-o-n-y

    2. Re:Changing passwords regularly by currently_awake · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you want a password that nobody will guess, try "Microsoft", because nobody associates that name with security.

    3. Re:Changing passwords regularly by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Linux would be much less secure with only 5 characters.

  5. Dubious About This Survey by jratcliffe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some really odd responses in here, that make me question the honestly of the responses. For example, on 35% of Chinese respondents believe their government restricts access to the Internet?

    Secondly, on the Snowden question, the question calls out for a "yes, I have" response. People don't want to admit to surveyors that they don't know something, so a good study will actually test whether they actually know about Snowden, or are just not willing to admit ignorance.

    Finally, it doesn't say what the "steps" people took actually are, so it's very hard to say what impact Snowden's actually had.

    There is a section asking about what people are doing differently on the net vs. last year (changed password, not go to certain sites, etc. etc.), but that was asked of all respondents, not just those who say they know of Snowden, so there's no output on what specific changes people made. Would be interesting to see the responses to that question separated between those who know of Snowden, and those who don't.

    1. Re:Dubious About This Survey by RobbieCrash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At this point, does it really matter if people are simply taking steps to hide their Facebook posts, or if they're starting to PGP sign their emails?

      People are starting to do something; starting to feel that it's important enough to do something. That's a positive step, each subsequent story makes them think "Oh, maybe I should do this thing more often, or keep these posts private." That increases the overall digital literacy, for lack of a better term, with each subsequent generation doing better than the past. Most people now know not to emails from strangers with attachments, if not most then certainly a lot more than did 5 years ago. Same goes for password practices, people know they should do better at them regardless of if they do or not.

      Eventually people will, or services will do it for them, encrypt their phones, they'll put a half decent password on things, etc. It's just not going to happen overnight. We should be encouraging any little steps people take, not deriding them for not doing enough.

      --
      Keep on knockin'
      https://robbiecrash.me
    2. Re:Dubious About This Survey by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Many Chinese people see their government's censorship of the internet as protecting them from bad or even criminal activity. You probably wouldn't say that the police "restrict" your ability to commit crime, but rather they protect you from it.

      It sounds like the question was poorly worded.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Dubious About This Survey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some really odd responses in here, that make me question the honestly of the responses. For example, on 35% of Chinese respondents believe their government restricts access to the Internet?

      How many times a day or week do you find yourself being blocked by the corporate web filter?

      Considering the average Chinese citizens surfing habits, this response might make sense when you consider the filters that likely exist in your life today and how often they truly interfere.

    4. Re:Dubious About This Survey by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Many Chinese people see their government's censorship of the internet as protecting them from bad or even criminal activity. You probably wouldn't say that the police "restrict" your ability to commit crime, but rather they protect you from it.

      Many American people see their government's tapping of the internet as protecting them from bad or even terrorist activity. You probably wouldn't say the NSA "restrict" your civil liberties, but rather they protect you (and the rest of the world) from them.

      One set of brainwashed people who believe the lies of their government is pretty much indistinguishable from another.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. There is no privacy. Good luck... by djfuq · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In this day and age there is no protection. Look at a live threat map and see whats happening day in and day out - countries are attacking the United States as a target and the United States in attacking itself. Its clear the genie is out of the bottle and nothing you can do, no matter what OS you use will protect you if you connect to the internet. Its time to be aware and the best defense is to remove all ingress points entirely... if you have something to hide, stop being insecure and let it all hang out if you are on the web and own your data publicly - chances are you arent into kiddie porn and you arent a murderer or a credit card thief, and more likely than not, especially if you are reading this, you need to be connected to the net 24/7 - SO, LET IT ALL HANG OUT AND SHOW THE WORLD YOU ARE LIKE EVERYONE ELSE AND YOUR VICES, INTERESTS AND INTELLIGENCE IS NOT INTERESTING OR UNIQUE! BARE IT ALL SO WE CAN BE COUNTED AND BOLDLY FEARLESS OF YOUR DATA! (um yeah srsly lolz) ;-)
    -DJfuQ

    --
    Dj fuQ [url="http://djfuq.org"]djfuq urges you to listen to the beats[/url] [url="http://djfuq.org"]http://djfuq.org[
  7. Before believing these numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    compare their 'concerns' with the kind of people they elect into office that take away all our privacy. I bet you will find large discrepancies. In other words, the whole lot of them can piss off! These stupid polls are garbage! They are a fantasy that doesn't exist outside the reader's head.

  8. chastised the media... for what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't Schneier know who the 'media' works for? As the government's watchdog it is only doing its job in protecting their interests.

  9. Entropy will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... have it's way. People keep forgetting they are just masses that require energy to move and the human mind has no evolved defense against tech that was just invented in recent history.

  10. Reliability of questionnaires by ciaran2014 · · Score: 2

    > 39% change their passwords regularly

    Am I the only one who finds that hard to believe?

    (And for how many website accounts do they do this?)

    --
    Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
    1. Re:Reliability of questionnaires by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Well, they're counting changing the password from "GoBadgers1" to "GoBadgers2".

  11. The main point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    64% of users thing changing passwords will keep them secure.

  12. Ministry of (dis-)Information by storkus · · Score: 1

    Security expert Bruce Schneier chastised the media for trying to downplay the numbers...

    Oh, come on, he doesn't really believe they aren't just a mouthpiece, or at least heavily controlled, does he?

  13. s/right/privilege/; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Another notable finding: 83% of users believe that affordable access to the Internet should be a basic human right.

    If you want something and someone else has to provide it to you then it cannot possibly be a right - at best it can be a privilege. Now affordable access to the Internet might be a privilege that the government is not allowed to deny an individual.

    Think of it this way: you may have a right to freedom of the press, but that does not mean that someone must provide to you a newspaper for you to print your opinion. If you want newspaper space then you get to pay for it - either by purchasing the space from someone with a newspaper or by purchasing/building your own newspaper. If you purchase space in someone's newspaper then they are allowing you the privilege to excercise your right in their forum.

    FTFY

  14. STARTTLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if its only to turn on 'requires encryption' on their email connection its enough. Realize that its not *HOW MANY* but more *WHO* among us does the changes. It doesn't take 100% of us to take steps, it only requires the small minority who code/configure for a living to take steps.

    Even if it was simply to delete 'Skype' and avoid buying that DropBox account you were eyeing (both part of PRISM surveillance), then that is a step in the right direction.
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Prism_slide_5.jpg

    I also ditched Google as far as was possible, and am looking for an Android device without the Google spyware part. As the tech becomes available, and I need to upgrade, so I will switch.

  15. Be that as it may by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden did us a service. And in return we let him sit and rot.

    Damn thankful lot WE are.

  16. Be that as it may by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Snowden have a Paypal, maildrop, email, message system ?

    It would be nice to have a way of sending him some pocket change to make his life abroad more confortable.

    And show a vote of appreciation, for show how much our government thinks of the Constitution, legal system and our people.

    I am not talking about text messages (no reason to have a junk folder full of crazy death threats) more of a slashdot poll.

    a) thank you, I hope you get to return to the US someday
    b) thank you, but you better apply for Russian citizenship
    c) thank you, but return to the USA, We have people that want to talk to you
    d) you traitor, welcome to gitmo
    e) burn baby burn
    f) tell them Cowboy Neal made you do it.

  17. Allowable limit exceeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have made 3 incorrect attempts, with your fat fingers, at your password.

    Reset Password?

  18. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in a very conservative environment and would get fired instantly for my various porn fetishes (none of which are illegal). It must be nice to have a life free of surrounding judgmental assholes. Congratulations.

    CAPTCHA: unhappy

  19. So .. if I mug 1000 people by johnlcallaway · · Score: 0

    And then a minority of people decide to better protect their money, it's OK??? Even though most people already know to protect their money and stay out of bad neighborhoods??

    What a moronic argument. He broke the law, ran like a coward, was basically a traitor who thought he, and he alone, knew best. And was willing to coerce his fellow employees to break the law along with him.

    Extradite him, try him, hopefully toss his cowardly traitorous ass in jail.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:So .. if I mug 1000 people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another NSA shill account. Are you cold Fjord?

      Either way, *you* are a traitor and a brown-noser of the jackbooted thugs. Snowden is a patriotic hero in the true sense.

  20. privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the internet is DESIGNED without privacy. Only a fool believes there is ANY privacy of their personal data ensured by their use of the internet. The biggest abusers of making personal data even more public are Facebook and Google, who shamelessly make most of their revenue by repackaging and reselling your personal information. Until someone stops the big corporations from misusing your data, your "private" data will continue to fund internet profit centers.

  21. Fuck sNOwden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world is not a nicer place since he went off on his own and decided to put 300 million American lives at risk and supplying our enemies with everything they could desire, the keys to the kingdom.

    FUCK THAT ASSHOLE

    1. Re:Fuck sNOwden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -5 Weak troll.

    2. Re:Fuck sNOwden by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      There are those that understand the meaning behind the Civil War/WWI/WWII. Unfortunately, you are not one of them.

  22. Gone Incognito by TechWhizIncorperated · · Score: 1

    I have been using incognito browser for the past 2 years now, it helps against data mining and doesn't collect history or save cookies on the site. I found this method effective if you want some of security without paying a lot of money for real heavy duty sites like Tor. Or what I believe to be ineffective methods like free online proxy's witch limits your functionality in browsers.

    1. Re:Gone Incognito by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that Chrome is a Google creation, and that they are one of the largest collectors of your data (as in the search bar in the top left of your browser..) and that if you weren't 'incognito', than you'd probably still be forking over your search queries to a google server.

                And as for the cookies and history, most browsers can be configured to do the exact same. It's easy at least in Firefox.

                With a Tor network, its easy to corrupt by just owning enough of the nodes that your packet travels through. Than its just a matter of comparing timestamps and tracing the requests.

      I'm sorry, but even using a Tor network will gain you some unwanted attention. Its like driving an armored tank down D.C just because its not inherently illegal.

  23. I've secured my desktop by ozduo · · Score: 0

    By wrapping it in tinfoil!

    --
    I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.