Slashdot Mirror


Investigation: Apple Failing To Protect Chinese Factory Workers

mrspoonsi writes with the findings of an investigation into working conditions at a factory that makes Apple products. Poor treatment of workers in Chinese factories which make Apple products has been discovered by an undercover BBC Panorama investigation. Filming on an iPhone 6 production line showed Apple's promises to protect workers were routinely broken. It found standards on workers' hours, ID cards, dormitories, work meetings and juvenile workers were being breached at the Pegatron factories. Apple said it strongly disagreed with the programme's conclusions. Exhausted workers were filmed falling asleep on their 12-hour shifts at the Pegatron factories on the outskirts of Shanghai. One undercover reporter, working in a factory making parts for Apple computers, had to work 18 days in a row despite repeated requests for a day off. Another reporter, whose longest shift was 16 hours, said: "Every time I got back to the dormitories, I wouldn't want to move. Even if I was hungry I wouldn't want to get up to eat. I just wanted to lie down and rest. I was unable to sleep at night because of the stress."

14 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can still have more iPhone? The workers are there to do work. I pay.

  2. Why Apple? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is it Apple's fault or Apple's problem? First of all these are Foxconn workers. Secondly Foxconn manufactures hardware for a lot of companies, not just Apple.

    1. Re:Why Apple? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems I should at least read the summary before commenting. Replace Foxconn with Pegatron in my comment above, but the argument still stands.

    2. Re:Why Apple? by kuzb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because Apple made a statement that they would not do business with companies that acted like this, and yet, here they are doing business with companies who act like this.

      To think Apple has no influence in this situation is absurd.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    3. Re:Why Apple? by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it Apple's fault or Apple's problem? First of all these are Foxconn workers. Secondly Foxconn manufactures hardware for a lot of companies, not just Apple.

      Apple is profitable. Not merely "regular" corporation profitable. But the sort of profitable Fortune 500 corporations look at in awe of.

      Further, it's profitable per unit made. Its not making a few cents and selling billions of units. Its making serious cash off every single solitary unit.

      Unlike a lot of other businesses at the top of this exploitation food-chain, Apple can well afford to pay these guys a lot better, not change their prices, and STILL be quite profitable.

      That arguably makes their situation both a lot less defensible and a lot more newsworthy.

      Just as Nike in the 90s when they took major heat over thier sweatshop labor producing insanely profitable $120 runners. They too were a globally recognized brand selling a premium "lifestyle" product ... and its image conscious consumers didn't want to wear that guilt. And at the prices / profit margins involved they were paying for runners there was no reason Nike couldn't afford to treat its workers betters.

      Fast forward 15 years. And its Apple. Same situation.

  3. You have selected....... by Tailhook · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have chosen to rationalize the exploitation of Chinese workers, probably using a product you or your employer couldn't afford to purchase if manufactured by someone that shared your pleasant lifestyle. Your rationalization is characterized by one or more of the following possible memes;

    [_] Making iPhones in a Chinese factory is better than being a Chinese peasant
    [_] iPhones/Pads would cost too much if I had to pay my fellow citizens to make them
    [_] iPhones/Pads would cost too much given environmental regulations I vehemently insist on for myself
    [X] All the other manufacturers are doing it too
    [_] Some/Many/Most Chinese workers appreciate 70 hour weeks and breathing my aluminum dust
    [X] It's not Apple, it's Foxconn
    [_] It's not Apple, it's the Chinese government
    [_] They should quit if they don't like it
    [_] It's just capitalism at work
    [_] It's just communism at work
    [_] Apple's disposable workers are paid better than non-Apple disposable workers
    [_] Apple's auditors didn't find any serious issues
    [_] Some day the Chinese will be too wealthy to exploit
    [_] Your Android is Foxconn too
    [_] You're an Apple hater using Apple as a scapegoat
    [_] I also work 60/80/100/120 hour weeks at my IT job
    [_] Apple designers are in the US
    [_] The US did the same thing to the British
    [_] The US had slaves once too
    [_] The US has prison labor today
    [_] It's up to the Chinese to stand up to their oppressive government
    [_] There are lines of willing workers outside Foxconn factories
    [_] If any company were to stop the exploitation, I really think it'll be Apple
    [_] Your free Linux runs on Chinese hardware too
    [_] Foxconn workers think they have it great, so it's ok!
    [_] Foxconn worker suicide rate is lower than Chicago's murder rate
    [_] Foxconn worker suicide rate is lower than China's suicide rate
    [_] We can't pollute the whole world!
    [_] Half of all US households have an Apple product
    [_] If we don't exploit them they'll never develop
    [_] The suicide's families get the insurance money
    [_] You're posting from a macbook/iphone/ipad right now
    [_] There are suicide nets on American bridges
    [_] Interns in the US don't get paid
    [_] They don't beat the workers, apparently.
    [_] Why is this news? We expect this from China.
    [_] It's their country; we have no right to judge.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  4. Re:And whose fault is this? by CaptainDork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I started to write this and then I canceled because you're a troll and then I got pissed and started/canceled again, but anyway, fuck you and stuff.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  5. working in the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Every time I got back to the dormitories, I wouldn't want to move. Even if I was hungry I wouldn't want to get up to eat. I just wanted to lie down and rest. I was unable to sleep at night because of the stress."

    that doesn't sound that different from my years working in ops and dev in the valley :)

  6. Re:man up by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe you should move to China and work for Foxconn. Them perhaps someone would care about you.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. May I say two things? by riskkeyesq · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. Nazis 2. Hitler. There, we're done here.

  8. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All the factories that I have visited are, to put it mildly, LABOR CAMPS

    No. There is one HUGE difference between these factories and a labor camp: In a labor camp, you can't say "I quit" and walk out.

  9. Does Samsung or Google have any influence? by Brannon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most phones that are manufactured in these places are Android phones--yet we only here about Apple failing to protect workers. Cisco, Nintendo, Sony, Amazon, etc. all use these companies (Pegatron, Foxconn, etc.).

    But it's okay because those companies never pretended to try to enforce higher standards--that's what you're saying, right? with a straight face and everything.

  10. Re:What about other manufacturers? by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but what about contract workers in similar factories who make phones for Samsung, Huawei, Microsoft (that still feels weird to write) and newcomers like OnePlus? I suspect that conditions are worse, simply because there is less external oversight.

    It's irrelevant what the conditions on those other products are because the companies haven't shouted from the roof tops how much they are doing to prevent the situation and don't have a wanky, shiny, HTML5 advertisement page linked prominently on their corporate homepage talking about how much awesome their supplier responsibility is than everyone else.

    Apple isn't being held to a higher generic standard. They are being held to their own standard.

  11. Meal breaks are generally state law ... by perpenso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... I remember my GF [grandfather] telling me that 'every 4 hours, they are required to let us eat'. even today, at my 'cushy IT job' I don't get a food break every 4 hours ...

    You probably do. Its one of those things that moved from union contracts to state law. Read your employee handbook, it probably says something about mandatory breaks and mealtimes after fixed numbers of hours. Or read the mandatory state labor rules poster in the break room at work.

    if my GF was still alive, he'd be furious for the things he and his peers fought for and yet we let drift away over the years.

    My grandfather's working days began a little later than yours, late 1920s. Blue collar union jobs from the late 1930s until retirement in the 70s. The way he explained it to me is that unions were less important today because the things the unions fought for back in the day are generally in the law now. So we're protect by law not union contract now. That the things his union fought for in the 60s and 70s, and that he went on strike over (reluctantly), were largely BS and they lost money by striking. The additional benefits, relative to the offer on the table before going on strike, never making up for the lost wages. That it was just politics and posturing of the union, and the union looking out for the union organization not the workers they represented. Every union is different but his was a very large well known union so I think his story may be more of the norm not the exception.

    After 30 years working in software development I've not seen a return to the bad old days as you suggest. Never had an employer that didn't recognize breaks and meals. About all you could say is that it was left to you, no manager was clocking you in and out. Certainly no manager was upset when you disappeared for half an hour and reappeared with a soft drink cup from a local fast food joint in your hand. The only time my managers ever cared was after a bogus complaint to the state by a disgruntled former employee, yes myself and coworkers thought the complaint bogus. Then managers were all annoying asking if you've been working four hours yet and haven't taken a meal break. They didn't care if you were in the flow coding and not hungry yet and wanted to continue for another hour before grabbing a bite, they had to interrupt you. And if you really wanted to stress them out say you brought a sandwich and wanted to eat at your desk while you worked. Losing the flexibility to take a meal at 3 to 5 hours of work depending on your focus and/or your hunger did not improve things.

    The closest you could get to the bad old days was that we were salary and didn't get paid overtime. However at the one company where we put in a ton of overtime we got pretty decent bonuses that made up for it. Now are all companies decent in this manner, no, certainly not. But as "white collared" salaried employees things were not that different from the old strong union days. Want to talk about unpaid overtime, talk to an uncle who worked on the space program in the 50s and 60s. Of course in their mind they were on a holy crusade and happy to do it, even more so than a recent college grad offered a job at a video game company.