When FISA Court Rejects a Surveillance Request, the FBI Issues a NSL Instead

An anonymous reader writes We've talked quite a bit about National Security Letters (NSLs) and how the FBI/DOJ regularly abused them to get just about any information the government wanted with no oversight. As a form of an administrative subpoena -- with a built in gag-order -- NSLs are a great tool for the government to abuse the 4th Amendment. Recipients can't talk about them, and no court has to review/approve them. Yet they certainly look scary to most recipients who don't dare fight an NSL. That's part of the reason why at least one court found them unconstitutional. At the same time, we've also been talking plenty about Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act, which allows the DOJ/FBI (often working for the NSA) to go to the FISA Court and get rubberstamped court orders demanding certain 'business records.' As Ed Snowden revealed, these records requests can be as broad as basically 'all details on all calls.' But, since the FISA Court reviewed it, people insist it's legal. And, of course, the FISA Court has the reputation as a rubberstamp for a reason — it almost never turns down a request. However, in the rare instances where it does, apparently, the DOJ doesn't really care, knowing that it can just issue an NSL instead and get the same information. At least that appears to be what the DOJ quietly admitted to doing in a now declassified Inspector General's report from 2008."

Comments

Re:Not that I have anything to worry about but

[Anonymous Coward]

[...] before being shuffled off to prison?

This part sounds strange. Can it happen without trial and sentence? If not, how is the proceeding for that?

Apparently you missed Obama signing the NDAA a few years ago, quietly, on New Years Eve as a matter of fact.
They can take you off to 'prison' without charge or trial, without access to a lawyer, and hold you 'indefinitely'.
The 'proceeding' for that is simply an 'executive decision'.