Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Cracks Down On VPN and Proxy "Pirates"

An anonymous reader sends this unfortunate report from TorrentFreak: Due to complicated licensing agreements Netflix is only available in a few dozen countries, all of which have a different content library. Some people bypass these content and access restrictions by using VPNs or other circumvention tools that change their geographical location. This makes it easy for people all around the world to pay for access to the U.S. version of Netflix, for example. The movie studios are not happy with these deviant subscribers as it hurts their licensing agreements. ... Over the past weeks Netflix has started to take action against people who use certain circumvention tools. The Android application started to force Google DNS which now makes it harder to use DNS based location unblockers, and several VPN IP-ranges were targeted as well.

9 of 437 comments (clear)

  1. encouraging piracy by bloodhawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I use a smart DNS service in Australia to get my Netflix access. If they do end up blocking it (currently still works fine), I will just go back to pirating my content. I am happy to pay reasonable services a reasonable rate for the content I consume, but be fucked if I will accept being forced to pay for the overpriced poor content supplied locally in Australia.

  2. This is a foolish business decision. by urbanriot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Canadian I know all too well how many people are using services to access American Netflix content that far surpasses the Canadian content in terms quality and quantity (or at least greater quantity of what people want). I expect the majority of my friends that are using these services to access American Netflix will cancel the service outright if they can no longer access it and furthermore, they'll stop suggesting Netflix as a viable option to cable / satellite.

  3. suggested by Netflix by oobayly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I use unblock-us, as suggested by a friend who in turn was directed to it by Netflix staff. The stupid thing is that I would be willing to pay Netflix an extra $5 a month to view [US only] programmes, which would in turn go to Hollywood. Instead I'm giving the money to a completely separate entity. It's another case of "I'm throwing money at my monitor, why won't you take it"

  4. Re:Cat and mouse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Opening a US bank account etc. I agree, it's too much work for something that I can get for free anyway and just wanted to pay for because I liked the show enough that I though the authors deserved payment. OK, back to torrents.

  5. Re:Cat and mouse... by jamstar7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's all about the cash. Different markets have different rates because they can/can't afford a single worldwide rate. Somebody making 2, 3 dollars a day (I'm looking at YOU, Pakistan!!) can't afford to pay American rates for content. Licensing agreements are designed to maximise profits.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  6. Re:Cat and mouse... by Imrik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Netflix is obligated to give the appearance of enforcing its licensing agreements, it doesn't have to try to succeed.

  7. Re: Cat and mouse... by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep in mind that this would also mean that when military members are deployed to various locations around the world that you're restricting them to the content offered there.

    It translates to my netflix account being almost useless outside of the country.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  8. Re:Seriously... by dk20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just wish consumers would be able to take advantage of "global markets" the same way the large multinationals can.

    They are free to export their jobs to the cheapest source, but thanks to copyright laws and "region restrictions" we (the consumer) cant re-import products where they are cheaper.

    Real dvd's (not bootlegs) sell for like a dollar in China and $29 here. Why cant i import them and sell them for $10 and make a tidy profit?

    First-sale doctrine says i can, lawsuits says you cant.

  9. Re:Cat and mouse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's all about the cash. Different markets have different rates because they can/can't afford a single worldwide rate. Somebody making 2, 3 dollars a day (I'm looking at YOU, Pakistan!!) can't afford to pay American rates for content. Licensing agreements are designed to maximise profits.

    So what is the issue with someone in Pakistan paying full US price for Netflix? Because that is what Netflix seems to be cracking down on here if the story is true.