Slashdot Mirror


Study: Red Light Cameras Don't Improve Safety

An anonymous reader writes: Ars Technica summaries a study by the Chicago Tribune (paywalled) that found red light cameras do not improve driver safety. "[W]hile right angle crash incidents have been reduced, rear-end crashes that resulted in injuries went up 22 percent." Chicago officials recently claimed that the cameras led to a 47% reduction "T-bone" injury crashes, using that statistic as evidence that the program is worthwhile. But the study's authors, who "accounted for declining accident rates in recent years as well as other confounding factors, found cameras reduced right-angle crashes that caused injuries by just 15 percent."

They also noted that the city chose to install many cameras at intersections where crashes were rare to begin with. Chicago has raised roughly $500 million from red light camera tickets since 2002. "[O]fficials recently admitted to the city inspector general that they had quietly dropped the threshold for what constitutes a red light camera ticket, allowing the tickets even when cameras showed a yellow light time just under the three-second federal minimum standard. That shift earlier this year snared 77,000 more drivers and $7.7 million in ticket revenue before the city agreed to change the threshold back.

6 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. Study financed by by Snotnose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the institute of No Shiat Sherlock. It was always about the revenue, safety was a smokescreen swallowed by the gullible.

    1. Re:Study financed by by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What they are saying is there is a link between having fines as a percentage of income and having those fines actually have some real impact. Obviously the idea of a $100 fine to someone earning a million dollars a year is much like expecting a $1 fine having an impact on someone earning $10,000 per year. So for real impact and to reduce the number of motor vehicle impacts fines need to be a percentage of annual income so as to have a fair and equal impact on all people breaking the law.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Old news. by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We had them installed in Los Angeles despite no one wanting them outside of the city council.

    They then installed them in places that didn't actually have accidents such as busy though safe intersections.

    The result was actually an increase in accidents because everyone had to start driving dangerously to avoid the cameras.

    This was brought to the attention of the city council and they basically ignored it. The accidents were higher. People were unhappy with them. We had one christmas where some group of people wearing santa outfits put big colorfully wrapped cardboard boxes over the speed cameras that said "merry christmas". No one liked these things.

    Then after the systems had been in place for awhile and they did a finacial audit... they found the cameras weren't actually making any money because most of the tickets were getting thrown out of court by judges that also didn't like them.

    THEN the city council took them down... roughly about a week after that was revealed the cameras were disconnected or gone.

    Which really highlights from several angles what this was always about.

    Money.

    Safety has nothing to do with it. Nothing what so ever. It was money - period. That is all these things are about or have ever been about. Cash. End of story.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Old news. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually yes they did, due to the extra threat of photos people are more likely to slam on the brakes at the last second when it would be safer to continue through the intersection.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  3. Your reasoning is: by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People have been trying to make driving safer.

    Driving is now safer.

    Laws to make driving safer were therefore hysterical and stupid.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  4. Re:Tailgaters cause rear end crashes by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nope, the tailgater is always wrong, without exception. You keep a safe distance and you won't hit anything, simple law of physics. I do have the right to avoid blowing the light. If you rear end me, screw you. You were too damn close or driving too fast! I am not responsible for the people behind me in any way. I always do my best to allow them to pass if they are so inclined. You don't have to like it. Just accept it and move along.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”