Slashdot Mirror


Google+ Will Make Your Videos Look Better

ErnieKey writes: A new Google+ feature for uploaded videos has been released that automatically enhances lighting, color, and stability. Soon, it'll also enhance speech in videos. "As more and more people now also take videos with their smartphones, it makes sense for Google to bring some of the technologies it has developed for photos (and YouTube) to these private videos, as well. Google has long offered a similar feature for YouTube users, so there is likely some overlap between the two systems here. While YouTube offers the option to 'auto-fix' videos, though, it doesn't automatically prompt its users to do this for them. YouTube also offers a number of manual tools for changing contrast, saturation and color temperature that Google+ doesn’t currently offer."

37 comments

  1. Missing feature by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Automatically fix the dreaded Vertical Video Syndrome.

    1. Re:Missing feature by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Automatically fix the dreaded Vertical Video Syndrome.

      ^^^ YES YES YESSSS!

      Come on people, how hard is it to hold your phone like, you know, a regular camera when you're using it like a camera?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re: Missing feature by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      how hard is it to rotate your phone 90 degrees? Vertical and horizontal composition have been valid for 150 years - don't blame photographers for 90lb CRT's or lazy web design.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re: Missing feature by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      how hard is it to rotate your phone 90 degrees? Vertical and horizontal composition have been valid for 150 years - don't blame photographers for 90lb CRT's or lazy web design.

      When those videos are re-broadcast on TV they're seriously messed up. They have to be down-rezzed because the vertical resolution of an HD tv is 1080, while the vertical resolution of a smartphone video is significantly more. So you end up with these fugly videos that only take up 1/3 of your screen width on an HD tv.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Missing feature by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Automatically fix the dreaded Vertical Video Syndrome.

      You owe me for the last hour I spent watching all their videos.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:Missing feature by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Automatically fix the dreaded Vertical Video Syndrome.

      The fix is quite simple: the video recording software on mobiles should display a warning: "Warning: Hold phone horizontally to get a better video" or something like that. Of course, the warning should be easily dismissible if you really want to shoot a VV.

    6. Re: Missing feature by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      How hard is it to rotate your phone 90 degrees?

      Some of us don't use a phone to watch YouTube. It's easier to rotate your phone 90 degrees to watch landscape videos.

      Vertical and horizontal composition have been valid for 150 years - don't blame photographers for 90lb CRT's or lazy web design.

      That's true for static paintings and photos. Movies and videos, however, were always in landscape mode (4:3, 16:9, etc). Vertical videos only happened when phones were able to record videos.

    7. Re:Missing feature by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Make sure you watch their product review of the Rotato Express and the one about time travel.

  2. Youtube fixed my shaky phone video by wombatmobile · · Score: 3, Funny

    Youtube said my shaky phone video looked shaky, would I like it to fix it? OK, I clicked. Why not?

    The fixed video is a lot less shaky! I'm pleased. The parts where the girls are lifting up their dresses to show me their underpants are still dark, because they only did it in the shadows of the dance floor. But perhaps google will be fix that too some time?

    1. Re:Youtube fixed my shaky phone video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But perhaps google will be fix that too some time?

      Yes. It'll be called Google Porn - porn.google.com

    2. Re:Youtube fixed my shaky phone video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to understand why Google does not jump on this flourishing business.

      Are they stupid and think there is something wrong with porn, that masturbating makes you blind and all this bullshit?

      Weird, you'd think that at least companies like Google are smart and modern but apparently not.

    3. Re:Youtube fixed my shaky phone video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's hard to understand why Google does not jump on this flourishing business.

      ...

      Weird, you'd think that at least companies like Google are smart and modern but apparently not.

      Remember Tumblr? Yahoo acquired it a number of months ago and changed it because the openly searchable explict content made the industry and Yahoo's investors worried. Stuff is still there, but supposedly less visible in ways I can't care to google. Remember explicit Yahoo groups in the late nineties? Rife with immoral stuff, and an early form of today's meetup. It was very easy to browse thousands of entries. Those "Adult" groups are still there, but their directory indexing changed to make bulk listing less feasible. I think searches still show results, but stuff is a LOT less public than a decade ago, and Yahoo "profiles" for group members obscured from showing all the kinky groups and stuff people had joined. Again, I don't recall, but that's just part of the results that family-friendly US giants want. It works.

      "Companies like google" is not the same as 'Google.' Recall that Facebook and Google+ are both US SOCIAL NETWORKS (arguably much unlike Yahoo and Microsoft Live). They have a great pull in the US and stay away from full-on redtube sex (Youtube has report buttons but lots of full-length softcore FOREIGN movies remain available). Stuff is allowed to be obscured behind mature flags, if it's too hot for TV/very obcene, but if you show breats, they can pull your video. Some Japanese games show people self-censoring their screencaptures by moving a window to cover the naughty bits.
      If FB and Google+ were to jump to the [porn]-tube market, being based off the US makes them open to protest groups and lawsuits (a given, because lots of web porn gets copyright infringment takedowns anyway). As giant US social networks, FB and Google have lots more cash at hand, more eyeballs on them and a legal impact to make* . Facebook has some mature groups with enticing images, but no full nudity or out-right pornography. FB-hosted videos with Japanese hentai disappeared sometime in the past 7 years, probably due to investors cleaning up public images, or a few visits from the Japanese MAFIAA.

      *See recent stories about divorce papers over FB, school teens and employees pressured / fired by what they post and how lawyers in cited FB in 20% of [US?] divorces in 2010

  3. How about you leave my damn content ALONE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Offer it as a feature but don't goddamn adjust it automagically FOR me. I might want to push something that's "got a problem" for artistic or statement reasons, Google.

    Seriously, Google...when did "Do no evil" go by the wayside? You've had the motto. At some point you've kept to it. At some point later you threw that out the window and it's SHOWING...BADLY.

    1. Re:How about you leave my damn content ALONE? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1
    2. Re:How about you leave my damn content ALONE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offer it as a feature but don't goddamn adjust it automagically FOR me. I might want to push something that's "got a problem" for artistic or statement reasons, Google.

      This. Video is lossy enough as it is. Processing and re-encoding it isn't going to help. When it's stupidhumantricks.mp4 maybe that's OK, but if it's something like the Columbia disaster or the Chelyabinsk meteor, or even as humdrum as Yet Another Police Abuse of Force video, the less processing, the better. Sometimes every individual frame matters.

    3. Re: How about you leave my damn content ALONE? by Fwipp · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is optional, you dork, just like auto -awesome is for pictures.

      "Don't be evil" like applying contrast boosting filters to video they host is evil.

  4. Fuck off, Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You incorrectly labelled 80 out of 120 of my videos as infringing music copyright (none of them did).

    I used your "music swap" feature, and now all the previously silent videos have shitty music on them. Furthermore, none of the videos "belong" to me any more, so I can't (for example) monetize them.

    No doubt using Google's special effects will transfer all ownership of your videos directly to Google. Fuckers.

  5. What about the content? by houghi · · Score: 1

    If the content is good, the quality is not as important.
    And also what if I do not want my content to be changed? Luckily I do not use Google+, but YouTube, so Google can't touch that. HA!

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  6. coming soon... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear G+ User.

    We wanted to let you know that your recently uploaded video "catsoncatnip.mp4" was automatically processed and several fixes were applied. We hope you like the results.

    Also, in order to improve the user experience, we embedded a few targeted ads into your content. We are sure you won't mind as we have judged them to be unobtrusive.

    Thank you for using G+

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:coming soon... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, pay for service and you won't get ads.

      It's not complicated, many of us have been doing it for years. Apps for your Domain solved the advertising issue.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:coming soon... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 1

      i wasnt aware youtube and g+ allowed me to pay and skip ads.

      could you send me a link?

      --
      never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    3. Re:coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear G+ User.

      We wanted to let you know that your recently uploaded video "catsoncatnip.mp4" was automatically processed and several fixes were applied. We hope you like the results.

      Also, in order to improve the user experience, we embedded a few targeted ads into your content. We are sure you won't mind as we have judged them to be unobtrusive.

      Thank you for using G+

      Additionally, we are not responsible for any inconvenience caused by our automated content analysis system, such as inappropriately associating your video's name with other kinds of pussies.

      On a separate subject, your account has been flagged for adult content.

  7. They already offer this for pictures... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    And it always results in an ugly, degraded attempt at a try.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  8. You know.. by koan · · Score: 1

    I started using youtube more often, and I have to say that YT and G+ and the host of services offered are such a jumble of confusing settings and functions.
    It's irritating, Google needs to clean it all up and offer something cohesive, functional.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:You know.. by gigne · · Score: 1

      True. The worst bit is they keep moving or taking away functionality. I used to enjoy using G+ pictures. Now it is a nightmare

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    2. Re:You know.. by koan · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I was feeling like I was the only one, it's usage and GUI are becoming cryptic

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  9. Upcoming feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    automatically replace critical parts of the speech entirely, and enhance with new speech that is "pro-Google."

  10. So... What, Exactly? by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    There are only two ways to fix that; put big black bars on either side of the video and resample it to 16:9 or stab the person who took the video in the face. So I'm guessing you want Google to automatically detect VVS and stab the user that uploaded it in the face over the internet?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  11. They Offer "Corrections" On Youtube by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    They always say my videos are shaky, and that's because my videos ARE shaky and are supposed to be. The camera's sitting on my head, not a stable platform. If I preview the corrections they suggest, they're moderately less shaky and are also blurry. I think I'll stick with the uncorrected video.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re: They Offer "Corrections" On Youtube by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Cool, then don't push the button. Thanks for your contribution.

  12. About time for bug fixe by lapm · · Score: 1

    So they finally figured whats wrong with youtube's encoders that make everything look dark...

  13. How About A Working "Search" by CaTfiSh · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy if they'd just provide a valid search feature. Not sure what their reasoning is, but each year it sucks harder. Worse, it provided more features and relevant returns 10 years ago.

    1. Re:How About A Working "Search" by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      This is because when Google first rolled out search of Google Videos and then YouTube (shortly post acquisition) the search keywords and phrases where only the title and keywords / phrases that Google search experts added by hand for top viewed and educational videos.

      Since then, I understand that speech to text, author tags, and discussion comments all factor into the keyword pool. The pool is polluted as well as an active target for SEO schmucks. They also need to get rid of the thumbs up / down moderation and go to at least a 5 point scale. I wish more in meta-moderation was being done to identify "good evaluators" and let their scores and tagging carry stronger weight or be a sort criteria of it's own. The only usable system like this so far seems to be Rotten Tomatoes.

      Another issue is the fact that view counts are all that matter for ad revenue to uploaders. This has left subject areas with few people producing video content as easy pickings for low production value tripe. About the only areas with enough competition and/or ethics to produce good production value seem to be gaming and hardware reviews and science education.

  14. Multitrack Audio by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

    I've said it before, and I will say it again. Make people upload source video with separate audio tracks for original content, verbal commentary (over dubs), and added music / SFX. I am so f'ing sick of having to listen to some idiots crap choice in music to watch an instructional or useful video. Even worse when I can't hear the explanation over the music track.

    I am almost completely fine with the MPAA / ASCAP / etc. pulling videos with music tracks under DMCA if it would teach amateurs to stop adding soundtracks to otherwise useful or entertaining content.

  15. But for audio synchronization, audio compression, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But for audio synchronization, audio compression, & audio gain, fuggedaboutit. Google ain't doing shit for you until you get their stock above $8000.

  16. Shake correction makes me physically ill by DarkStarSword · · Score: 1

    Sometimes their shake compensation does horrible things to the videos that can make me feel physically ill trying to watch them. I don't get motion sickness in real life, but I the feeling I get while watching these is similar to what I imagine motion sickness would be like. I've experienced this when friends baby videos taken freehand have been automatically "fixed" by google - the original was certainly shaky, but it felt natural to watch, while the slow distorted image that you get after google does their stuff just feels weird, unnatural and sickening. I've also seen this happen to some video game let's plays - these videos shouldn't be compensated as the motion it's trying to correct is not coming from a shaky camera at all, it's from looking around and walking in the game. When it gets applied to these it is far far worse than when it is applied to a freehand video and I can't watch these for more than a few seconds without feeling ill. The image just continually distorts in different directions and moves constantly as it tries to correct for the actual movement in the game.