Slashdot Mirror


ODF Support In Google Drive

An anonymous reader writes: Google's Chris DiBona told a London conference last week that ODF support was coming next year, but today the Google Drive team unexpectedly launched support for all three of the main variants — including long-absent Presentation files. You can now simply open ODT, ODS and ODP files in Drive with no fuss. It lacks support for comments and changes but at least it shows progress towards full support of the international document standard, something conspicuously missing for many years.

40 comments

  1. Re: who needs comments by WayneWinquist · · Score: 1

    Professors, that's who...

  2. Re:who needs comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People who are working on the same content, and doing revisions in cycle, writing a book chapter... (I just did this Monday)

    Git/etc do NOT work for the type of work you do editing papers/books/etc

  3. International document standard? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 0, Troll

    Great.. I heard of this. I can't really say I've ever seen it.

    Apple iWork doesn't have it. The only office format which seems to be standard appears to me Microsoft's and PDF and PDF isn't really a great editing format.

    I recently used LibreOffice and OpenOffice and I was just absolutely amazed at how bad they were. Don't get me wrong, they had gobs of features, they just didn't work well with Windows or Mac and had truly horrible cut and paste support.

    Example, open a PDF file in Acrobat Reader. Copy a section of text (no images) and paste it into LibreOffice. Then select an image and try to paste it in. I can't for the life of me figure out how to insert the image where I want it instead of automatically creating an extra column and having to press enter a bunch of times and manually flow my text past the image.

    It's just absolute shit. Even WordPerfect gets that one right.

    1. Re:International document standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a dumbass.

      LibreOffice's cut and paste function works quite well, when you actually use it to copy and paste from an EDITABLE document format to another EDITABLE document format.

    2. Re:International document standard? by Jdodge99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You seem to be either creating an odd situation on purpose, or getting stuck on one you've come across. When you grab a section of formatted text from a PDF, LibreOffice considers it a unitary chunk -- and tries to keep it together. If you want to break this, or have LibreOffice treat it differently - there's a pretty wide variety of methods to do so:
      First method: grab the bit above your graphic - paste it, then paste your graphic, then paste the text below it.
      Second Method: paste as unformatted text, either by using paste-special "unformatted text" or washing in through notepad. If I want text, not formatting, I habitually wash it through notepad. Open notepad and paste in text, highlight and copy.
      So I'm not sure which part you object to and I don't know what your desired behavior is, but for me LibreOffice's behaviour is very reasonable -- and when I want it to do something different, it's fairly simple to accomplish.

      If you want to point out a real weak point in Libre Writer? Labels. Labels implementation is still (I think) both bad and confusing. I know it is confusing. I wish I had time to look at it and offer to help fix it. For now, I just hope someone else does.

                                                  - Jeff

    3. Re:International document standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if this will work, but what about Foxit?

    4. Re:International document standard? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      LibreOffice isn't intended to be simply a slavish function-by-function replacement for MS Office. Not everything MS Office does is done well.

      Actually, MS Office has some real warts inside. Look at a table in its RTF form and you can see one of the most blatant, as the "table" isn't really a table.

      If you're used to doing things one way, even a superior replacement is likely to offend. Sometimes, eventually, you may come to prefer the new way, though.

      Working with framed objects in LibreOffice is not intuitive. It has more precision of placement and more options (for example, text wrapping/overlay) than a simple "slam-image-here" sort of paste.

      I too, find it irritating when all I want is a brain-dead way of inserting images. But I eventually, I supposed I'll break down and RTFM.

    5. Re: International document standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This statement above us what's wrong with free stuff. Never the fault of the program. Next its the computer than the user.... Etc

    6. Re: International document standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the program could very well be wrong, every program do have bugs. But that could also be an error between the keyboard and the chair, not to uncommon.

      You are saing that if a user tries to use a text editor to edit a JPEG file it is the editors fault that the user fails that? That if a reader rips out pages because he want to turn the pages the other ways it is the books fault, or the book binders book or even the authors?

      The user have to read the instructions when they fail. Because they might try to do stuff in a way not meant to be possible. A way which would be against the philosophy of the design of the program.

  4. Multi column - FAIL by Forget4it · · Score: 1

    I just uploaded an ODT file that has two columns on a single page.
    GDrive, by default, converts it and removes the column formatting.
    Still not as good as OneDrive then.

    Shame on you Google.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make real computers act like the ones in the movies.
    1. Re:Multi column - FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try editing it now in Word online. Hey, where did that second column go. Shame on you, idiot.

  5. This is huge by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have been wishing for ODF support in Google Docs since forever. This one feature is what makes it now really feasible for me to start using the Google office tools - becauses I can then open the documents with a myriad other suites that work with ODF!

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:This is huge by SpzToid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Plus, Microsoft Office just became less relevant and must now play catch up in order to remain competitive.

      This is huge news for the ODF Standard, and for all the municipalities, universities, etc. who must break free of Microsoft Office Lock-in and 'taxes'.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    2. Re:This is huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, Microsoft Office just became less relevant and must now play catch up in order to remain competitive.

      This is huge news for the ODF Standard, and for all the municipalities, universities, etc. who must break free of Microsoft Office Lock-in and 'taxes'.

      True enough but LaTeX is the premier open document standard allowing edits in a basic text editor or a fancy feature-rich point-and-click application. A return to terminal-mode and command-line applications would reduce network traffic even if they were all accessed via a remote SSH session. Don't get me wrong I enjoy reading PDF documents but document creation and reading are different ends of the document producer-consumer spectrum.

    3. Re:This is huge by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Why must it play catch up? MS Office in later versions opens ODF files just fine.

    4. Re:This is huge by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Oh. Thank you for clarifying what I wrote earlier. This is good to know.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    5. Re:This is huge by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Does MS Office save ODF files okay also? Like a round-trip?

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    6. Re:This is huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the version, older versions silently delete formula and replace them with the result on document load newer versions work if without any of the useful extensions. As for why this it, the formula specification was at the time of publishing done as "like lotus 123" by everyone, rather than officially specified, so they could claim compatibility while doing this. This oversight was fixed for ODF 1.2 so new versions had to include working formula support in order to claim compatibility (or lose several very large government contracts).

    7. Re:This is huge by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Latex has it's good and bad points.

      good points
      maintains mental distinction between input and output
      maintains a reasonable level of semantic information
      reliable and reasonablly fast for large documents
      produces really nice typeset output
      handles equations well
      handles captioning and cross-referencing well
      makes a reasonable job at layout before tweaking

      bad points
      only a few image formats work, with traditional latex it's EPS or bust, pdflatex is a bit better but it still pretty limited with PDF being the only vector format supported (which is fun as most pdf creators don't want to create arbitary sized pdfs so you often have to print to pdf then use a seperate tool to remove the borders) and the only bitmap formats supported being png and huffman jpeg (at least in my experiance artimetic coded jpeg doesn't work and gives an unhelpful error message, that caused some head scratching)
      the layout engine is reasonablly smart but not smart enough to get a layout i'm happy with without tweaking and the compile-build-view cycle gets annoying during layout tweaking.
      the whole system feels like hacks built on top of hacks. The parameters to hyperef to avoid ugly boxes don't work in all versions (not sure if they work in the latest now, I certainly remember having to downgrade when working on my thesis because of this). Hyperref links go to the float caption rather than the float itself unless you add another hack package called hypcap but that in turn requires further hackery to work with custom figure types (such as figures placed by the side of the text rather than inline with it..
      table handling leaves a lot to be desired requiring significant manual tweaking for any nontrivial table.
      there are way too many markup sensitive characters, this means that significant editing is often required after pasting in plain text.
      requires running a bunch of tools in the right order and sometimes multiple times to process a document

      Thats my experiance from writing a phd thesis with the thing anyway.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:This is huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too

  6. Exporting? by loosescrews · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did they finally fix exporting as ODF?

  7. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did it take so long in the first place?

  8. Google's Beta by simplypeachy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Features and services may be introduced and withdrawn without notice. Good luck relying on any of them at home or work."

    1. Re:Google's Beta by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Well, almost all the software we pay for has boilerplate EULA that says, "We promise you lots of stuff. But if the software you bought for does not do it, well, tough luck buddy, suck it. Cant sue us". In fact some software actually said, "this software is not fit to do anything. not nuclear reactors definitely".

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  9. Google is very strategic. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Everyone knew as long as MS-Office franchise is delivering money to Microsoft in fire hoses, there is no way anyone can compete with it in *any* sphere. It will sustain losses year after year to deny revenue to the competition. Once the competition folds it has the market for itself. Look how long it was able to sustain losses to gain dominance with XBox franchise. Everyone knew that. Many people had ideas to attack it, but lacked the resources. People with resources, I am looking at you Sun microsystems, lacked the competence to pull it off.

    Google went about it strategically. First it peeled of the low hanging fruit, people who don't need all the bells and whistles of a full suite with Google docs/apps. Then it leveraged the central server doing the edits, to create a collaborative edit features that were well ahead of MsOffice when it was introduced. Priced it cheap, pitched it to the enterprises. When it was forcing Microsoft to scramble to offer collaboration tools, Apple helped in the upgrade tread mill battle. In an earlier era, the top exec gets the latest and greatest laptop every six months with latest Office pre-installed and starts belting out documents in the latest format. IT will upgrade rest of the corp. But Apple took all the top execs with its iPad, and now PC is not the latest toy these top honchos were getting. Side effect: The corporate upgrade treadmill slowed down significantly.

    Now it is going for the last section that really needs all the bells and whistles of a full fledged office suite. Instead of spending the money to reinvent the wheel inside google docs, it is just using the well established code base of OpenOffice and the ODF. Even though Microsoft lost the mind share and the market share in percentage terms, its cash cows were producing milk at the same old prodigal rate. Cutting off a significant portion of the MsOffice revenue stream is important for Google's business ops in other spheres. Else Microsoft will under cut it. It even tried to pay people to use Bing.

    Google does not really want to make much money off its google docs franchise. It uses it just to crimp the revenue stream of Microsoft. It is making money elsewhere.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Google is very strategic. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      ...It will sustain losses year after year to deny revenue to the competition. Once the competition folds it has the market for itself. Look how long it was able to sustain losses to gain dominance with XBox franchise.

      It didn't work and Microsoft has little hope of ever recovering its losses.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  10. Does MS Office save ODF files okay by scottme · · Score: 1

    In a word: no. A colleague who knows I prefer LibreOffice thought he was being helpful by sending me a presentation for review in odp format. He'd created and saved it in Powerpoint.

    Guess what? LibreOffice can't make any sense of it. Google Docs can't make any sense of it. But Powerpoint doesn't have a problem with it. If I open it with an archive manager it seems to have the right kind of structure, but the content xml file is so full of boilerplate (font definitions and other crap) that I can't actually find the content. I have to assume the file is some proprietary version of ODP that only Powerpoint understands.

  11. I doubt this "upgrade" was for the users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so Google can "read' more content and deliver more ads, gather more "intel" on users. I'm not a troll, BTW. I'm a guy who is concerned about the rapid and ridiculous surrender of data to third parties who will and are turning it over to whomever hands them a warrant. Innocent people get caught up in these dragnets.

    Kids, keep your data under your own control. You'll thank yourself later. I promise.

    1. Re: I doubt this "upgrade" was for the users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is why it is important to be able to export/import ODF format so you can use whatever tool that is useful.

  12. Must not yet have made it to my part of the US by questro · · Score: 1

    I do not yet see the functionality in Google Drive. In the "new" layout, there is no option to open an .odt, .ods, .odp file with the Google products Docs, Sheets, Slides. In the "old" layout of Google Drive, I can open the file, but it makes a copy of the file rather than editing the ODF based file. So it looks like I would not be able to edit the same file with the Google tools, then move to a laptop and use LibreOffice on the same file via Google Drive. In place ODF editing not there yet for me...

  13. Zoho has your back, but nobody seems to know.... by Ragica · · Score: 2

    Zoho Docs has supported ODT for some time. It's sad so few know about it. Their app Zoho Writer even supports editing ODT on android (and perhaps other platforms?). I was amazed when I stumbled on this functionality entirely by accident. The Zoho Writer app also supports opening files from Google Drive and Dropbox... so technically you could say that it supports editing ODT on those platforms as well.

    Furthermore, Zoho has a desktop file sync client that supports Linux, unlike Google who has has seemingly utterly failed to provide a linux client despite promising it when Drive launched.

    Way too little, way too late from Google, as far as I'm concerned.

    (My documents are fairly simple, so I'm not sure how technically complete the ODT support is. But it's worked for me.)

  14. Excellent! Finally, standard formats by dwheeler · · Score: 1

    This is excellent news. It's absurd that so many typical documents are stuck in proprietary formats. As stuff changes we should be able to read older documents using any tool we'd like. This is a major step along the way; there are now even more systems that support open document format. Congrats to Google!

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  15. Re:Google is not as strategic as MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not by one helluva long shot.

    I was excited about google docs at one point. I even got certified in google apps. I thought there was real potential.

    But google has proved, over, and over again, that if something is not directly connected to it's ad revenue, it is put on a distant back burner.

    Google docs suck. The syncing is horrid. There is no client for Linux. Dropbox, and Evernote, work much *much* better. There are serious bugs that have been around for years, but Google still has not fixed them. There is no real support. Even the document searching sucks.

    If google hopes to compete with an entrenched leader, like MS, google must do *much* better.

    MS is much more strategic. MS started selling office for $10 though it's HUP program. MS created a cloud service. MS rigged OOXML being called an ISO standard.

  16. Unexplained acronyms by jtara · · Score: 1

    What would a lazy slashdot post be without a few unexplained acronyms?

    Next up, support for PQZ, RUO, U89, and VUI files!

  17. WTF? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    What business of a storage medium is it to tell documents what format they can be?
    We wouldn't accept it if a usb stick refused to work with autocad files. How is this different?

    I store all sorts of gunk on Google Drive and I don't expect it to 'support' or not 'support' it. I just expect it to hang onto it.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  18. Re:who needs comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, and LaTeX is just a weird spelling for a type of rubber

  19. Re:Zoho has your back, but nobody seems to know... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Google's support for critical open source infrastructure like Libreoffice has in general been pathetic. Much of the blame for that would appear to lie with that same Chris Dibona.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  20. Re:Google is not as strategic as MS by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    My S&P400 company gives us all both MsOffice and Google docs. Free to use whatever we want. I see Google docs being preferred over MsOffice for almost all the documents. Some fancy presentations with animations is the only time people fire up MsOffice. Send a link to all, and they get the most updated version of the document, don't have to bother working through comments and change history and emailing docs back and forth. Almost all the corporate back office forms are google spreadsheets now. All team leads directly post their budget proposals for the next year and it all gets consolidated and gets reported to admin.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact