Slashdot Mirror


What Northern Hemisphere Astronomers Are Missing From the Southern Hemisphere

creimer (824291) writes The New York Times Sunday Review has an interesting article on the astronomical night life when viewed from Sao Paulo, Brazil, featuring a treasure trove not visible to astronomers in the Northern Hemisphere: "Yet the Southern Hemisphere claims the three brightest stars of the night sky: Sirius, Canopus and Alpha Centauri. Canopus belongs to the Carina constellation, notorious for two things: the Carina Nebula, four times as large and even brighter than the famous Orion Nebula, and the star system Eta Carinae, which is expected to burst as a supernova or hypernova sometime in the next thousand years. (A scientist told the BBC that the explosion would be so bright that you would see it during the day, and you could even read a book by its light at night.) Alpha Centauri and Beta Centauri, the 11th-brightest star, are called "The Pointers," as they form a line in the sky to the constellation Crux (the Southern Cross). Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations but one of the most distinctive. It is visible at practically any time of the year in all of the Southern Hemisphere."

104 comments

  1. Erh... I don't get it by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, yes, it's true. And yes, it's interesting. But ... news?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      We should do something about this travesty! The northern hemisphere is being jipped! Drill baby, drill! Cause some massive tectonic action! Move the continents! Move them right now!

    2. Re:Erh... I don't get it by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      You might have noticed it's a slow news week...

      A young Brazilian woman discussing science - what's not to like?

    3. Re:Erh... I don't get it by ignavus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I mean, yes, it's true. And yes, it's interesting. But ... news?

      Yeah, not really. In Australia I have known for decades that we have a great opportunity for our telescopes because we see portions of the sky that are out of sight for all you Northern Hemisphereans. Hardly news. That is also why bases in Australia are very useful during space flights, when the capsules or whatever go out of range for the Nrothern Hemisphere.

      Oh, and it's summer here - a balmy 25 degree Celsius (=77 degrees F). And I live three minutes walk from the beach ....

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    4. Re:Erh... I don't get it by waimate · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it's also *tomorrow* :))

    5. Re:Erh... I don't get it by donscarletti · · Score: 4, Funny

      In 1766, the Royal Society commissioned Lt. James Cook to command H.M. Bark Endeavour to sail to the South Pacific to witness the transit of Venus across the sun from the southern hemisphere, where it would be visible. On this voyage he and his crew would become the first Europeans to see the East Coast of Australia and New Zealand.

      In the closing days of 2014, the news reaches slashdot.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    6. Re:Erh... I don't get it by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that it doesn't work like that, however I can see how you might think it with a steady diet of Faux News.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    7. Re:Erh... I don't get it by fabioalcor · · Score: 1

      Aren't some of the most powerful observatories in Chile? What they are missing?

    8. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Simple: Hemisphere Envy

    9. Re:Erh... I don't get it by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The three largest telescopes are in the northern hemisphere. But there are big observatories in both the north and the south. A lot of them are in Hawaii, which is decently close to the equator, so it gets pretty good all around views.

      The the next two super telescopes are already under construction, ESO's EELT in Chile, and the TMT in Hawaii.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    10. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1766, the Royal Society commissioned Lt. James Cook to command H.M. Bark Endeavour to sail to the South Pacific to witness the transit of Venus across the sun from the southern hemisphere, where it would be visible.

      You missed the best part... Unfortunately, after sailing to the other side of the planet, Lt. James Cook encountered a cloudy night and missed transit of Venus across the Sun.

    11. Re:Erh... I don't get it by aliquis · · Score: 1

      So wanna marry so I can get my citizenship?

      / Swedish male at somewhat worse years (35)

    12. Re: Erh... I don't get it by cammoblammo · · Score: 2

      If he was trying to observe the transit of Venus at night I doubt clouds were the problem. He might have had more success if he stayed on his own side of the planet.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    13. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American, I wonder... how do you do Christmas in warm weather? Or do you just do Christmas in July?

      Couldn't we just get some mad scientists to invent something to rotate the Earth 180 degrees? Or if they're really mad, 360 degrees.

    14. Re: Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? We only live once. This irrelevant. As long as you have bred another tax payer you have done your duty.

    15. Re: Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't rub it in. Australian life is a beach. The whole coast is a beach. North American life is a fight against gang bangers and political corruption. In Australia we have one continuous summer if fun. The north americans don't get it so their life sux.

    16. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christmas is just stinking hot, mostly we wear singlets, shorts and no shoes or thongs. Or rather more accurately just stay indoors in the air conditioning, was hitting close to 40 degrees celsius so the rains we got were a blessing!

    17. Re:Erh... I don't get it by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Oh, and it's summer here - a balmy 25 degree Celsius (=77 degrees F). And I live three minutes walk from the beach ....

      It's winter in Florida, but yesterday's high was 80 degrees F. And nowhere in the state is more than a 2-hour drive to the beach.

      Winter isn't what it used to be.

    18. Re:Erh... I don't get it by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      As an American, I wonder... how do you do Christmas in warm weather?

      At the beach!

      Seriously, I live in a sub-tropical climate in the USA and for years one of the biggest conundrums we had was what to do with Xmas stockings when most houses didn't have fireplaces!

    19. Re:Erh... I don't get it by smoore · · Score: 1

      It was a balmy 70 something here yesterday too. You don't need summer time to have warm temperatures in North Florida.

      --
      Shawn Moore http://www.teuse.net
    20. Re:Erh... I don't get it by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Pangaea Ultima or Bust!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    21. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It was a balmy -7 here yesterday. Warmest Christmas ever.

      I mean, sure, we have white Xmas, but where's the meter long ice stalactites hanging from the rooftops? How am I supposed to get into the Christmas spirit when my breath doesn't freeze while caroling?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re: Erh... I don't get it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's easier to observe during night. Less sun-glare.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Erh... I don't get it by styrotech · · Score: 1

      In 1766, the Royal Society commissioned Lt. James Cook to command H.M. Bark Endeavour to sail to the South Pacific to witness the transit of Venus across the sun from the southern hemisphere, where it would be visible. On this voyage he and his crew would become the first Europeans to see the East Coast of Australia and New Zealand.

      In the closing days of 2014, the news reaches slashdot.

      And in more breaking news just to hand... recent archaeological studies have unearthed evidence that European discovery of New Zealand might now be dated back to the 1640s!

    24. Re:Erh... I don't get it by ignavus · · Score: 1

      As an American, I wonder... how do you do Christmas in warm weather? Or do you just do Christmas in July?

      Couldn't we just get some mad scientists to invent something to rotate the Earth 180 degrees? Or if they're really mad, 360 degrees.

      A: yes, we do Christmas in July (well, some of us do) ... and Christmas in December - so two Christmases, if you want

      B: we put fake frost on shop windows, sing songs about sleighs and reindeer, and wear shorts and T-shirts and go to the beach and get sunburnt. I am not used to your wintry Christmas, so I have nothing to miss.

      C: the world has already been rotated 360 degrees by mad scientists - didn't you get the email?

      D: how do you do July 4th in warm weather? July is cold, and when we used to have "cracker night" (24 May - so one week short of winter) we would wrap up, sit around a bonfire in the street, and let off "bungers" (large, noisy, unsafe exlosive fireworks). Definitely a cold weather thing.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    25. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off my lawn/volcano/rift/shallow sea!

    26. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BBQ can happen with the 4th of July.

      But, we sort of have fireworks New Year's Eve/Day, so, I guess that counts as cold.

    27. Re:Erh... I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 2-hour drive to the beach from anywhere in the state? We (in Oz) have a tiny state like that too!

  2. "Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations"... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but, in terms of widely recognized asterism shape, Delphinus and Sagitta are both smaller. Sure, as the sky is officially divvied up and assigned to constellations, Crux gets the smallest area -- but those divisions seem about as respectable as gerrymandered congressional districts in the US.

  3. Not much I'd Say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Night sky is pretty shitty from Mauritius. I use GoSkyWatch planetarium iOS App and to match what I see in the sky, I set the illumination slider to 3.2. Yes that's what I see at midnight pitch black from my shitty location.

  4. I'm planning a trip to Chile by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just to view the southern sky from the Atacama Desert. Clear skies far from light pollution. I need to see these sights. Those and the LMC and SMC.

    1. Re:I'm planning a trip to Chile by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      The skies in the Atacama Desert are amazingly clear. Check out this video for a sample.

    2. Re:I'm planning a trip to Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walking through a field in the dark on the Chilean side of Tierra del Fuego, I looked up and gasped.
      I had no idea that the Magellanic Clouds actually look like clouds to the naked eye. For objects outside our galaxy, they are amazingly huge in the night sky. Most spectacular thing I've ever seen.

    3. Re:I'm planning a trip to Chile by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      I would like to visit there, but the weather is too unpredictable to ensure a nice view of the sky.

    4. Re:I'm planning a trip to Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been on the Argentinian side, on the road thru Patagonia and was stuck in awe at the sky.

    5. Re:I'm planning a trip to Chile by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      I, too, have had a strong desire to some day make a trip to the southern hemisphere to view these amazing sights. It'll be so amazing!

  5. Sirius by atam · · Score: 1

    Isn't Sirius observable in the Northern Hemisphere as well? Why the article sounded as if you can only see it in the Southern Hemisphere?

    1. Re:Sirius by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, it's visible from most of the earth, with the only exception being really far north, north of the Arctic Circle. In the northern hemisphere it's considered part of the Winter Hexagon.

    2. Re:Sirius by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Here in Washington state, both Orion and Sirius stay below the horizon during the summer. For me, the first fall sighting of Orion - usually low in the eastern sky, often while the weather is still mild - serves as a strong affirmation that summer is truly over and winter is on the way.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Sirius by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Orion is a winter constellation in the north. You are only missing out if you are too wimpy to go outside in the winter. :)

      But this is the case for anywhere, you need to observe year-round if you want to see everything.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Sirius by kayditty · · Score: 0

      Why the article sounded as if you can only see it in the Southern Hemisphere?

      it doesn't. it just says this it's a southern hemisphere star. this refers to the celestial equator, not "where you are on Earth."

  6. I just wish I could see the stars! by AaronW · · Score: 3, Informative

    The light pollution where I live is so bad that only a few stars are visible on a clear night. I frequently wish all the street lights could be turned off for a change. I doubt that the switch to LED street lights will improve things. In fact, I imagine it will make things worse for the local observatory (Lick) since it is relatively easy to filter out sodium.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    1. Re:I just wish I could see the stars! by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      So you want to live in coastal California, with all its conveniences and mild weather and high-paying jobs, but you want a night sky that looks like rural West Virginia?

    2. Re:I just wish I could see the stars! by AaronW · · Score: 1

      It would be nice. Fortunately I don't have to drive more than an hour or so to get a clear night sky but I do miss the sky from when I was young, before all the land was built up.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    3. Re:I just wish I could see the stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Heck, I've been to places I'd be happy to see the sky, the pollution is so bad. When the sun can be mistaken for an orangish moon, dim and hard to see, and there are no clouds, it's a sign. A sign of the Apocalypse!

    4. Re:I just wish I could see the stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here (in Seattle) it seems to be getting a little better with the switch to the LED lights. They are much better aimed (even illumination over a rectangular area with little leakage) and thus less total light: without the gaps, the bright spots don't have to be so overly lit. The lack of the orange glow is nice too. Its also much easier to see colors with the white lights. I think its safer, and lower light pollution. Still way more light that I would personally choose, but its progress.

    5. Re:I just wish I could see the stars! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I used to wish the same thing for the same reason. Then, my wish came true at about 4:30 AM and I learned a very important lesson: Be careful what you wish for, because you might get it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  7. All visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can see all those stars in the Northern Hemisphere... some of the time,
    some places. The one that's really trouble for Americans is Alpha Centauri.
    Key West or Hawaii are examples of where you should be able to see it.

    The real pleasure, as the article says & the picture shows, is the Milky
    Way, & the Magellanic Clouds. Pronounce the "g" in Magellan hard
    (like "get") if you want someone in Latin America to understand what
    you're looking for. And Alpha Centauri? That's Rigel Kent.

    1. Re:All visible by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Neither his native Portuguese, Magalhaes nor the Spanish transliteration Magallanes feature a 'ge' spelling, so we can assume the English got it wrong.

      Maddie Magellan pronounces her surname with a hard g in Jonathan Creek; that's good enough for me!

    2. Re:All visible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a chance 'murica got that wrong. Oh, and have you seen our nukular reactors?

  8. See nothing by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, the majority of humans now live in urban areas, and see little or nothing of the night sky at all, whether northern or southern. Perhaps I'm taking this a step too far, but would it be possible that we'll see a continuing decline in interest and support for astronomy and space technology as more and more voters and influential people grow up and live their lives without ever really seeing the skies?

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:See nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm,

      Well, the 'influential people' nowadays tend to be looking at balance sheets and profit and loss statements rather than the skies. On occasion they will look 'up' at their screens to check out their share portfolios and place orders or sells.

      But I'm afraid their eyes very rarely lift higher than that.

      We look down .... not up ... nowadays.

      Get with the program. :)

    2. Re:See nothing by fufufang · · Score: 1

      Probably not. GLONASS is a recent addition to the smartphones. It is space technology. They also want to use satellite to track the planes, rather than having to pick up the black boxes when bad things happen. I think people will interact with space technology more often. I think at least the interest in Earth-bound space technology will increase.

    3. Re:See nothing by ledow · · Score: 1

      As someone who got into back-yard astronomy a year or so ago, I can tell you that it's not so much the problem seeing anything as just never having looked.

      I live in London. Way inside the boundaries of the M25, the motorway that circles London and distinguishes "Greater London" from the green belt which surrounds it. I have for most of my life. I live in the middle of a large town in London, it's complete suburban sprawl and the parks are the only break in it.

      From my back-yard (which joins onto the back yards of 20+ other houses in a circle), I can see the planets and stars. We watched ISS traverse with the naked eye just the other night (because someone suggested it could be misconstrued as "Santa's Sleigh" to the right age of child). Nebulae are a struggle, but to image them is no more difficult than anywhere else (this is the bit where you need long exposures and motorised equipment anyway).

      As a complete amateur, I can tell you that with the naked eye I can see hundreds of times more than I ever expected. I just wasn't looking. With a telescope, I can see anything I choose to see. I have imaged the larger planets with incredibly short exposures through a very cheap telescope. It's all there to see. A bigger hindrance, to me, is that the horizon is artificially raised by nearby houses, fences, etc. not that the light pollution from all those houses is destroying my enjoyment (and, trust me, I've yelled several times when a neighbours outside halogen PIR light turns on just as I got my night-vision).

      I've been to Scotland, into the middle of the Highlands miles from anywhere, and seen Venus with the naked eye while driving there. The stars are "better" up there, but not magnificently so. I've been to Italy, into the middle of the North where it's all fields and no towns, and the same things happens - yes, it's slightly easier, and you can pick out the Milky Way easier, but it's not like the overlay you get on TV shows when they want to depict night-time. Unless you're in the middle of nowhere and spend hours acclimatising and have good eyesight or good equipment, it won't be. More likely to destroy your enjoyment of the stars is the weather, the cycle of what's actually up to see, spending hours aligning equipment and tracking (I don't like go-to technology as I feel it's cheating, so I do everything with push-to technology at worst, but manual hunting most of the time), and just the general difficulty of finding something interesting to look at.

      I made some photos on the first few days of tying a Canon SLR to my telescope with some hodge-podge connections (one of them is actually taken through the eyepiece by holding the camera close). I consider them the worst photos I have taken, taken from London, with only manual tracking available, which is what piqued my interest - if this is the worst you can do with cheap equipment and no knowledge, what could you do after some practice and good equipment? Have a look, and you can also see my equipment:

      http://www.ledow.org.uk/joomla...

      There's a ton to see, even in the middle of a city. The light pollution - sure, I imagine it can be an issue and put a threshold on things. But, for the casual observer, it's only really an issue if you live close enough to the city to be priced out of owning a garden anyway. Hell, the local astronomy club meets in a park NEARER to central London - so far, in fact, that I can't be bothered to drive up there.

      Don't believe the crap about not being able to see the night sky in an urban area. It's there. And even without any equipment, you can still see hundreds of stars, which is more than enough to start from (stars are VERY boring in any telescope that costs less than your car).

      Yes, I intend to bring my equipment to Italy next time my girlfriend drags me over, but I will still need the equipment, and still have the same hassles as at home (except it'll be mountains in the way and n

    4. Re:See nothing by JanneM · · Score: 2

      What I tried to say was more or less that without regular exposure to the night skies, fewer and fewer people will be interested in ever looking. Just seeing the skies clear skies once or twice will give you a "wow!" experience. But it's only once that pretty surface is old and familiar to you that you start asking deeper questions about what you're seeing.

      I think the same thing is happening in other fields. Naturalists, or green biologists, may be losing mind share to lab biology and to other fields - in part of course because there's more money in white biology, but also, I suspect, because fewer people are familiar with and interested in local biotopes, and don't realize there's a lot of interesting things going on.

      tl:dr: you tend to never become interested in things you have no personal experience with or connection to. And as humans become more and more urban, then fields such as astronomy will gradually lose mindshare. Regrettable but probably unavoidable.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:See nothing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And as humans become more and more urban, then fields such as astronomy will gradually lose mindshare. Regrettable but probably unavoidable.

      Maybe one day we'll solve this light pollution problem. We're already making minor inroads into it by going to more efficient lighting and paying more attention to reflector use and design.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Emission spectroscopy by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    since it is relatively easy to filter out sodium

    And the wavelengths the LEDs are putting out - emission spectroscopy is what you are looking for.
    One positive is a lot of the new lights have fittings that reflect the light more in the direction where it is useful. It's easier to design such things for lights that are not very hot.

  10. And by rossdee · · Score: 1

    You can also eat fresh strawberries and go swimming on Xmas day

    1. Re:And by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Hey, you can do that up here too... as long as you don't mind freezing your balls off.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:And by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I've actually gone swimming in the Pacific on Xmas day, but I've certainly done it right around it. The water is actually warmer then, but it's cold as shit all year anyway so who cares? Then you get out and get dressed quick because it's windy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Re:"Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations" by dwywit · · Score: 4, Informative

    Crux is very useful for navigating at night. From wikipedia:

    In the Southern Hemisphere, the Southern Cross is frequently used for navigation in much the same way that the Pole Star is used in the Northern Hemisphere. Alpha and Gamma (known as Acrux and Gacrux respectively) are commonly used to mark south. Tracing a line from Gacrux to Acrux leads to a point close to the Southern Celestial Pole.[3] Alternatively, if a line is constructed perpendicularly between Alpha Centauri and Beta Centauri, the point where the above-mentioned line and this line intersect marks the Southern Celestial Pole. Another way to find south, strike line through Gacrux and Acrux, 3 1/2 times the distance between Gacrux and Acrux, directly below that point is south.

    --
    They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  12. Re:"Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the topic of the Crux, I found out recently that it is visible in the northern hemisphere, in some places. Also, it used to be visible as far north as Greece. So yes, Crux is a better name than Southern Cross.

  13. When the supernova goes off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There won't be any stargazing in the southern hemisphere because the night sky is ruined.

  14. Open clusters by duckintheface · · Score: 1

    In 2008 I visited an observatory in Dubbo, NSW, Australia run by Peter Neilson. There were several open cluster visable that were more spectacular than any visible from the Northern Hemisphere. Half the sky is not visible from the US so we should not assume that we got the better half. :)

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    1. Re:Open clusters by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Half the sky is not visible from the US so we should not assume that we got the better half. :)

      Umm, no.

      New Orleans is 30 degrees north latitude. Which means that we can see down to 60 degrees South latitude (yah, 60 S is sitting on the horizon and the viewing is terrible, but it's still visible).

      Which means all we're really missing the the south polar skies. WAAAAAY less than half the sky.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Open clusters by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Tonight, look in the Northern Hemisphere winter sky for Orion's Belt, the line of three stars in the center of the constellation.. That is right on the celestial equator. Everything below it in the sky is the southern celestial hemisphere.

  15. Re:You want stars? I got stars for you to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about that Notch guy, I heard he has a house in the hills...

  16. Re:"Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations" by robot5x · · Score: 3, Informative
    For anyone interested in reading a friendly introduction to the southern hemisphere I recommend Richard Hall's 'How to gaze at the southern stars'.

    As you might imagine, there is a section specifically on Crux:

    In your mind, draw a straight line through the axis of the Cross, through the tip and across the sky. You will find the arrow is pointing at another bright star. You cannot fail to identify this star, Achernar, because it is the only first-magnitude star in that part of the sky. Approximately halfway along the imaginary line between the cross and Achernar is the south celestial pole... Once you have established where the celestial pole is, you can determine your latitude. The celestial pole is always a number of degrees above the horizon equal to the latitude at which you are standing. Surprisingly, you don't need complex equipment to make this measurement. Polynesian navigators used a notched stick held at arms length, or sometimes nothing more than the outstretched hands and fingers.

    --
    Hej! Nasi tu byli!
  17. No North Star or Big Dipper in the So Hemi by wardk · · Score: 1

    suck it southern astronomers!

  18. Ah, yes. Astronomers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The window-shoppers of science.

  19. Re:"Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations" by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    There's a little asterism at the Vulpecula/Sagitta border called The Coathanger that's arguably smaller than either of these. It's just barely visible with the naked eye under ideal conditions, but it's there. Pretty cool to spot, too - a real challenge.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  20. Sizes of Constellations by billstewart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The phrase "smallest of all 88 constellations" really irks me. Constellations aren't real things, they're imaginative descriptions of patterns people see to make it easier to remember which stars are which. There's at least one constellation "The Triangle*" which is smaller, or if you allow two-star constellations, "those two faint dots over there" is even smaller.

    (*Yes, I stole that The Triangle from Terry Pratchett; it's the name of a Discworld constellation.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Sizes of Constellations by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Constellations aren't real things, they're imaginative descriptions of patterns people see

      In astronomical terms, a constellation is one of the 88 areas of the sky defined by the International Astronomical Union. What you're describing are asterisms.

      Every point in the sky is in a constellation, and a constellation is normally named after an asterism in it. Some rather vague asterisms and their associated constellations were designated in modern times to fill in the far southern sky where the ancients hadn't designated any -- like Telescopium.

    2. Re:Sizes of Constellations by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      There's at least one constellation "The Triangle*" which is smaller, or if you allow two-star constellations, "those two faint dots over there" is even smaller.

      (*Yes, I stole that The Triangle from Terry Pratchett; it's the name of a Discworld constellation.)

      You may have stolen it from Pratchett, but it already exists in astronomical canon.

      It boggles my mind that astronomers picked this particular set of three stars, and no other, to call "The Triangle". There are plenty of sets of three not-particularly-colinear stars that deserve the title, from very large scales (the Summer Triangle) to much smaller scales (Orion's head).

      Then again, the figures people see in the sky are mostly baffling to me. Give humans a random sensory stimulus, and we can't help but invent meaningful patterns in it.

    3. Re:Sizes of Constellations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give humans a random sensory stimulus, and we can't help but invent meaningful patterns in it.

      Well, as a Libra, you would say that, wouldn't you.

  21. Been there, done that by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Heading south is a very good thing for astronomers to do. It's like visiting another planet: lots of new stars and stuff, and the familiar constellations are all upside down.

    I've observed from Australia, New Zealand and the Cook Islands. My first view of the Eta Carinae region was from St. Kilda Beach in Melbourne. My first view of the Magellanic Clouds was from a highway rest area just south of Echuca, Victoria. One night at a motel in Forbes, NSW, I needed the bathroom in the wee hours and padded out to have a look. I knew the Sagittarius Milky Way would be out at that time of the night, but I couldn't find it at first. It was directly overhead.

    Of course I went to Parkes. A nerd's gotta do what a nerd's gotta do. :-)

    I'm watching Top Gear in Patagonia, and while Argentina has better scenery, Australia has better weather. And much better roads.

    ...laura

    1. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus the only people you gang up on and run out-of-town are those uppity New Zealanders!

  22. wtf by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Scorpius (when did the name change?) is quite visible from Europe. It's easy to spot as it's the only constellation that actually looks like what it's supposed to be.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:wtf by careysub · · Score: 2

      I submit that Triangulum, the triangle, does indeed look exactly like a triangle. So that makes at least two. The image of Orion, the hunter, is also very easy to visualize.

      I do not know what you are talking about regarding the "name change" of the constellation Scorpius, it has been called that for all of the modern era. Are you confusing it with the astrological sign Scorpio?

      I found it odd that the writer asserted that the only thing she missed from the Northern sky was the Big Dipper. She is also missing one of the most spectacular sights in the sky, M31 (the Andromeda galaxy), and also M33 (the Triangulum galaxy) - not as spectacular, but still the third largest galaxy in the Local Group to which we belong.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:wtf by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I submit that Triangulum, the triangle, does indeed look exactly like a triangle. So that makes at least two.

      As does any grouping of three stars.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:wtf by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      We can see all of Scorpius from Arizona, and all the way down to just above Crux.

  23. I was thinking about a trip by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    but then I read "in the next thousand years" so I figure I don't have to immediately plan a trip to that portion of the planet real soon.

    Other than that, it would be interesting event unless there's tons of radioactive particles or a gamma ray burst (can may be nasty).

    And to think last time of a visible supernova was when Europeans spend all their time doing religious reading and writing, and Chinese did very little documentation (or if they did it got lost in bureaucracy of those dynasties).

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:I was thinking about a trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supernova 1987 has words for you.

      it too was in the souther Hemisphere.

    2. Re:I was thinking about a trip by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed the neutrinos from Supernova 1987a.

  24. Except... by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    ...that actual astronomers DO constantly use the equipment mounted in the southern hemisphere for observing.

    Perhaps the article would have made more sense if instead of astronomers, she'd said 'stargazers' - people who just enjoy looking at stars as opposed to actual astronomers?

    --
    -Styopa
  25. Notorious? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Canopus belongs to the Carina constellation, notorious for two things

    I do not think that means what you think it means.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Notorious? by careysub · · Score: 1

      Canopus belongs to the Carina constellation, notorious for two things

      I do not think that means what you think it means.

      Dictionary.com:
      Definition 2: publicly or generally known, as for a particular trait

      I think it does mean what the summary writer thought it meant. (I know correct summaries are a surprise here.)

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:Notorious? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Dictionary.com:
      Definition 2: publicly or generally known, as for a particular trait

      I suspect definition 1 (widely and unfavorably known) would be the one that would be inferred by the overwhelming majority of readers.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  26. Re:"Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations" by twosat · · Score: 1

    The Southern Cross appears on the national flags of many countries in the Southern hemisphere. It features prominantly on both the New Zealand and Australian flags, causing confusion for people unfamiliar with them.

    Flags depicting the Southern Cross: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

  27. What Northern Hemisphere Astronomers Are Missing F by temcat · · Score: 1

    Well duh, by definition, all northern hemisphere astronomers are missing from the southern hemisphere!

  28. Huh? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    You can't see Sirius from the Northen Hemisphere?

    Sitting bright and pretty, right there in Canus Major.

    They aren't sirius, are they?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Huh? by kayditty · · Score: 0

      you aren't "sirius," are you? for your pretense about basic astronomy, you don't seem to understand the concept of the celestial sphere.

  29. What The Article Is Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that astronomers in the Northern Hemisphere can use telescopes in the Southern Hemisphere. The European Southern Observatory (ESO) has built several telescopes in Chili for this purpose.

  30. Well, that's pretty obvious by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    What Northern Hemisphere observers are missing from the Southern Hemisphere?

    All of them.

  31. I can see them too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Antigua, 17N, we just did a star gazing night out and all the stars mentioned in the article are quite visible.

    1. Re:I can see them too... by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      I live in Antigua, 17N, we just did a star gazing night out and all the stars mentioned in the article are quite visible.

      I've observed from Costa Rica, at 10 degrees north, and the bulk of the southern hemisphere goodies are indeed observable. By a pleasant coincidence, the prime observing season for the Centaurus/Carina Milky Way (February to April) coincides with the dry season in much of the country. The Large Magellanic Cloud, however, is down in the murk from Costa Rica. The Small Magellanic Cloud and 47 Tucanae are worse. If you want to really observe the Magellanic Clouds you need a southern hemisphere location.

      Many equatorial telescope mounts don't like being in the tropics either. I've played with the leg lengths on my G-11, and once tried putting a fork mount (an old 8" Celestron SCT) together backwards, in effect aligning it for -10 degrees south instead of 10 degrees north. It almost worked...

      ...laura

  32. Re:"Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations" by robot5x · · Score: 1
    What's confusing about the Australian flag is their Southern Cross has five stars instead of the factually correct four seen in the more genuine representation of Aotearoa/NZ's flag.

    Always have to go one better, bloody Aussies

    --
    Hej! Nasi tu byli!