Slashdot Mirror


Councilmen Introduce Bills Strongly Regulating UAV Use in NYC

SternisheFan passes on this excerpt from an Ars Technica article: On Wednesday Councilman Dan Garodnick introduced a bill to the New York City council seeking to ban all use of drones except those operated by police officers who obtain warrants. A second, parallel bill introduced by councilman Paul Vallone would place more stringent restrictions on drone use but stop short of banning drones for hobbyists and companies altogether. Both bills have been passed to the city's committee on public safety. An all-out ban on drones within the metropolis would be a quite wide-reaching step, especially as the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) seems poised to adopt more permissive rules, with respect to commercial interests in particular. Earlier this year, the FAA formally granted six Hollywood companies exemptions to drone ban rules. A couple of months later, the FAA granted similar exemptions for construction site monitoring and oil rig flare stack inspections. The article explains that Vallone's bill is less restrictive, and rather than propose an outright ban "lists 10 instances where operating a UAV would be illegal, including at night, out of the operator's eyesight, or above 400 ft high. Outside of those conditions, hobbyists and commercial interests would be free to fly drones."

4 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. hooray for the government by jehan60188 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm so glad our benevolent overlords are here to keep us safe!
    Banning things like UAVs, guns, and large sodas is definitely the best way to keep citizens (who are all too stupid to make their own decisions) healthy.
    But thank goodness cops can still use guns and UAVs; they never abuse their power, and are always fully trained, so we know nothing could possibly go wrong!

    Never mind educating and empowering them to make their own decisions, who has time for that?! No, we citizens want to be spoon fed. And as long as we have a good TV signal while american idol is on, we won't really care what you do to us

    1. Re: hooray for the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If gun bans work, then please explain Chicago.

  2. Re: here's a better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is that everything in politics revolves around money. These guys get to the top using money and create laws based on money. So, sorry. If you have enough money to buy yourself the laws you want you likely don't care about flying a drone in a park.

  3. FAA has sole jurisdiction by gavron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the United States the Federal Aviation Administration is the entity with jurisdiction over all airspace SURFACE to SPACE*

    This has been discussed on slashdot so many times in the last year wrt drones and FAA authority that it's beating a dead horse.

    NY Councilmen can posture and mumble and pass laws all day long but they have no authority over the air.

    E

    * Note that this includes surface to 400ft which some people believe is magically exempt from regulation... except the FAA has recently shown it's not.