Slashdot Mirror


NSA Reveals More Than a Decade of Improper Surveillance

An anonymous reader writes: On Christmas Eve, the NSA quietly dropped 12 years worth of internal reports on surveillance that may have broken laws, including reports that were illegally withheld and the subject of a FOIA lawsuit in 2009. "The heavily-redacted reports include examples of data on Americans being e-mailed to unauthorized recipients, stored in unsecured computers and retained after it was supposed to be destroyed, according to the documents. ... In a 2012 case, for example, an NSA analyst 'searched her spouse’s personal telephone directory without his knowledge to obtain names and telephone numbers for targeting,' according to one report (PDF). The analyst 'has been advised to cease her activities,' it said. Other unauthorized cases were a matter of human error, not intentional misconduct. Last year, an analyst 'mistakenly requested' surveillance 'of his own personal identifier instead of the selector associated with a foreign intelligence target,' according to another report." Here's there list of reports going back to 2001.

13 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Cue Liberals by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This has got to be some of the laziest trolling ever.

  2. Re:Cue Liberals by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Authoritarians have infiltrated both the Republican and Democratic parties, emphasizing different aspects to allow them to feign a tug-of-war. To try and blame a single party is to ignore the underlying problem.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  3. No consequences - more of the same by rbanzai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like any organization public or private they will do whatever they can get away with, and in this case they can get away with anything. The checks and balances don't work anymore because elected officials themselves just ignore them and on election day all we have to vote for are more people just like them.

  4. Tip of the iceberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Firstly this is the tip of the iceberg, secondly what happens when NSA staff and their agents run for public office? General Alexander looked like he was going for a presidential run when he did his tour promoting himself just before retirement. He could have been President and had access to a lot of surveillance data on competing candidates and opponents. (Note, the CTO of the NSA does consultancy for General Alexanders company, and this is an insane conflict of interest that has not been addressed, he continues to have links to his former work colleges despite retiring! Their loyalty to him should not trump their legal duty to the democracy).

    Even lower level NSA staff and their allies will move into politics a more subtle shift but one that over time will turn USA into a dictatorship. If you want to see what that looks like, take a look at Russia and ex-KGB man Putin. He became President, and used his KGB links to ensure he stays that way.

    There's a damn good reason why we don't spy on our own. Ity undermines your democracy, and its why agencies like GCHQ are supposed to protect the privacy of Brits, not spy on Brits and hand that data to a foreign power.

    I see UKIP is having a lot of their telephone calls leaked, the most damning ones taken out of context, handy that. How many calls were listened to by GCHQ/NSA, recorded, and filtered to find the ones with political advantage? How many calls did you GCHQ, intercept on behalf of a foreign power that are now being used to undermine the UK political system? You f*ing traitors.

    1. Re:Tip of the iceberg by mitcheli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know so much about the GCHQ, but the NSA's publicly stated mission is to "lead the U.S. Government in cryptology that encompasses both Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) and Information Assurance (IA) products and services, and enables Computer Network Operations (CNO) in order to gain a decision advantage for the Nation and our allies under all circumstances." Hence all the "REL FVEY" material in those reports. It may be the tip of the iceberg, and it likely is because many of the systems and techniques alluded to in those reports are classified. They're classified to prevent our adversaries (to include UK's adversaries) from knowing what can be done. And with all honesty, I'm really curious how much flack the NSA will receive now that Sony was put into the dark ages by one of the least connected countries in the world. The threat is real, and organizations like GCHQ and NSA are there to protect the rest of us from these people. We may not agree with the way they go about it, but they do take their jobs seriously. And as for the analyst who was spying on her spouse, she's damn lucky she got a slap on the wrist. She could have gotten much, much worse for that.

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
  5. Re:Cue Liberals by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Authoritarians have infiltrated both the Republican and Democratic parties,

    Got bad news for you - this is the norm.

    You don't spend gobs of money and time running for office if you don't want to tell people what to do.

    You may tell yourself that telling them what to do is "for their own good", but it's really about the rush you get when large numbers of people do what you say.

    In other words, there is no "infiltrate", there is only "that's the whole point of politics"....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  6. "Oh look, a puppy!" by kheldan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Less than 100 comments on this /. posting so far, and the signal-to-noise ratio is as low as ever..

    The older I get, the more cynical, apparently. In my opinion, this is just the NSA throwing the U.S. populace a bone for Christmas. Is this redacted stuff they tossed us for real? Yes. Is it just the tiniest ice crystal from the tip of the Titantic-sinking-class iceberg? Hell, yes it is. They wouldn't dare show us the really bad stuff, which is probably closer to what The Machine (and more to the point, the other machine, 'Samaritan') from the TV show Person of Interest collects on everyone on a moment-by-moment basis, and they'd rather lose an eye than show us the really incriminating stuff; this is just meant as a distraction.

    We're headed for a Federal meltdown, I think. No worries, it won't be some shooting war like you'd see in the movies, where a small but determined underground army rises up to topple the corrupt, rotting-from-within government, it'll be a slow burn, with lots of talking, and papers shuffled around, and finally, at the very end, something involving men with guns, and it probably won't happen in what's left of my lifetime, but I think it's going to happen. Call it reform, to put an appropriately pretty and benign word to it. But when it finally happens, nothing will be the same ever again, and Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, and all the rest will turn over in their graves. Of course there's a still a small spark within me that believes that the system those men put in place so long ago will self-correct and prevent everything from completely falling apart. We'll see, I guess.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:"Oh look, a puppy!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my opinion, this is just the NSA throwing the U.S. populace a bone for Christmas.

      This is NSA burying a bone - by releasing it on a day when nobody's watching the news (except for us nerds) and nobody's writing stories about the news. It's like releasing bad news on a Friday afternoon, except that Christmas Day newsdumps are even less likely to be read by anyone.

  7. Re:How very transparent by grumling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I’ll believe the system works when we see perp walks and jail time.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  8. Re:Cue Liberals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really? I found it to be an accurate assessment of one of the major problems with the US; both Democrats and Republicans are more interested in expanding the power of the Federal Government than in holding government accountable for abuses.
    Democrats hate the thought of anyone determining their own fate and Republicans want to prevent anyone from enjoying the same advantages they do. Both Parties have become useless to the majority and only serve specific, rabidly vocal special interest groups.

  9. Re:Spying... on themselves? by SternisheFan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These are just the crimes that they are admitting to now. What scary to me is what they aren't copping to.

  10. Re:This is why .... by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've got it right! BO has been president for six of those ten years and done absolutely and positively nothing about it but the OP still blames the GOP. What happened to "the most transparent administration in history?" Typical liberal hypocrisy.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  11. Alll we can do at this point by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is raise awareness and keep things in the independent press. Nobody from the Government has gone to jail for any of these abuses, and this should infuriate people. Our TV based media is not harping on this, they harp on everything but holding the Government accountable for their actions. If you really want to make change you have to get people awake to the severity of the problems, normal media channels work for the same team as our Government.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.