Slashdot Mirror


Sony: 'The Interview' Will Have a Limited Theatrical Release

New submitter clovis writes: It's not over until it's over. Sony Pictures has announced that The Interview will be getting a limited theatrical release after all. The Texas-based Alamo Drafthouse Cinema chain has authorization to show the film, and The Plaza Theater in Atlanta will show it as well. It's not yet clear whether the major theater chains will choose to show the movie despite the threats against them. Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Layton said, "[W]e are continuing our efforts to secure more platforms and more theaters so that this movie reaches the largest possible audience." There are unconfirmed reports that Sony will make the movie available over video-on-demand as well.

5 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. In other news... by jddeluxe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Larry Flynt has announced that Hustler is making a porn version of The Interview:

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/bus...

    Becuase Freedom!

  2. Re:Limited Theatrical Release by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh, Sony pulled the plug too.

    It may have been after the major movie chains did so, but Sony didn't let it go to anyone else either. Until now.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  3. Re:They realized how badly they screwed up by bledri · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wrong. That is Sony propaganda. Everything the Sony CEO said was in service of his own cowardice. Yes, some theaters backed out. Others major movie theater chains BEGGED Sony to release the film.

    More importantly, Sony could have released it direct to Video, to HBO, etc. You don't need to 'look for other ways' and if Netflix, HBO, and Hulu were 'afraid of getting hacked' They could simply have given it to the Pirate Bay.

    This was a decision made by Sony, not anyone else. You on the other hand have fallen for a pack of lies.

    "Some" theaters backed out? Bullshit, 9 out of the top ten theater chains in North America pulled out. They own a bunch of theaters that you probably think are "independent." They own virtually all the mega-plexes. Only Marcus Theaters (#6 and well under half the size of #5, or about 3% the size of the top five combined) didn't back out. Which is awesome but they are small potatoes for a "blockbuster" where you make most of your money on the opening weekend.

    Why the fuck would they give it to pirate bay? They spent $44 million making the movie, they aren't going to fucking give it away. Sony wants to make money with the movie. Right, Son'y's evil. That's why.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  4. Re:Limited Theatrical Release by bledri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh, Sony pulled the plug too.

    It may have been after the major movie chains did so, but Sony didn't let it go to anyone else either. Until now.

    Actually, 9 out of the top ten chains pulled the movie. Only #6, Marcus Theaters, didn't. They are less than half the size of #5 (Cineplex Entertainment). They have about 3% of the screens of the top five.

    It's hard to have a "blockbuster" release by opening only in the midwest on a limited number of screens. So Sony pulled it until they could negotiate with enough small players to make it worthwhile. I don't get all the hate toward Sony over this. It just seems like mob mentality to me, along with conflating Song Pictures with Sony BMG.

    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  5. Re:Dear SONY: by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 3, Informative

    How about because they are part of the MPAA cartel? Suing grandmas and kids all over the world. But yeah, their dubious "family members" (aka Sony Music, Sony Computer Entertainment) doesn't really contribute to their reputation, whether Sony Pictures have control over them or not.

    Watching Sony bleed has really been the greatest xmas gift of this year.